The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
Advertisements

Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Mechanism of a Molecular Valve in the Halorhodopsin Chloride Pump
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of the Human MutSα DNA Lesion Recognition Complex
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Structures of Mismatch Replication Errors Observed in a DNA Polymerase
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
The Closing Mechanism of DNA Polymerase I at Atomic Resolution
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
The structural basis for pyrophosphatase catalysis
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
PcrA Helicase, a Prototype ATP-Driven Molecular Motor
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Structural Insight into Translesion Synthesis by DNA Pol II
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Karunesh Arora, Tamar Schlick  Biophysical Journal 
Kay Perry, Young Hwang, Frederic D. Bushman, Gregory D. Van Duyne 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
An open and closed case for all polymerases
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Karina Kubiak, Wieslaw Nowak  Biophysical Journal 
In Search of the Hair-Cell Gating Spring
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Mijo Simunovic, Gregory A. Voth  Biophysical Journal 
A Critical Residue Selectively Recruits Nucleotides for T7 RNA Polymerase Transcription Fidelity Control  Baogen Duan, Shaogui Wu, Lin-Tai Da, Jin Yu 
Structural Insights into the Origins of DNA Polymerase Fidelity
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages R19-R23 (February 1999)
Yogesh K. Gupta, Deepak T. Nair, Robin P. Wharton, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Presentation transcript:

The Mechanism of the Translocation Step in DNA Replication by DNA Polymerase I: A Computer Simulation Analysis  Andrei A. Golosov, Joshua J. Warren, Lorena S. Beese, Martin Karplus  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 83-93 (January 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.10.014 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Pol I Conformations and Its Interaction with DNA (Top) Overview of the polymerase in the open (left) and closed (right) conformations. Protein is shown colored dark blue to red from N to C terminus. DNA phosphate backbone is shown as orange tubes and bases are shown in blue. Van der Waals outline is shown in semitransparent outline. (Bottom) The primer (left) and template (right) strands bind in tracks on the protein surface (shown colored by atom type, i.e., N is in blue, O is in red, P is in orange, the rest are C atoms). Black ends indicate that this is a cut in the surface of pol I. All images of molecules in this paper were prepared using PYMOL (DeLano Scientific; http://pymol.sourceforge.net/). Structure 2010 18, 83-93DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Pol I DNA Replication Steps Schematics (left) and close-up views (right) of the active site of the polymerase in the closed pre-chemistry conformation (top), closed equilibrated post-chemistry pre-translocation configuration (center), and open translocated conformation (bottom) are shown. Top and bottom panels show one monomer from X-ray crystal structures. The center panel shows the equilibrated, post-chemistry pre-translocation starting structure used for these studies. Protons were omitted from the post-chemistry model to facilitate comparison with the open and closed crystal structures. Close up views focus mostly on conformational change of O helix shown as blue helix with yellow G711. G715 is also shown in yellow. The rest of the protein is colored as blue ribbons. DNA is colored by atom. Mg2+ ions are shown as green spheres. Structure 2010 18, 83-93DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Order Parameters Describing the DNA Translocation θ, δ, and β order parameters (see text and Supplemental Information for the definition), which describe the overall O helix rotation, the DNA displacement, and the insertion of the preinsertion base into the preinsertion site, respectively, are shown in the closed and open conformations. The angle θ is defined as the angle (black) between Cα atoms of residues R629, G711, and N700 shown as cyan spheres. β (green) is the distance between Cα atom of G711 and the center of mass of the preinsertion base shown as green sticks. δic and δio measure the difference in the distance of a single phosphate atom from appropriate residues in the pol I closed and open conformations, respectively. The residues contributing to δi of a given phosphate atom (n, n-3; n-3, n-4, n-6; shown as spheres) have the same color as that atom (see Table S1 for the list of residues). Brown and orange tubes represent template and primer strands, respectively. Preinsertion base and incoming nucleotide are shown as sticks and lines, respectively. Mg2+ ions and atoms defining the θ angle are shown as green and cyan spheres, respectively. Structure 2010 18, 83-93DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effect of PPi (Top) Fluctuations obtained from equilibrium/equilibration trajectories for the closed conformation of pol I-DNA complex with and without PPi in the parameter space of θ (degrees) versus δ (Å). θ fluctuations are suppressed in the presence of the pyrophosphate, indicating that the closed conformation is more stable in the presence of the pyrophosphate. Fluctuations for the open conformation are also given for comparison. (Bottom) The time evolution of the order parameter θ during RP-TMD simulations of pol I-DNA complex with and without PPi using the same perturbation. Fluctuations obtained from equilibration trajectories for the closed and open conformations are shown for reference (with time scaled to fit the range of the plot). Structure 2010 18, 83-93DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 RP-TMD Pathways and Intermediates Along Relaxation Trajectories (A) Comparison of RP-TMD pathways with varying strength of perturbation parameter. θ versus β is shown above and θ versus δ is shown below. The equilibration/equilibrium trajectories in closed (c) and open (o) configurations are also shown. The pathway with perturbation strength of 0.0025 Å has been extended (ext w/) by increasing the perturbation to 0.01 Å and 0.015 Å. θ is in degrees, while β and δ are in Å. (B) Relaxation trajectories revealing several intermediates along the reaction pathways (A, B, C, D1, D2, E1, and E2). Diamonds and circles indicate the start and the end of a given trajectory. The clusters from individual trajectories at the end indicate the presence of intermediates. Circles represent such intermediates. Only one trajectory is shown per intermediate. D1 and D2 and E1 and E2 had the same starting coordinates, but different momenta. Initial momenta for all relaxation trajectories have been drawn from Maxwell distribution at 300 K. θ is in degrees, while β and δ are in Å. Structure 2010 18, 83-93DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Comparison of Metastable States A, B, and C Each panel (the states correspond to labeled circles in Figure 5) compares two structures. (A) Metastable state A (dark blue) compared with starting configuration (protein in teal blue, primer bases in yellow, and template bases in purple), rotation of the O helix and the displacement of n template and n-1 template bases. (B) Metastable states B (red) versus A (dark blue), or displacement of n-1 template and further downstream bases. (C) C (green) versus B (red) states, or displacement of the n primer base. (θ, δ, β)A = (63, −4.6, 13); (θ, δ, β)B = (70, −3.3, 13); (θ, δ, β)C = (68, −1.9, 14). Notice the distortion of the DNA template strand between the n template and the preinsertion bases. Phosphate backbone is represented by tubes. Protein is shown as ribbons. Mg2+ ion is shown as green sphere. The DNA positions of the open configuration can be inferred from the closed configuration and are not shown. Structure 2010 18, 83-93DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of Metastable States D2, E1, and E2 D2 (teal blue), E1(dark blue), and E2(red) metastable states showing the gating of O1 helix and preinsertion base insertion into the preinsertion site (circled area). The additional part of pol I-DNA complex is shown to demonstrate a fair alignment of the rest of the protein. Notice the fluctuation of the loop connecting O helix with O1 helix. The positions of Cα atoms of G715 (in the loop area) and G711 (at the base of the O helix) are also shown as spheres. (θ, δ, β)D2 = (61, 1.9, 13); (θ, δ, β)E1 = (65, 5.9, 10); (θ, δ, β)E2 = (65, 5.6, 7.1). Preinsertion base is shown as sticks; the rest of DNA is shown as lines for E1, as well as tubes for D2, E1, and E2. Y714 is shown as lines. Structure 2010 18, 83-93DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions