Building Evidence The YCC Evaluation Molly Irwin Chief Evaluation Office US Department of Labor
Why the focus on evidence Increased emphasis on evidence-based policy making at all levels of government and in the private sector, for example: The President’s FY16 budget, “increases the use of evidence and evaluation to ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely on programs that work” Proposed legislation in congress Evidence reviews and tiered-evidence funding initiatives Private philanthropic organizations calling for evaluation and the use of evidence Increased emphasis on learning and program improvement on the ground
Why the focus on evidence Plan Use Evaluation to Improve Implement Evaluate
What we know now Rigorous evidence to support Career Academies! Sustained earnings gains of 11 percent (or $2,088) more per year for Academy group members compared to non-Academy group ($16,704 boost in total earnings over eight years). Labor market impacts were concentrated among young men -- real earnings for young men in the Academy group increased by $3,731 (17 percent) per year — or nearly $30,000 over eight years. Less rigorous, but promising evidence suggests career academies lead to improved academic achievement, reduced high school dropout rates for disadvantaged students and increased preparation for, and graduation rates from, college.
How the YCC evaluation will add to the literature It will answer these questions: How were the YCC programs implemented? What is the impact of YCC programs on students outcomes? Receipt of services Educational experiences Employment and labor market outcomes Does the impact of YCC programs vary by student and grantee characteristics? By implementing the following design: Implementation study involving all YCC programs Random assignment impact evaluation with a subset of grantees
When we’ll know what Data collection Grantee survey (now and in spring 2017) Focus groups/key informant interviews during site visits (3 times during the program period - fall/winter 2015, spring 2017, early 2018) Baseline data collection as students enter the program (collected during 2015-2016 school year from applicants for 2016-2017 YCC enrollment) Student follow up data (18 months after students enter the program – spring 2018) Reports Interim report 2017 Final report 2019
Where you fit in As partners in building evidence about workforce programs for youth so we can continue to improve the programs and outcomes for the youth we serve.
Questions… Irwin.molly.e@dol.gov