Drosophila Chromosome Condensation Proteins Topoisomerase II and Barren Colocalize with Polycomb and Maintain Fab-7 PRE Silencing  Rossella Lupo, Achim.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Advertisements

Visualization of trans-Homolog Enhancer-Promoter Interactions at the Abd-B Hox Locus in the Drosophila Embryo  Matthew Ronshaugen, Mike Levine  Developmental.
Cosuppression in Drosophila: Gene Silencing of Alcohol dehydrogenase by white-Adh Transgenes Is Polycomb Dependent  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Skin-Specific Expression of ank-393, a Novel Ankyrin-3 Splice Variant
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Marios Agelopoulos, Daniel J. McKay, Richard S. Mann  Cell Reports 
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Chi-Yun Pai, Elissa P. Lei, Dolanchanpa Ghosh, Victor G. Corces 
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
Activation of p53 or Loss of the Cockayne Syndrome Group B Repair Protein Causes Metaphase Fragility of Human U1, U2, and 5S Genes  Adong Yu, Hua-Ying.
Distinct Contributions of Histone H3 Lysine 9 and 27 Methylation to Locus-Specific Stability of Polycomb Complexes  Leonie Ringrose, Heidi Ehret, Renato.
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Adam C Bell, Adam G West, Gary Felsenfeld  Cell 
Giacomo Cavalli, Renato Paro  Cell  Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages (May 1998)
Short Telomeres in Yeast Are Highly Recombinogenic
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Partner of Numb Colocalizes with Numb during Mitosis and Directs Numb Asymmetric Localization in Drosophila Neural and Muscle Progenitors  Bingwei Lu,
Douglas J Guarnieri, G.Steven Dodson, Michael A Simon  Molecular Cell 
Architecture of a Polycomb Nucleoprotein Complex
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (December 2007)
TALEN-Induced Double-Strand Break Repair of CTG Trinucleotide Repeats
Molecular Structure of a Functional Drosophila Centromere
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Nicholas S. Sokol, Lynn Cooley  Current Biology 
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
SIR2 Is Required for Polycomb Silencing and Is Associated with an E(Z) Histone Methyltransferase Complex  Takehito Furuyama, Rakhee Banerjee, Thomas R.
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (March 2001)
Tatiana I Gerasimova, Victor G Corces  Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
Distal Sequences, but Not ori-β/OBR-1, Are Essential for Initiation of DNA Replication in the Chinese Hamster DHFR Origin  R.F Kalejta, X Li, L.D Mesner,
Yi Wei, Lanlan Yu, Josephine Bowen, Martin A Gorovsky, C.David Allis 
ELAV, a Drosophila neuron-specific protein, mediates the generation of an alternatively spliced neural protein isoform  Sandhya P. Koushika, Michael J.
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Ludovica Bruno, Hans Jörg Fehling, Harald von Boehmer  Immunity 
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Sex-Linked period Genes in the Silkmoth, Antheraea pernyi
Barbara S Nikolajczyk, J.Aquiles Sanchez, Ranjan Sen  Immunity 
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
Multiple Developmental Stage–Specific Enhancers Regulate CD8 Expression in Developing Thymocytes and in Thymus-Independent T Cells  Wilfried Ellmeier,
Phosphorylation of PERIOD Is Influenced by Cycling Physical Associations of DOUBLE- TIME, PERIOD, and TIMELESS in the Drosophila Clock  Brian Kloss, Adrian.
Nucleosomes Unfold Completely at a Transcriptionally Active Promoter
Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S
The Effect of Distance on Long-Range Chromatin Interactions
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
The Drosophila dCREB2 Gene Affects the Circadian Clock
Pantelis Hatzis, Iannis Talianidis  Molecular Cell 
Drosophila DDP1, a Multi-KH-Domain Protein, Contributes to Centromeric Silencing and Chromosome Segregation  Dori Huertas, Alfred Cortés, Jordi Casanova,
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Polycomb Silencing Blocks Transcription Initiation
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages (October 1996)
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Distinct Contributions of Histone H3 Lysine 9 and 27 Methylation to Locus-Specific Stability of Polycomb Complexes  Leonie Ringrose, Heidi Ehret, Renato.
A Stage-Specific Enhancer of Immunoglobulin J Chain Gene Is Induced by Interleukin-2 in a Presecretor B Cell Stage  Chang-Joong Kang, Colleen Sheridan,
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Replacement of Fab-7 by the gypsy or scs Insulator Disrupts Long-Distance Regulatory Interactions in the Abd-B Gene of the Bithorax Complex  Ilham Hogga,
Presentation transcript:

Drosophila Chromosome Condensation Proteins Topoisomerase II and Barren Colocalize with Polycomb and Maintain Fab-7 PRE Silencing  Rossella Lupo, Achim Breiling, Marco E Bianchi, Valerio Orlando  Molecular Cell  Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 127-136 (January 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00161-7

Figure 1 Southern Analysis of In Vivo Fixed Chromatin Immunoprecipitation with TOPOII and BARR Antibodies Specific BX-C genomic fragments previously identified by low resolution analysis as containing binding sites for TOPOII and BARR were digested with restriction enzymes and resolved on 1.2% agarose gels (A), transferred onto nitrocellulose filters, and hybridized with DNA probes from TOPOII (C), BARR (D), and mock (no antibody, [B]) chromatin immunoprecipitations. Loading reflects the proximal-distal position in the BX-C map (Martin et al. 1995). Lane M is a molecular weight marker (1 kb ladder, Promega). Lane 1, AbdB γ promoter (p8106), HindIII, AccI; lane 2, iab-7 (p3434), EcoRI, XhoI; lane 3, Fab-7 (p4344), EcoRI, XbaI, XhoI; lane 4, Fab-7 (p4389), PstI, HindIII; lane 5, Mcp (p5989), EcoRI, AccI, PstI; lane 6, iab-4 (p7652), EcoRI, XhoI, PstI; lane 7, iab-3 (p6741), EcoRI, SalI, XhoI; lane 8, iab-3 (p2088), EcoRI, SmaI; lane 9, abdA II promoter (p3060), EcoRI, BamHI; lane 10, bxd (p3384), EcoRI, EcoRV, ClaI; lane 11, p6807, EcoRI, ClaI, EcoRV; lane 12, Ubx promoter (p3901), EcoRI, BamHI, ClaI; lane 13, p7480, EcoRI, SmaI, XbaI; lane 14, p1617, EcoRI; lane 15 bx (p2571), EcoRI, Eco47III, HindIII; lane 16, p2333, EcoRI; and lane 17, p10074, EcoRI, AccI, HindIII, HincII. The names of all subclones (except p8106) reflect the size of the corresponding genomic fragment in bp. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 127-136DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00161-7)

Figure 2 High-Resolution Distribution of TOPOII and BARR in the BX-C Hybridization signals in Figure 1 were quantified by Phosphorimager and plotted with ImageQuant software. Each panel provides a schematic view of the subclones and the position of TOPOII and BARR binding sites based on the quantitation values. Intensity values were normalized to an arbitrary 1 kb fragment and subtracted from the corresponding background values obtained from the mock hybridizations. The x axis represents the restriction fragments, featuring the genomic subclone structure below each panel. Numbers at the edges of the subclones indicate the position in the genetic map of the BX-C (Martin et al. 1995). The y axis represents TOPOII and BARR values after subtraction of the background, expressed in arbitrary units. Panel letters are also reported in Figure 3, permitting the identification of the position mapped for the two proteins in the locus. Restriction enzymes: AccI, A; BamHI, B; ClaI, C; EcoRI, E; EcoRV, EV; Eco47III, E47; HincII, HII; HindIII, H; PstI, P; SalI, S; SmaI, Sm; XbaI, Xb; and XhoI, Xh. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 127-136DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00161-7)

Figure 3 Distribution of TOPOII and BARR in the BX-C The scheme represents the BX-C, including transcription units and genetically characterized regulatory regions. The numbers represent the map coordinates expressed in kilobases (0 distal, 340 proximal; Martin et al. 1995). Previously identified major PC binding sites (green squares) are shown. A highly significant colocalization is observed between these sites and the BARR (red squares) and TOPOII (blue squares) sites. The capital letters (A–N) refer to genomic subfragments shown in Figure 2. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 127-136DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00161-7)

Figure 4 Coimmunoprecipitations of PH, BARR, and TOPOII Nuclear extracts from Drosophila embryos were immunoprecipitated with antibodies against BARR, TOPOII, PH, PC, PSC, and the preimmune serum (PI-serum) from the rabbit used for the PH antibody production (as indicated on top of the Western blots shown). After washing and SDS–PAGE (see Experimental Procedures), TOPOII (A), BARR (B), and PH (C) were detected with the respective antibodies. In each panel, an aliquot (10 μl) of the extract is shown as input. The molecular weights are 164 kDa for TOPOII, 97 kDa for BARR, and 170 kDa (PH 170p), 140 kDa (PH 140p), and 130 kDa (PH 130d) for the three PH isoforms (note the higher apparent molecular weight of TOPOII and of the PH isoforms in the blots shown). The three different isoforms and the size of the marker bands (New England BioLabs, prestained protein marker, broad range) are indicated. In (C), an additional blot of proteins immunoprecipitated with TOPOII antibodies is shown with an aliquot of nuclear extract run on the same gel for exact size comparison of the PH isoforms. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 127-136DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00161-7)

Figure 5 Loss of Fab-7 PRE-Induced Silencing of a mini-white Reporter Gene in barren Null Heterozygotes (A) Effect of a null allele (L305) of the barren gene on the expression of a mini-white gene under the control of Fab-7 PRE (5F24 25,2 line). Heterozygous females for barren show strong derepression of the mini-white gene (red eye). (B) Female progeny resulting from the same cross as in (A) carrying the balancer chromosome CyO (wild type for barren) instead of the barrL305 allele. In this case, no effect on the mini-white gene expression is observed (white eye). (C) Effect of the barrL305 allele on the expression of a mini-white gene not placed under the control of Fab-7 PRE (UI5 1,1 line). In this case, no derepression of the mini-white gene is observed (white eye). (D) The corresponding progeny as in (C) carrying the balancer chromosome CyO. Also in this case, no effect on mini-white expression is observed (white eye). Expression of the mini-white gene (red eye) was detected as flies hatched. In all cases (white and red eyes), no changes were observed up to ten days after eclosure. In all panels, 1-week-old females are shown. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 127-136DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00161-7)

Figure 6 Enhancement of the Fab-72 Phenotype by the barrL305 Allele (A) The Fab-7 region of the BX-C between iab-6 and iab-7 as adapted from Mihaly et al. 1997. Black boxes indicate strong nuclease hypersensitive sites (HS). Ovals mark putative nucleosomal core particles. The deleted regions of the class I (Fab-71), class II (Fab-72), and class III (ΔPRE316) Fab-7-specific mutant fly lines are indicated. Fab-71 removes the whole element, Fab-72 removes the boundary region, and ΔPRE316 removes the PRE. (B) Abdominal cuticle patterns of adult male flies. Abdomens were cut along the dorsal midline and flattened on a slide. On the far right, a wild-type (+/+) and a barrL305 heterozygous cuticle are shown (barrL305 cuticles appear brighter, as these flies carry the yellow marker). Wild-type males show normal sized tergites 4, 5, and 6. Tergites 5 and 6 are pigmented. Structures in the bottom of each panel are part of the genitalia. Heterozygous Fab-71 and Fab-72 males have rudimentary or significantly reduced sixth tergites, respectively (arrows), whereas ΔPRE316 and barrL305 heterozygotes show a wild-type pattern. Cuticles of Fab-71/barrL305, Fab-72/barrL305, and ΔPRE316/barrL305 double heterozygotes are shown in the second and third rows. The bottom panels are from crosses of barrL305 females with male Fab-7 mutants (cuticles appear brighter, as male flies take the yellow marker from the barrL305 mothers), and the upper panels are from the reverse cross. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 127-136DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00161-7)

Figure 7 Chromosome Segregation Defects in ph Mutant Embryos Early embryos (0–3 hr after egg laying) from the ph503 stock were collected, stained with DAPI, and screened for mitotic figures. In a subset of embryos at stages 8 and 9, mitotic defects were observed as abnormal anaphases. Multiple chromosomal bridges (brightly staining material between the separating chromosomes) are clearly visible (A and B). In some cases, a few chromosomal breaks were also found. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 127-136DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00161-7)