Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2002 ADSA 2002 (GRW-1) (abstract 125) G.R. WIGGANS,* P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.C. PHILPOT Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Advertisements

ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to derive factors to predict daily milk yield when milk is sampled once per d for cows milked three times (3x)
Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
2004 H.D. Norman, A.H. Sanders,* R.H. Miller, and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricutural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
J. B. Cole 1, P. D. Miller 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2 Department.
Use of cow culling to help meet compliance for somatic cell standards H. D. Norman and J. R. Wright * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
2005 ADSA/ASAS/CSAS meeting (1) Historical examination of culling of dairy cows from herds in the United States H. DUANE NORMAN, E. HARE, and J.R. WRIGHT.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
2012 ADSA-AMPA-ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS joint annual meeting (1)Norman Comparison of daughter performance of New Zealand and North American sires in US herds H.D.
Derivation of Factors to Estimate Daily Fat, Protein, and Somatic Cell Score from One Milking of Cows Milked Three Times Daily M. M. Schutz* 1 and H. D.
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2002 7WCGALP (HDN-1) Performance of Holstein clones in the United States H.D. NORMAN,*,1 T.J. LAWLOR, 2 and J.R. WRIGHT 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) 2001 Variance of effects of lactation stage within herd by herd yield N. Gengler 1,2, B. Auvray *,1, and G.R. Wiggans 3 1.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Assessment of voluntary waiting period and frequency of estrus synchronization among herds R.H. Miller, 1, * H.D. Norman, 1 M.T. Kuhn, 1 and J.S. Clay.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA San Antonio.
Genetic correlations between first and later parity calving ease in a sire-maternal grandsire model G. R. Wiggans*, C. P. Van Tassell, J. B. Cole, and.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Synchronization Effects on Parameters for Days Open M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and R. H. Miller* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,
Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
Factors that affect abortion frequency in dairy herds in the United States R.H. Miller,* M.T. Kuhn, H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.
G.R. Wiggans* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
Dr. George R. Wiggans, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA
Factors affecting death rate of lactating cows in Dairy Herd Improvement herds R. H. Miller, H. Duane Norman, M. T. Kuhn* and J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
H.D. Norman* and J.L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
Minimum Dry Period Length to Maximize Performance M. T. Kuhn*, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
ADSA 2002 (RHM-P1) 2002 R.H. Miller, ,1 H.D. Norman, 1 and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Lactation Curve Topic 3091 Basic Concepts Melinda Klockziem.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
H.D. Norman*, J.L. Hutchison, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
Characteristics of milk ELISA results for Johne’s disease in US dairy cows Byrem, T. M. 1 *, H. D. Norman 2 and J. R. Wright 2 1 Antel BioSystems, Lansing,
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT
A National Sire Fertility Index
Domestic vs. imported AI semen for Holstein graziers in the US
Abstr. M4 Merit of obtaining genetic evaluations of milk yield for each parity on Holstein bulls H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* R.L. Powell, and P.M. VanRaden.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Reproductive trends of dairy herds in the United States
Multiplicative Factors
3Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON Canada
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
Presentation transcript:

Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350 BACKGROUND Estimated milk loss per unit increase in lactation mean SCS 135 kg during first parity 270 kg for parities 2-4 Raubertas and Shook, 1982, J. Dairy Sci. 65:419 DATA Holstein test-day records from first and second calvings during 1995 through 2002 First 4 test days required for milk yield and SCS First test day required to be <41 d after calving RESULTS (cont.) Partial regression of test-day milk yield (kg) on mean of prior and current test-day SCS: Prior SCS most useful for predicting test-day milk yield during late lactation for parity 1 and on test day 4 for parity 2 Current SCS useful for predicting test-day milk yield regardless of test day or parity but more useful for parity 2 Partial regression of test-day milk yield (kg) on mean of prior test-day SCS (current test-day SCS not in model): Prior SCS most useful for predicting test-day milk during late lactation for parity 1 and test-days 6 through 10 for parity 2 RESULTS (cont.) Partial regression of standardized lactation milk yield (kg) on test-day SCS: Test day Mean prior SCS Current SCS Parity 1 Parity 2 121 –0.142 –0.289 –0.235 –0.589 13 –0.155 –0.327 –0.216 –0.512 14 –0.163 –0.366 –0.252 –0.489 15 –0.197 –0.335 –0.260 –0.521 16 –0.249 –0.329 –0.255 –0.569 17 –0.284 –0.312 –0.246 –0.647 18 –0.295 –0.269 –0.291 –0.744 19 –0.346 –0.198 –0.286 –0.875 10 –0.302 0.021 (NS) –0.401 –1.209 1Mean prior SCS = SCS on test day 1 Test day Parity 1 Parity 2 Coefficient t-value 1 –54.6 –22.4 –61.4 –26.0 2 –40.9 –14.2 –32.3 –12.3 13 –31.4 –10.2 –25.3 –9.2 14 –15.3 –4.8 –16.9 –5.8 15 –9.4 –2.9 –13.7 –4.5 16 –7.2 –2.2 –18.2 –5.7 17 –0.7 (NS) –0.2 –18.0 –5.5 18 –6.5 (NS) –1.9 –21.5 –6.4 19 11.6 3.4 –20.8 –6.1 10 15.7 4.9 –45.3 –14.3 OBJECTIVES Determine test-day milk loss associated with elevated SCS on current and previous test days Determine lactation milk loss associated with elevated SCS on test days 1 through 10 RESULTS Maximum mean SCS and highest frequency of peak SCS on test day 1 for parity 1 and on test day 10 for parity 2: Mean milk yield on test day: CONCLUSIONS Test-day milk loss due to elevated SCS: Greatest for current test day Carryover effect for subsequent test days (nearly equal for parity 1, much less for parity 2) Lactation milk loss due to elevated SCS: Greatest for test-day 1 regardless of parity Much greater for early lactation than for late lactation for parity 1 Substantial for all test days during parity 2 (especially early and late lactation) Mastitis control most critical at calving or during early lactation for 1st-parity heifers and important throughout lactation for 2nd­parity cows LEAST-SQUARE ANALYSES Milk yield on test day n (n = 2, 3, …, 10) as dependent variable; corresponding test-day SCS and mean test-day SCS (1, 2, …, n–1) as independent variables Nuisance effects: parity, calving year, regression on DIM on test day 1, regression on days open (test days 7 to 10 only) Analysis within herd and cow Corresponding analyses without regression on current test-day SCS Corresponding analysis with standardized lactation (305-d, 2-times-a-day milking, mature- equivalent) milk yield as dependent variable and test-day SCS (n = 1, 2, … 10) as independent variables Test day Parity 1 Parity 2 Error df 121 –0.201 –0.581 214,526 13 –0.256 –0.664 213,672 14 –0.315 –0.711 212,927 15 –0.371 –0.713 203,369 16 –0.428 –0.746 196,010 17 –0.462 –0.784 176,296 18 –0.509 –0.797 171,801 19 –0.550 –0.805 165,397 10 –0.587 –0.780 143,748 1Mean prior SCS = SCS on test day 1