Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Advertisements

Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
MicroRNAs Act as Cofactors in Bicoid-Mediated Translational Repression
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
Tony DeFalco, Nicole Camara, Stéphanie Le Bras, Mark Van Doren 
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Toshiaki Watanabe, Haifan Lin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Suzanne Komili, Natalie G. Farny, Frederick P. Roth, Pamela A. Silver 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Control of Fat Storage by a Drosophila PAT Domain Protein
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Rho-LIM Kinase Signaling Regulates Ecdysone-Induced Gene Expression and Morphogenesis during Drosophila Metamorphosis  Guang-Chao Chen, Patrycja Gajowniczek,
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (April 2001)
lin-35 and lin-53, Two Genes that Antagonize a C
Ruth Grosskortenhaus, Frank Sprenger  Developmental Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Julien Ablain, Ellen M. Durand, Song Yang, Yi Zhou, Leonard I. Zon 
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
Alexandra Schambony, Doris Wedlich  Developmental Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Temporal and Spatial Control of Germ-Plasm RNAs
Pipe-Dependent Ventral Processing of Easter by Snake Is the Defining Step in Drosophila Embryo DV Axis Formation  Yong Suk Cho, Leslie M. Stevens, David.
Naohito Takatori, Gaku Kumano, Hidetoshi Saiga, Hiroki Nishida 
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Nuclear Retention Prevents Premature Cytoplasmic Appearance of mRNA
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
MicroRNA Destabilization Enables Dynamic Regulation of the miR-16 Family in Response to Cell-Cycle Changes  Olivia S. Rissland, Sue-Jean Hong, David P.
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Yuichiro Mishima, Yukihide Tomari  Molecular Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Maternally Inherited Stable Intronic Sequence RNA Triggers a Self-Reinforcing Feedback Loop during Development  Mandy Li-Ian Tay, Jun Wei Pek  Current.
Sarah E. Siegrist, Chris Q. Doe  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
Julien Ablain, Ellen M. Durand, Song Yang, Yi Zhou, Leonard I. Zon 
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
The Bicoid Morphogen System
Developmental Timing in C
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 143-155 (January 2007) SMAUG Is a Major Regulator of Maternal mRNA Destabilization in Drosophila and Its Translation Is Activated by the PAN GU Kinase  Wael Tadros, Aaron L. Goldman, Tomas Babak, Fiona Menzies, Leah Vardy, Terry Orr-Weaver, Timothy R. Hughes, J. Timothy Westwood, Craig A. Smibert, Howard D. Lipshitz  Developmental Cell  Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 143-155 (January 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Microarray-Based Gene Expression Profiling of Maternal Transcript Stability in Activated Unfertilized Eggs from Wild-Type and smg Mutant Females Unfertilized eggs were collected 0–2, 2–4, and 4–6 hr after laying. (A) Maternal mRNAs (5097) sorted according to instability at 4–6 hr; each is represented by a horizontal bar, with black indicating no change, green a decrease, and red an increase in transcript abundance relative to stage 14 oocytes. Transcripts above the dashed yellow line (ratio's log base 2 of −0.59 = 1.5-fold decrease) are significantly destabilized. (B) Left: the 1069 transcripts that are significantly destabilized in wild-type. Right: the same transcripts in eggs from smg mutant females, showing that many of these are stabilized. (C) Unstable transcripts can be subdivided into two classes. Upper: 712 SMG-dependent transcripts. Lower: 357 SMG-independent transcripts. Y axis: ratio's log base 2; dashed yellow line as in (A). Developmental Cell 2007 12, 143-155DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 SMG Protein Is Absent in Embryos from png, plu, and gnu Mutant Females Western blot of extracts from 0- to 3-hour-old embryos probed for SMG and β-tubulin (a loading control). Developmental Cell 2007 12, 143-155DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 png Is Required Following Egg Activation for SMG Expression and Destabilization of Maternal Transcripts (A) bcd5′UTR-png-bcd3′UTR (BPB): dashed line represents CaSpeR4 vector sequences; solid line represents genomic DNA flanking the bcd 5′ and 3′ UTRs, which are represented by black boxes; white box represents the png ORF. E, B, N, and M denote restriction sites for EcoRI, BstEII, NdeI, and MluI, respectively. (B) Western blot probed for PNG and β-tubulin: PNG protein from bcd5′UTR-png-bcd3′UTR is expressed only after egg activation. Full-length PNG is marked with an asterisk (∗). Extracts were from stage 14 oocytes and 0- to 3-hour-old embryos of the indicated genotypes. (C) Whole-mount fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of Hsp83 transcripts (top row) and immunostain of SMG protein (bottom row): in png embryos, bcd5′UTR-png-bcd3′UTR induces mRNA destabilization and SMG expression. Representative 2- to 4-hour-old embryos are shown with the anterior to the left and dorsal toward the top. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 143-155DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 PNG Is Required for the Translation of smg mRNA Acting through Its 3′ UTR (A) Northern blot showing that smg mRNA levels are similar in 0- to 3-hour-old wild-type and png50 mutant embryos. rpA1 is a loading control. (B) UAS-smg-bcd3′UTR (USB) transgene, which places the smg ORF under the translational control of the bcd 3′ UTR, is able to restore SMG expression in png mutants, as demonstrated in a western blot probed for SMG. (C and D) smg5′UTR-GFP-smg3′UTR (SGS) (C) and UAS-GFP-smg3′UTR (UGS) (D) transgenes are able to reconstitute png-dependent translational control as evidenced by western blots probed for GFP. Expression of UAS-smg-bcd3′UTR and UAS-GFP-smg3′UTR was driven by Nanos-Gal4-VP16 (NGV). In all westerns, extracts were from either 0- to 3-hour-old embryos (0–3) or stage 14 oocytes (st. 14) of the indicated maternal genotype. Blots were also probed for DDP1 (loading control). In all schematics, K, N, and B denote restriction sites for KpnI, NdeI, and BsiWI, respectively; ORFs and UTRs are represented by white and black boxes, respectively; flanking genomic and vector sequences are represented by solid and dashed lines, respectively. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 143-155DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 PNG Promotes the Translation of smg via Polyadenylation-Independent Mechanisms (A) Northern blot showing that all three smg mRNA isoforms are cytoplasmically polyadenylated following egg activation and that polyadenylation is reduced in png mutants. Total RNA from stage 14 oocytes, 0- to 0.5-, 0.5- to 1.0-, and 1.0- to 1.5-hour-old embryos was cleaved with RNase H after hybridization of an antisense oligonucleotide complementary to a site 275 nucleotides 5′ to the first poly(A) addition site. The blot was probed with a smg fragment complementary to sequences between the two sites (top panels), stripped, and reprobed for rpA1 (loading control; bottom panels). The first lane shows total RNA from stage 14 oocytes that had also been hybridized to oligo(dT) prior to RNase H cleavage to reveal the lengths of transcripts lacking poly(A) tails. Brackets denote the size range of each RNA isoform from the 0.5–1.0 hr embryonic time point (labeled 1–3, from smallest to largest). (B) Western blot showing that SMG translation correlates with long poly(A) tails. Extracts were from stage 14 oocytes and 0- to 3-hour-old embryos from wild-type and png50 mutants. The blot was probed for SMG and β-tubulin. UAS-PAP overexpression using the NGV driver lengthens smg poly(A) tails in both wild-type and png mutants (C) but results in increased translation only in the former (D). Developmental Cell 2007 12, 143-155DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Restoration of SMG Expression in png Mutants Is Insufficient to Rescue Destabilization of Hsp83 mRNA Whole-mount fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of Hsp83 transcripts (top row) and immunostain of SMG protein (bottom row): in png embryos, although SMG expression from the UAS-smg-bcd3′UTR (USB) transgene occurs in the anterior, Hsp83 mRNA degradation is not induced. Representative embryos of the indicated maternal genotypes from 2- to 4-hour-old collections are shown. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 143-155DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for Posttranscriptional Regulation of Maternal Transcripts and Their Role in the Early Embryonic Cell Cycle PNG is required upon egg activation for the translation of at least three transcripts: cyclin B, smg, and y, which encodes an unknown factor. Though Cyclin translation only requires relief of repression by PUM, smg translation requires the relief of at least one additional, parallel-acting repressor (X). The translational activation of the three sets of transcripts is required at different stages of development for distinct purposes. The mitotic Cyclins are necessary for the initial cell cycles. Coincidently, SMG, acting together with Y, triggers the destabilization of maternal transcripts. Transcripts that are targeted by the SMG pathway must be eliminated to allow late cell cycle progression. Solid lines represent steps in the pathway supported by data from this study as well as the published literature; dotted lines represent hypothetical processes. Developmental Cell 2007 12, 143-155DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.005) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions