Revision of EU Ecolabel Criteria for detergents

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
Advertisements

Cosa è ?. Mandatory labelling EU Energy Labelling Voluntary labelling EU Ecolabel EU Energy Star programme.
U.S. EPA Design for the Environment Program NPPR Webinar June 23, 2011 Libby Sommer Environmental Scientist.
European Portable Battery AssociationEPBA EPBA Trilateral Meeting EPBA association update 16 June 2011 Washington.
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
B UILDING R ESEARCH I NSTITUTE 1 Barriers for Deconstruction and Recycling of the Currently Built Single Detached Houses S. Nakajima Building Research.
Task 4.1 – Requirements analysis for Eco-Label and Environmental Product Declaration Duration: month 1 to month 36 Partners involved: CONSORZIO TRE (WP.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
Ecolabel Sector - Service for Environmental Certifications ISPRA- National Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research Dr. Stefania Minestrini.
Overview of the NSF 375 Draft Sustainability for the Water Treatment and Distribution Industry October 30, 2012.
Malaysia Update on “draft” proposal for the Environmentally Hazardous Substance (“EHS”) Notification and Registration Scheme.
Workshop on Green Voluntary Mechanism Belgrade, 29 May - 30 May 2012 Ecolabel Sector - Service for Environmental Certifications ISPRA- National Italian.
Industries’ activities in collaboration with the Commission UNICE-UEAPME Eco-Label Information Day Guido Lena Responsible for Environmental Affairs at.
Water.europa.eu Amendment of the regulation on the use of phosphates in household laundry detergents Strategic Coordination Group Meeting November.
Directorate E: Agriculture and environment statistics; Statistical cooperation Unit E3: Environment statistics 1 ‘DIMESA 2006’ Preparation Meeting, 13.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
1 The European Ecolabel Scheme The use of the European Ecolabel in Green Public Procurement approaches.
REACH 2018 Find your co-registrants and prepare to register jointly.
An Introduction to the Scottish Carbon Metric
EUEB meeting Development of EU Ecolabel criteria for Cleaning Services Overview on the ongoing work Task 2: Market Analysis 1 EUEB meeting, 17th June.
Seminar on ESA 2010 Metadata
Impacts of new Legislation on waste statistics
EER Assurance September 2018
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
Revision of EU Ecolabel Criteria for Wooden Floor Coverings
Competent Body Meeting Ecolabel Criteria for ‘Televisions’
The general obligations regarding self-classification under the CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 Sylvain BINTEIN.
Assessment and verification
EU Ecolabel Statistics: Proposal on the way forward
EU Ecolabel All Purpose Cleaners and Sanitary Cleaners:
WWater reuse Water Directors 24/11/2014 Nicola NOTARO
Sanitary Products/ Absorbent Hygiene Products
Silvia FerratiniDG ENVIRONMENT, EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Harmonisation of national criteria with European Eco-label criteria
EU Tyres labelling scheme
EU Ecolabel Criteria for Flushing Toilets and Urinals
Revision of EU Ecolabel Criteria for Furniture
Revision of EU Ecolabel Criteria for Lubricants
Revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria for the product group of indoor and outdoor paints and varnishes JRC- IPTS November 2012.
Up-date on the on-going work on: Buildings
Revision of EU Ecolabel criteria for Furniture
Summary of the final changes
Revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria for the product group of soaps, shampoos and hair conditioners (Rinse-off cosmetic products) JRC- IPTS November 2012.
Joint Research Centre The European Commission’s in-house science service.
Scope analysis for the revision process of the Ecolabel for “Footwear”
EUEB special session on hazardous substance verification
Updates on issues related to the EU Ecolabel
Revision of EU Ecolabel Criteria for Wooden Floor Coverings
EU Ecolabel Criteria revision for ‘Footwear’
EUEB 13th March 2014 Revision of the EU Ecolabel criteria for the product group 'Wooden Floor Coverings' Scope and definition.
Assessment and verification
EUEB special session on hazardous substance verification
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Bed Mattresses JRC- IPTS November 2012.
Competent Body Meeting Ecolabel Criteria for ‘Televisions’
Revision of EU Ecolabel for Furniture
Update on issues related to the EU Ecolabel
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
CARACAL March 2013 COM Project – “The potential impact on industrial competitiveness of restrictions on certain.
Joint Research Centre (JRC) Product Bureau
Updates on issues related to the EU Ecolabel
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Proposal for an amendment for C&G Paper: Status of the process
Reclassification of some surfactants due to update on CLP Regulation
Revision of Decision 2010/477/EU
Article 8 Guidance – Integration levels and methods
Joint Research Centre (JRC) Product Bureau
Working Group meeting of February 2015
Impacts of new Legislation on waste statistics
Presentation transcript:

Revision of EU Ecolabel Criteria for detergents Preliminary Scoping EU Ecolabel CB Forum June 2014, Brussels Joint Research Centre   The European Commission's in-house science service 

Content Current scope definition within the detergents EU Ecolabels Penetration of the detergents EU Ecolabels Current criteria and areas of focus for revisions Preliminary LCA screening results Toxicity evaluation

Current EU Ecolabels and revision schedule The "detergents" group is made up of: Domestic laundry detergents, Industrial and institutional laundry detergents, Detergents for dishwashers, Industrial and institutional automatic dishwasher detergents.  Project start – December 2013  Preliminary reports – on-going work  Draft for AHWG meeting – November 2014 (expected) All-purpose cleaners, Hand dishwashing detergents.  Project start – June 2014 Ad hoc working group meetings to take place simultaneously for all product groups as the stakeholders are common to almost all products.

Source: Eurostat. PRODCOM Production of manufactured detergent products, EU-28, value and tonnes, 2013 Source: Eurostat. PRODCOM 4

Current EU Ecolabel penetration Current number of EU EcoLabelled products on the market under each Ecolabel: - Domestic laundry detergents: 180, (includes detergents and pre-treatment stain removers) - I&I laundry detergents: 3, - Domestic dishwasher detergents: 76, - I&I dishwasher detergents:5, - All-purpose cleaners: 2143, (includes all-purpose cleaners, window cleaners, sanitary cleaners) - Hand dishwashing detergents: 390.

Current criteria and focus areas for revisions (non-exhaustive) LD IILD DD IIDD APC HDD Measurement threshold Functional unit Reference dosage Dosage requirements Toxicity to aquatic organisms: Critical Dilution Volume (CDV) Biodegradability of organics Biodegradability of surfactants Specified excluded ingredients Hazardous substances and mixtures Biocides Corrosive properties VOCs Enzymes Phosphorus Weight/utility ratio (WUR) Phtahlates regulation plastic packaging Labelling of plastic packaging Fitness for use Points system Consumer information Information on EU Ecolabel Not yet studied Existing criterion Area under consideration

Preliminary screening of LCA studies Laundry and dishwasher detergents Findings of relevance for both scope and criteria areas: The use phase has the most impact on energy and water use: temperature of water, size of loads, Surfactants and builders have the most impact from the POV of ingredient sourcing, concentrated detergents help reducing the impact, Packaging and transport impacts are generally low (1-3% of all impacts, each), End of Life: focus on toxicity to aquatic organisms and biodegradability of ingredients.  Need for precise data on laundry detergent composition for further LCA studies – please send in contributions.

Toxicity evaluation: CDV vs USEtox Toxicity to aquatic organisms is a criterion in all EU EcoLabels linked to detergents Currently toxicity evaluation is performed by using Critical Dilution Volume (CDV) CDV is a pass/fail assessment method with absolute toxicity thresholds and not a ranking method USEtox has been proposed as an alternative to CDV for EU EcoLabels; it is already the recommended method for French environmental labelling USEtox is an LCA based method and therefore used for comparing products using the best available average data  email sent to CBs (26/05) asking for feedback about measuring toxicity to aquatic organisms in national Ecolabels and what changes should be brought in the EU Ecolabel – currently no replies.

Toxicity evaluation: CDV vs USEtox Tentative list of steps necessary to include USEtox as a method to assess toxicity to aquatic organisms for the EU Ecolabel: Assess benchmark formulations with the "biggest acceptable impacts" that can be EU ecolabeled (all applicants must show their products are less impacting) Create a database containing verified data for the most commonly found substances in detergents (make it easy to import into the USEtox) Provide an easy-to-use manual for the USEtox method, covering in detail the case where a substance is not in the list mentioned above (which databases to use, how to calculate the different characterisation factors, etc.) Use USEtox as a complementary (alternative?) method to CDV, at least in this revision The following recommendation on the potential scope extension can be made on the basis of the analysis of legislation and existing labels and on the preliminary screening of market information and LCA studies for furniture,: Furniture often seems to consist of different materials. The most common materials used in the furniture sector are wood and wood-based materials, followed by metals and plastics. Therefore the product group should be expanded in order to allow for the inclusion of types of furniture most commonly used. However, it should be noted that this proposal might result in the use of materials that are not desirable from the environmental point of view. According to the LCA screening, it will be important to set criteria for the different material types which may be used in furniture. The focus should be on the most important environmental impacts associated to wood and wood-based products (such as sustainable forestry), metals, plastics and any other critical material identified along the project. Glass should be not excluded "a priori" from the scope, due to relevant impacts associated with the use of this material. Although 56% of the production volume is classified as wooden furniture; few products are composed of at least 90% by weight of wood. Consequently, the current scope does not cover the significant share of the wooden furniture in the market. No matter the scope is widened or not to cover other materials, it is proposed to reduce the wood content weight threshold for wooden furniture. For instance, the minimal threshold could be set to 50%, as in the Blue Angel. For the definition of the scope it is important to take into account the types of furniture with the greater market shares (e.g. furniture for dining rooms, living rooms and bedrooms, kitchens, seats, office furniture). Specific types of products whose primary function is not to be used as domestic or office furniture should be excluded from the scope (e.g. streetlights, bike-parks, playgrounds, building products - steps, walls, panels , sanitary equipment, carpets)

Needed feedback Generic formulations of different detergents: - laundry detergents (especially industrial formulations), - dishwasher detergents (both domestic and industrial), - hand dishwashing detergents, - sanitary cleaners. Deadline: mid-July 2014 (in time to be analysed before the drafting of the criteria scheduled for July 2014)

Thank you Project website: Galyna Medyna galyna.medyna@ec.europa.eu +34-9544888402 Project website: http://susproc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/product_bureau