Jie Dong, Weimin Ni, Renbo Yu, Xing Wang Deng, Haodong Chen, Ning Wei 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Advertisements

Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Kazumasa Nito, Catherine C.L. Wong, John R. Yates, Joanne Chory 
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages e4 (July 2018)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Shu-Tang Tan, Hong-Wei Xue  Cell Reports 
Nuclear Accumulation of the Phytochrome A Photoreceptor Requires FHY1
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Constitutive Expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) Gene Disrupts Circadian Rhythms and Suppresses Its Own Expression  Zhi-Yong Wang, Elaine.
Phytochrome A Negatively Regulates the Shade Avoidance Response by Increasing Auxin/Indole Acidic Acid Protein Stability  Chuanwei Yang, Famin Xie, Yupei.
Wenqi Wang, Nan Li, Xu Li, My Kim Tran, Xin Han, Junjie Chen 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
PIF4 Coordinates Thermosensory Growth and Immunity in Arabidopsis
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Young-Hee Cho, Sang-Dong Yoo, Jen Sheen  Cell 
Kneissl Julia , Shinomura Tomoko , Furuya Masaki , Bolle Cordelia  
Positive or Negative Roles of Different Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Pho85-Cyclin Complexes Orchestrate Induction of Autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Phytochrome Signaling in Green Arabidopsis Seedlings: Impact Assessment of a Mutually Negative phyB–PIF Feedback Loop  Pablo Leivar, Elena Monte, Megan.
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Arabidopsis MSBP1 Is Activated by HY5 and HYH and Is Involved in Photomorphogenesis and Brassinosteroid Sensitivity Regulation  Shi Qiu-Ming , Yang Xi.
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Jacopo Scrofani, Teresa Sardon, Sylvain Meunier, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Stress-Induced Phosphorylation of S
Volume 17, Issue 13, Pages (July 2007)
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Xiang Han, Hao Yu, Rongrong Yuan, Yan Yang, Fengying An, Genji Qin
HOS1 Facilitates the Phytochrome B-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Function during Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis  Ju-Heon Kim, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung,
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
BZR1 Interacts with HY5 to Mediate Brassinosteroid- and Light-Regulated Cotyledon Opening in Arabidopsis in Darkness  Qian-Feng Li, Jun-Xian He  Molecular.
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
MAX2 Affects Multiple Hormones to Promote Photomorphogenesis
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Frank G. Harmon, Steve A. Kay  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
DELLA Proteins Promote Anthocyanin Biosynthesis via Sequestering MYBL2 and JAZ Suppressors of the MYB/bHLH/WD40 Complex in Arabidopsis thaliana  Ye Xie,
CDK Phosphorylation of Translation Initiation Factors Couples Protein Translation with Cell-Cycle Transition  Tai An, Yi Liu, Stéphane Gourguechon, Ching.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
RRC1 Interacts with phyB and Colocalizes in Nuclear Photobodies.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Light-Dependent Degradation of PIF3 by SCFEBF1/2 Promotes a Photomorphogenic Response in Arabidopsis  Jie Dong, Weimin Ni, Renbo Yu, Xing Wang Deng, Haodong Chen, Ning Wei  Current Biology  Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages 2420-2430.e6 (August 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2017 27, 2420-2430.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 EBF1/2 Inhibit Hypocotyl Elongation by Reducing PIF3 Activity in Red Light (A) Overexpression of EBF1 or EBF2 suppressed PIF3-Myc-induced hypocotyl elongation in red light. Seedlings grown under 10 μmol/m2/s red light for around 4 days were measured for hypocotyl length. Representative seedlings are shown on the left, and the mean hypocotyl lengths (mean ± SEM) are shown as bar graphs on the right. Statistical significance was calculated by Student’s t test. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (B) The ebf1 ebf2 double mutant exhibited longer hypocotyls in red light compared to Col, and the phenotype could be suppressed by the pif3 mutation. Seedling growth and data analyses were performed as in (A). The scale bars represent 2 mm. See also Figures S1 and S2. Current Biology 2017 27, 2420-2430.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 PIF3 Interacts with EBF1 and EBF2 (A) PIF3 interacts with both full-length and LRR domains of EBF1 and EBF2 in yeast. Full-length or partial EBF1 and EBF2 were fused with the binding domain (BD) as baits. Full-length PIF3 was fused with the activation domain (AD) as prey. Empty vectors were used as negative controls. (B) PIF3 interacts with EBF1 and EBF2 in vitro. The proteins of EBF1-flag, EBF2-flag, and PIF3-Myc were synthesized using an in vitro translation system. The flag antibody was used for in vitro pull down, and pellets were analyzed by western blots using antibodies to flag and Myc. (C) EBF1 and EBF2 co-immunoprecipitate PIF3 in Arabidopsis. Total proteins were extracted from 3-day-old dark-grown PIF3-Myc or EBF-GFP/PIF3-Myc seedlings. GFP antibody was used for immunoprecipitation, and pellets were analyzed by western blots using antibodies to GFP and Myc. (D) PIF3 interacts with EBF1 and EBF2 in LCI assays. PIF3 was fused to nLUC, and EBF1/2 without an F box domain (EBF1/2 ΔF) were fused to cLUC, which were co-expressed in tobacco. Empty vectors were used as negative controls. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2017 27, 2420-2430.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 EBF1/2 Promote PIF3 Degradation after Light Exposure (A and B) Mutation of EBF1 and EBF2 slowed down the light-induced degradation rate of endogenous PIF3 protein (A) and ectopic PIF3-GFP protein (B). Dark-grown seedlings (“D”) were treated with a red-light pulse (Rp) and kept in the dark for the indicated times before protein extraction and western blotting with antibodies to PIF3 and RPN6. (A) Top: representative western blot result. Bottom: quantification results of PIF3 degradation kinetics from three independent biological repeats. PIF3 protein level was normalized to RPN6 loading control, and the dark PIF3 level was set as 100%. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. (B) S.exp, short exposure time; L.exp, long exposure time. (C and D) Overexpression of EBF1-TAP and EBF2-TAP accelerated light-induced degradation of endogenous PIF3 (C) or ectopic PIF3-Myc protein (D). Dark-grown seedlings (“D”) were treated with either pulse (Rp) or continuous (Rc) red light. Western blots were performed with antibodies to PIF3, RPN6, Myc, or RPT5. See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2017 27, 2420-2430.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 EBF1/2 Promote Light-Induced PIF3 Ubiquitination Total polyubiquitinated proteins were precipitated using tandem ubiquitin-binding entities 2 (TUBE2) from 3-day dark-grown seedlings without/with R light pulse (D/Rp) treatment, and then analyzed by western blots using antibodies to ubiquitin (A), Myc (B and C), or PIF3 (D). Both Ub and Ubi are the abbreviations for ubiquitin. See also Figure S5. Current Biology 2017 27, 2420-2430.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 EBF1- and EBF2-Mediated PIF3 Degradation Is Dependent on Phytochrome-Induced PIF3 Phosphorylation (A and B) EBF1-promoted (A) or EBF2-promoted (B) PIF3 degradation upon light exposure is dependent on phyA and phyB. Dark-grown seedlings (“D”) were treated with a Rp and kept in the dark for the indicated times before total proteins were extracted and analyzed by western blots using antibodies to PIF3 or RPN6. (C and D) The interaction between PIF3 and phytochromes is necessary for EBF1-promoted (C) or EBF2-promoted (D) PIF3 degradation. The GFP-fused PIF3 transgenic lines PIF3 WT (wild-type PIF3) and PIF3 mAPAmAPB (PIF3 with mutations in the APA and APB domains) in wild-type (Col) or EBF1/2-TAP backgrounds were used. Dark-grown seedlings (“D”) were treated with continuous red light (Rc) for the indicated times before western blotting using antibodies to GFP or RPN6. (E and F) EBF1-promoted (E) or EBF2-promoted (F) PIF3 degradation is dependent on light-induced PIF3 phosphorylation. The Myc-fused PIF3 transgenic lines PIF3 WT (wild-type PIF3) and PIF3 A20 (PIF3 protein with 20 mutations of light-induced phosphorylation sites) in wild-type (Col) or EBF1/2-TAP backgrounds were used. Protein preparation was as described in (C), and western blots were performed with antibodies to Myc or RPN6. Current Biology 2017 27, 2420-2430.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 PIF3 Phosphorylation Promotes the Assembly of PIF3-EBF1/2 with CUL1 (A) EBF interacts with PIF3 under both dark and light conditions in Arabidopsis. Dark-grown (“D”) seedlings (3-day-old) were treated with a Rp and then kept in darkness for 10 min, and total proteins were extracted. IgG Sepharose was used for immunoprecipitation, and pellets were analyzed by western blot using a Myc antibody. (B) EBF1/2 interact with wild-type and phospho-site mutants of PIF3 in yeast two-hybrid assays. Full-length EBF1, EBF2, and LRB2 were fused to DNA-binding domains (BD) as baits. Phospho-dead (A6 and A20), wild-type, and phospho-mimic (D6 and D19) PIF3s were fused to activation domains (AD) as prey. Empty vectors were used as negative controls. (C) Light induces the association of CUL1 and PIF3 in Arabidopsis. Experimental conditions were the same as in (A). GFP antibody was used for immunoprecipitation (IP), and the pellets were analyzed by western blots using antibodies to GFP or CUL1. CUL1 was co-precipitated with YFP-PIF3 after light (Rp), but not in the dark (“D”). (D) EBF1 and EBF2 are essential for light-induced association of CUL1 and PIF3 in Arabidopsis. Experimental conditions were the same as in (A). GFP antibody was used for IP, and the pellets were analyzed by western blots using antibodies to CUL1 and PIF3. (E) PIF3 phosphorylation can enhance its association with CUL1 without light activation. Dark-grown seedlings (3-day-old) were used for IP with Myc antibody. The pellets were analyzed by western blots using antibodies to Myc or CUL1. Endogenous CUL1 was pulled down by proteins of PIF3 phospho-mimic (PIF3-D6), but not PIF3 phospho-dead (PIF3-A20) mutant. (F) Phospho-mimic PIF3 promotes EBF1 and CUL1 association. Experimental procedures were the same as in (E). IgG Sepharose was used for IP of EBF1-TAP, and the pellets were analyzed by western blots using antibodies to Myc or CUL1. CUL1 was strongly pulled down with EBF1-TAP in the presence of PIF3 phospho-mimic transgenic products, compared to those in PIF3 wild-type, PIF3 phospho-dead, or no PIF3 transgene. The relative amounts of CUL1 protein to EBF1-TAP protein in pellets are shown as mean ± SD from three independent experiments, in which the ratio of EBF1-TAP transgenic plants was set as 1.0. (G) ASK1 is necessary for the association of EBF1 and CUL1 promoted by phospho-mimic PIF3 in vitro. EBF1-flag, CUL1-His, PIF3 A20-Myc, and PIF3 D6-Myc proteins were expressed using an in vitro translation system. GST and GST-ASK1 proteins were expressed and purified from E. coli. Anti-flag antibody was used to immunoprecipitate EBF1-flag, and then the pellets were analyzed by western blots using antibodies against flag, His, Myc, and GST. See also Figure S6. Current Biology 2017 27, 2420-2430.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 EBF and LRB E3 Ligases Have Distinct Functions (A) LRBs regulate light-induced degradation of phyB whereas EBFs do not. 3-day-old dark-grown (“D”) seedlings were transferred to 60 μmol/m2/s red light for 72 hr (Rc) and then total proteins were analyzed by western blots using antibodies to phyB or RPN6. Light-induced decline in phyB was prohibited only in lrb mutants, not in the other lines tested. (B) lrb mutants show light hypersensitivity whereas ebf mutants show hyposensitivity with regard to the hypocotyl response. Hypocotyl lengths of 3-day-old seedlings growing under dark (Dc) or 5 μmol/m2/s red light (Rc) were measured (mean ± SEM). Statistical significance was calculated by Student’s t test. n.s, p > 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The lrb mutants displayed shorter hypocotyls whereas ebf mutants displayed longer hypocotyls under Rc. The scale bars represent 2 mm. (C) ebf mutants showed defects in PIF3 degradation under both strong and weak light conditions, whereas lrb mutants showed defects in PIF3 degradation predominantly under strong light condition. 3-day-old dark-grown seedlings were treated with either 3,000 μmol/m2 or 100 μmol/m2 Rp and then kept in darkness for 15 min before total proteins were extracted and analyzed by western blots using antibodies to PIF3 and RPN6. (D) EBFs promote PIF3 degradation under both strong and weak light conditions, whereas LRB’s effect on PIF3 is detected predominantly in strong light. 3-day-old dark-grown seedlings were treated with either 3,000 μmol/m2 (upper) or 100 μmol/m2 (lower) Rp and kept in the dark for the indicated times before western blotting using antibodies to PIF3 or RPN6. (E) A model illustrating the distinct functions of EBF1/2 and LRBs in the plant light signaling pathway through their control of PIF3. In the dark, PIF3 accumulates to promote skotomorphogenesis. PIF3 binds EBF1/2 but the complex is not recruited to the SCF core, and PIF3 does not bind LRBs. When plants sense weak light at the beginning of light exposure, PIF3 undergoes multisite phosphorylation (represented by the circles with “-”). The phospho-PIF3-EBF complex and core SCF scaffold assemble to form SCFEBF1/2-PIF3 complexes, resulting in the ubiquitination and degradation of PIF3. This PIF3 degradation pathway promotes photomorphogenesis. When plants perceive strong light, another PIF3 degradation pathway is triggered in addition to SCFEBF1/2-PIF3, in which the phyB-PIF3 complex is targeted by CUL3LRBs E3 ligases. The LRB pathway results in the degradation of both phyB and PIF3 to attenuate plant light responses. See also Figure S7. Current Biology 2017 27, 2420-2430.e6DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.062) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions