What Integration Sites Tell Us about HIV Persistence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Retroviruses And retroposons
Advertisements

Section 8.3 Summary – pages Cancer is a growth resulting from uncontrolled cell division. Occasionally, cells lose control of the cell cycle.
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Structure-based design of peptide presentation on a viral surface: the crystal structure of a plant/animal virus chimera at 2.8 å resolution  Tianwei.
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 Complex Assembled on DNA and Its Implications for DNA DSB Repair  Laura Spagnolo, Angel Rivera-Calzada,
Viral Latency and Its Regulation: Lessons from the γ-Herpesviruses
Allan Award Lecture: On Jumping Fields and “Jumping Genes”
Discovery and Characterization of piRNAs in the Human Fetal Ovary
Conserved Seed Pairing, Often Flanked by Adenosines, Indicates that Thousands of Human Genes are MicroRNA Targets  Benjamin P. Lewis, Christopher B. Burge,
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Michael J. Metzger, Carol Reinisch, James Sherry, Stephen P. Goff  Cell 
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Analysis of Telomerase Processivity
HIV-1 Vpu Mediates HLA-C Downregulation
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Luther Davis, Nancy Maizels  Cell Reports 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Widespread Inhibition of Posttranscriptional Splicing Shapes the Cellular Transcriptome following Heat Shock  Reut Shalgi, Jessica A. Hurt, Susan Lindquist,
Properties of H. volcanii tRNA Intron Endonuclease Reveal a Relationship between the Archaeal and Eucaryal tRNA Intron Processing Systems  Karen Kleman-Leyer,
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Young Jun Im, James H. Hurley  Developmental Cell 
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
The Cell Biology of HIV-1 Virion Genesis
The Host Restriction Factor APOBEC3G and Retroviral Vif Protein Coevolve due to Ongoing Genetic Conflict  Alex A. Compton, Vanessa M. Hirsch, Michael.
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
IPOP Goes the World: Integrated Personalized Omics Profiling and the Road toward Improved Health Care  Jennifer Li-Pook-Than, Michael Snyder  Chemistry.
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Frank P Leu, Roxana Georgescu, Mike O'Donnell  Molecular Cell 
A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders  Jennifer A. Lee, Claudia M.B. Carvalho, James.
Double Trouble: HIV Latency and CTL Escape
Reciprocal Crossovers and a Positional Preference for Strand Exchange in Recombination Events Resulting in Deletion or Duplication of Chromosome 17p11.2 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Alex Sigal, David Baltimore  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Interactions between Retroviruses and the Host Cell Genome
Characterization of New Members of the Human Type II Keratin Gene Family and a General Evaluation of the Keratin Gene Domain on Chromosome 12q13.13  Michael.
Chandan Shee, Janet L. Gibson, Susan M. Rosenberg  Cell Reports 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 110, Issue 4, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Division of Labor at the Eukaryotic Replication Fork
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Rodney A King, Sarbani Banik-Maiti, Ding Jun Jin, Robert A Weisberg 
Allan Award Lecture: On Jumping Fields and “Jumping Genes”
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
DNA Damage-Induced Transcription of Transposable Elements and Long Non-coding RNAs in Arabidopsis Is Rare and ATM-Dependent  Zhenxing Wang, Rainer Schwacke,
Bruce Rannala, Jeff P. Reeve  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Presentation transcript:

What Integration Sites Tell Us about HIV Persistence Stephen H. Hughes, John M. Coffin  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 588-598 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.010 Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Retroviral DNA Integration (A) The steps in retroviral integration. At the top is a drawing of the full-length linear viral DNA. In the second panel, IN has removed two nucleotides from the 3′ ends of the viral DNA (the 3′ Processing reaction). In the third panel, the newly exposed 3′ ends of the viral DNA are aligned with the host genome for the Strand Transfer or ST reaction (shown in panel 4). The five dots represent the nucleotides of the host DNA that are duplicated in the HIV integration reaction. In the bottom two panels, host repair enzymes repair the mismatches and nicks in the DNA left by the ST reaction, creating the target site duplication. (B) The crystal structure (Maertens et al., 2010) of a complex of PFV IN, two pieces of DNA that represent the ends of the virus DNA (vDNA), and the target DNA (tDNA). There are four IN subunits in the complex. All of the domains of the two inner subunits, which are directly involved in the ST reaction, can be seen; these two are colored blue and green. Only a portion of the two outer subunits (colored gold) can be seen in the crystal structure; these are the central catalytic domains (CCD); the CCDs of the two inner subunits are also marked. Compared to the IN of HIV, PFV IN has an N-terminal extension domain (NED) (seen only on the two inner INs). (C) Structure of the host and virus DNA with the IN protein removed. The tDNA is bent, as can be seen more clearly in this panel, because the DNAs are rotated 90° relative to (B). (C) also shows the position of the host strands that participated in the ST reaction after the ST reactions have taken place. Reprinted with permission from (Brown, 1997) (A) and (Maertens et al., 2010) (B and C). Cell Host & Microbe 2016 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Viral RNA from blood and viral DNA from PBMCs of patients on ART (A) Kinetics of decay and rebound. Note that the y axis is a log scale. Immediately following the start of therapy, there is a rapid loss of the viral RNA and the level of the viral RNA decays in several stages (see text). The level of the viral DNA also decays, but the loss of viral DNA is much smaller. Interruption of therapy, even after many years, invariably leads to a return of the virus to levels very near the pretherapy values (Hilldorfer et al., 2012). (B) Comparison of HIV DNA sequences before and after ART. The drawings show neighbor-joining trees representing the relatedness of gag-pol sequences from viral DNA isolated from blood cells. The open dots show viral sequences from cells taken either before or just after the initiation of ART. All of the patients had been infected for a long time, and no two pretherapy viral DNA sequences were alike. After prolonged ART (>7 years), another sample was taken from the blood of all four patients. After long-term ART, clusters of identical viral DNA sequences are seen in samples of blood from each of the patients (filled dots, circled in red) Reprinted from Maldarelli et al. (2012). Cell Host & Microbe 2016 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Only a small fraction of the cells in an expanded clone that carries an infectious provirus make virus at any one time A group of infected cells is shown on the left. In patients, only about 1 cell in 1,000 is infected; for simplicity, uninfected cells are not shown. Most of the infected cells carry defective proviruses; a cell that carries an infectious provirus is shown in blue. The blue cell divides, giving rise to a clone. Most of the cells in the clone do not make viral RNA or produce virus (blue cells in the upper part of the drawing); however, by an unknown mechanism, some of the cells in the clone are occasionally activated to make virus (bottom). These cells most likely die rapidly (dying cells are shown in faded red). In treated patients, effective therapy (cART) prevents the virus that is released from the cells from infecting new cells. The clone is maintained by division of the (blue) cells that do not make virus; from this reservoir, cells that can make virus are continually produced. Although the virus producing cells die rapidly, new virus producing cells arise, and these cells maintain a low level of virus in the blood (red, lower right). The authors thank Francesco Simonetti for this figure. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Integration sites in the MKL2 gene A diagram of the MKL2 gene on chromosome 16 is shown; the exons are indicated as small vertical bars. Integration sites in PBMCs taken from healthy human volunteers and infected in culture are shown above the diagram of the gene. The orientation of the proviruses relative to the gene is indicated by the direction of the arrowheads and by their color. The integration sites obtained from patient 1 of Maldarelli et al. (2014) are shown below the gene. The 7 kb portion of the gene, encompassing three small introns where there were integration sites in the patient, is expanded and is shown at the bottom of the figure. Circled arrowheads indicate integrations that were shown to be clonally expanded. The integration site data for patient 1 is reprinted from Maldarelli et al. (2014). Cell Host & Microbe 2016 19, 588-598DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.010) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions