fMRI Quality Assurance (QA)(v2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
fMRI Methods Lecture6 – Signal & Noise
Advertisements

When zero is not zero: The problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI Stark & Squire (2001) By Mike Toulis November 12, 2002.
Basis Functions. What’s a basis ? Can be used to describe any point in space. e.g. the common Euclidian basis (x, y, z) forms a basis according to which.
General Linear Model L ύ cia Garrido and Marieke Schölvinck ICN.
General Linear Model Beatriz Calvo Davina Bristow.
Assessment of tumoural ADC’s in rectal Tumours using Burst: New methodological Developments SJ Doran 1, ASK Dzik-Jurasz 2, J Wolber 2, C Domenig 1, MO.
Buttons in SPM5 Carolyn McGettigan & Alice Grogan Methods for Dummies 5 th April 2006.
MRI Phillip W Patton, Ph.D..
Richard Wise FMRI Director +44(0)
NON-EXPONENTIAL T 2 * DECAY IN WHITE MATTER P. van Gelderen 1, J. A. de Zwart 1, J. Lee 1,3, P. Sati 1, D. S. Reich 1, and J. H. Duyn 1. 1 Advanced MRI.
Clinical Evaluation of Fast T2-Corrected MR Spectroscopy Compared to Multi-Point 3D Dixon for Hepatic Lipid and Iron Quantification Puneet Sharma 1, Xiaodong.
Evaluation of Reconstruction Techniques
Section 1 fMRI for Newbies
Parameters and Trade-offs
Methods Protocol: Previous studies [1, 2] have involved imaging of only a single central slice of the brain. The present study used a similar paradigm,
Topics spatial encoding - part 2. Slice Selection  z y x 0 imaging plane    z gradient.
Statistical Parametric Mapping Lecture 10 - Chapter 12 Preparing fMRI data for statistical analysis Textbook: Functional MRI an introduction to methods,
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 12 Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center M.Tech.
Magnetic Resonance Imagining (MRI) Magnetic Fields
Realigning and Unwarping MfD
Moving Averages Ft(1) is average of last m observations
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 19: Data formats and data path DICOM DICOM servers Conversion between formats Slice-time correction.
Volumetric Analysis of Brain Structures Using MR Imaging Lilach Shay, Shira Nehemia Bio-Medical Engineering Dr. Alon Friedman and Dr. Akiva Feintuch Department.
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 12: Signal-to-Noise Ratio Things that determine signal strength –voxel size –RF coil Things that determine.
Method for Determining Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Cerebral Lesions from Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examinations T.H.
Signal and Noise in fMRI fMRI Graduate Course October 15, 2003.
Tissue Contrast intrinsic factors –relative quantity of protons tissue proton density –relaxation properties of tissues T1 & T2 relaxation secondary factors.
Magnetic Resonance Imagining (MRI) Magnetic Fields Protons in atomic nuclei spin on axes –Axes point in random directions across atoms In externally applied.
Radiofrequency Pulse Shapes and Functions
Chemometrics Method comparison
Principles of MRI Physics and Engineering
Automated Image Analysis Software for Quality Assurance of a Radiotherapy CT Simulator Andrew J Reilly Imaging Physicist Oncology Physics Edinburgh Cancer.
TSTAT_THRESHOLD (~1 secs execution) Calculates P=0.05 (corrected) threshold t for the T statistic using the minimum given by a Bonferroni correction and.
CT Quality Control for CT Scanners. Quality Control in CT A good idea? Yes Required for accreditation? Sometimes Improves image quality? Sometimes Depends.
Function BIRN: Quality Assurance Practices Introduction: Conclusion: Function BIRN In developing a common fMRI protocol for a multi-center study of schizophrenia,
Preprocessing of FMRI Data fMRI Graduate Course October 23, 2002.
Introduction Many clinicians routinely use multiple receive coils for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the human brain. In conjunction with.
597 APPLICATIONS OF PARAMETERIZATION OF VARIABLES FOR MONTE-CARLO RISK ANALYSIS Teaching Note (MS-Excel)
Basics of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. How MRI Works Put a person inside a big magnetic field Transmit radio waves into the person –These "energize"
Correcting for Center Frequency Variations in MRSI Data Using the Partially Suppressed Water Signal Lawrence P Panych, Ph.D., Joseph R Roebuck, Ph.D.,
Signal and noise. Tiny signals in lots of noise RestPressing hands Absolute difference % signal difference.
FINSIG'05 25/8/2005 1Eini Niskanen, Dept. of Applied Physics, University of Kuopio Principal Component Regression Approach for Functional Connectivity.
FMRI Methods Lecture7 – Review: analyses & statistics.
A CCELERATED V ARIABLE F LIP A NGLE T 1 M APPING VIA V IEW S HARING OF P SEUDO -R ANDOM S AMPLED H IGHER O RDER K-S PACE J.Su 1, M.Saranathan 1, and B.K.Rutt.
NIMH MEG Core Facility Magnetoencephalography Imaging Resource, IRP, NIMH / NINDS Comparison of temporal and spatial resolution for various neuroimaging.
WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management Akm Saiful Islam Lecture-7:Extereme Climate Indicators.
Image Reconstruction using Dynamic EPI Phase Correction Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies using echo planar imaging (EPI) employ data acquisition.
Figure 3. Log-log plot of simulated oscillating phantom, assuming a Gaussian-shaped field. Field constants a 1 =a 2 =0.1. The data initially plateau, then.
Functional Brain Signal Processing: EEG & fMRI Lesson 14
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Core What We Need from Cores 1 & 2 NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing.
FEAT (fMRI Expert Analysis Tool)
Conclusions Simulated fMRI phantoms with real motion and realistic susceptibility artifacts have been generated and tested using SPM2. Image distortion.
Quality Assurance.
SPM Pre-Processing Oli Gearing + Jack Kelly Methods for Dummies
Statistical Analysis An Introduction to MRI Physics and Analysis Michael Jay Schillaci, PhD Monday, April 7 th, 2007.
Real time shimming (RTS) for compensation of respiratory induced field changes P van Gelderen, JA de Zwart, P Starewicz, RS Hinks, JH Duyn Introduction.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic representation of the near-infrared (NIR) structured illumination instrument,
Yun, Hyuk Jin. Introduction MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR) signal intensity measured from homogeneous tissue is seldom uniform; rather it varies smoothly across.
Assessment of data acquisition parameters, and analysis techniques for noise reduction in spinal cord fMRI data  R.L. Bosma, P.W. Stroman  Magnetic Resonance.
FMRI data acquisition.
Surface-based Analysis: Inter-subject Registration and Smoothing
Sunday Case of the Day Physics
Surface-based Analysis: Intersubject Registration and Smoothing
Signal fluctuations in 2D and 3D fMRI at 7 Tesla
Martin D Bootman, Michael J Berridge  Current Biology 
Signal and Noise in fMRI
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
The statistical analysis of fMRI data using FMRISTAT and MINC
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Basics of fMRI and fMRI experiment design
Presentation transcript:

fMRI Quality Assurance (QA)(v2) Data acquisition, processing and analysis Katherine Lymer Medical Physicist in MR Support SFC Brain Imaging Research Centre for Scotland, University of Edinburgh

fMRI QA: Objectives Describe the quality of the fMRI data Using measures of SNR, SFNR, fluctuation and drift Monitor the long-term stability of scanner performance in fMRI Allow between site-assessments of fMRI data

Image Acquisition Equipment set-up Test-object set-up Coil: As per usual fMRI examination (e.g. quadrature / 8 channel-head coil) Test object: Manufacturer provided homogenous sphere Test-object set-up Mark as “zero” position Centre coil / test object in scanner Align lasers with centre of coil; Use test object holder (if applicable); Place test object in centre of coil;

Image Acquisition Frequency of acquisition: Scanning parameters Site dependant: May be useful to acquire data on a weekly / fortnightly basis to establish a baseline; The results from our QA suggest that a monthly test is acceptable on our scanner. Scanning parameters Note magnet room temperature Sequence: Two approaches: As per typical fMRI examination “Pushing” the scanner as hard as possible (measure stability “under stress”) In Edinburgh, we use the following protocol on our 8 channel head coil: TE TR NEX FOV #slices Slice thickness spacing nVols Matrix Flip angle Tscan 40ms 2044ms 1 24cm 28 5mm 202* 128*64 90º 6min 53sec * Includes dummy scans (processing software expects 2 dummy vols) Note the RF-receiver and transmit gain and the resonant frequency

Image Processing Requirements: Transfer data to “off-line” to image analysis work station NB This processing protocol is based upon that provided by the BIRN (http://www.nbirn.net/research/function/fbirn_tools_primer.shtm) and is similar to that used in “Calibrain”. See also: Weisskoff et al, MRM 36: 643-645, 1996 Friedman et al, JMRI 23: 827–839, 2006 Requirements: PC / workstation with matlab; SPM5 (as supplied by the FIL: http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) fMRI_qa.m script (as supplied by fBIRN: http://www-calit2.nbirn.net/tools/fbirn_stability_phantom/index.shtm) This script needs to be modified to reflect local / in-house needs (4) mricro

Data Management Ensure that data is stored in central fMRI data store, in appropriate folder denoting the current QA session (E.g. In Edinburgh, the data is stored in Y:\MONTHLY_QA using the format: QAddmmyyyyTEMPtt_yyyymmdd_studyNumber) In the relevant monthly QA folder, make two new sub-folders to differenentiate between the raw and reconstructed data e.g. “raw_data” and “SPM5_output”. Copy the fMRI dicom files into the raw_data folder (E.g. in Edinburgh, this is: QAddmmyyyyTEMPtt_yyyymmdd_studyNumber\raw_data)

Pre-processing Start Matlab (ensure all paths are correct) Start SPM5 Convert the DICOM files using the “DICOM Import” function in SPM5: Select the files to be reconstructed (all in the “raw data” folder) Select “Done”; Select output dir: SPM5_output; Select “Done (NB if performing reconstruction on a windows machine: In pop-up window: Output image format: Two file (img +hdr) NIFTI Use ICEDims in filename: No) This may take a few minutes

Pre-processing (4) Start mricro Check the central slice in volume Load the first “real” fMRI volume (i.e. the third listed volume) into mri cro Review entire volume and note central slice Amend fMRI_qa.m accordingly

Image Processing: fMRI_qa_calc Edits required to fMRI_qa (original version obtained from http://www-calit2.nbirn.net/tools/fbirn_stability_phantom/index.shtm) Ensure TR is correct; Ensure that the date is in the correct format; Define dimensions of ROI for ghosting measurement by changing: X1G, X2G, Y1G, Y2G (4) Ensure that the central ROI is placed appropriately within the central image (5) Check that the central slice number is correct (i.e. it matches that practically acquired)

Image Processing: fMRI_qa_calc Run your version of fMRI_qa Import values into excel spreadsheet; Plot results to help identify any trends / outliers. Note any variation in RF-receiver / -transmit gain and resonant frequency (since the phantom and the protocol remain the same, these should remain constant)

Image Analysis: All image analysis is performed on the central slice of the volume. (NB It is important to check that the central slice as designated in KL_fMRI_qa.m matches that practically acquired.) Application of the BIRN / Calibrain protocol yields six measurements: Mean signal A mean image is produced by calculating the mean, on a voxel by voxel basis, across all the central slices. A signal summary value is obtained from an ROI placed in the centre of this mean image. Example mean image:

Image Analysis: (2) Temporal Fluctuation Noise Image A fluctuation noise image is produced by subtracting the calculated trend line from the data (the BIRN function uses a second order polynomial). (It’s effectively a standard deviation image.) By removing the trend from the data, we can estimate the fluctuations in the data about that trend: A linear trend may indicate a systematic increase or decrease in the data (caused by e.g. sensor drift). Example standard deviation image:

Image Analysis: (3) Signal-to-Fluctuation Noise Ratio (SFNR) Image and Summary SFNR Value A SFNR image is created by dividing the mean signal image by the temporal fluctuation (SD) image on a voxel-by-voxel basis. The summary SFNR value is obtained from the mean SFNR from the same ROI placed in the centre of the SFNR image. Example SFNR image:

Image Analysis: (4) Static Spatial Noise In order to measure the spatial noise, the sum of the odd and even numbered slices are calculated separately (so there are two results); the difference between these two sums is then calculated. This approximates the static spatial noise. Is there is no drift in either amplitude or geometry across the time series, then this difference image will show no structure of the phantom and provides a measure of intrinsic noise. Example difference image:

Image Analysis: (5) SNR Summary The same ROI is placed in the centre of the static spatial noise (difference) image. Using the signal summary value (see (1)), the

Image Analysis: (6) SNR Percent Fluctuation and Drift The average signal intensity is calculated from each of the central slices across the time series using the same ROI, placed in the centre of each image. A time series of volume number vs average intensity is plotted and a second order polynomial is fitted to the data to establish a trend line. The mean signal intensity (prior to detrending) and the SD of the residuals after detrending are calculated.

Image Analysis: (7) Summary graphs In addition, a series of summary graphs showing the change in raw signal, SGR, magnitude spectrum and relative standard deviation will be displayed

Image Analysis: (8) Signal-to-Ghost Ratio (SGR) In addition to the BIRN tests, a signal to ghost (SGR) measurement was added to the protocol by Dr Gordon Waiter, Aberdeen Biomedical Imaging Centre, University of Aberdeen. The image may have to be windowed to observe the ghost. In order to make the SGR measurement, a second (ghosting) ROI is defined within the ghosting region of the image. The SGR summary value is calculated from the mean signal (from the central ROI) / mean signal (from the ghosting ROI).

SINAPSE Reporting Mechanism: Short-term Maintain results locally; Distribute summary results with colleagues e.g. for multi-centre studies, comparisons of scanner performance (KL happy to hold central data base and distribute as required). Medium - Long term We aim to produce a SINAPSE QA reporting website to which these results can be uploaded. Watch this space…………..!