THE MODEL CITY BENCHMARK (TOCE) 3RD IMPACT Workshop November 5-8, 2003 Université Catholique de Louvain Lovain-la-Neuve, Belgium
TEST CASE: 1A vs 1B
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 2)
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 3)
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 4)
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 5)
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 6)
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 7)
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 8)
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 9)
1A vs 1B (GAUGE 10) wake
TEST CASE: 2A vs 2B
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 2)
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 3)
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 4)
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 5) Chaneled probes are less accurate
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 6)
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 7)
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 8)
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 9)
2A vs 2B (GAUGE 10)
TEST CASE: 3A vs 3B
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 2)
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 3)
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 4)
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 5)
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 6)
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 7)
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 8)
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 9)
TEST CASE: 4A vs 4B vs 4C
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 2) Bottom elevation Solid walls High friction
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 3) Solid walls Bottom elevation High friction
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 4) Solid wallsBottom elevation High friction
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 5) Solid walls Bottom elevation High friction
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 6) Solid wallsBottom elevation High friction
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 7) Solid wallsBottom elevation High friction
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 8) Solid wallsBottom elevation High friction
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 9) Solid walls Bottom elevation High friction
4A vs 4B vs 4C (GAUGE 10) Solid walls Bottom elevation High friction
3A vs 3B (GAUGE 10)