Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Advertisements

Dawit Kidane, Peter L. Graumann  Cell 
SMK-1, an Essential Regulator of DAF-16-Mediated Longevity
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Harinath Doodhi, Eugene A. Katrukha, Lukas C. Kapitein, Anna Akhmanova 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages (November 2004)
Long-Range Ca2+ Waves Transmit Brain-Damage Signals to Microglia
The Cilium Secretes Bioactive Ectosomes
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
The RecF Protein Antagonizes RecX Function via Direct Interaction
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Selection and Identification of Skeletal-Muscle-Targeted RNA Aptamers
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
A Ferritin-Based Label for Cellular Electron Cryotomography
Homodimeric Kinesin-2 KIF3CC Promotes Microtubule Dynamics
Budding Yeast Has a Minimal Endomembrane System
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
A Super-Assembly of Whi3 Encodes Memory of Deceptive Encounters by Single Cells during Yeast Courtship  Fabrice Caudron, Yves Barral  Cell  Volume 155,
The Conserved NDR Kinase Orb6 Controls Polarized Cell Growth by Spatial Regulation of the Small GTPase Cdc42  Maitreyi Das, David J. Wiley, Xi Chen, Kavita.
Distinct Autophagosomal-Lysosomal Fusion Mechanism Revealed by Thapsigargin- Induced Autophagy Arrest  Ian G. Ganley, Pui-Mun Wong, Noor Gammoh, Xuejun.
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Katie S. Kindt, Gabriel Finch, Teresa Nicolson  Developmental Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Marko Kaksonen, Christopher P. Toret, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 19, Pages (October 2009)
Mitochondria Restrict Growth of the Intracellular Parasite Toxoplasma gondii by Limiting Its Uptake of Fatty Acids  Lena Pernas, Camilla Bean, John C.
Proteolytic Cleavage of Opa1 Stimulates Mitochondrial Inner Membrane Fusion and Couples Fusion to Oxidative Phosphorylation  Prashant Mishra, Valerio.
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
A Role of Receptor Notch in Ligand cis-Inhibition in Drosophila
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Extracellular Regulated Kinase Phosphorylates Mitofusin 1 to Control Mitochondrial Morphology and Apoptosis  Aswin Pyakurel, Claudia Savoia, Daniel Hess,
Regulation of Golgi Cisternal Progression by Ypt/Rab GTPases
Characterization of MTMR3
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Robert T. Wheeler, Lucy Shapiro  Molecular Cell 
The Scaffold Protein Atg11 Recruits Fission Machinery to Drive Selective Mitochondria Degradation by Autophagy  Kai Mao, Ke Wang, Xu Liu, Daniel J. Klionsky 
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Dawit Kidane, Peter L. Graumann  Cell 
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Cargo Regulates Clathrin-Coated Pit Dynamics
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2005)
Katie L. Zobeck, Martin S. Buckley, Warren R. Zipfel, John T. Lis 
The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Heterogeneous MAC Initiator and Pore Structures in a Lipid Bilayer by Phase-Plate Cryo-electron Tomography  Thomas H. Sharp, Abraham J. Koster, Piet Gros 
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Stress-Induced Nuclear-to-Cytoplasmic Translocation of Cyclin C Promotes Mitochondrial Fission in Yeast  Katrina F. Cooper, Svetlana Khakhina, Stephen K.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages 383-395 (October 2006) Mitochondrial Inner-Membrane Fusion and Crista Maintenance Requires the Dynamin- Related GTPase Mgm1  Shelly Meeusen, Rachel DeVay, Jennifer Block, Ann Cassidy-Stone, Sarah Wayson, J. Michael McCaffery, Jodi Nunnari  Cell  Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages 383-395 (October 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.021 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Mgm1 Is Required for Mitochondrial Fusion In Vitro (A) Schematic of in vitro mitochondrial fusion assay. (B) Fluorescent images of fusion reactions with m-GFP and m-dsRed mitochondria from MGM1 (Ba), mgm1-5 (Bb), and mgm1-7 strains (Bc) at the restrictive temperature. White arrowheads indicate fused mitochondria. Bar = 2.0 μm. (C) Comparison of mitochondrial fusion efficiency in MGM1 and mgm1ts mitochondria at the permissive (gray bars) and restrictive temperatures (black bars). Fusion efficiency of mgm1ts mitochondria is expressed as a percentage of wild-type fusion, which averaged 15% of total mitochondria. In this and all other figures, data are represented as mean ± SEM. Cell 2006 127, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.021) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 mgm1ts Mitochondria Form Deformed Mitochondrial Fusion Intermediates at Nonpermissive Temperature In Vitro (A) Fluorescent image of a wild-type deformed mitochondrial intermediate. Panels are FITC channel (Aa), rhodamine channel (Ab), and overlay (Ac and Ad). White shading in (Ad) delineates area where red and green fluorophores are juxtaposed, which is defined as the inner-membrane interface. Bar = 1.0 μm. (B) Comparison of the abundance of fused (black bars) and deformed (gray bars) structures that accumulate in wild-type and mgm1ts mitochondria during the in vitro fusion assay at the restrictive temperature. Fusion efficiency of mgm1ts mitochondria and their ability to form deformed structures are expressed as a percentage of wild-type, which averaged 15% and 9% of total mitochondria, respectively. Cell 2006 127, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.021) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mgm1 Is Not Required for Mitochondrial Outer-Membrane Fusion In Vitro (A) Schematic of in vitro mitochondrial outer-membrane fusion assay. (B) Fluorescence images of completed homoallelic stage 1 fusion reactions containing MGM1 (Ba), mgm1-5 (Bb), and mgm1-7 (Bc) mitochondria labeled with OM45GFP/m-dsRed and m-BFP. Arrows indicate outer-membrane-fused structures. Bar = 2.0 μm. Below (Ba)–(Bc) are magnified images of representative outer-membrane-fused structures. (C) Comparison of the abundance of outer-membrane-fused structures formed by homoallelic reaction of mitochondria isolated from MGM1 under stage 1 conditions and mgm1ts strains under stage 2 conditions at the restrictive temperature of 37°C. Fusion efficiency of mgm1ts mitochondria is expressed as a percentage of wild-type, which averaged 9% of total mitochondria. (D) Representative fluorescence image of outer-membrane-fused mitochondria formed from stage 2 fusion reactions containing mgm1-6 mitochondria at the restrictive temperature of 37°C. (Da) shows FITC channel, (Db) shows rhodamine/DAPI channels, and (Dc) is an overlay. Bar = 1.0 μm. (E) Representative electron micrographs of mgm1ts mitochondria subjected to stage 2 conditions at the restrictive temperature of 37°C. Bar = 1.0 μm. Cell 2006 127, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.021) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Inner-Membrane Interfaces Accumulate in mgm1-5 Mitochondria In Vivo Immediately upon Shifting to Restrictive Temperatures Representative electron micrographs are shown of mitochondrial morphologies in mgm1-5 cells after shifting to the restrictive temperature of 37°C for 0 min (Aa), 5 min (Ba and Ca), and 20 min (Da and Ea). Black arrowheads indicate inner-membrane interfaces. Bar in top row = 1.0 μm. (Ab)–(Eb) show magnified areas of (Aa)–(Ea). Cell 2006 127, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.021) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Functional Mgm1 Is Required on Both Mitochondrial Partners to Promote Fusion of Mitochondrial Inner Membranes (A) Comparison of mitochondrial fusion efficiency in heteroallelic reactions containing MGM1 and mgm1ts mitochondria at the restrictive temperature. (B) Comparison of mitochondrial fusion in the homoallelic mgm1-6 and mgm1-7 reactions and the heteroallelic reaction containing mgm1-6 mitochondria and mgm1-7 mitochondria performed at the permissive temperature of 23°C. Fusion efficiency of mgm1ts mitochondria is expressed as a percentage of wild-type fusion, which averaged 10% of total mitochondria. Cell 2006 127, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.021) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Mgm1 Tethers Opposing Mitochondrial Inner Membranes by Acting In trans at Inner-Membrane Interfaces (A) Electron micrographs of outer-membrane-fused MGM1 (top panel) formed under stage 1 conditions and outer-membrane-fused mgm1-6 (bottom panel) mitochondria formed under stage 2 conditions at restrictive temperature. On the right are percentages of outer-membrane-fused mitochondria for each mgm1 allele with wild-type and aberrant mgm1-6 inner-membrane interface morphology. (B) FlAsH labeling of mixtures of m-dsRed-labeled Mgm1TC mitochondria and m-BFP-labeled Mgm1TC mitochondria (Ba) and m-dsRed-labeled Mgm1 mitochondria and m-BFP-labeled Mgm1 mitochondria (Bb) under stage 1 conditions. Bottom panels are magnifications of representative outer-membrane-fused structures containing inner-membrane interfaces. Scale bar = 0.5 μm. (C) Immunoelectron microscopy analysis of Mgm1MYC and Mgm1HA localization in a stage 1 heteroallelic reaction of Mgm1MYC mitochondria and Mgm1HA mitochondria. (Ca) and (Cb) show two representative images. Twelve nanometer gold particles (red arrowheads) indicate immunolabeled MYC epitope; 6 nm gold particles (black arrowheads) indicate immunolabeled HA epitope. (D) Immunoprecipitation of Mgm1HA from a stage 1 heteroallelic reaction of Mgm1MYC mitochondria and Mgm1HA mitochondria. DS = depleted immunoprecipitate supernatant; P = immunoprecipitate eluate. Cell 2006 127, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.021) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Crista Abundance Decreases in Mgm1 GED Mutant Mitochondria at Nonpermissive Temperature (A) Electron micrographs of stage 2 MGM1 (Aa and Ab), mgm1-7 (Ac and Ad), and mgm1-10 (Ae and Af) mitochondrial fusion reactions at permissive (Aa, Ac, and Ae) or restrictive (Ab, Ad, and Af) temperatures. Arrows indicate crista structures. Magnification is ×5,400 in (Aa)–(Ad) and ×11,500 in (Ae) and (Af). (B) Quantification of crista abundance in MGM1, mgm1-7, and mgm1-10 mitochondria under permissive and restrictive temperatures in vitro. Cell 2006 127, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.021) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions