Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(11):

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.
Advertisements

Jennifer Vaughn, MD Bart Scott, MD.  Myelodysplastic syndromes ◦ Clonal hematopoetic disorder in which ineffective or dysplastic cell production leads.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Carfilzomib: High Single-Agent Response Rate with Minimal Neuropathy Even in High-Risk Patients 1 Baseline Peripheral Neuropathy Does Not Impact the Efficacy.
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Therapeutic Response to Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (sMDS) Enrolled in the AVIDA Registry 1 Prospective Trial.
Final Results From a Phase I Combination Study of Lenalidomide and Azacitidine in Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Sekeres MA.
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
A Randomized Phase II Study of Azacitidine Combined with Lenalidomide or with Vorinostat vs Azacitidine Monotherapy in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
5-Azacitidine For Myelodysplasia Before Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Field T et al. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009:[Epub ahead of print].
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) Aquired Clonal disease of BM. comprise a heterogeneous group of malignant stem cell disorders characterized by : 1.
MLAB HEMATOLOGY KERI BROPHY-MARTINEZ Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety.
ClaPD (Clarithromycin, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Mark TM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 77.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
Safety and Efficacy of Abbreviated Induction with Oral Fludarabine (F) and Cyclophosphamide (C) Combined with Dose-Dense IV Rituximab (R) in Previously.
Best of ASH 2007 Myelodysplastic Syndromes Lloyd E. Damon, MD.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
MLAB Hematology Keri Brophy-Martinez
Results from a Randomized Phase III Trial of Decitabine versus Supportive Care or Low-Dose Cytarabine for the Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
ANCO 2006 ASH UPDATE MDS Joseph M. Tuscano, M.D. UC Davis Cancer Center.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Phase II Trial of 5-Day Decitabine as Front-Line Therapy for Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Cashen.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
1 Oliva EN et al Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 91.
Summary Author: Dr. C. Tom Kouroukis, MD MSc FRCPC
Geisler C et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 290.
Final Results from a Phase 2 Study of Pracinostat in Combination with Azacitidine in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)1   CC-486 (Oral.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Azacitidine 75 mg/m2 per day x 7 days q28
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dex vs High-Dose Dex in Rel/Ref Myeloma
DiNardo C et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 327.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Sekeres MA et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 908.
MLAB Hematology Keri Brophy-Martinez
Algorithm for the classification of adult-onset primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This classification system is based on the 2008 criteria of the.
5-Azacytidine (AZA) in Combination with Ruxolitinib (RUX) as Therapy for Patients (pts) with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MDS/MPNs)1  
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Kantarjian H et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
Ferrajoli A et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 1395.
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.
Faderl S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6503.
Grövdal M et al. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 223.
Pollyea DA et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6505.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
ASH Review 2018: Update on Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Presentation transcript:

Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(11):1850-56. Hematologic Response to Three Alternative Dosing Schedules of Azacitidine in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(11):1850-56.

Introduction Azacitidine has been shown to alter the natural history of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (J Clin Oncol 2002;20:2429; Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):223; J Clin Oncol 2002;20:2441) Significant prolonged survival in higher-risk MDS and trend toward prolonged survival in all French-American-British (FAB) MDS subtypes; decreased risk of transformation to AML Significant reduction in transfusion dependence in higher- and lower-risk MDS (J Clin Oncol 2002;20:2429; J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3895) The approved AZA regimen is 75 mg/m2/d administered subcutaneously or intravenously for 7 days every 28 days and includes weekend dosing Study Objective: Assess safety and efficacy, based on hematologic improvement and transfusion independence rates, of three azacitidine dosing schedule alternatives that eliminate weekend dosing, in a multicenter, community-based open-label study Source: Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1850-56.

Phase II Trial of Alternative Dosing Schedules of Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with MDS AZA 5-2-2 (n=50) AZA, 75 mg/m2 SC, d1-5 AZA, 75 mg/m2, d8-9 q28d x 6 Eligibility Diagnosis of MDS: Refractory anemia (RA) or RA with ringed sideroblasts (RARS) requiring a transfusion every 28 days or with thrombocytopenia or neutropenia RA with excess blasts (RAEB) RA with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-T) Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) AZA 5-2-5 (n=51) AZA, 50mg/m2 SC, d1-5  AZA, 50 mg/m2, d8-12 q28d x 6 R AZA 5 (n=50) AZA, 75 mg/m2 SC, d1-5 q28d x 6 SC = subcutaneous Source: Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1850-56.

Hematologic Improvement (HI) AZA 5-2-2 AZA 5-2-5 AZA 5 Major or minor HI1 (Intent-to-treat) (n=50, 51, 50) 44% 45% 56% Onset of HI during first two cycles 82% 90% Major or minor HI, FAB lower-risk patients (n=33, 29, 32) 49% 41% 50% Patients with multilineage cytopenias who experienced multilineage HI (n=32, 24, 30) 34% 21% 33% 1HI evaluated using International Working Group 2000 criteria Source: Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1850-56.

Achievement of RBC Transfusion Independence (TI) Among Baseline RBC Transfusion-Dependent Patients AZA 5-2-2 AZA 5-2-5 AZA 5 Overall (intent-to-treat) (n=24, 22, 25) 50% 55% 64% FAB lower-risk patients (n=17, 12, 18) 53% 61% Onset of TI within first two cycles 92% 75% Absence of baseline neutropenia or thrombocytopenia and lower transfusion requirements were predictive of higher rates of RBC transfusion independence. Source: Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1850-56.

Selected Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events AZA 5-2-2 (n = 50) AZA 5-2-5 (n = 48) AZA 5 > 1 grade 3 or 4 adverse events 84% 77% 58% Hematologic disorders 66% 50% 34% Anemia Febrile neutropenia Leukopenia Neutropenia Thrombocytopenia 24% 8% 14% 42% 26% 15% 31% 10% 2% 22% 12% Infections 29% Source: Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1850-56.

Summary and Conclusions These three alternate dosing regimens demonstrated good activity and tolerability HI, overall (intent-to-treat): 44%-56% HI, lower-risk MDS: 41%-50% Achievement of TI, overall (intent-to-treat): 50%-64% Achievement of TI, lower-risk MDS: 50%-61% In all dosing arms, the onset of TI and HI was relatively rapid, occurring in the majority of patients within the first two dosing cycles (75%-92% for TI, 56%-90% for HI) Grade III/IV adverse events included hematologic disorders (34%-66%) and infections (10%-29%) The AZA 5 dosing regimen may be a better-tolerated and more convenient dosing schedule than the other two alternative dosing regimens. Source: Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1850-56.