Session 29 Classifying a Suspect (Role Play) 120 Minutes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Baldrige National Quality Program The Site Visit Process and Evaluating Site Visit Issue Worksheets.
Advertisements

IAEA Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response Development of Simulation Exercise Work Session (Drill) Module WS-012.
I. Confirm Implementation of the CIP II. Assess the Effectiveness of the Strategies, Action Steps, Benchmarks III. Provide Feedback to CIP Team and Faculty.
Q Comp Peer Reviewer Training Covering: Job Description and Expectations Norms and Confidentiality Agendas Interviews Rubric and Debriefing Wrap-up.
Testing Without Executing the Code Pavlina Koleva Junior QA Engineer WinCore Telerik QA Academy Telerik QA Academy.
Managing Large Classes with Group Work
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
BUILDING SKILLS AND A BOOK OF BUSINESS AS A STUDENT LOAN CONSULTANT (SCL) AN INSTRUCTIONAL PLAN PRESENTED BY JESSICA MATYE.
Welcome to PC362: Managing Grants. Please set cell phones and pagers to silent Refrain from side discussions. We all want to hear what you have to say!
Welcome to PC361: Managing Customer Contracts. Please set cell phones and pagers to silent Refrain from side discussions. We all want to hear what you.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
The Comprehensive Walk Through Protocol The Comprehensive Walkthrough Protocol.
Welcome to AR355: Processing Interfund Transactions.
AR354: Advanced Billing Welcome to AR354: Advanced Billing.
Traditional Training Methods
Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part II-
Experimental Control Definition Is a predictable change in behavior (dependent variable) that can be reliably produced by the systematic manipulation.
Drug Recognition Expert (DRE)  12-Step Standardized and Systematic Process for evaluating persons suspected of being under the influence of drugs.  A.
Preparing for your HIPPY Accreditation visit Accreditation 101.
Analyzing & evaluating qualitative data Kim McDonough Northern Arizona University.
Drug Recognition Expert
60 Minutes Session 2 Overview of the Drug Evaluation and Classification Procedures.
60 Minutes Session 2 Overview of the Drug Evaluation and Classification Procedures Revised: 01/2015 Drug Evaluation and Classification (Prelim) Drug Evaluation.
Experiments vs. Observational Studies vs. Surveys and Simulations
Henderson State Focus Group (1)
Drug Recognition Expert
Chapter 8: Performance-Based Strategies
50 Minutes Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance.
Session 23 Curriculum Vitae Preparation and Maintenance 50 Minutes
Chapter 16 Participating in Groups and Teams.
DWI Detection and Standardized Field Sobriety Testing
Session 26 Preparing the Narrative Report 50 Minutes
Session 30 Transition to the Certification Phase of Training
105 Minutes Session 12 Alcohol Workshop.
Drug Recognition Expert Course
1 Hour 30 Minutes Session 13 Report Writing Exercise and Moot Court.
2 Hours Session 14-A Video Workshop Second Session.
2 Hours Session 14 “Testing Subjects” Practice: Second Session.
Session 14 “Testing Subjects” Practice: Second Session 2 Hours R 2014
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Managing Large Classes with Group Work
110 Minutes Session 24 Drug Combinations.
Home Firearm Safety Introduction
Introduction to Internal Audits
The Nursing Process and Pharmacology Jeanelle F. Jimenez RN, BSN, CCRN
Module 10: Culminating Task
Micro Teaching What is micro teaching? Why micro teach?
120 Minutes Session 5 Alcohol Workshop.
Session 14-A Dry Lab 2 Hours R 2014
Drug Evaluation and Classification (Prelim)
105 Minutes Session 8 Demonstrations of the Evaluation Sequence.
90 Minutes Session 27 Practice: Test Administration.
Session 16 Written Examination and Program Conclusion
Demonstrate After Action Review Proficiency Role Playing Exercise
Cooperative Learning Prepared By : English Language Supervisor
120 Minutes Session 29 Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)
60 Minutes Session 11 Practice: Eye Examinations.
45 Minutes Session 25 Practice: Test Interpretation.
After Action Review Role Playing Exercise
SAFE-T Steps to Consensus
Preparing to Teach and Overview of Teaching Assignments
Session 10 Conclusion of the Preliminary Training 45 Minutes
SAFE-T Steps to Consensus
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Prepared by : Sereen alsabi Dareen alzubaidi.
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
2 Hours Session 11 “Testing Subjects” Practice: First Session.
The Path Toward Third Party Certification For Cleaning Organizations
Presentation transcript:

Session 29 Classifying a Suspect (Role Play) 120 Minutes Revised: 04-16-2014 Drug Recognition Expert Course Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)

Learning Objectives Conduct a complete drug influence evaluation using the systematic and standardized 12-step process Compile a complete, clear and accurate report documenting the results of a drug influence evaluation using the 13-step component narrative report format Briefly review the objectives, content and activities of this session. Upon successfully completing this session the student will be able to: Conduct a complete drug influence evaluation using the systematic and standardized 12- step process. Compile a complete, clear and accurate report documenting the results of a drug influence evaluation using the 13-step component narrative report format. Content Segments Learning Activities Scenarios: Simulated Examinations Interviewing Practice Report Preparation Practice Note-taking Practice Report Review and Critique Small Group Work Session Instructor-Led Presentations Participant-Led Presentations Participant-Led Critiques A. Scenarios: Simulated Examinations Team Assignments Assign the students to teams of 3-4 members. The total number of student teams should not be more than the number of “role players” participating in this session. Otherwise, one or more teams would be unoccupied during major portions of this segment. Revised: 04-16-2014 Drug Recognition Expert Course Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)

Procedures Each team will examine as many as possible of the “role players” Each examination will be carried out fully At certain points in the examination, the “role player” will inform the team what to record Procedures Explain procedures to the students. Each team will examine as many as possible of the “role players”, until the time scheduled for this segment elapses. Each examination will be carried out fully: nothing will be omitted except for the breath alcohol test. At certain points in the examination, the “role player” will inform the team what to record. Example: the “role players” will instruct the teams concerning the evidence to be recorded from the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test. Revised: 04-16-2014 Drug Recognition Expert Course Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)

Role Playing Some “role players” will be simulating the signs and symptoms of exactly one category of drugs Some “role players” may be simulating the signs and symptoms of two or more categories in combination All students will participate in critiquing the reports All data will be recorded on the standard Drug Influence Evaluation Form. Some “role players” will be simulating the signs and symptoms of exactly one category of drugs. Clarification: “Role player Alpha” might be simulating a person who is under the influence of a CNS Stimulant only. “Role player Delta” might be simulating a person under the influence of an Inhalant only. Some “role players” may be simulating the signs and symptoms of two or more categories in combination. “Role player Bravo” might be simulating someone who is under the influence of both PCP and Marijuana. It is possible that one or more “role players” may be simulating persons who are not under the influence of any drugs. At the completion of each examination, the team will discuss the evidence obtained and reach a consensus concerning the category or categories of drugs present. Subsequently, each team will be assigned the responsibility of preparing and presenting a complete narrative report on one “role player.” All students will participate in critiquing the reports. Verify that all teams understand the procedures. Solicit students’ questions concerning the procedures. Revised: 04-16-2014 Drug Recognition Expert Course Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)

Drug Evaluation and Classification Practice Practice will continue for approximately 2 hours, or until each team has completed the evaluation of at least three “role players” Drug Evaluation and Classification Practice Assign a “role player” to each team. Example: “Alpha” to team #1, “Bravo” to team #2, “Charlie” to team #3, etc. As each team completes the entire evaluation, the team will hand over its “role player” to the next team. That is, team #1 hand off to team #2, team #2 to team #3, etc. Make sure that each team member fully participates, and conducts some portion of the evaluation of each “role player.” Allow the practice to continue for approximately 2 hours, or until each team has completed the evaluation of at least three “role players” (whichever occurs later). Revised: 04-16-2014 Drug Recognition Expert Course Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)

Report Preparation Practice Team Assignments Group Writing Exercise B. Report Preparation Practice Team Assignments Instruct each team to prepare a report based on the third “role player” evaluated by the team. Verify that each team understands who is to be the subject of the report. Group Writing Exercise Team members may divide the report writing work among themselves in any way they see fit. Revised: 04-16-2014 Drug Recognition Expert Course Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)

Report Review and Critique Read Report Explain Conclusions Critique C. Report Review and Critique Report Presentation Each team should appoint a speaker to read its report. The speaker should explain exactly what led the team to its conclusion concerning the category or categories of drugs. Report Critique Inquire whether other teams that evaluated this same “role player” reached a different conclusion about the drug category or categories. In turn, present and critique the other teams’ reports. If necessary, this segment can be conducted simultaneously in two separate classrooms, with half of the teams present in each classroom, to allow all reports to be presented and critiqued within the allotted time. Revised: 04-16-2014 Drug Recognition Expert Course Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)

QUESTIONS? Solicit participants’ comments and questions concerning Classifying a Suspect. Revised: 04-16-2014 Drug Recognition Expert Course Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)