Chair’s Actions Researcher completes the Online Ethics Checklist

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School of Nursing and Midwifery Studies Research Review and Ethics Screening Committee Overview The purpose of this interactive flowchart is to assist.
Advertisements

An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
Introducing Research Ethics & the UREC Professor Chris Newman, UREC Chair.
Ethics Approval for Projects based overseas George Ellison (Director) Research & Graduate School
Master of Psychiatric Nursing program. A Thesis …  Is a formal, comprehensive, written description of original research on a chosen subject  Is used.
NURSING & MIDWIFERY PROGRAMMES ELECTIVE PLACEMENTS Updated October 11.
NAMES COUNCIL MEETINGS PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL RULES.
Student to generate their ethical approval form alongside their research proposal which will be reviewed and considered by a member of academic staff (Project.
Overview of Session Current guidelines for accreditation Current quality assurance processes in the context of some recent examples Discussion.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Research Ethics A guide to principles and procedures
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Introducing Research Ethics: Policy and Procedure
Committee on Human Research Processes Clinical Translational Research Fellowship Program Curriculum Core.
School of Arts and Social Sciences 28 April 2010.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Cardiff and Vale UHB Bwrdd lechyd Prifysgol Caerdydd a’r Fro NHS R&D Overview How to avoid the common pitfalls? Thomas Fairman Research Liaison Manager.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Regulations & Processes.
Vic Chancellor Directorate of Research and Development Process: Research and Development Procedure: Research Ethics Proposal Date 26 July 2004 /Page 1.
Research Ethics Board (REB)
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Research Examiner/ Independent Chair Training Programme
R&D – a perspective Dr Nana Theodorou Research Coordinator Sheffield Clinical Research Office.
Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC) April 2014.
RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PROJECT: ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS May 30, 2012.
PhD Registration and Assessment procedures There are 3 stages of internal assessment during the PhD: Research Plan 8 weeks after registration date Early.
AfRE Standard Operating Procedures for University Research Ethics Committees Overview Prof Margaret Rees AfRE Chair 8 September 2015 Association for Research.
Academic Approval and Periodic Review Staff Development for Chairs and Secretaries of Approval and Periodic Review Events.
Applying for HEA Fellowship What happens after you’ve submitted your application.
49 th EWG Meeting, Gyeongju, Korea June 22-26, 2015.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
INSETA ASSESSOR- MODERATOR REGISTRATION PROCESSES.
School of Environment and Development Faculty of Humanities Challenges at School level surrounding Ethical Approval for research Rosie Williams Teaching.
Ethical approval processes for research
Applying for ethical approval
Tusla’s Research Ethics
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Procedures for seeking YSJU Research Ethics Approval
Procedures for Taught Degree students seeking YSJU Research Ethics Approval Does the research involve living human participants, their tissue or their.
Applying for HEA Fellowship
Outline of process for PTP Accreditation
There are no guarantees that a visitor will be accepted to work at the University. The terms of any grant or contract under which the visitor is to work,
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
Research Ethics: a short guide for PhD students 2017/18
Registration and Assessment
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Dr. Niamh Lenahan November 2016
Chair’s Actions Researcher completes the Online Ethics Checklist
UW-Madison Central IRB Gateway
Process for reviewing student ethics applications
Researcher completes the Online Ethics Checklist
Ethics: The practical nuts and bolts
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Approval of Assessments
Progression and Advancement
Assessment and completion
Scientific Panel Study Approval Process
Introduction to Office of Research
Overview of Process Applicable to project management / Key Projects
UL Research Ethics & Research Integrity
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
I’m doing a project; how do I know if I need to go through the IRB?
PhD Registration and Assessment procedures
Research Degree Independent Chair Workshop 4 April 2019
Overview of Process Applicable to project management / Key Projects
Validation Programme Developers
Preparation for the Doctoral Examination 11 March 2019
Preparing for upgrade Dr Alex Mermikides 1.
Presentation transcript:

Chair’s Actions Researcher completes the Online Ethics Checklist Checklist indicates need for scrutiny by NHS (or other external) ethics committee PGR students submit to supervisor UG/Taught students submit to supervisor Staff submit to relevant Ethics Panel Checklist indicates research will be undertaken outside the UK Checklist indicates minimal risk Checklist indicates above minimal risk Supervisor grants approval for minimal risk. Supervisor confirms high risk, forwards to Ethics Programme Team for Review Submit to NHS REC (Researcher may choose to submit to Panel prior to NHS REC for review) Supervisor Reviews, confirms good quality and forwards to Ethics Champion Obtain ethical approval from country/ collaborative third party Supervisor Reviews, confirms good quality and forwards to ethics filter Approval documents provided to Ethics Filter Ethics Filter Approved Low Risk only Ethics Programme team review Approved Referral to Ethics Panel Ethics Champion confirms low risk and approves Ethics Panel reviews application Approved OR Approved subject to minor amendments Approval not granted ; subject to major amendments resubmit Approval not granted Referral to UREC Chair’s Actions Approved Approval not granted Appeal to UREC