Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Advertisements

Dynamic epigenetic enhancer signatures reveal key transcription factors associated with monocytic differentiation states by Thu-Hang Pham, Christopher.
Chromatin Control of Developmental Dynamics and Plasticity
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Loss of imprinting at the 14q32 domain is associated with microRNA overexpression in acute promyelocytic leukemia by Floriana Manodoro, Jacek Marzec, Tracy.
Hi-C Analysis in Arabidopsis Identifies the KNOT, a Structure with Similarities to the flamenco Locus of Drosophila  Stefan Grob, Marc W. Schmid, Ueli.
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Nucleosome-Driven Transcription Factor Binding and Gene Regulation
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (October 2011)
Chromatin binding sites shared by pCREB1 and ERα are predominantly cAMP induced. Chromatin binding sites shared by pCREB1 and ERα are predominantly cAMP.
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2017)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
A Major Epigenetic Programming Mechanism Guided by piRNAs
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
C/EBPα overrides epigenetic reprogramming by oncogenic transcription factors in acute myeloid leukemia by Justin Loke, Paulynn Suyin Chin, Peter Keane,
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Genome-Wide Epigenetics
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (November 2016)
Polycomb Protein Ezh1 Promotes RNA Polymerase II Elongation
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Doxorubicin Enhances Nucleosome Turnover around Promoters
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 148, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Increased signal intensity and significant enrichment of transcription factor motifs is observed with DSG in breast tissue. Increased signal intensity.
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
ChIP-seq analyses in primary in prostate tissue.
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Discovery of Novel Transcriptional and Epigenetic Targets in APL by Global ChIP Analyses: Emerging Opportunity and Challenge  Jan-Henrik Mikesch, Hinrich.
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e7 (August 2018)
Multiplex Enhancer Interference Reveals Collaborative Control of Gene Regulation by Estrogen Receptor α-Bound Enhancers  Julia B. Carleton, Kristofer.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 173-185 (February 2010) PML-RARα/RXR Alters the Epigenetic Landscape in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia  Joost H.A. Martens, Arie B. Brinkman, Femke Simmer, Kees-Jan Francoijs, Angela Nebbioso, Felicetto Ferrara, Lucia Altucci, Hendrik G. Stunnenberg  Cancer Cell  Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 173-185 (February 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.042 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 PML-RARα and RXR Colocalization to Genomic Regions (A) Overview of the RARβ, RUNX1, RARα, and GFI1 PML-RARα/RXR binding sites. In red, the PML ChIP-seq data are plotted; in purple, the RARα data; and in blue, the RXR data. (B) PML-RARα and RXR binding sites detected by ChIP-seq in leukemic NB4 cells. PML and RARα peaks were called using MACS (p < 10−6) after which relative RARα, PML, and RXR tag density was determined at these peaks. Results were sorted according to relative tag density and the top 8000 peaks were displayed in a regression curve. A cut off was set at a relative tag density of 0.00012 (14 tags/kb). (C) Box plot showing the percentage of PML, RARα, and RXR tags, within three groups of PML-RARα binding sites that harbor different RXR densities or a set of random regions of similar size. (D) Distribution of the PML-RARα/RXR binding site location relative to ENSEMBL genes (left) compared to the tag distribution of total genomic DNA (right). Locations of binding sites are divided in 5′ far (−25 kb to −5 kb of the transcription start site), 5′ near (−5 kb to the transcription start site), gene body (gene), 3′ near (end of untranslated region to +5 kb), 3′ far (untranslated region +5 kb to +25 kb), and distant (everything else). See also Figure S1 and Tables S1 and S2. Cancer Cell 2010 17, 173-185DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.042) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Presence of DR, ER, and IR Motifs in PML-RARα/RXR Peaks (A) Overview of the architecture and spacing of different DR motifs that were used to analyze PML-RARα binding sites. (B) Analysis of the presence of DR motifs underlying PML-RARα/RXR binding sites. PML-RARα/RXR binding sequences were searched first for the presence of DR1–5 motifs, and then for DR0,6–13 motifs and then for presence of ER or IR motifs. (C) Total numbers of the different DR motifs present in the PML-RARα/RXR binding regions. DR motifs were counted and ordered according to the total number. Cancer Cell 2010 17, 173-185DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.042) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Identification of PML-RARα/RXR Binding Sites in APL Blasts (A and B) Overview of the HNRNPM and SPG7 PML-RARα/RXR binding sites in NB4 leukemic cells and two patient APL blasts (pz164 and pz74). In red, the PML ChIP-seq data are plotted and, in blue, the RXR data. (C) Regression curve analysis of PMLAPL and RXRAPL tags at the PML-RARα/RXR binding sites identified in NB4 cells. A cut-off was set at a relative tag density of 10 tags/kb. (D) Venn diagram representing the overlap of binding sites detected in NB4 cells and two patient blasts. (E) Analysis of the presence of DR motifs underlying the overlapping PML-RARα/RXR binding sites from NB4 cells and two patient blasts. See also Figure S2 and Table S3. Cancer Cell 2010 17, 173-185DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.042) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ATRA-Induced Epigenetic Changes at PML-RARα/RXR Binding Regions in NB4 Cells (A–D) Overview of the RARβ, GALNAC45, PRAM1, and PRTN3 PML-RARα/RXR binding site in NB4 cells. In red the PML, in purple the RARα, and in blue the RXR ChIP-seq data are plotted for proliferating NB4 cells. For H3K9K14ac (pink), H3K27me3 (yellow), H3K9me3 (green), and DNAme (turquoise), the data are plotted both for proliferating and for 24 hr (H3K9K14ac, H3K27me3, and H3K9me3) or 48 hr (DNAme) ATRA-treated NB4 cells. (E) Box plot showing the percentage of H3K9K14ac, H3K27me3, H3K9me3, and DNAme tags, before and after ATRA treatment of NB4 cells, within all PML-RARα/RXR peaks. (F) Clustering analysis of epigenetic changes at PML-RARα/RXR peaks. Log2 values for ATRA-induced changes in H3K9K14ac, H3K27me3, H3K9me3, and DNAme for each binding site were calculated and used for hierarchical clustering. Depicted below each cluster is the number of peaks within the cluster and the directionality (increase, no change, or decrease) for each epigenetic modification. See also Figure S3 and Tables S4 and S5. Cancer Cell 2010 17, 173-185DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.042) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Reduced H3 Acetylation upon PML-RARα Binding (A–C) Overview of the PRAM1, PIK3AP1, and TNNI2 binding regions in untreated (−zinc) and 5 hr zinc-treated (+zinc) UPR9 cells. In red, the PML; in purple, the RARα; in blue, the RXR; in pink, the H3K9K14ac; and in yellow, the H3K27me3 ChIP-seq data are plotted. (D) Box plot showing the average percentage of PML-RARα tags, before and after zinc treatment of UPR9 cells, within all PML-RARα/RXR peaks detected after zinc treatment (left) and the 50% of peaks that show the highest level of PML-RARα induction (right). (E) Box plot showing the percentage of H3K9K14ac and H3K27me3 tags, before and after zinc treatment of UPR9 cells, within all PML-RARα/RXR peaks detected after zinc treatment (left) and the 50% of peaks that show the highest level of PML-RARα induction (right). See also Figure S4. Cancer Cell 2010 17, 173-185DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.042) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ATRA-Induced Acetylation Changes at PML-RARα/RXR Binding Regions in NB4 and APL (pz164) Blast Cells (A–C) Overview of the CCND3, RNPEPL1, and NADK PML-RARα/RXR binding sites in NB4 leukemic cells (top) or a patient APL blast (bottom). In red the PML and in blue the RXR ChIP-seq data are plotted for untreated NB4 and patient APL cells. For H3K9K14ac (pink) and H3K27me3 (yellow) the data are plotted both for proliferating and for ATRA-treated cells. (D) Box plot showing the percentage of H3K9K14ac and H3K27me3 tags, before and after ATRA treatment of patient APL cells, within all PML-RARα/RXRAPL peaks. (E) Heat map displaying Log2 values for ATRA-induced changes in H3K9K14ac and H3K27me3 for each PML-RARα/RXR binding site identified in patient APL cells. See also Figure S5. Cancer Cell 2010 17, 173-185DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.042) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 ATRA-Induced Transcriptional Changes Correlate with H3 Acetylation Changes at PML-RARα/RXR Binding Regions (A) Overview of ATRA-induced expression of the TGM2 gene. In red the PML, in purple the RARα, and in blue the RXR ChIP-seq data are plotted for proliferating NB4 cells. In green the RNAPII data are plotted for proliferating and 24 or 48 hr ATRA-treated NB4 cells. For H3K9K14ac (pink), H3K27me3 (yellow), H3K9me3 (green), and DNAme (turquoise) the data are plotted both for proliferating and for 24 hr (H3K9K14ac and H3K27me3) or 48 hr (DNAme) ATRA-treated NB4 cells. (B and C) Box plot showing the percentage of H3K9K14ac, H3K27me3, H3K9me3, and DNAme tags, before and after ATRA treatment of NB4 cells, within PML-RARα/RXR peaks (B) or gene bodies (C) of ATRA-induced or -repressed genes. (D) Total numbers of increased or decreased acetylated (DAR), lysine 27 methylated (DK27R), lysine 9 methylated (DK9R), and DNA methylated (DMR) regions detected at PML-RARα/RXR peaks associated with ATRA-induced or -repressed genes. (E) Total numbers of differentially acetylated, lysine 27 methylated, lysine 9 methylated, and DNA methylated regions detected at ATRA-induced or -repressed genes that harbor a nearby PML-RARα/RXR binding site. See also Figure S6 and Table S6. Cancer Cell 2010 17, 173-185DOI: (10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.042) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions