Material Strength Local subgrade settlement failure (from NHI Highway Materials Engineering course)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOIL CLASSIFICATION Sarik Salim.
Advertisements

1 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PROJECT AND THEIR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN EUROPEAN STANDARD -Major findings -Major findings suitable for inclusion in European Standard.
Mechanical Properties of Metals
Educational Resource Library
AN INNOVATIVE METHOD TO EVALUATE DEGREE OF COMPACTION OF RIVER EMBANKMENTS USING CPT BARBARA COSANTI N. SQUEGLIA D.C.F. LO PRESTI University of Pisa –
JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
COnstruction with Unbound Road AGgregates in Europe.
Dr. Wa'el M. Albawwab ECGD4228 Transportation Engineering II Summer 2008 Sat. 15:30-18:30 PM K115.
Pavement Structure and Base
Pavement Design Session Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Material Properties.
Course : S0705 – Soil Mechanic
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
Manufacturing Technology
Chapter (1) Geotechnical Properties of Soil
1 Characterization of Granular Base Materials for Design of Flexible Pavements Lulu Edwards, Walter Barker, Don Alexander US Army Engineer Research and.
Pavement Design.
Pavement Design CEE 320 Steve Muench.
In Tai Kim & Erol Tutumluer University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Determination of Soil Stiffness Parameters
Soil Physics 2010 Outline Announcements Basic rheology Soil strength Triaxial test.
SESSION 3 Subgrade This module presents the concepts and methods of characterizing the subgrade for the purpose of concrete pavement design. It also highlights.
Pavement Design CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Subgrade Characterization For Concrete Pavement Design
Highway Engineering ) ) Chapter 18/ Soil
Road Construction Method
III. Soil Classification
Soil Compaction and Pavement Design
7. Soil Compaction (Das, chapter 6)
Module 2-5 Field Sampling and Testing.  Identify reasons for conducting field sampling and lab testing  Describe typical field sampling and testing.
CHAPTER TWO SOIL COMPRESSION.
Lecture-8 Shear Strength of Soils
Field Compaction Equipment and Procedures
6. Soil Classification (Das, chapter 5) Sections: All except 5.1.
Nondestructive Testing and Data Analysis Module 2-3.
Field Compaction Equipment and Procedures
In Situ Stabilization of Pavement Base Courses Roads Pavement Forum Thursday, May 17, 2001.
Soil Classification Systems
Dynamic Behaviour of Unsaturated CH soil under Cyclic Loading in Unconsolidated Undrained Conditions 5th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering,
Unconfined Compression Test ASTM D-2166 /02
 The objective of this task is to develop a mix design procedure for the various types of FDR  Determine what works and what does not work  Each.
DESIGN FLEXIBLE AND RIGID PAVEMENTS Ms Ikmalzatul Abdullah.
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD
4. Properties of Materials Sediment (size) Physical States of Soil Concepts of Stress and Strain Normal and Shear Stress Additional Resistance Components.
Civil Engineering Department College of Engineering Course: Soil and Rock Mechanics (CE 260) Lecturer: Dr. Frederick Owusu-Nimo.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
Soil Index Properties and Classification
On the investigations of Resilient Modulus of Residual Tropical Gravel Lateritic Soils from Senegal (West Africa) for Road Design Purposes Introduction.
Copyright February 22, Index Properties of Soils Prof. Basuony El-Garhy Geotechnical Engineering and Foundations Civil Engineering Department Faculty.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
Leads Institute of Technology & Engineering Subject Code : Name Of Subject :Building Construction Name of Unit : Soil Foundation Topic : Bearing.
CVE 308 SOIL MECHANICS ENGR S.O ODUNFA DEPT. OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA.
Construction Inspection for FO Activities - Soils and Earthwork
Asphalt Technology Course
California Bearing Ratio
Pavement Design Al-Balqa’ Applied University
Transportation Engineering-II
California Bearing Ratio Test
Structural Design of Highway
AASHTO CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
SUBGRADE HOW TO DEAL WITH SOFT SPOTS
Flexible pavement design
Structural Design of Highway
Structural Design of Highway
Experiment # 6 Consolidation ASTM D 1883 Soil Mechanics Lab CE 350.
Pavement materials: Soil
Determination of Soil Stiffness Parameters
Triaxial Compression Test ASTM D-2166 /02
Presentation transcript:

Material Strength Local subgrade settlement failure (from NHI Highway Materials Engineering course)

Subgrade Strength/Stiffness California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Resistance Value (R-Value) Resilient Modulus (MR) Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (K) Each measure a different thing

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) CBR: California Bearing Ratio Test. Developed by The California State Highways Department in 1930. Resistance of the material to uniaxial penetration. Measure of soil shear strength relative to standard crushed stone material. Field and laboratory test.

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Used in Pavement Design Performed on unbound layers: Subgrade layer, Subbase layer base layer.

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Load a piston (area = 3 in2) at a constant rate (0.05 in/min) Record Load every 0.1 in penetration Total penetration not to exceed 0.5 in. Draw Load-Penetration Curve.

CBR Test Equipment Soaking Samples for 4 days measure swelling and CBR Piston Surcharge Weights Allow soaked samples to drain water for 15 min. then perform the CBR test. Min. surcharge weight = 10 lb Surcharge weights are added during testing and soaking to: Simulate the weight of pavement. Prevent heaving up around the piston. Soaking Samples for 4 days measure swelling and CBR Typical Testing Machine

CBR Calculation Loads and Stresses Corresponding to 0.1 and 0.2 inches Penetration for the Standard Rocks Penetration 0.1” (2.5 mm) 0.2” (5.0 mm) Load of Standard Rocks (Ib) 3000 4500 Load of Standard Rocks (kN) 13.24 19.96 Stress of Standard Rocks (KPa) 6895 10342 Stress of Standard Rocks (psi) 1000 1500 Calculate CBR at 0.1 in (25 mm) and 0.2 in (50 mm) deformation then use the Maximum value as the design CBR.

CBR Curves Need correction because the piston is not exactly perpendicular with the soil sample.

CBR Curve Correction 0.0 0.1 0.2

Influence of Moisture upon CBR CBR is evaluated at equilibrium moisture condition Use relevant value of moisture content when assessing soils under laboratory conditions.

Resistance Value (R-Value) Developed by California Division of Highways: 1940s Measures frictional resistance of granular material to deformation Uses the Hveem Stabilometer Tests material in a saturated condition (worst case scenario

Resistance Value (R-Value) Stabilometer

R-value Test (ASTM D2844) Pv Ph Pv = applied vertical pressure (typically 160 psi) Ph = transmitted horizontal pressure D2 = displacement of stabilometer fluid necessary to increase horizontal pressure from 5 to 100 psi. Pv Ph

Typical R-Value Ranges General Soil Type USCS Soil Type R-Value Range Clean gravels GW 30 – 80 GP Gravels with fines GM GC Clean sands SW 10 – 50 SP Sands with fines SM 20 – 60 SC Silts and clays ML 5 – 20 CL OL < 7 MH CH OH

Resilient Modulus (MR) Measures “stiffness” of the material under repeated load. Determines the load carrying capacity of the material. Used for HMA as well as unbound materials Uses a repeated load triaxial test. Used in most modern methods of pavement design. s1 s3 s3 s2 s1

Triaxial Test Equipment

Typical Stress Strain Response During one Loading Cycle Dwell Unloading Strain vs. Time ep er Stress vs. Time Linearity: stress strain relationship, Viscosity: time dependency of strain under constant stress, Plastic or elastic: degree to which the material can rebound or recover strain after stress removal.

Resilient Modulus er = DL/L load rest Time Load 2 14 16 load rest Time Load er = DL/L ASU Advanced Pavement Laboratory Animation from University of Tokyo Geotechnical Engineering Lab

Nonlinear Material Behavior: Coarse-Grained Soils Bulk stress: q = s1 + s2 + s3 K1, K2 are material constants K1 > 0 K2 ≥ 0 (stress-stiffening) K2 K1

Nonlinear Material Behavior: Fine-Grained Soils Octahedral shear stress: K3, K4 are material constants K3 > 0 K4 ≤ 0 (stress-softening) log M R K3 K4 log t oct

Combined Stress Dependence of MR (NCHRP 1-37A) Bulk (Confining) Stress Stiffening term (k2 > 0) Dominates for coarse granular soils (base, subbase) Shear (Deviatoric) Stress Softening Term (k3 < 0) Dominates for fine-grained soils (subgrade)

Bulk Stress  Stiffening Shear Stress  Softening Effect of Stress on MR Coarse Materials Fine Materials Bulk Stress  Stiffening Shear Stress  Softening q = s1 + s2 + s3 q = I = Bulk stress = First stress invariant toct = Octahedral shear stress

Effect of Moisture/Density on MR Moisture  Softening Density  Stiffening

MR Model Including Moisture and Density S = degree of saturation d= dry unit weight kS, k= regression coefficients a,b = constants (function of soil type) Pa = atmospheric pressure (NCHRP 1-37A)

Correlations Conversions between CBR, R-value, MR Important points: No direct correlation Each test measures a fundamentally different property Developed correlations are only for limited data sets Direct correlation is like centigrade to farenheit, or liters to gallons CBR = strength and resistance to penetration R-value = frictional resistance to permanent deformation MR = stiffness or recoverable elastic movement

Correlations (CBR  MR) Origin: Heukelom and Klomp (1962) Limitation: Fine-grained non-expansive soils with soaked CBR  10   Origin: NCHRP 1-37A – Mechanistic Design Guide Limitation: not stated Units: CBR  % MR,  psi

Correlations Origin: HDOT Limitation: Fine-grained non-expansive soils with soaked CBR  8 Origin: 1993 AASHTO Guide Limitation: Fine-grained non-expansive soils with R  20

Correlation Example MR R-Value MR vs. R-value for some Washington State soils MR R-Value

MR Correlations w/ Index Properties and Soil Classification (NCHRP 1-37A)

Default MR for USCS Classes (NCHRP 1-37A)

Default MR for AASHTO Classes (NCHRP 1-37A)

Plate Loading Test Measure supporting power of subgrades, subases, bases and a complete pavement. Field test. Data from the test are applicable for design of both flexible and rigid pavements. Results might need some corrections.

Plate Loading Test Plate Loading Test Schematic Plate Loading Test Reaction Reaction Pressure Gauge Hydraulic Jack 12″ f Plate 3 Deflection Dials 18″ f Plate 24″ f Plate Reaction for Dial 30″ f Plate To minimize bending, series of plates are used Apply load through the hydraulic jack and the reaction beam (use heavy equipment), EX: loader Measure the deflection of the plates at at least three points Draw the load deflection relationship Tested Layer Plate Loading Test Schematic Plate Loading Test

Effect of Plate Size p = n + m (P/A) p m n P/A p = Unit load (stress) n, m = Empirical values obtained by test P/A = Perimeter over area p To determine m, n tests must be made on each soil using two different sizes of bearing plates using same deflection m n P/A

Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k) Required for rigid pavement design. Stress , psi 10 psi D K = modulus of subgrade reaction P = unit load on the plate (stress) (psi) D = deflection of the plate (in) For design use stress P = 10 psi (68.95 kN/m2) Deformation, in

Corrections for K Correction due to saturation (worst case scenario). Correction due to bending of the plates.

Correction Due to saturation Ks = modulus of subgrade reaction corrected for saturation Ku = field modulus of subgrade reaction Du/Ds = ratio of the deflection in the unsaturated and saturated tests Field Condition Saturated Condition Stress 10 psi Du 10 psi Stress Deformation Run laboratory consolidation or simple compression test on subgrade soil samples at both the field moisture content and dry density as well as saturated condition. Determine the ratio of the measured deflection in both tests corresponding to 10 psi Ds Deformation

Correction due to Bending of the Plates Some bending of the plates might occur When materials of high modulus are tested. Use chart for correction of k for plate bending. K (pci) Kcorrected (pci)

Basic Plate Loading Test Types Deformation Rate Stress Deformation Time Static Load Static Load

Basic Plate Loading Test Types Stress Stress Accumulated Plastic Deformation Elastic Rebound Deformation Deformation Repeated Load Repeated Load

To do a good job you need to study Hard, don’t you?! Importance of subgrade uniformity (from NHI Highway Materials Engineering course) To do a good job you need to study Hard, don’t you?!