D16 – Bellringer Define Kairos; what does it mean? (review pp )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Advertisements

LOGICAL FALLACIES Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments Moore AP Language and Composition.
When Claims Go Wrong Recognizing & Avoiding Logical Fallacies Kim Miller Davis.
Debate Manners Recall that debate is a cooperative activity with a long history as civil discourse.
Debating Year 10 extension. By the unit of this unit, you will be able to: Understand debating terms and apply them to your own and others’ debates. Form.
Logical Fallacies1 This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because pity does not serve as evidence for a claim Just to get a scholarship does not justify.
Fallacies Of Thinking A fallacy is flawed logic or misguided thinking.
Persuasive Elements and Techniques Freshmen English.
TODAY’S GOALS Continue developing preparations for the class debate Learn advanced strategies for addressing counterarguments.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING. INTRODUCTION PARAGRAPHS LESSON 1.
Rhetorical Fallacies.
Understanding Fallacy
What is a logical fallacy?
In other words, people are lying to you ALL THE TIME…
Claim, Evidence & Reasoning, Counter Claim & Counter Attack
Argument Notes English IV.
Description.
Logical Fallacies ENGL 101.
Errors in reasoning that invalidate the argument
Rhetorical Fallacies Faulty Arguments in Persuasive Texts:
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
Logical fallacies.
PHL 320 Week 3 Apply: Logical Structures of Arguments //Download Your Course Here:
PHL 320 STUDY Education for Service-- phl320study.com.
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
November 2nd to 6th Mrs. Camarano’s Classes
Looking for false logic in someone’s argument
Logical Fallacies Ms. Wilkie
D2 – Bellringer! Next as an example of seeing things from another perspective, let’s do the following: If your group was PRO the issue we debated last.
Week 2 Class 2.
The Gun Control Debate Mrs. Opperman English 11H.
D10 – Bellringer List some different issues that we might discuss debate in class (or others are currently debating), which would be kairotic right now:
D1 – Bellringer Of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos, which do you use the most? Explain why:
D4 – Bellringer Look and see if you can find any persuasive writing contests that we might participate in as a class (or perhaps just you!). We’ll be.
D5 – Bellringer Let’s take one last look and see if you can find any persuasive writing contests that we might participate in as a class (or perhaps.
D6 – Bellringer Reminder: get your essay out!
D21 – Bellringer Define Pathos. What might be an example of being persuasive via pathos? Examples: “Caravan of Migrants: Look at how diligent / sad / helpless.
D20 – Bellringer Define Ethos. What might be an example of being persuasive via ethos? Examples: “I can talk about this because I went thru this experience.
D3 – Bellringer Take a look at the following issues; note that you will be writing about one of these: Gun Control Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted?
Chapter 6 Reasoning Errors
D15 – Bellringer Define Kairos; what does it mean? (review pp )
Classroom Based Assessment Constitutional Issues 8th Grade
D4 – Bellringer Let’s Discuss Ch. 1 first!
D5 – Bellringer Let’s take a look and see if you can find any persuasive writing contests that we might participate in as a class (or perhaps just you!).
D2 – Bellringer Think of a word, and then a synonym, that have different connotations, and use them in the context of an argument and illustrate one.
D18 – Bellringer Define Ethos. What might be an example of being persuasive via ethos? Examples: “I can talk about this because I went thru this experience.
D17 – Bellringer Think of some current events for which it is the opportune moment in the Rhetorical Situation right now. Write down at least two, and.
D17 – Bellringer Time to prep for your quiz! Grab your notes, textbook, and let’s prep for the review! Kahoot.
D14 – Bellringer Make sure that you have contacted your chosen school / competition, so that we can move forward with specific competitions and goals.
D15 – Bellringer Guess how much money we raised: $300+!!!! Good work!
D8 – Bellringer Today is the DAY!
D17 – Bellringer Think of some current events for which it is the opportune moment in the Rhetorical Situation right now. Write down at least two, and.
D14 – Bellringer Define Kairos; what does it mean?
D8 – Bellringer Today is the DAY!
D12 – Bellringer Now, let’s review our reading from last time (pp ), and answer the following: When looking at an argument, as you prepare to analyze.
The Second Amendment The Right to Bear Arms.
D4 – Bellringer Think of a word, and then a synonym, that have different connotations, and use them in the context of an argument and illustrate one.
Logical Fallacies What could this mean? [Logic = thinking; Fallacy = false or flawed]
PROPOSAL FOR REDUCED HOURS FOR NAME
Logical fallacies.
D5 – Bellringer Why does it matter what words we use? Don’t all synonyms / words mean the same thing? Explain your answer: Let’s check out pp :
1D2 – Bellringer! Take a look at the following issues, and pick one that you feel strongly about. Start with procon.org Alternative Energy vs. Fossil.
The Second Amendment The Right to Bear Arms.
D8: Review / Quiz! Time for our quiz! Let’s review via Kahoot!
D19 – Bellringer Define Pathos. What might be an example of being persuasive via pathos? Examples: “Caravan of Migrants: Look at how diligent / sad / helpless.
Logical Fallacies English III.
Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments
BR: D15 Review (Case Study): What good things did Sam do in his desire to create a well thought-out argument, both in his research and thinking? (pp.
1. Could I receive an A for this class
Presentation transcript:

D16 – Bellringer Define Kairos; what does it mean? (review pp. 49-53) Describe a situation where the Kairos (the opportune time; see this vid for a review of the word) might be best for someone wanting to: A: Promote Gun Control (Example: Florida Shooting) This is a story about the Stoneman Douglas High School Shooting in Florida…people were upset, angry, etc., and that proved to be an ideal time for those in favor of stronger gun control to put the blame (justified or not) on poor / lax gun control laws. B: Promote Gun Rights (Example: Springville Attack) Conversely, here’s a story about a person with a Concealed Carry permit, who came to the aid of a police officer, and stopped his assault. Had he not been carrying a weapon, things may have turned out differently. Here a pro-gun advocate could argue that here, the 2nd Amendment rights being used by this person may very well have saved the police officer’s life.

Ch. 4, Part II Kairos & Decorum P. 54: What is discourse? P. 54-55: How is college, for example, an example of many diverse communities? Explain: P. 55: “Every community has a s_________.” Explain: P. 56, par. 2: “Persuasive power can come from _____________________________________.” P. 56: What’s a “gatekeeper”? Explain: Kairos is about talking to the right p____, at the right t____, in the right p____, under the right c________. P. 54: The “Life Cycle” of an issue has four main parts; define each, explain when the “critical / opportune moment” aka Kairos is: Pp. 60-61: What is “decorum”? Explain, and give some good / bad examples: Does defying decorum work? Explain: Kairos is about talking to the right p____ (people), at the right t____ (time), in the right p____ (place), under the right c________ (circumstances).

Note: Mr. Wright will be checking with local stores to help create a shirt for our debate team. Also, do not forget to double check with your assigned events for potential competitions!

Logical Fallacy of the Day (from last time): Ad Hominem – Personal Attack These are very common… Basically, you argue that someone is dumb / bad / whatever, and that should mean whatever argument they have made is invalid. It is a distraction from the argument, and doesn’t address it. Example:

Logical Fallacy 2: Begging the Question This is a form of circular reasoning, where you just double back on your claim. VID