CMS-Bijing weekly meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CERN Summer Student Session
Advertisements

Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Quark Compositeness Search with γ +Jet Final State at the LHC Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh Choudhary, Debajyoti Choudhury Department.
N-1 Plots. 2 N-1 Plots – Lead Photon Mass Cut at 100 GeV applied Lead Photon – More plots in Backup.
ESTIMATING THE FAKE LEPTON BACKGROUND IN A SEARCH FOR PAIR PRODUCED STOPS AT CMS David Kolchmeyer Advisor: Alberto Graziano.
1 Goals -Short term: – Finish merging the L1 trigger configuration files with the HLT. – When this is done, hopefully I will see that the signal increase.
Trigger efficiencies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics April 19 th,
1 High energy photon pairs: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS Group Meeting 13June 2007.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Quark Compositeness Study and Progress Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh C. Choudhary & Debajyoti Choudhury Department of Physics & Astrophysics.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
1 High energy photon pairs from RS-1 Gravitons: L1/HLT Studies Vladimir Litvin, Toyoko Orimoto Caltech, CMS WG4 Group Meeting 01 June 2007.
Trigger studies for GMSB with photons (Internal note for approval) Shilei Zang Bernadette Heyburn, Uriel Nauenberg University of Colorado, Boulder TSG.
Instructions for DP Approval Slides I Plots: – Fonts Large for readability Standard fonts : – Arial, Times New Roman, or similar – Do not use Comic Sans.
1 Hgg Cut based Analysis update Jim Branson, Chris Palmer, Marco Pieri, Matteo Sani, Sean Simon.
India-CMS meeting, BARC 30 th July, MonoPhoton Study Umberto Berzano, Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sandhya Jain Yurii Maravin, Tia Miceli, Albert de Roeck,
Argonne Jamboree January 2010 Esteban Fullana AOD example analysis.
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
Trigger validation for Many thanks to Long Zhao, Chihiro Omachi, Julie Kirk, Giovanni Siragusa, Patricia Conde Muiño, Andreas Reinsch, Olya Igonkina,
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
Categories for resolution study Categories : eta, energy, number of primary vertices, conversion should be considered Eta : barrel – endcap ? or 4 bins.
29,30 July 2010 India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai 1 Update on Z’-> τ τ->τ jet+ τ jet analysis Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir.
Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
5/28/2002UTA group meeting1 An update of top to stop analysis How to estimate W->e cross section? Why the w to e cross section I used is so big? Next Choose.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Status and Prospects of the H → γγ Analysis Jim Branson - Marco Pieri - Sean Simon UCSD Meeting March 11 th 2008.
Monika Grothe, DQM for MC from EWK PAG, Sep DQM for MC from EWK PAG Monika Grothe U Wisconsin September Currently 3 modules: 1.EwkDQM in.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Fixing Tau HLT (Part 1.5/2) ‏ M.Bachtis. 2 L1 Seeding Fix L1: Seeding with High Et Jet paths to increase efficiency with High Et Still using corrected.
H  in CMS Chris Seez Friday, 16 th March 2012 at LAL Orsay.
Work in IPN-Lyon 2009 J. Tao Aug. 16 th, 2009 Topics: Electromagnetic PS/ME matching with ALPGEN, with the  + jets samples ECAL Single Dead Channel Correction.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD WG6 Meeting, February
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
Converted photon and π 0 discrimination based on H    analysis.
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
AOD example analysis Argonne Jamboree January 2010
 discrimination with converted photons
CMS-IHEP/Beijing weekly meeting
SM Direct Photons meeting
Tree based validation tool for track reconstruction
Jet Studies 1. Changes in seed finding for cone jets reconstruction
Modified HEEP ID for Z’ SUSY Search
b-ID: p17 certification: Version 1.1 seems solid so far
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
MET Experience at UF Bobby Scurlock University of Florida
Michele Pioppi* on behalf of PRIN _005 group
Higgs Plans for ICHEP Gave status at conveners meeting last Friday
Update: High energy photon pairs Search for RS-1 Gravitons
Overview of CMS H→ analysis and the IHEP/IPNL contributions
Status of ECAL Optimization Study
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
SM-like Higgs searches
Status and Prospects of the H→γγ Analysis
 discrimination with converted photons
QqH;H->rr 肖虹
EGAMMA HLT Marco Pieri UCSD Meeting 12 June 2007.
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
Hγγ Analysis Techniques: How can we get the most from a small signal?
Converted photon and π0 discrimination based on H  cut-based analysis Zhen Zhang IHEP
 discrimination with converted photons
Higgs  update Catalin and Tony May 22, 2007
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
An Easy to Use Track Comparison Tool
Presentation transcript:

CMS-Bijing weekly meeting H->γγ October Exercise J.Tao IHEP-Beijing CMS-Bijing weekly meeting Oct. 30, 2009 Two simple exercises for the H->γγ: HiggsGamGamValid https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/HiggsWG/HiggsGamGamValid HiggsGamGamVtx https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/HiggsWG/HiggsGamGamVtx 3 groups involved in the HiggsGamGamValid Marco Pieri Nancy & Ted Beijing/IPNL: Junquan Tao, Hong Xiao, Anna Falkiewicz, Susan Gascon-Shotkin

The HggOctEx Code A standard CMSSW Analyzer Codes in 3_1_X were developed and checked into the CVS package by J. Tao: http://cmssw.cvs.cern.ch/cgi-bin/cmssw.cgi/UserCode/HggOctEx src: HggOctEx.cc interface: HggOctEx.h test: hggoctex_cfg.py, MultiStack.C and all the plots of my results Modifications (S. Gascon, A. Falkiewicz, J. Tao and H. Xiao, thanks to V. Litvin and others for disccusion): 1: HLT 'All-pass' (HLT selection done upstream, for now) 2: ISO variables plotted directly *after* selection of leading and subleading (in pt) photons, ISO cuts imposed *before* all plots (formerly was *after* all plots except m_2gamma). Can steer intermediate parts of selection with configuration 3: Added eta limits on photons: Incorporated into choice of leading and subleading photons are chosen 4: Cleanup/uniformisation of histo binning, limits, titles… 5: Two Separate new versions committed and tagged, one with solid, one with hollow cone track isolation (SolidConeTrackIso03_3_1_X , Hollow ConeTrackIso03_3_1_X) 6: Isolation bias: selected iaolated 2 highest PT photons Currently just gives histograms (can add output root tree later) Runing with Crab by J. Tao, H. Xiao and A. Falkiewicz many times with all the SD samples of HiggsGaGa.

Datasets after skimming of HiggsGaGa Secondary dataset: SD_Photon20 samples for 10TeV and 7TeV Secondary dataset: SD_DoublePhoton10 samples for 10TeV and 7TeV (not actually needed for the plots for october exercise, but only for tests) 8 sets of plots: AfterSkim and AfterCuts for both 7 and 10 TeV with SD_Photon20 and SD_DoublePhoton10 tt zee Wenu PhotonJet_Pt15 QCD_EMenriched_Pt20to30 QCD_EMenriched_Pt30to80 QCD_EMenriched_Pt80to170 QCD_BCtoE_Pt20to30 QCD_BCtoE_Pt30to80 QCD_BCtoE_Pt80to170 zee QCD_Pt15 QCD_Pt30

Basic variables and events selections Basic variables for plots: for events passing the skim: Photon variables for leading and subleading photon separately: Et, eta, sigma_ietaieta, H/E, R9, Isol_tk, Isol_ECAL, Isol_HCAL (define variables, same as for selection below) Diphoton variables: M_gamgam, Pt_gamgam, costhetastar, eta_gamgam, Pz_gamgam Primaryvertex_with_tracks (for now choose the one with maximal Sum(pt) ) Z, Sum(|pt|), |Sum(pt)|, Ntk For events with at least one photon with 2 converted tracks, with valid conversionVertex and with |deltaCot(theta)|<0.15: Zvtx_fromconv; Zvtx_fromconv-Z_fromtracks Additional plots for Fermiophobic Higgs: Uncorrected calo jets: Leading and subleading et, eta, Deta, M_jj MET: caloMET, tcMET for events passing the selections: Same plots as above Selections: Pt leading > 30 GeV && Pt sub-leading > 20 GeV && |eta| both photons <2.5 Isolation (leading and subleading the same): Tracker (Sum Pt tracks solid cone Dr<0.3 less than ~2 GeV) ECAL (Jurassic sum Et solid cone Dr<0.3 less than ~8 GeV) HCAL (Jurassic sum Et solid cone Dr<0.3 less than ~8 GeV)

Configuration File For events passing the skim: no cut in cfg file #Used for photon selection MaxPhotonEta = cms.double(50.0), minPhotonEt = cms.double(0.0), minNumberPhoton = cms.int32(2), #don't change this or keep >=2 minPhotonEtGammaLead = cms.double(0.0), #Min PT of Leading Gamma minPhotonEtGammaSubLead = cms.double(0.0), #Min PT of SubLeading Gamma MinMGammaGamma = cms.double(0.0), #Min 2Gamma mass #Used for Isolation ISOMaxNumberTrack = cms.int32(9999), #will not use ISOMaxSumPTTrack = cms.double(-1), #if not requirement, specify a value <0 ISOMaxSumETECAL_EB = cms.double(99999.0), #ECAL Isolation in Barrel ISOMaxSumETECAL_EE = cms.double(99999.0), #ECAL Isolation in Endcap ISOMaxSumETHCAL_EB = cms.double(99999.0), #HCAL Isolation in Barrel ISOMaxSumETHCAL_EE = cms.double(99999.0), #HCAL Isolation in Endcap #Used for jet selection MinJetEt = cms.double(0.0), #Used for conversion track vertex calculation MaxCovDeltaCotTheta = cms.double(999.) #vertex from conversion, Nancy's proposal For events passing the skim: no cut in cfg file For events passing the selections: cuts #Used for photon selection MaxPhotonEta = cms.double(2.5), minPhotonEt = cms.double(20.0), minNumberPhoton = cms.int32(2), #don't change this or keep >=2 minPhotonEtGammaLead = cms.double(30.0), #Min PT of Leading Gamma minPhotonEtGammaSubLead = cms.double(25.0), #Min PT of SubLeading Gamma MinMGammaGamma = cms.double(10.0), #Min 2Gamma mass #Used for Isolation ISOMaxNumberTrack = cms.int32(9999), #will not use ISOMaxSumPTTrack = cms.double(2.0), #if not requirement, specify a value <0 ISOMaxSumETECAL_EB = cms.double(8.0), #ECAL Isolation in Barrel ISOMaxSumETECAL_EE = cms.double(8.0), #ECAL Isolation in Endcap ISOMaxSumETHCAL_EB = cms.double(8.0), #HCAL Isolation in Barrel ISOMaxSumETHCAL_EE = cms.double(8.0), #HCAL Isolation in Endcap #Used for jet selection MinJetEt = cms.double(0.0), #Used for conversion track vertex calculation MaxCovDeltaCotTheta = cms.double(0.15) #vertex from conversion, Nancy's proposal

Histograms produced (1) TH1I* h_event_count; TH1I* h_eventpasshlt_count; TH1I* h_hltsize_count; TH1I* h_hltbit_Npass; TH1I* h_photon_count; TH1D* h_photon_R9; TH1D* h_photon_R9_EB; TH1D* h_photon_R9_EE; TH1D* h_photon_et_Lead; TH1D* h_photon_et_SubLead; TH1D* h_photon_eta_Lead; TH1D* h_photon_eta_SubLead; TH1D* h_photon_SigmaEtaEta_Lead; TH1D* h_photon_SigmaEtaEta_SubLead; TH1D* h_photon_SigmaIEtaIEta_Lead; TH1D* h_photon_SigmaIEtaIEta_SubLead; TH1D* h_photon_HoE_Lead; TH1D* h_photon_HoE_SubLead; TH1D* h_photon_R9_Lead; TH1D* h_photon_R9_SubLead; TH1D* h_mass_2gamma; TH1D* h_pt_2gamma; TH1D* h_pz_2gamma; TH1D* h_eta_2gamma; TH1D* h_CosThetaStar; Edit encore, add refs PTDR

Histograms produced (2) TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO; TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EB; TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EB_R9G93; TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EB_R9L93; TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EE; TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EE_R9G93; TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EE_R9L93; TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaL09_R9G948; //12 CAT: R9min>0.948 && |eta|max<0.9 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaL14442_R9G948; //12 CAT: R9min>0.948 && 0.9<|eta|max<1.4442 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaL21_R9G948; //12 CAT: R9min>0.948 && 1.4442<|eta|max<2.1 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaG21_R9G948; //12 CAT: R9min>0.948 && |eta|max>2.1 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaL09_R9G90; //12 CAT: 0.9<R9min<0.948 && |eta|max<0.9 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaL14442_R9G90; //12 CAT: 0.9<R9min<0.948 && 0.9<|eta|max<1.4442 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaL21_R9G90; //12 CAT: 0.9<R9min<0.948 && 1.4442<|eta|max<2.1 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaG21_R9G90; //12 CAT: 0.9<R9min<0.948 && |eta|max>2.1 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaL09_R9L90; //12 CAT: R9min<0.90 && |eta|max<0.9 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaL14442_R9L90; //12 CAT: R9min<0.90 && 0.9<|eta|max<1.4442 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaL21_R9L90; //12 CAT: R9min<0.90 && 1.4442<|eta|max<2.1 TH1D* h_mass_2gamma_ISO_EtaG21_R9L90; //12 CAT: R9min<0.90 && |eta|max>2.1 Edit encore, add refs PTDR

Histograms produced (3) TH1D* h_nTrkHollowDR03_Lead; TH1D* h_trkSumPtHollowDR03_Lead; TH1D* h_ecalRecHitSumEtDR03_Lead; TH1D* h_hcalTowerSumEtDR03_Lead; TH1D* h_nTrkHollowDR03_SubLead; TH1D* h_trkSumPtHollowDR03_SubLead; TH1D* h_ecalRecHitSumEtDR03_SubLead; TH1D* h_hcalTowerSumEtDR03_SubLead; TH1D* h_IsISOPhoton_Lead; TH1D* h_IsISOPhoton_SubLead; TH1I* h_PrimaryVertex_count; TH1D* h_PrimaryVertex_ZDistance; TH1D* h_ZconvpvMinusZdefaultpv; TH1I* h_PrimaryVertex_NtrkDefaultRec; TH1D* h_PrimaryVertex_ZDefaultRec; TH1D* h_PrimaryVertex_RxyDefaultRec; TH1I* h_PrimaryVertexFromTraks_Npv; TH1I* h_PrimaryVertexFromTraks_Ntrk; TH1D* h_PrimaryVertexFromTraks_Z; TH1D* h_PrimaryVertexFromTraks_VectorSumPT; TH1D* h_PrimaryVertexFromTraks_AbsSumPT; TH1D* h_dz_EatimateFromTracksMinusZDefault; TH1D* h_dz_EatimateFromTracksMinusZconv; Edit encore, add refs PTDR

Histograms produced (4) TH1D* h_CaloJet_PT_Lead; TH1D* h_CaloJet_Eta_Lead; TH1D* h_CaloJet_Phi_Lead; TH1D* h_CaloJet_PT_SubLead; TH1D* h_CaloJet_Eta_SubLead; TH1D* h_CaloJet_Phi_SubLead; TH1D* h_CaloJet_DeltaEta_j1j2; TH1D* h_CaloJet_Mass_j1j2; TH1D* h_CaloMET; TH1D* h_CaloMETphi; TH1D* h_tcMET; TH1D* h_tcMETphi; Edit encore, add refs PTDR

H->γγ October Exercise Results My results for HiggsGamGamValid: See the results from the tes/ directory: http://cmssw.cvs.cern.ch/cgi-bin/cmssw.cgi/UserCode/HggOctEx/test/ The links from the HiggsGamGamValid website: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/HiggsWG/HiggsGamGamVtx Cross check: the results of HiggsGamGamValid from others (Marco Pieri, Nancy & Ted)

October Exercise Results: PT of leading photons 7TeV: AfterCuts 7TeV: AfterSkim 10TeV: AfterSkim 10TeV: AfterCuts

Eta of leading photons 10TeV: AfterSkim 10TeV: AfterCuts

Sigma_EtaEta && H/E of leading photons 10TeV: AfterSkim 10TeV: AfterCuts 7TeV: AfterSkim 7TeV: AfterCuts

Mgamgam && Eta(gamgam) 7TeV: AfterSkim 7TeV: AfterCuts

Z of primary vtx from tracks and conversions 10TeV: AfterSkim

Mgamgam: Barrel R9>0.93 & Barrel R9<0.93 7TeV: AfterSkim 7TeV: AfterCuts 7TeV: AfterSkim 7TeV: AfterCuts

Summary Hgg Oct exercise for HiggsGamGamValid have been finished @IHEP-Beijing. From the results, there’s no big problem about the analysis codes and the SD data samples Comparing with others, the results are almost the same. You can see the results of the HiggsGamGamValid https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/HiggsWG/HiggsGamGamValid