An Introduction to the Reportable Condition Mapping Tables Jeremiah Sable Consultant, The St. John Group Contractor to APHL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EDOS Workgroup Update July 16, 2013 Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
Advertisements

EDOS Workgroup Update Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative.
EDOS Workgroup Pilots – Kickoff Teleconference October 2, 2012.
Building a National Medication Reference Terminology:
The New Jersey Communicable Disease Reporting and Surveillance System (CDRSS) Recipient of the 2008 Nicholas E. Davies Award of Excellence for Public Health.
February 14, Help promote Plans for additional guidance materials Overview of new materials Provide feedback Agenda 2.
Disease Surveillance Modernization Project (MEDSS) How it works.
Presenting on behalf of the Stage 2 MU PH Reporting Requirements Task Force.
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Ebola Facts October 28, /28/14 Identify, Isolate, Inform: ED Evaluation and Management The following diagram provides guidance on evaluation and.
Protocol Author Process People Technology
Engineering Medical Information Systems
Health Care Information System Standards
ELTSS Alignment to Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap DRAFT: For Stakeholder Consideration in response to public comment.
TM Aggregate Reporting of Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Doses Administered Discussion of Option 1: Data Exchange Using CDC’s CRA System and State Immunization.
National Center for Public Health Informatics Reportable Condition Mapping Table (RCMT) - Cysticercosis (link to phConnect discussion thread)link April.
An Introduction to the Reportable Condition Mapping Tables Jeremiah Sable Consultant, The St. John Group Contractor to APHL.
Case Identification for the Missouri Perinatal Hepatitis B Prevention Program Libby Landrum, RN, MSN Viral Hepatitis Prevention Manager Bureau HIV, STD,
National Center for Public Health Informatics Reportable Condition Mapping Table (RCMT) -Botulism and Diphtheria March 24 rd, 2011 CSTE & CDC ELR Task.
Amy Sheide Clinical Informaticist 3M Health Information Systems USA Achieving Data Standardization in Health Information Exchange and Quality Measurement.
Best Practices for Interoperable Data Exchange Using LOINC Ming-Chin (Mark) Lin, MD Stanley M. Huff, MD.
TB Outbreak in Grand Forks
National Center for Public Health Informatics Reportable Condition Mapping Table (RCMT) Project: Overview March 17 th, 2011 CSTE & CDC ELR Task Force Standards.
ALOINC Order Code Project: Public Health Test Orders Ruby M. Phelps September 24, 2014 Laboratory Practice Standards Branch Division of Laboratory Programs,
An Introduction to HIS Hou Hai-feng.
National Center for Public Health Informatics Reportable Condition Mapping Table (RCMT) -Pertussis -Preview of STD, Tickborne - RCMT Distribution & Implementation.
Public Health Vocabulary Services (a) Gautam Kesarinath – CDC NCPHI Associate Director of Technology, (b) Nikolay Lipskiy – CDC SDO & Interoperability.
PHDSC session Readiness of public health information systems to support Meaningful Use of EHRs through health information exchanges.
Robert W. Pinner, M.D. June 4, 2012 Update on ELR in the U.S CSTE Annual Conference Omaha, Nebraska.
RCMT Mapping Overview Jeremiah Sable Consultant, The St. John Group Contractor to APHL.
Page 0 10/19/2015 Welcome to the VMCoP Meeting July 21st, 2009.
Page 0 10/19/201510/19/2015 Meaningful Use of Health IT: Laboratory Data Capturing and Reporting Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA CDC, PHITPO.
National Center for Public Health Informatics Reportable Condition Mapping Tables (RCMTs) and “the knowledgebase” CSTE Surveillance Practice and Implementation.
Terminology Services in the OpenHIE. Agenda Terminology Services Overview Terminology Services in Rwanda Distributed Terminology System (DTS) Next Steps.
MedCentral Health System Using Artificial Intelligence Software as a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Laboratory Results: First Increased Troponin –
ELR Technical Assistance Current-state and Case Studies June, 2012 CSTE Annual Meeting Wesley R. Kennemore, MD, MS, PE, Assoc. of Public Health Laboratories.
12/24/2015DRAFT1 Public Health & Lab LOINC - June 8 th 2012 CDC Vocabulary Team Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services (OSELS)
National Center for Public Health Informatics Reportable Condition Mapping Table (RCMT) - Chagas Disease (American Trypanosomiasis) (link to phConnect.
Page 0 12/26/2015 Welcome to the VMCoP Meeting August 17th, 2010.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.
National Center for Public Health Informatics Reportable Condition Mapping Table (RCMT) - Non-Condition specific lab tests & results and Drug Susceptibility.
National Center for Public Health Informatics CSTE & CDC Joint ELR Task Force Standards Workgroup Meeting - NCMT Discussion Jan 7 th 2011.
National Center for Public Health Informatics Reportable Condition Mapping Table (RCMT) - Intro (101), FAQ, Instructions for Reviewers March 23 rd, 2011.
Public Health Case Reporting - CSTE TIG Lab Vocabulary Review May 2nd Week – Bacterial Diseases CRSWg, LMCoP, VMCoP May 13 th, /11/20161.
Implementation of National Standards (LOINC, SNOMED) for Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results: BioSense Experience Nikolay Lipskiy 1, DrPH, MS, MBA;
1 Special eSHARE Webinar: Overview of ELR vocabulary associated with Zika, dengue, and chikungunya viruses New Conference Number: Participant.
National Center for Public Health Informatics Reportable Condition Mapping Table (RCMT) - Amebiasis (link to phConnect discussion thread)link April 14th,
Enhancement of the Communicable Disease Electronic Surveillance System with Syphilis Serology Tracking and Perinatal Hepatitis B Modules Hwa-Gan Chang.
Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 2 Clinical Information Standards – Unit 3 seminar Electronic.
NEDSS Messaging Solution Division of Integrated Surveillance Systems and Services 09/26/2008 Arunkumar Srinivasan MS, NCPHI-CCHIS The findings and conclusions.
Using Vaccine Preventable Disease Surveillance Indicators for Evaluation (of Reporting to CDC) Denise Woods-Stout Vaccine Preventable Disease Surveillance.
Utilizing BioSense Integrator Technology for Electronic Laboratory Results Reporting: A Technical Perspective W. Lane Chambers Healthcare Systems Consultant.
Functional EHR Systems
Laboratory Orders Interface Initiative
6th Annual PHIN Conference August 25-28, 2008
CDISC Use of LOINC Codes
Application of the Internet
Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Tuberculosis
Mandating hospital and commercial
Functional EHR Systems
Sandy Jones, Public Health Advisor
Introduction To Medical Technology
Public Health Surveillance
Department of Health Hospice Update 2018
Syndromic Surveillance and EHR Incentive Programs
Concepts of Nursing NUR 212
Introduction Diagnostics Data Service Existing Standards
Using Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis in California
Public Health Electronic Case Reporting (eCR)
A Scenario to Conceptually Illustrate
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to the Reportable Condition Mapping Tables Jeremiah Sable Consultant, The St. John Group Contractor to APHL

Resources for public health reporting What are the Reportable Condition Mapping Tables? The RCMT tables associate reportable conditions with laboratory tests and results that are indicative of those conditions. How are they used? They can be used to filter the output of clinical labs for test results that are of interest to public health. Which conditions do they include? The scope of the RCMTs is all conditions that are: nationally notifiable reportable at the state level reportable in sub-state jurisdictions reportable in US territories

What problem do the RCMTs solve? Which test results are of public health interest in which jurisdiction? Clinical Lab Hospitals Medical groups etc. Test results

Filtering the output of clinical labs RCMT tables can identify tests and results of public health interest. Clinical Lab Hospitals Medical groups etc. RCMT filter Public health agency Test results

Within a public health agency Test results Public health agency STD Foodborne Tb Hepatitis etc... RCMT Routing test results within an agency

The problem of non-comparable lab data ARUP labs LabCorp Mayo labs etc.... Quest labs Each lab has its own codes and names for lab tests. There is no consistency across labs. It isnt possible to map the test catalog of each lab to reportable conditions.

The problem of non-comparable lab data In order to solve this problem the Regenstrief Institute in Indianapolis created a universal code system for clinical lab tests called LOINC. The first edition of LOINC was released in Mayo lab sends a lab report to Dr. Jones John Smith Serum creatinine 1.2 One month later ARUP lab sends Dr. Jones a report on the same patient John Smith Creatinine, Ser 1.2 mg/dl It is easy for Dr. Jones to look at these two test results and see that the patients creatinine level has not changed over the past month. But Dr. Joness computer cannot tell that the tests or the results were the same.

LOINC Clinical labs do not replace their own test names and codes with LOINC. Labs continue to use their own names and codes. When their computers send out lab report messages the test results contain the labs own test names and codes, along with the equivalent LOINC names and codes. LOINC now contains over 45,000 lab tests. It is freely available and has been widely adopted. Federal agencies that exchange lab data must use LOINC to code the tests.

LOINC LOINC now contains over 40,000 lab tests. It is freely available and has been widely adopted. Federal agencies that exchange lab data must use LOINC to code the tests. LOINC makes it possible to aggregate and compare lab test data. Clinical labs do not replace their own test names and codes with LOINC. Labs continue to use their own names and codes. When their computers send out lab report messages the test results contain the labs own test names and codes, along with the equivalent LOINC names and codes.

The problem of non-comparable lab data ARUP labs LabCorp Mayo labs etc.... Quest labs Each lab has its own codes and names for lab tests. There is no consistency across labs. It isnt possible to map the test catalog of each lab to reportable conditions.

LOINC enables data aggregation across labs ARUP labs LabCorp Mayo labs etc.... Quest labs This problem disappears when labs send LOINC codes along with their own codes. It is possible to map LOINC tests to reportable conditions.

RCMTs map LOINC tests to reportable conditions Simplified example of RCMT content

How does it work? HospitalLab HL7 message

How does it work? Patient # LOINC LOINC test name Creatinine : MCnc : Pt : Ser/Plas : Qn : Hematocrit : VFr : Pt : Bld : Qn : Potassium : SCnc : Pt : Ser/Plas : Qn : Yersinia pestis Ag : ACnc : Pt : Isolate : Ord : IF Helicobacter pylori Ab : Titr : Pt : Ser : Qn : Rubella virus Ag : ACnc : Pt : CSF : Ord : Lab test results in the HL7 message HospitalLab HL7 message

How does it work? Patient # LOINC LOINC test name Creatinine : MCnc : Pt : Ser/Plas : Qn : Hematocrit : VFr : Pt : Bld : Qn : Potassium : SCnc : Pt : Ser/Plas : Qn : Yersinia pestis Ag : ACnc : Pt : Isolate : Ord : IF Helicobacter pylori Ab : Titr : Pt : Ser : Qn : Rubella virus Ag : ACnc : Pt : CSF : Ord : Code Condition Plague Rubella Lab test results after processing with RCMT RCMT HospitalLab HL7 message

Does this LOINC map to a reportable condition? Many LOINCs are non-specific and cannot be mapped to conditions.

Does this LOINC map to a reportable condition? For these non-specific LOINCs the RCMTs contain lists of organisms that cause reportable conditions. These lists contain SNOMED organism codes and names. RCMT virus list

What they are and what they arent A pplications – The RCMTs are not applications or software. They are repositories of facts that are used to identify lab tests and results of public health importance. B reakable – The RCMTs contain many thousands of rows. The tables can be subsetted to create program-specific filters. For example an STD program can create an STD subset of the RCMTs. C ase definitions – The RCMTs are not laboratory criteria for diagnosing notifiable conditions and they cannot be used to confirm cases. Some tests, like blood cultures, are diagnostic of current infections. Others, like IgG antibody tests, can only be evaluated in conjunction with other tests because they may indicate past infection. D ecision support – The information in these tables can be used in decision support systems. But since the tables do not contain rules or criteria, they are not sufficient for decision support. E LR – The RCMTs are for electronic lab reporting (ELR). They should be used to filter the output of clinical labs for test results that need to be routed to public health programs. F inished – These tables are not finished or complete. New diseases emerge unpredictably, new lab tests are developed, organism taxonomies are revised, medical knowledge expands, and coding systems like LOINC and SNOMED try to keep up. This is an ongoing project.

Reviewing RCMT content The scope of the RCMTs is all reportable conditions in all jurisdictions. This means the content of the tables needs to be reviewed with many CDC programs. Is the list of lab tests for each condition correct? Are there other tests that we should add to LOINC? Are there other organisms (or toxins) that should be added to SNOMED? How will we find out about new tests for each condition?

Interacting with Public Health Programs Based on past experience with many state public health labs.... Point of contact One person from each program should be in charge of interactions between the program and the RCMT team. This person will be able to answer many questions without wasting the time of lab and epi SMEs. Pre-review intro Prior to reviewing the RCMTs with each program there should be an introductory meeting with the RCMT team and appropriate people from the program. This will be a high-level overview of the RCMTs and what we need from the program. Follow-through After reviewing the RCMTs with a program new questions will arise and information on the program web site will change. So there will be some ongoing communication between the RCMT and the programs point of contact. Questions and comments about the RCMTs are always welcome.

RCMT contact information RCMT Planning Team RCMT Website (phConnect) :