Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 27, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2009.
Advertisements

April 28, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 28, 2010.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, Contents  Q2 business highlights  Market development  Business areas  Financials  Outlook 2 July 16,
July 17, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2009.
July 18, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, 2008.
February 4, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 4, 2008.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, Q4 - highlights  Order growth continued  Record operating profit –All business areas above 20% operating.
February 1, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 1, 2007.
Committed to sustainable productivity
February 2, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, 2009.
April 27, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2006.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 20, Q1 - highlights  Very strong order intake –Record orders received in all business areas  Record operating.
February 2, Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, 2010.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, Q3 - highlights  Strong order growth –Sequentially higher volumes in all regions and in most customer.
April 27, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2005.
October 24, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 24, 2006.
July 17, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2006.
October 22, 2009, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2009.
April 24, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 24, 2008.
October 23, 2008, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 23, 2008.
April 26, 2007, Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 26, 2007.
October 21, 2005www.atlascopco.com1 Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 21, 2005.
Atlas Copco Group Q results January 30, 2014.
Atlas Copco Group Q results January 31, 2013.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, Q2 - highlights  Very strong organic order growth –Record orders received –Favorable demand in mining, manufacturing.
October 22, Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2004.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 29, Page 2 April 29, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q1 Highlights and Strategic Moves  Market Development.
Atlas Copco Group Q results July 17, Q2 - highlights  Healthy demand –Organic order intake declined slightly –Stable order intake for small.
Atlas Copco Group Q results October 25, 2013.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 23, Page 2 October 23, 2001www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials.
Group, First Quarter 8,156 MSEK -3% Change in value 1st Half-year, 1999 / 1998 Orders.
July 16, 2007, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, 2007.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 21, Q3 - highlights  Overall demand remained at a high level –Solid development in manufacturing and mining.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, Contents  Q2 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials  Outlook.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results Stockholm, April 26, 2001.
COMMITTED TO SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTIVITY Q results April 29, 2014.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 14, Page 2 February 14, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q4 Highlights and strategic moves  Market.
Group Handout Atlas Copco Group – September 30 th 2000 The face of interaction.
Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 18, Page 2 July 18, 2002www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q2 Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas.
Giulio Mazzalupi Atlas Copco Group - Q4 Results Stockholm, February 12, 2001.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 28, Contents  Q1 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials  Outlook.
Index Group Handout Atlas Copco Group – June 30 th 2000 The face of interaction.
Atlas Copco Group Q results July 18, Q2 in brief  Service business continues to develop well  Industrial and construction demand improved.
Atlas Copco Group Q results April 29, 2013.
The SKF Group Half-year result 2003 Tom Johnstone President and CEO.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 3, Page 2 February 3, 2003www.atlascopco-group.com Contents  Q4 Business Highlights  Market Development.
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 2, Contents  2003 Summary  Q4 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials 
COMMITTED TO SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTIVITY Q results October 20, 2014.
Group “Handout” Quarterly presentation Atlas Copco Group.
July 16, Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 16, 2004.
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 23, Contents  Q3 Business Highlights  Market Development  Business Areas  Financials  Outlook.
Atlas Copco Group Q results January 31, 2013
Atlas Copco Group Q4 Results February 4, 2008.
Atlas Copco Group Q1 Results April 27, 2004 April 27, 2004.
The face of interaction
Q2 Results Stockholm, July 19, 2001
Alrik Danielson, President and CEO
Atlas Copco Group Group total 36,534 MSEK +11% Orders Received
Atlas Copco Group Q3 Results October 22, 2010.
20 April 2010.
Atlas Copco Group Group total 26,324 MSEK +6% Orders Received
Atlas Copco Group Q results October 24, 2012.
The SKF Group Nine-month result 2003 Tom Johnstone President and CEO.
Atlas Copco Group Q results July 17, 2012 July 17, 2012.
Atlas Copco Group Q results April 29, 2013
Sune Carlsson, President and CEO
Atlas Copco Group Group total 26,324 MSEK +6% Orders Received
Atlas Copco Group Q results April 27, 2012 April 27, 2012.
Alrik Danielson, President and CEO
Alrik Danielson, President and CEO
Presentation transcript:

Atlas Copco Group Q2 Results July 17, 2009

Contents Q2 Business Highlights Market Development Business Areas Financials Outlook

Q2 - Highlights Demand remained low in all regions and for most types of equipment Order intake significantly down compared to a strong Q2 2008 Better sentiment within mining and cancellations have stopped Sales of aftermarket products and services doing well Capacity and cost reductions continued in the quarter Functional costs are coming down Employee reduction of 1 600 in the quarter – 5 440 since September 2008 Strong operating cash flow at MSEK 2 492 (396) Inventory reductions accelerated

