HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
Advertisements

Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Zachary Lee Johnson, Jue Chen  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Tsan Xiao, Par Towb, Steven A. Wasserman, Stephen R. Sprang  Cell 
Molecular Basis of Fibrin Clot Elasticity
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
The Structural Basis for the Large Powerstroke of Myosin VI
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Insights into How Nucleotide-Binding Domains Power ABC Transport
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
Discovery Through the Computational Microscope
Structural Basis for the Differential Effects of CaBP1 and Calmodulin on CaV1.2 Calcium-Dependent Inactivation  Felix Findeisen, Daniel L. Minor  Structure 
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages e2 (July 2018)
Myosin VI Rewrites the Rules for Myosin Motors
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Thomas R. Lane, Elaine Fuchs, Kevin C. Slep  Structure 
Sequential Unfolding of Individual Helices of Bacterioopsin Observed in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Extraction from the Purple Membrane  Michele.
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Recognition of the Regulatory Nascent Chain TnaC by the Ribosome
Paolo A. Lobo, Lynn Kimlicka, Ching-Chieh Tung, Filip Van Petegem 
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1995)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages (October 2014)
Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
SR Protein Kinase 1 Is Resilient to Inactivation
Yanxin Liu, Jen Hsin, HyeongJun Kim, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Presentation transcript:

Formation of Salt Bridges Mediates Internal Dimerization of Myosin VI Medial Tail Domain  HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 1443-1449 (November 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2010.09.011 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic Diagram of Myosin VI Construct The N-terminal region starts from a motor domain (black), which is followed by unique insert 2 (pink) and IQ motif (cyan). Insert 2 binds a calmodulin (CaM, light pink) with 4 calcium ions, and the IQ motif binds an apo-CaM (brownish yellow). The proximal tail (PT) domain (blue) consists of a three-helix bundle and serves as the lever-arm extension upon dimerization (Mukherjea et al., 2009). The medial tail (MT) domain (green) shows a pattern of alternating charged residues with only a small number of hydrophobic residues; it is followed by the distal tail (DT) domain (orange) and the cargo-binding domain (CBD, purple). The sequence of the MT domain is displayed on the right. The color scheme for the displayed sequence is adopted from Spink et al. (2008); blue, red, and green colors denote positively and negatively charged residues and hydrophobic residues, respectively. The color scheme for the myosin VI diagram is adopted from Phichith et al., 2009. Structure 2010 18, 1443-1449DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.09.011) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Dimerization of the Myosin VI MT Domain (907–980) (A) Spontaneous self-association of the MT segments in a 1 μs coarse-grained simulation. The MT segments are colored according to residue type (red: negatively charged; blue: positively charged; white: hydrophobic; green: polar). (B–D) (B) All-atom equilibrium MD of the MT dimer over a 50 ns duration. The dimer is seen to be stable with a significant buried molecular surface area (black trace in C). The red trace in (C) is the buried molecular surface area of the hydrophobic residues. The MT dimer contact map is shown in (D), with five observed salt bridges displayed in the insets. The main interhelical interactions are seen to lie below the diagonal, indicating a vertical offset between the helices that can be also recognized in (B); the diagonal in the contact map is indicated by a dashed line. See also Movies S1–S4 and Figures S1 and S2. Structure 2010 18, 1443-1449DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.09.011) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Percentages of Dimerized Myosins at Different Ionic Strengths The percentage of processive myosins was measured with 52 and 149 mM buffer. 14.0% ± 3.8% and 3.8% ± 2.9% (average ± SD) of the construct properly dimerized and walked processively for buffers with 52 and 149 mM ionic strengths, respectively. Percentages were calculated from six separated measurements. A total of 764 and 1037 myosins were counted for buffers with 52 and 149 mM ionic strength, respectively. Error bars represent SD. Structure 2010 18, 1443-1449DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.09.011) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Insensitivity of Processivity to Mutations of Hydrophobic Residues in the Medial Tail (A) Example trace of the mutant 940 construct (see text). The graph plots the position of the fluorescent labeled CY3 on one of the IQ-CaMs along actin filament versus time. Calculated step sizes are denoted by numbers in the graph. (B) Measured step size histogram for the mutant 940 construct. The average forward step size is 53.3 ± 19.1 nm (N = 143) and the average backward step size is −26.3 nm (N = 1). (C) Comparison of the percentage of properly dimerized myosin VI 940 for WT and mutant-type constructs. A fraction of 5.1% ± 3.5% and 6.6% ± 4.3% (average ± SD) of myosin VI was seen to be processive for mutant and WT constructs, respectively. Percentages were calculated from nine separate measurements; a total of 1007 and 995 myosins was counted for mutant and WT, respectively. Ionic strength of buffer was 52 mM for both cases. Structure 2010 18, 1443-1449DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.09.011) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Equilibrium MD of Truncated (907-940) MT Segment Dimers (A and B) Both WT (A) and mutant (B) dimers remained stable over the simulation. (C) Evolution of buried molecular surface area between the dimerized MT segments (red: WT dimer; black: mutated dimer; purple: buried molecular surface area from the hydrophobic residues of the WT dimer; blue: buried molecular surface area from the hydrophobic residues of the mutated dimer). (D) Potential of mean force characterizing the dimerization of the MT segments (red: WT; black: mutated). See also Movies S5 and S6. Structure 2010 18, 1443-1449DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.09.011) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Present Model of the Dimerized Full-Length Myosin VI The color scheme is adopted from Figure 1, except for the motor domain, which is shown in dark gray. MT domain (green) is the key dimerization region; the unfolded three-helix PT domain (blue) provides myosin VI with sufficient step length for the two motor domains (dark gray) to span a 36 nm step distance on the actin filament. There is a slight (∼10 Å) offset in the relative placement of the two MT domain segments. Structure 2010 18, 1443-1449DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2010.09.011) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions