Flooding in Flathead County and Kalispell, MT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Runoff Estimation, and Surface Erosion and Control Ali Fares, PhD NREM 600, Evaluation of Natural Resources Management.
Advertisements

Runoff Processes Daene C. McKinney
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Introduction to Surface Water Hydrology and Watersheds Lecture 1 Philip B. Bedient Rice University November, 2000.
Forest Hydrology: Lect. 18
Hydrologic Simulation Models
4 th International Symposium on Flood Defence, 6 th – 8 th May 2008, Toronto, Canada Efficiency of distributed flood mitigation measures at watershed scale.
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Development of a Hydrologic Model and Estimation of its Parameters Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University.
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
Revisit of the Halloween Flood from 2013 Juhn-Yuan Su C E 394K Dr. D. R. Maidment Fall 2014.
Hydrology & Water Resources Engineering
Contents Interpolated Rainfall :« simple to complexe » methods
Copyright [insert date set by system] by [CH2M HILL entity] Company Confidential Hydrologic Evaluation of the Little Thompson River Phase 2: Little Thompson.
WinTR-20 SensitivityMarch WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
August 20th, CONTENT 1. Introduction 2. Data and Characteristics 3. Flood analysis 1. MOUSE 2. SOBEK 3. ARC-SWAT 4. Conclusions and suggestions.
Watershed delineation and data preparation for groundwater modeling using GIS in the Savannah River Site GIS term project presentation November 25, 2003.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
Team 10 Presentation Vol. II 18th February 2011 Sophia Antipolis, France Improvement by calibration or with geometry?
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Long Valley Creek: A Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Story Rob Thompson Hydrologist U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Synthetic UH Definition: Synthetic Hydrograph is a plot of flow versus time and generated based on a minimal use of streamflow data. Example: A pending.
Introduction to Urban Hydrology
Hydrologic Objects for Modeling: One Viewpoint Thomas A. Evans US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
Effects of Rain Water Harvesting on the Hydrograph Tyler Jantzen May 3, 2007 CE 394K.2.
Jingqi Dong April 27 th, Contents Theories Methods to predict stream flow Tools HydroModeler in HydroDesktop Work done Calculated precipitable.
Waller Creek Sub-basin HMS Review Original project idea scrapped Difficult to find adequate GIS data No measured flow data to validate model results.
The Effects of Impervious Cover on a Hydrologic System BRUSHY CREEK WATERSHED By Ruth Haberman.
Hurricane Irene in Connecticut River Milena Spirova CE 394 K 2015.
1 Application of SDI in hydrology for assessment of hydropower potential of small streams Subija IZEIROSKI Bashkim IDRIZI Sotir PANOVSKI Igor NEDELKOVSKI.
Storm Water Management Plan Lawrence County, PA Katelyn Zollos CE 549.
BUILDING AND RUNNING THE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL
HYDROLOGY Lecture 10 Unit Hydrograph
Application of TOPMODEL GIS for Bear River Watershed
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
NFIE-Geo HMS Model: Extraction Tool
Kristina Schneider February 27, 2001
Innovation Through GIS
Liberty Lake Watershed Analysis
Week 1.
Digital model for estimation of flash floods using GIS
Hydrologic Analysis (Bedient chapter 2)
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
Lauren Schneider CE394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Dr. Maidment 4/28/05
Prepared by: Sulyman Khraishe Madhat Z
Hydrologic Modeling for Watershed Analysis and River Restoration
Approaches to Continental Scale River Flow Routing
Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
Hydrologic Simulation Models
A Geographic Information System Tool for Hydrologic Model Setup
Introduction to Urban Hydrology
GIS in Water Resources Presentation By: Zac Sharp
Hydrologic River Routing
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Nitrogen Transport Estimates in the San Antonio River Basin
Hydrograph Computation
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
Incorporating Green-Ampt Infiltration Model into CRWR-prepro
Rio Blanco County, Colorado
Hydrologic Information System
HMS-RAS Integration Strategy/Workflow Brushy Creek Example Dean Djokic, ESRI 22 March 2012 What’s New in ArcGIS 8.3.
Rainfall Runoff in the Guadalupe River Basin
CRWR-PrePro Calculation of Hydrologic Parameters
WRE-1 BY MOHD ABDUL AQUIL CIVIL ENGINEERING.
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

Flooding in Flathead County and Kalispell, MT Initiation to Geo-HMS and HEC-HMS Remi Candaele Hydrology - CE394K

Context & Flood Events Characteristics ArcGIS Process Geo-HMS Process Outline Context & Flood Events Characteristics ArcGIS Process Geo-HMS Process HMS Model Future Work Evergreen – Kalispell Suburb - 1995

Context Flathead county subject to flooding Located in northwest corner of Montana State. Total area of 13,614 km² (5,256 mi²), 410 km² (158 mi²) of it (3.01%) is water. As of 2000, the population was 74,471.

Motivations Being familiar with a Hydraulic Model !!!

Flood Events Characteristics Peak Flow : 2 events at 35m3/s Peak Flow : 2 events > 100m3/s

Flood Events Characteristics Flathead Valley Occurring mostly during spring time, Focus on 2 major events : 04/13/1996 04/20/1997 Low Rainfall intensity : computation over a long period, Difficulty : 1 meteorological station and 2 gauge stations. Time Series

Catchments & Streams Delineation Projected Coordinate System : NAD1983_StatePlane_Montana 7 Subwatersheds selected OBJECTID NAME BasinSlope (%) BasinCN BasinLag (hr) Area_HMS (km2) 1 W90 24.89 67.02 5.78 476.79 2 W100 20.58 70.21 8.28 498.30 3 W110 22.92 60.90 5.46 211.40 4 W120 6.39 66.50 1.68 3.83 5 W130 22.06 63.12 6.71 557.40 6 W140 10.09 67.78 8.46 282.61 7 W150 13.08 67.39 5.84 115.68 SubWatershed Characteristics

Reclassification of Land Cover Data downloaded from NLCD Reclassification in 4 main categories thanks to Dr Venkatesh Merwade Land Use Grid Obtained

Soil Data – Characterization of the Soil Type SSURGO (scale 1:24,000) dataset doesn’t cover the entire watershed: use of the Statsgo dataset (1:250000). 4 types of soil: A/B/C/D. Soil B assigned to the unknown soils Classification Type of soil A (low runoff potential) Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. B Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. C Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. D (high runoff potential) Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.

CN obtained from SCS TR55 (1986) Curve Number & Grid CN obtained from SCS TR55 (1986) Generation of a CN Grid Statistics Mean : 66.26 Std Deviation : 11.06

Geo-HMS ArcGIS Interface to create input files to HMS Processes River Length River Slope Basin Slope FlowPaths, Basin Centroids HMS Inputs/Parameters Loss, Transform methods by SCS, Route method by Muskingum Time Lag Basin Curve Numbers Selection of the contributing catchments - GeoHMS Interface

Geo-HMS ArcGIS Interface to create input files to HMS Basin Lag in Hours Basin Curve Numbers

Geo-HMS ArcGIS Interface to create input files to HMS Schematic Export to HMS

Running the model under HMS Meteorologic model : Weight gages, Muskingum routing, Time Lag, Time Series.

Results – Calibrating the model Computations for exercising. Next steps : Find accurate numbers for Muskingum routing, Calibration factor : Streamflow = Model

Venkatesh Merwade – Purdue U. Christine Dartiguenave – ESRI Acknowledgments Venkatesh Merwade – Purdue U. Christine Dartiguenave – ESRI Ron Schlagenhaufer – Flathead County Folks : Eusebio, Tyler, Brian & others

Questions ????