Nigeria Case Study HIVAIDS Specific Slides. ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

DATA DEMAND AND USE: S HARING I NFORMATION AND P ROVIDING F EEDBACK Session 5.

Advertisements

Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.

Malaria-specific Slides

GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.

Begin with the End in Mind

C OMMUNICATING F INDINGS & L INKING D ATA WITH A CTION Module 5.

LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.

Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.

DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.

Context of Decision Making

UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.

Module 5: Sharing data & information. Module 5: Learning objectives  Understand the importance of information feedback in program improvement and management.

M&E Framework for Programmes for Most-at-Risk Populations

Increasing district level evidence-based decision making in Côte d’Ivoire Tara Nutley MEASURE Evaluation / Futures Group Mini University, Washington DC.

Technical Approach to and Experiences from Strengthening National Monitoring and Evaluation System for Most Vulnerable Children Program in Tanzania Prisca.

MEASURE Evaluation DATIM Data Exchange Denise Johnson

Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.

Indicators Regional Workshop on the

Case management versus M&E in the context of OVC programs: What have we learned? Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.

Bridging the Research-to-Practice Gap Session 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data- informed decision making  Understand.

Data Triangulation. Objectives:  At the end of the session, participants will be able to:  Describe the role of data triangulation in program evaluation.

PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.

Sub module 1 Introduction to HIV care and ART recording and reporting system.

Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making.

Linking Data with Action Part 2: Understanding Data Discrepancies.

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.

WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Session 1: Setting the Gender Policy Context.

Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.

Information Use Part II Informing Decisions Strengthening Programs through Improved Use of Data and Information.

MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.

MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.

Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.

Data Demand & Use: Information Use Map Webinar Series #2 Tuesday, January 24, 2012 Presenters: Eric Geers and Tara Nutley.

Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.

Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.

Community Health Information System in Action in SSNPR/Ethiopia

Difference-in-Differences Models

Data Quality Assurance Workshop

Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:

Data Quality Assurance

Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment

Using Data to Inform Community-Level Management

Session: 8 Disseminating Results

Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia

Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use

Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.

ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS

MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:

Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification

Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia

Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis

Training Content and Orientation

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Information Systems for Health:

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Information Systems for Health:

Introduction to Health Informatics:

Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output

Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

Data and Interoperability:

Measuring Data Quality

Introduction to Health Informatics

Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up

Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation

EHRs and Privacy Protection in LMICs

Presentation transcript:

Nigeria Case Study HIVAIDS Specific Slides

ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA

Summary Data from General ANC, VCT, and Partner Registers VariablesNumber 1.New ANC clients 2.Group pre-test counseled 3.Individual pre-test counseled 4.Accepted HIV test 5A.HIV test result – Positive 5B.HIV test result – Negative 5C.HIV test result – Indeterminate 6 A.Post-test counseled – Positive 6 B.Post-test counseled – Negative 8A.ARV therapy received – Current NVP

Are ANC clinics reaching their coverage targets for testing and counseling?

Summary Data from General ANC, VCT, and Partner Registers VariablesNumber 1.New ANC clients 2.Group pre-test counseled 3.Individual pre-test counseled 4.Accepted HIV test 5A.HIV test result – Positive 5B.HIV test result – Negative 5C.HIV test result – Indeterminate 6 A.Post-test counseled – Positive 6 B.Post-test counseled – Negative 8A.ARV therapy received – Current NVP

Summary Data from General ANC, VCT, and Partner Registers VariablesNumber 1.New ANC clients 6 A.Post-test counseled – Positive 6 B.Post-test counseled – Negative

VariablesFacility 1 Facility 2 Facility 3 Facility 4 1.New ANC Clients A.Post-test counseling – positive B.Post-test counseling – negative Total post-test counseled

Are facilities reaching coverage targets?

Additional Questions Which facility is performing better/worse than expected? What is the trend over time for these facilities? What is the ratio for this group of facilities? How would you assess each facilitys performance based on the data? What other data or information should you consider in providing recommendations or guidance to the facilities?

DATA USE

Policy to Program Operations Declining school enrollment among children orphaned or made vulnerable by HIV/AIDS

Policy to Program Operations Declining school enrollment… Revised national policy on educational support for MVC

Policy to Program Operations Declining school enrollment… Revised national MVC policy National budget line item for educational support for MVC

Policy to Program Operations Declining school enrollment… Revised national MVC policy National MVC budget Select priority districts Budget allocations for each district Select priority districts Budget allocations for each district

Policy to Program Operations Declining school enrollment… Revised national MVC policy National MVC budget Select priority districts Select local organizations and design activities

Policy to Program Operations Declining school enrollment… Revised national MVC policy National MVC budget Select priority districts Select local organizations Train community workers Identify households Implement activities Train community workers Identify households Implement activities

Policy to Program Operations Declining school enrollment… Revised national MVC policy National MVC budget Select priority districts Select local organizations Implement activities Monitor progress Identify problems Monitor progress Identify problems

Policy to Program Operations Declining school enrollment… Revised national OVC policy National OVC budget Select priority districts Select local organizations Implement activities Monitor progress Modify budgets, activities

Decisions and Information Flow Declining school enrollment… Revised national OVC policy National OVC budget Select priority districts Select local organizations Implement activities Monitor progress Modify budgets, activities

PROVIDING FEEDBACK

Quarterly Performance Indicators #IndicatorNumeratorDenominatorPercentage ART 1% of eligible clients placed on ART # of new clients on ARTSum of # of new clients on ART and clients on ART waiting list 100% 39 2% of current ART clients# of active clients on ART# of cumulative clients on ART 92% % of ART clients in 6- month cohort undergoing repeat CD4 testing # of clients for whom repeat CD4 testing was done at 6 months Total # of active ART clients in 6- month cohort 94% Pediatric ART 1% of children currently on ART # of active children on ART# of cumulative children on ART 78% 4558 ART Care Follow-up 1% of non-active ART patients who have stopped ART # of patients who stopped ART# of non-active ART patients 0% % of non-active ART patients who transferred out # of patients who transferred out# of non-active ART patients 6% % of non-active ART patients who died # of patients who died# of non-active ART patients 73% % of non-active ART patients who have been lost to follow-up # of patients who have been lost to follow-up. # of non active ART patients. 16% 23145

22

MEASURE Evaluation is a MEASURE project funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development and implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group International, ICF Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and Tulane University. Views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the U.S. Government. MEASURE Evaluation is the USAID Global Health Bureau's primary vehicle for supporting improvements in monitoring and evaluation in population, health and nutrition worldwide.