The results are in! Now what?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIV TB. World wide TB is the most common cause of death in people with HIV About 1/3 of HIV infected people worldwide are co-infected with TB (co-infection.
Advertisements

Industry Issues: Dataset Preparation for Time to Event Analysis Davis Gates Schering Plough Research Institute.
CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
1 Voriconazole NDAs and Empiric Antifungal Therapy of Febrile Neutropenic Patients Study 603 John H. Powers, M.D. Medical Officer Division.
Development of extensive drug resistance in Multi-Drug resistant tuberculosis patients MSF anti-TB programmes in Abkhazia and Uzbekistan Authors: Cathy.
4 th National Anti-tuberculosis Drug Resistance Survey Botswana, 2007.
Culture Conversion and Self- Administered Therapy in Privately Managed Tuberculosis Patients Melissa Ehman MPH, Jennifer Flood MD MPH, Pennan Barry MD.
Johns Hopkins Center for Tuberculosis Research
Thank you for viewing this presentation. We would like to remind you that this material is the property of the author. It is provided to you by the ERS.
TB 101 Part II Brenda Mayes, R. N. March TREATMENT TB DISEASE MDR XDR LATENT TB INFECTION.
Challenges of Non-Inferiority Trial Designs R. Sridhara, Ph.D.
What is a non-inferiority trial, and what particular challenges do such trials present? Andrew Nunn MRC Clinical Trials Unit 20th February 2012.
Olivia Chang, MPH Research and Program Manager Pangaea Global AIDS
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Power & Sample Size Dr. Andrea Benedetti. Plan  Review of hypothesis testing  Power and sample size Basic concepts Formulae for common study designs.
Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (TBTC) Overview Completed, Ongoing, and Moxifloxacin Clinical Trials Kenneth G. Castro, M.D. Assistant Surgeon General,
California Update : TB Epidemiology and Indicators CTCA October 22, 2010 Jennifer Flood MD MPH Chief, Surveillance and Epidemiology Tuberculosis Control.
PNG, Philippines and Vietnam. Cascade of Patient Care Action Points All enrolled patients complete their treatment Decentralize services to improve access.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2016 Youngju Pak, PhD. Biostatistician Session 2 Understanding Equivalence and Noninferiority testing.
Peter Cegielski, MD, MPH Team Leader for Prevention, Care and Treatment Global Tuberculosis Branch Division of Global HIV and TB Reinforcing the Surveillance.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
Randomized clinical trial to determine efficacy and safety of antiretroviral therapy one week after tuberculosis therapy in patients with CD4 counts
SEIN SEIN THI1, SYLVIE JONCKHEERE1, CHINMAY LAXMESHWAR1, GUSTAVO CORREA1, SARTHAK A RASTOGI1, PARVATI NAIR1, SUYOG S SHETYE1, DINESH P SAWANT1,
Treatment-Naïve Adults
A European, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
- Higher SBP visit-to-visit variability (SBV) has been associated
Treatment for Multi-drug Resistant TB
STREAM Trials Andrew Nunn MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL
STAND Trial NC-006 (M-Pa-Z) Dr Suzanne Staples Principal Investigator at THINK 26 Mar 2015.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2007
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
The Patient Triage Concept: Right Diagnosis, Right Treatment
Daniel Meressa, M.D. Global Health Committee St. Peter’s Hospital
Adaptive non-inferiority margins under observable non-constancy
Switch to RPV-TDF-FTC from Ritonavir-boosted PI Regimen SPIRIT STUDY
Treatment of Latent TB Infection (LTBI)
Comparing shorter with conventional MDR-TB treatment in Uzbekistan 2-month culture conversion rates and treatment outcomes P du Cros1, A Khamraev2, D Lister3,
Copyright © 2008 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Safe and effective bedaquiline treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) within the National Bedaquiline Clinical Access Programme in South Africa.
DESIGN ISSUES OF A NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL
JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Effect of Oral Voriconazole on Fungal Keratitis Prajna NV, TKrishnan T, Rajaraman R, et al; Mycotic Ulcer Treatment.
IMPI Trial design: Participants with TB pericarditis and risk for HIV were randomized to prednisolone (n = 706) vs. placebo (n = 694) and to M. indicus.
A practical trial design for optimising treatment duration
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Stratified medicine in the treatment of TB
The results are in: now what?
CD25 expression is associated with unfavorable clinical outcome.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
مدیریت امور آزمایشگاهها دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان
Short or long adjuvant treatment: can we use new trials to decide it?
Session 4: Expanded indications for bedaquiline and delamanid
24 July 2018 Treatment outcomes with bedaquiline use when substituted for second-line injectables in multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective.
The Research Question In non-asthmatic adults presenting to primary care with acute lower respiratory tract infection and not requiring immediate antibiotics.
SUSTAIN-6 Trial design: Patients with DM2 at high risk for CV events were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either semaglutide 0.5 mg, semaglutide 1 mg,
Issues in TB Drug Development: A Regulatory Perspective
RIDDLE-NSTEMI Trial design: Patients with NSTEMI were randomized to either immediate (within 2 hours) intervention or delayed (within 72 hours) intervention.
5957 episodes in complete dataset
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
HOPE-3 Trial design: Patients without known cardiovascular disease, and with an intermediate risk of cardiovascular events, were randomized in a 2 x 2.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
MDR-TB Clinical Trials Landscape Overview: Current and Future Trials
DANAMI 3-DEFER Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI and in whom the operators could establish TIMI 2-3 flow without stenting or those presenting.
CASE HOLDING FOR PMDT.
Chest Pain Choice Trial design: Patients presenting to the ED with low risk chest pain were randomized to either use of a tailored decision aid or routine.
Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the forehead and scalp: a randomized, controlled, phase II clinical study evaluating the non-inferiority.
საქართველოს ტუბერკულოზის პროგრამა - არსებული მიღწევები და გამოწვევები
Illustrative Cluster Detection and Response Strategy
Medical Statistics Exam Technique and Coaching, Part 2 Richard Kay Statistical Consultant RK Statistics Ltd 22/09/2019.
Presentation transcript:

The results are in! Now what? Illustrations of results from Delamanid (superiority) and STREAM 1 (non-inferiority) Phase III Trials Carole Mitnick Meredith Brooks

Superiority Example: Time to conversion 95% CI Median days to culture conversion 95% CI Superior H0: time to conversion is not different between the experimental and control regimens 95% CI Control arm Experimental arm Not superior 95% CI

DLM phase III Results: primary analysis Median days to culture conversion 95% CI Treatment arm (mITT) Days to conversion (95% CI) Control (n=101) 57 (56-64) Experimental (n=226) 51 (43-57) Crude difference 6 days P-value 0.056 95% CI H0: time to conversion is equal between the experimental and control regimens

Superiority vs. Non-inferiority: risk difference example H0: difference in unfavorable outcomes between the experimental and control arms=0 HA: difference in unfavorable outcomes between the experimental and control arms<0 Difference in unfavorable outcomes between the experimental and control regimens ∆ 10 Non-inferior Inferior Not superior Inconclusive Superior Difference in unfavorable outcomes between the experimental and control regimens H0: difference in unfavorable outcomes between the experimental and control arms>=10 HA: difference in unfavorable outcomes between the experimental and control arms<10

STREAM Results Adjusted difference Δ = 10 2.1 (95% CI: -6.9, +11.2) Treatment arm (mITT) % unfavorable outcome Experimental (n=210) 21.9% Control (n=108) 19.4% Crude difference 2.5% Adjusted difference Δ = 10 2.1 (95% CI: -6.9, +11.2) Conclusion: 95% CI includes Δ (10%), inconclusive for non-inferiority 95% confident that true difference between the control and experimental treatments is between -6.9% and +11.2% H0 (experimental regimen is >= 10% worse than the control), cannot be ruled out

Simplified example of possible algorithm integrating all new treatment modalities for RR/MDR-TB

Rapid molecular (or conventional) test positive for TB and RR/MDR Known (or suspected) R to FQ and/or inject or HIV infected? Yes Conventional regimen + BDQ and/or DLM No Known R to PZA? >=50% PZA R among FQ-S in jurisdiction? PZA-R, XDR, pre-XDR among known contacts of patient? Known or suspected R to other drugs in shortened regimen? Shortened regimen, pending conventional DST Is R documented? Conventional regimen + 2 of 3: BDQ, LZD, DLM Continue shortened regimen