Q2 - Figures in summary -37% organic order intake Revenues of MSEK 16 155; 27% organic decline Operating profit at MSEK 2 066 (3 630) Including restructuring costs of MSEK 259 MSEK 400 in positive currency effect compared to last year Adjusted for non-recurring items, operating margin at 14.4% Profit before tax at MSEK 1 943 (3 354) Earnings per share SEK 1.20 (2.01) Operating cash flow MSEK 2 492 (396)

Contents Q2 Business Highlights Market Development Business Areas Financials Outlook

Orders received - Local currency Group total -37% YTD (-35 excl. cancellations), -37% last 3 months (Structural change 0% YTD, 0% last 3 months) 37 -39 -38 16 -49 -46 22 -28 -29 12 -31 -40 8 -31 -27 5 -24 -20 June 2009 A = Portion of sales, Year-to-date, % B = Year-to-date vs. prev. year, % C = Last 3 months vs. prev. year, % A = Portion of sales, Year-to-date, % B = Year-to-date vs. prev. year, % A B C

Q2 - The Americas Continued decline in North America Weak demand from all customer segments Stable aftermarket Sales remained low in South America Construction segment still better than mining 16 -49 -46 8 -31 -27 June 2009 A = Portion of sales, Year-to-date, % B = Year-to-date vs. prev. year, % C = Last 3 months vs. prev. year, % A B C

Q2 - Europe and Africa/Middle East Weak demand from most customer segments across Europe Sales relatively better in Italy and the Nordic countries Substantial decline in Russia Good development for light construction equipment in Eastern Europe Order intake down in Africa / Middle East compared to strong previous year Good demand for industrial equipment in Northern Africa 37 -39 -38 12 -31 -40 June 2009 A = Portion of sales, Year-to-date, % B = Year-to-date vs. prev. year, % C = Last 3 months vs. prev. year, % A B C

Q2 - Asia and Australia Healthy level of demand in Asia Orders down compared to record Q2 2008 Good demand for construction equipment and small compressors in China Sales were relatively good in Australia but still below previous year Somewhat better demand for mining equipment 22 -28 -29 5 -24 -20 A = Portion of sales, Year-to-date, % B = Year-to-date vs. prev. year, % C = Last 3 months vs. prev. year, % June 2009 A B C

Organic* Growth per Quarter Atlas Copco Group, continuing operations Change in orders received in % vs. same quarter previous year *Volume and price Order cancellations

Atlas Copco Group – Sales Bridge

Contents Q2 Business Highlights Market Development Business Areas Financials Outlook

Atlas Copco Group Operating Profit and Return On Capital Employed (ROCE) by Business Area

reduced functional costs Compressor Technique 34% organic order decline Compared to a strong quarter the previous year Aftermarket sales still held up well Operating margin at 17.5%, adjusted for MSEK 114 in restructuring costs Affected by under-absorption Positively affected by currency and Unique energy saving certification for range of compressors reduced functional costs 14 July 17, 2009, www.atlascopco.com

Compressor Technique *Volume and price Quarterly operating margins include Prime Energy from Q1 2006.

Construction and Mining Technique Order intake still substantially down compared to last year Organic order decline of 39%, cancellations stopped Aftermarket continued on healthy level Increased inquiries from customers Operating profit at MSEK 875, including MSEK 85 in restructuring costs Adjusted margin at 14.3%, supported by currency and functional cost reductions

Construction and Mining Technique *Volume and price

Industrial Technique Considerable order decline Both order intake and revenues down 45% organically Continued weak demand, both from the motor vehicle industry and the general industry Adjusted operating profit margin at 3.7% (19.7), excluding restructuring costs of MSEK 58 Margin heavily affected by under-absorption

Industrial Technique *Volume and price

Contents Q2 Business Highlights Market Development Business Areas Financials Outlook

Group Total

Profit Bridge April – June, 2009 vs 2008 One-time items include restructuring costs as well as reversal of previous year’s one-time items.

Profit Bridge – by Business Area April– June, 2009 vs 2008 One-time items include restructuring costs in all three business areas as well as reversal of previous year’s one-time items.

Balance Sheet

Capital Structure Net Debt*/EBITDA *Net Debt adjusted for the fair value of interest rate swaps

Atlas Copco AB’s Loan Maturity Profile

Cash Flow

Contents Q2 Business Highlights Market Development Business Areas Financials Outlook

Near-term Outlook The demand is expected to remain weak in most industries and regions and stay around the current level.

30

Cautionary Statement “Some statements herein are forward-looking and the actual outcome could be materially different. In addition to the factors explicitly commented upon, the actual outcome could be materially and adversely affected by other factors such as the effect of economic conditions, exchange-rate and interest-rate movements, political risks, the impact of competing products and their pricing, product development, commercialization and technological difficulties, supply disturbances, and major customer credit losses.”