Design of Interaction Region

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interaction region design and construction for BEPCII C. H. Yu IHEP Feb.4, 2007.
Advertisements

KEKB Design 1.Parameters 2.Collider Ring 3.Interact Region 4. Magnet, RF, Instabilities 5.Recent progress with crab crossing.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
1 Optics and IR design for SuperKEKB Y.Ohnishi 1/19-22, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Qingjin XU Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP)
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
Xiao-Yan Zhao Beam Instrumentation Group Accelerator Center, IHEP BEPCII Background Issues: Beam Loss Measurement.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Preliminary Result on L*=1.5m CEPC Interaction Region Yiwei Wang, Dou Wang, Sha Bai Yingshun Zhu, Teng Yue CEPC acc. meeting, 5 September 2014.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Yingshun Zhu Design progress of QD0 in CEPC Interaction Region
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
The Interaction Region
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Superconductivity in the BEPCII Performance
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
CEPC accelerator physics
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
BINP Tau-Charm Project
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
The design of interaction region
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
Comparison of the final focus design
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
BEPCII Background Issues: Collimators and Masks
Update of DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
CEPC optics and booster optics
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

Design of Interaction Region Gang Xu Accelerator Physics Group IHEP, Beijing, Oct. 14, 2001

Content Introduction to BEPCII Requirements to IR design from accelerator physics Detector boundary condition IR beam line layout IR Magnets Background and consideration of new design Summary

Introduction to BEPCII 2-ring collider— factory type machine Synchrotron radiation facility Basic parameters (next page)

Introduction to BEPCII(continued) Tab. 1 Main parameters Energy E(GeV) 1.55 Energy spread(10-4) 4.23 Circumference C(m) 237.53 Emittance εx/εy(μm) 0.21/0.003 Energy loss/turn U0(keV) 55.8 Momentum compact α 0.036 RF frequency frf(MHz) 499.8 β*x /β*y(m) 1/0.015 RF Voltage Vrf(MV) 1.5 Chromaticity ξx/ξy 13.3/28.5 Total current/beam I(A) 1.116 Tunes νx/νy/νz 6.64/7.58/0.047 Particle number Nt 5.51×1012 Crossing angle θx(mrad) ±11 SR Power P(kW) 62.3 Bunch spacing Sb(m) 2.4 Bunch number Nb 93 Damping time τx/τy/τz(ms) 44/44/22 Bunch current Ib(mA) 12 Beam-beam parameter 0.04/0.04 Bunch length σz(cm) Luminosity(1033cm-2s-1) 1.0 Natural bunch length σz0(cm) 1.1 Effective impedance() 0.7

Requirements to IR design from accelerator physics Rapidly separate the beams into two rings Squeeze the vertical beta function to 1.5cm Compensate the coupling from detector solenoid Connect the two outer rings to provide the synchrotron radiation Keep the background in the acceptable level All accelerator components in IR must stay in the space limited by the detector HOM heating due to the mask and the discontinuity of vacuum chamber should be considered

Boundary condition Detector geometric condition

Boundary condition(continued) Summary of the main geometric conditions The first accelerator component must be after 0.5m away from IP Before 1.15m, the outer aperture of components must be less than Φ384mm Before 1.9m, the outer aperture of components must be less than Φ756mm

Boundary condition(continued) Detector solenoid(Bs=1T, new design value 1.2T)

Boundary condition(continued) Aperture of IR vacuum chamber(Half ) For collision beam 1. 14σx+xoffset+10mm c.o.d.(εx=0.25μm) 2. 14 σy+5mm c.o.d. (full coupling εy=0.125μm) For injection beam 3. 16σx+xoffset+3mm c.o.d. For SR photons(collision beam) 4. Out of the trajectories of SR photons from 10 σ particles

IR beam line layout Crossing angle θx(mrad)=±11 relative to the detector solenoid axis Beam comes to IP from outer ring then goes into inner ring 1st S.C. magnet has combined anti-solenoid(ASOL) and bending coil(SCB), the latter is used in synchrotron radiation mode Both electron and positron are off the axis of SCQ All S.C. coils are in one cryostat ISPB is a septum type magnet, it will bend the beam in inner ring OQ1, IQ1, OQ2, IQ2 are special magnets with dual aperture, beam goes through their axes.

IR beam line layout(continued) βy max<120m(βy *=1.5cm)180m(βy *=1cm), βx max<6m in s=0~1.9m

IR Magnets(Superconducting) Anti-solenoid ASOL with integral strength 1.42 T·m, 0.6m away from IP, it will be extended onto SCQ to cancel the effect of the solenoid fringe field SCB placed at the same location as ASOL with integral strength 0.26 T·m SCQ with strength 17.6T/m and effective length 0.4m, 1.15m away from IP

IR special magnets(Normal) D to IP (m) L D between e± BSC(H×V) strength entry exit (mm) ISPB 2.25 0.4 78 108 72×72 90×64 0.6T OQ1 2.90 131 167 101×59 106×58 12T/m IQ1 3.55 0.5 190 235 129×47 136×42 OQ2 4.55 281 326 82×72 78×73 IQ2 5.55 372 417 106×38 101×35

Background issue and consideration of new design Since the beam coming from outer ring is off axis in the SCQ, this will lead to synchrotron radiation. From the previous plot, the minimum distance between beryllium pipe and the trajectory of the photon is only 7.2mm. This situation must be improved.

7.2

Three improvement methods Increase the radius of the beryllium pipe Add a bending coil on SCQ to cancel(or partially) the bending field due to the off axis for the beam in outer ring, this will lead to BSC increasing from Φ120 to Φ140 Place SCQ to the center of outer ring beam orbit, this will lead to the equivalent BSC increasing from Φ120 to Φ170

Before doing the improvement, we need to know What is the acceptable level of the synchrotron radiation? The more detail boundary conditions in IR The acceptable heating power of each IR component

Summary IR design is very preliminary Due to the background issues we must do more detail IR design Many items are not taken into account such as background from the loss particle, vacuum, beam diagnostics, …