Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Structure of the E. coli DNA Glycosylase AlkA Bound to the Ends of Duplex DNA: A System for the Structure Determination of Lesion-Containing DNA  Brian.
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Structural Insights into the Inhibition of Wnt Signaling by Cancer Antigen 5T4/Wnt- Activated Inhibitory Factor 1  Yuguang Zhao, Tomas Malinauskas, Karl.
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Structural Elements of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor–DNA Complex
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
DNA Minor Groove Sensing and Widening by the CCAAT-Binding Complex
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Pablo De Ioannes, Shruti Malu, Patricia Cortes, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (May 2004)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages 1197-1206 (November 2012) DNA Binding by GATA Transcription Factor Suggests Mechanisms of DNA Looping and Long-Range Gene Regulation  Yongheng Chen, Darren L. Bates, Raja Dey, Po-Han Chen, Ana Carolina Dantas Machado, Ite A. Laird-Offringa, Remo Rohs, Lin Chen  Cell Reports  Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages 1197-1206 (November 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012 Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Structures of GATA3/DNA Complexes (A) Structure of complex 1. The N-finger and the linker are colored in green, the C-finger and C-tail are colored in magenta, and the DNA is colored in yellow. (B) Structure of complex 2. Complexes of GATA3 N-/C-fingers bound to DNA from neighboring asymmetric units are shown to illustrate one GATA3 protein bridging two pieces of DNA. One N-finger is colored in green, the C-finger of the same GATA protein is colored in magenta, and all other molecules are colored in gray. (C) Structure of complex 3. Complexes of GATA3 N-/C-fingers bound to DNA from neighboring asymmetric units are shown to illustrate DNA bridging by GATA3 protein; same color scheme as described in (B). The sequences of the DNA are listed below. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 DNA Recognition by the GATA3 DBD (A) Arg367 binds DNA only in the wrapping mode (complex 1). These interactions are stabilized through the interaction between the Arg277 guanidinium group and the Lys368 backbone, reducing the conformational flexibility of the C-terminal tip. The electron density is calculated from a composite omit map. (B) Hydrogen-bonding interactions among Arg276, Asn286 (N-finger), and 3 bp (GAT) of the binding site at their major groove core. These hydrogen bonds, in particular the bidentate hydrogen bond of the Arg276 guanidinium group with guanine, lead to specific recognition of the base-pair identity. (C) A network of hydrogen-bonding interactions, similar to the one shown in (B), including a bidentate hydrogen bond, is formed among Arg330, Asn340 (C-finger), and 3 bp (GAT) of the binding site at their major groove core. (D) Arg365 forms hydrogen bonds with the minor groove edge of a base. Because these base readout interactions in the minor groove are not as specific as in the major groove, the negative electrostatic potential enhanced through the narrow minor groove stabilizes interactions with arginine residues (shape readout). See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Schematic Representation of DNA Contacts with GATA3 Amino Acids in Complex 1 in the Palindromic Site Hydrogen bonds are indicated by blue dotted lines, and hydrophobic contacts are indicated by red dashed lines. The protein/DNA contact diagram was generated by NUCPLOT (Luscombe et al., 1997). The contact map demonstrates that GATA3 contacts the DNA in both the major and minor grooves and employs base and shape readout mechanisms. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Superposition of Zinc Finger Motifs Displaying Various Linker Conformations (A) Superposition of the N-fingers from the three complexes. (B) Superposition of the C-fingers from the three complexes. (C) Superposition of the N-finger and C-finger in complex 1. P304 pushes the linker region away from the minor groove, whereas K358 pulls the C-tail close to the minor groove through its interaction with C321. The DNA is visualized as an orange ribbon. See also Figures S3 and S4. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Biacore Analyses (A) Sensorgrams show a kinetic analysis of GATA3 DBD with either a single GATA site (top) or a palindromic site (bottom). Black lines represent triplicate injections performed in random order over the indicated DNA surface. A 1 min association was followed by a 5 min dissociation phase. Red lines represent the global fit of data sets using CLAMP. (B) Association rate constants ka, dissociation rate constants kd, and equilibrium constants KD = ka/kd demonstrate the kinetics of GATA3 DBD binding to either a single or a palindromic GATA site. The SEM is indicated. The dissociation rates of single and palindromic sites are significantly different (p < 0.05). Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 In-Gel FRET Analysis of DNA Looping by GATA3 in Solution (A) GATA3 N-/C-fingers can bring two binding sites into close proximity despite their separation in sequence. The pseudo-colored image shows a superposition of the fluorescence of the Cy3-donor (green) and the fluorescence of the Cy5-acceptor (red) fluorophores. Labels to the left indicate the respective protein/DNA species. Lanes 1–6 show the binding of wild-type GATA3 to DNA. Lanes 7–12 show the binding of a GATA3 mutant R276E, which abolishes N-finger DNA binding. (B) Cartoons represent models of the distinct overall architecture corresponding to the two protein shifts. The N-finger is displayed as a cyan oval, and the C-finger is shown as a purple oval. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Crystal Packing of Different GATA3/DNA Complexes, Related to Figure 1 (A) Complex 1. The crystal belongs to the P21 space group. Each asymmetric unit contains one GATA3 DBD bound to a palindromic dsDNA substrate. The DNA molecules form a pseudo-continuous helix along the diagonal of the ab plane of the unit cell. Two layers of DNA follow two crossing diagonals of the ab plane. (B and C) Complex 2. The crystal belongs to the P21 space group, with two copies of GATA3 DBD and two dsDNA substrates in each asymmetric unit. The DNA molecules form a pseudo-continuous helix along the a and b axes of the unit cell, which explains why the unit cell axes a and b have lengths that are approximately equal to the length of 20-mer dsDNA (65 Å). The two layers of DNA molecules run perpendicularly to each other. The N-finger (yellow) and C-finger (magenta) of GATA3 bridge separated DNA fragments arranged in parallel within the same plane, not between the layers. (D and E) Complex 3. The crystal belongs to the C2 space group, with one GATA3 DBD and one dsDNA molecule in each asymmetric unit. The DNA molecules also form a pseudo-continuous helix but do not align with any major unit cell axis. The axes of DNA in alternating layers run across each other at an angle of ∼30°. The packings of different layers of DNA are mediated by the N-finger and C-finger, respectively. The N-finger layer is sandwiched by DNA layers and therefore is densely packed, whereas the C-finger layer is formed by protein–protein interactions between symmetry-related C-fingers. The N-finger and C-finger of the same GATA DBD bind to sites on separated DNA molecules from different DNA layers that sandwich the N-finger. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Protein–DNA Interactions Representing the Shape Readout between GATA Arginine Residues and the Shape-Dependent Negative Electrostatic Potential in the Minor Groove, Related to Figure 2 The DNA shape is shown in green and dark gray for convex and concave surfaces, respectively. The red mesh represents a −5 kT/e isopotential surface. The plots below show the correlation between minor groove width (blue plots) and electrostatic potential (red plots), which attracts arginine contacts. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Electron Density Maps of Linker Regions, Related to Figure 4 (A) Complex 1. (B) Complex 2. (C) Complex 3. It is apparent in this figure that although the protein side chains cannot be resolved due to flexibility, the backbone of the linker can be correctly traced. The electron density is calculated from composite omit map. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Sequence Alignment between the GATA3 N-finger and C-finger, Related to Figure 4 The homology is indicated according to standard convention below the sequence alignment. Cell Reports 2012 2, 1197-1206DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.012) Copyright © 2012 The Authors Terms and Conditions