Simon Bergqvist, Mark A Williams, Ronan O'Brien, John E Ladbury 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (October 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Finn Werner, Robert O.J Weinzierl  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Callum Smits, Peter E. Czabotar, Mark G. Hinds, Catherine L. Day 
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
TCR Binding to Peptide-MHC Stabilizes a Flexible Recognition Interface
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
TCR Binding to Peptide-MHC Stabilizes a Flexible Recognition Interface
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
The C. elegans SYS-1 Protein Is a Bona Fide β-Catenin
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Systematic Profiling of Histone Readers in Arabidopsis thaliana
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Structural Basis for the Differential Effects of CaBP1 and Calmodulin on CaV1.2 Calcium-Dependent Inactivation  Felix Findeisen, Daniel L. Minor  Structure 
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Michael Torrez, Michael Schultehenrich, Dennis R. Livesay 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 98, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Linking transcriptional mediators via the GACKIX domain super family
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Gauging of the PhoE Channel by a Single Freely Diffusing Proton
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Structural differences between mesophilic, moderately thermophilic and extremely thermophilic protein subunits: results of a comprehensive survey  András.
Thermodynamic Characterization of the Unfolding of the Prion Protein
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Energetics of Pore Opening in a Voltage-Gated K+ Channel
Fredrik Elinder, Michael Madeja, Hugo Zeberg, Peter Århem 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Binding-Linked Protonation of a DNA Minor-Groove Agent
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
The structure of ribosomal protein S7 at 1
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Caroline M. Groft, Stephen K. Burley  Molecular Cell 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Structural Basis of Inward Rectification
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Luhua Lai, Hisao Yokota, Li-Wei Hung, Rosalind Kim, Sung-Hou Kim 
Presentation transcript:

Reversal of Halophilicity in a Protein-DNA Interaction by Limited Mutation Strategy  Simon Bergqvist, Mark A Williams, Ronan O'Brien, John E Ladbury  Structure  Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 629-637 (May 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00749-9

Figure 1 Salt Dependence of Binding Data Showing LogKobs against Log[NaCl] for the ScTBP DNA and the PwTBP-DNA Complex (A) The salt dependence of binding for the ScTBP DNA interaction determined using quantitative DNase I footprinting [3]. The slope is negative, indicating net release of ions, which becomes less favorable as the salt concentration is increased. The net change in ions was found to be between 3 and 4 (where a positive number indicates release) by fitting the data to Equation 1 using the nonlinear curve-fitting algorithm of the Origin software. The net change in water molecules (B) and Kref were also obtained, but the error in B is large, since the salt concentration regime used is well below 1 M, at which concentration water release becomes significant. (B) Binding studies on the PwTBP-DNA interaction, performed at high salt concentrations using ITC, reveal the role of water molecule release form the binding site on complex formation. This is manifested in curvature resulting in tighter binding at higher salt concentrations. The net change in ions (A) was found to be −2 (uptake), and the number of waters (B) and Kref were 39 and 5.7, respectively. Osmotic stress experiments on the wild-type PwTBP have also been used to verify the number of water molecules released on forming the complex [9]. Structure 2002 10, 629-637DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00749-9)

Figure 2 Sequence Alignment of Eight Representative Sequences of the Conserved C Termini of the Archaeal and Eukaryotic TBPs Multiple alignments were carried out using the program ClustalW, and minor adjustments were made manually. Numbering of the PwTBP is shown above the sequences along with the secondary structural elements. Acidic residues are highlighted in red, and basic residues are highlighted in blue. Residues were identified as being involved in binding based independently on two different criteria, accessible surface area (ASA) and electrostatic interaction energy (EIE), using GRASP [13]. Residues whose ASA decreases by more than 1 Å2 on complexation are labeled with triangles. Residues with an EIE with the DNA of more than 1 kT are labeled with squares. Isoelectric points for the conserved region were calculated using the ExPASy ProtParam tool. All sequences were taken from the SwissProt and the TreEMBL databases. Abbreviations used for the species are as follows: Pw, Pyrococcus woesei/Pyrococcus furiosus (Q57050); Tc, Thermococcusceler (Q56253); HlD, Halobacterium salinarium (NRC-1) TBP-D (Q48325); HlB, Halobacterium salinarium (NRC-1) TBP-B (O52004); Af, Archaeoglobus fulgidus (029874); Mm, Methanosarcina mazei (CAC42920); Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (P13393); Hs, Homo sapiens (P20226). Structure 2002 10, 629-637DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00749-9)

Figure 3 Salt Dependence Data and Extrapolated Thermodynamic Parameters for the Wild-Type and Mutated PwTBP Complexes (A) LogKobs against log[NaCl] for the wild-type and mutated forms of the TBP-DNA interaction determined by ITC. Equation 1 [1] has been fit to the logKobs against log[NaCl] data in an identical manner to the wild-type complex (black) to quantitate the effect of charged residue mutations on the binding behavior. The effect of the E12A mutation (red line) was to reduce the cation uptake by the complex from two to one ion, as previously described [9]. The orange line shows that mutation E128A also reduces the net number of ions taken up by forming the complex. The effect of combining the E12A and E128A mutations (purple line) is additive, and the approximate net uptake of ions by the double mutant complex is 0. The Kobs for the combined mutant E12AE128A is almost independent of salt concentration up to about 0.5M NaCl. At higher Nacl concentrations the increase in binding is entirely due to the entropic effect of released waters (see legend to Figure 1). Shown in green are data for the triple mutant form of PwTBP containing the charge reversal E42K plus the E12AE128A charge removal mutations. The combined effect is to produce a net release of ions (where A = +1) on forming the complex and reversing the direction of the slope of the salt dependence profile to that of the mesophilic species Sc (see Figure 1). Finally, the blue line shows data for the quadruple mutant form of the PwTBP containing two charge reversals (E41K and E42K) and the two charge replacement mutations (E12A and E128A) previously described. Overall, the net change in stoichiometry of ions for the quadruple mutant is the release of two ions compared to uptake of two ions in the wild-type complex (i.e., a net difference of four ions). The output from the fitting is summarized in Table 3. (B) Extrapolation of ΔG for the wild-type PwTBP and the quadruple mutant complex to predict the effect the mutations have on the stability of the complex with DNA at the optimum growth temperature of the Pyrococcus woesei (∼100°C). ITC experiments were carried out over a range of temperatures (25°C–55°C), and extrapolation of the thermodynamic parameters based on the temperature dependence of the enthalpy of the interaction (ΔCp) was carried out using the Gibbs-Helmholtz relation in the form: ΔGo bind (To) = ΔH(To) − To[[ΔH(T) − ΔGo(T)]/T + ΔCpln(To/T)], where ΔH is the enthalpy change, ΔGo bind is the ΔGo of binding, To = 298 K, and T is the absolute temperature. The extrapolation shows that the E12AE41KE42KE128A quadruple mutant complex has an even higher temperature of minimum ΔGo bind, i.e., the temperature at which the complex is most stable. Structure 2002 10, 629-637DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00749-9)

Figure 4 Modeled Ion Binding Sites in the Wild-Type and E12AE41KE42KE128A Quadruple Mutant PwTBP-DNA Complexes Showing Sites with an Absolute Potential Greater than 6 kT/e and Color Coded by Electrostatic Potential (See Experimental Procedures) (A) Wild-type highlighting residues E12 and D101. (B) The other side of the wild-type complex highlighting residues 41, 42, and 128. (C and D) The same views for the quadruple mutant. Note that D101 has no nearby cation sites and has been previously found to have no effect salt dependence of binding. Structure 2002 10, 629-637DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00749-9)