Solution structure of the donor site of a trans-splicing RNA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydration sites in purine·purine·pyrimidine and pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplexes in aqueous solution  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel 
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Structure of TAR RNA Complexed with a Tat-TAR Interaction Nanomolar Inhibitor that Was Identified by Computational Screening  Zhihua Du, Kenneth E Lind,
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2004)
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
Solution structure of a pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplex containing T·AT, C+ ·GC and G·TA triples  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel  Structure 
Kei-ichi Okazaki, Shoji Takada  Structure 
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Transconformations of the SERCA1 Ca-ATPase: A Normal Mode Study
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Opioid Receptor Three-Dimensional Structures from Distance Geometry Calculations with Hydrogen Bonding Constraints  Irina D. Pogozheva, Andrei L. Lomize,
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 1994)
Shozeb Haider, Gary N. Parkinson, Stephen Neidle  Biophysical Journal 
Solution Structure of a Unique G-Quadruplex Scaffold Adopted by a Guanosine-Rich Human Intronic Sequence  Vitaly Kuryavyi, Dinshaw J. Patel  Structure 
Structural Basis of the Enhanced Stability of a Mutant Ribozyme Domain and a Detailed View of RNA–Solvent Interactions  Kara Juneau, Elaine Podell, Daniel.
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Structural Basis for a New Templated Activity by Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase: Implications for V(D)J Recombination  Jérôme Loc'h, Sandrine Rosario,
Dynamic Motions of the HIV-1 Frameshift Site RNA
RNA bulges as architectural and recognition motifs
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Quentin Vicens, Eric Westhof  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Two structurally different RNA molecules are bound by the spliceosomal protein U1A using the same recognition strategy  Luca Jovine, Chris Oubridge, Johanna.
Azobenzene Photoisomerization-Induced Destabilization of B-DNA
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Comparison of X-Ray Crystal Structure of the 30S Subunit-Antibiotic Complex with NMR Structure of Decoding Site Oligonucleotide-Paromomycin Complex  Stephen.
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Crystal Structure of SRP19 in Complex with the S Domain of SRP RNA and Its Implication for the Assembly of the Signal Recognition Particle  Chris Oubridge,
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Amedeo Caflisch, Martin Karplus  Structure 
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Solution Structure of the Interacting Domains of the Mad–Sin3 Complex
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Solution Structure of the Proapoptotic Molecule BID
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Predicting 3D Structure, Flexibility, and Stability of RNA Hairpins in Monovalent and Divalent Ion Solutions  Ya-Zhou Shi, Lei Jin, Feng-Hua Wang, Xiao-Long.
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Analyzing the Flexibility of RNA Structures by Constraint Counting
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Hydrophobic Core Formation and Dehydration in Protein Folding Studied by Generalized-Ensemble Simulations  Takao Yoda, Yuji Sugita, Yuko Okamoto  Biophysical.
Tertiary structure of an immunoglobulin-like domain from the giant muscle protein titin: a new member of the I set  Mark Pfuhl, Annalisa Pastore  Structure 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Solution structure of the donor site of a trans-splicing RNA Nancy L Greenbaum, Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel, David Hirsh  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 725-733 (June 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0

Figure 1 Design of the SL1 RNA construct and per residue statistics. (a) Sequence and predicted secondary structure of the SL1 RNA of C. elegans and of the 26-nucleotide fragment. The splice-donor site is marked by a triangle in the full-length sequence. The guanosine and cytosine residues added to the native sequence at the 5′ and 3′ termini of the fragment, respectively, form base pairs. Structure calculations were limited to the nucleotides of the native sequence without these added base pairs (i.e., between U8 and A26). (b) Distribution of inter residue NOEs by residue (left); mean rmsd per residue for the sixteen structures as compared with the minimized average structure (right). The number of inter residue NOEs was counted once per proton pair. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 1 Design of the SL1 RNA construct and per residue statistics. (a) Sequence and predicted secondary structure of the SL1 RNA of C. elegans and of the 26-nucleotide fragment. The splice-donor site is marked by a triangle in the full-length sequence. The guanosine and cytosine residues added to the native sequence at the 5′ and 3′ termini of the fragment, respectively, form base pairs. Structure calculations were limited to the nucleotides of the native sequence without these added base pairs (i.e., between U8 and A26). (b) Distribution of inter residue NOEs by residue (left); mean rmsd per residue for the sixteen structures as compared with the minimized average structure (right). The number of inter residue NOEs was counted once per proton pair. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 2 Ensemble of structures calculated from distance and angle constraints. (a) Superimposition of the ensemble of sixteen calculated structures required to examine all conformational space. The mean rmsd from the minimized average structure for all heavy atoms is 1.05 å. (b) The loop (nucleotides C13–A21) and stem segments for the same structures were superimposed on the minimized average structures, viewed from the same aspect. The mean rmsd for all non-hydrogen atoms from the minimized average structure for the same segments is 0.91 å and 0.31 å for the loop and stem, respectively. The ensemble of transformations required to achieve the best fit of loop structures was 0.5 ± 13.5° in rotation and –0.01 ± 0.46 å in translation. The set of axes for these transformations clustered with an average of 36.3° (22.4° for the closest 10 of the 16 structures) deviation from the average axis of rotation. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 2 Ensemble of structures calculated from distance and angle constraints. (a) Superimposition of the ensemble of sixteen calculated structures required to examine all conformational space. The mean rmsd from the minimized average structure for all heavy atoms is 1.05 å. (b) The loop (nucleotides C13–A21) and stem segments for the same structures were superimposed on the minimized average structures, viewed from the same aspect. The mean rmsd for all non-hydrogen atoms from the minimized average structure for the same segments is 0.91 å and 0.31 å for the loop and stem, respectively. The ensemble of transformations required to achieve the best fit of loop structures was 0.5 ± 13.5° in rotation and –0.01 ± 0.46 å in translation. The set of axes for these transformations clustered with an average of 36.3° (22.4° for the closest 10 of the 16 structures) deviation from the average axis of rotation. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 3 Two views of the hairpin loop that contains the splice-donor site of the SL1 RNA. For this and subsequent depictions, the nucleotides are colored according to type: U=green, A=pink, C=yellow, G=cyan. (a) The base-paired stem (U8–A26, U9–A25, A10–U24, C11–G23, C12–G22) has a typical A-helical conformation. The first three nucleotides on the 5′ side of the loop (C13, A14, A15) also approximate an A helix, although there is a bend in the axes of the stem and loop between C12 and C13. (b) The view has been rotated approximately 90° from (a). The bulged adenine (A21), in purple, is apparent at the base of the loop. The phosphate at the splice-donor site, situated between G22 and G23 in the 3′ side of the helical stem, is shown in red. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 3 Two views of the hairpin loop that contains the splice-donor site of the SL1 RNA. For this and subsequent depictions, the nucleotides are colored according to type: U=green, A=pink, C=yellow, G=cyan. (a) The base-paired stem (U8–A26, U9–A25, A10–U24, C11–G23, C12–G22) has a typical A-helical conformation. The first three nucleotides on the 5′ side of the loop (C13, A14, A15) also approximate an A helix, although there is a bend in the axes of the stem and loop between C12 and C13. (b) The view has been rotated approximately 90° from (a). The bulged adenine (A21), in purple, is apparent at the base of the loop. The phosphate at the splice-donor site, situated between G22 and G23 in the 3′ side of the helical stem, is shown in red. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 4 Several views of the loop. (a) Close-up of the turn in the loop. A buckled Watson-Crick base pair forms between A14 and U19. The orientation of the ribose of G16 flips with respect to that of A15; the guanosine base is in a syn conformation about its glycosidic bond. (b) Conformation of nucleotides at the base of loop. There is a hydrogen bond between an amino proton of A21 and the 2′OH of A14. The base pair between C13 and G20 is twisted as a result of the sharp bend in the backbone in the region of the G20–A21–G22 trinucleotide. In most cases a hydrogen bond is observed between the imino proton of G20 and the O2 of C13, although in this particular structure, the hydrogen bond could involve the imino and/or an amino proton of G20. (c) View from the ‘top’ of the loop showing partial stacking of G20 and G22 and of G20 with A14. Criteria for identification of a hydrogen bond included a distance between the heavy atom and hydrogen of less than 2.3 å, and an angle >135° between the vectors formed by the hydrogen with the associated heavy atoms. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 4 Several views of the loop. (a) Close-up of the turn in the loop. A buckled Watson-Crick base pair forms between A14 and U19. The orientation of the ribose of G16 flips with respect to that of A15; the guanosine base is in a syn conformation about its glycosidic bond. (b) Conformation of nucleotides at the base of loop. There is a hydrogen bond between an amino proton of A21 and the 2′OH of A14. The base pair between C13 and G20 is twisted as a result of the sharp bend in the backbone in the region of the G20–A21–G22 trinucleotide. In most cases a hydrogen bond is observed between the imino proton of G20 and the O2 of C13, although in this particular structure, the hydrogen bond could involve the imino and/or an amino proton of G20. (c) View from the ‘top’ of the loop showing partial stacking of G20 and G22 and of G20 with A14. Criteria for identification of a hydrogen bond included a distance between the heavy atom and hydrogen of less than 2.3 å, and an angle >135° between the vectors formed by the hydrogen with the associated heavy atoms. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 4 Several views of the loop. (a) Close-up of the turn in the loop. A buckled Watson-Crick base pair forms between A14 and U19. The orientation of the ribose of G16 flips with respect to that of A15; the guanosine base is in a syn conformation about its glycosidic bond. (b) Conformation of nucleotides at the base of loop. There is a hydrogen bond between an amino proton of A21 and the 2′OH of A14. The base pair between C13 and G20 is twisted as a result of the sharp bend in the backbone in the region of the G20–A21–G22 trinucleotide. In most cases a hydrogen bond is observed between the imino proton of G20 and the O2 of C13, although in this particular structure, the hydrogen bond could involve the imino and/or an amino proton of G20. (c) View from the ‘top’ of the loop showing partial stacking of G20 and G22 and of G20 with A14. Criteria for identification of a hydrogen bond included a distance between the heavy atom and hydrogen of less than 2.3 å, and an angle >135° between the vectors formed by the hydrogen with the associated heavy atoms. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 5 Surface representations of the first stem loop of the SL1 RNA. Surface curvature of the molecule, as defined in [40], is displayed with GRASP. The view of the molecule is identical to that shown in Figure 3b. Convex surfaces are shown in green, and concave surfaces in gray. The ‘roof’ of the pocket is formed by the A21 base, and the ‘floor’ is formed by the C12–G22 base pair. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)

Figure 6 Plot of all-atom rms deviations from the minimized average structure for 20 calculated structures in order of ascending constraint energy [42]. Structure 1996 4, 725-733DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00078-0)