Decoding Cognitive Processes from Neural Ensembles

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Two views of brain function Marcus E. Raichle Trends in Cognitive Sciences Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010) DOI: /j.tics
Advertisements

Soyoun Kim, Jaewon Hwang, Daeyeol Lee  Neuron 
Heterogeneous Coding of Temporally Discounted Values in the Dorsal and Ventral Striatum during Intertemporal Choice  Xinying Cai, Soyoun Kim, Daeyeol.
Dmitriy Aronov, David W. Tank  Neuron 
Volume 83, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Hippocampal Replay Is Not a Simple Function of Experience
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Ranulfo Romo, Adrián Hernández, Antonio Zainos  Neuron 
Hiroaki Norimoto, Yuji Ikegaya  Current Biology 
Jiannis Taxidis, Costas A. Anastassiou, Kamran Diba, Christof Koch 
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e4 (December 2017)
Jung Hoon Sul, Hoseok Kim, Namjung Huh, Daeyeol Lee, Min Whan Jung 
Chenguang Zheng, Kevin Wood Bieri, Yi-Tse Hsiao, Laura Lee Colgin 
Aaron C. Koralek, Rui M. Costa, Jose M. Carmena  Neuron 
E.H. Baeg, Y.B. Kim, K. Huh, I. Mook-Jung, H.T. Kim, M.W. Jung  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 20, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Seiichiro Amemiya, A. David Redish  Cell Reports 
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
H. Freyja Ólafsdóttir, Francis Carpenter, Caswell Barry  Neuron 
Neural Correlates of Knowledge: Stable Representation of Stimulus Associations across Variations in Behavioral Performance  Adam Messinger, Larry R. Squire,
Trajectory Encoding in the Hippocampus and Entorhinal Cortex
Developmental Inhibition of Gsk3 Rescues Behavioral and Neurophysiological Deficits in a Mouse Model of Schizophrenia Predisposition  Makoto Tamura, Jun.
R. Ellen Ambrose, Brad E. Pfeiffer, David J. Foster  Neuron 
Kenji Mizuseki, György Buzsáki  Cell Reports 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Gamma and the Coordination of Spiking Activity in Early Visual Cortex
New Experiences Enhance Coordinated Neural Activity in the Hippocampus
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Shigeyoshi Fujisawa, György Buzsáki  Neuron 
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Annabelle C. Singer, Loren M. Frank  Neuron 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e4 (December 2017)
Hippocampal Replay of Extended Experience
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Prefrontal Cortex Activity Related to Abstract Response Strategies
Kevin Wood Bieri, Katelyn N. Bobbitt, Laura Lee Colgin  Neuron 
Athanassios G Siapas, Matthew A Wilson  Neuron 
The Role of Hippocampal Replay in Memory and Planning
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
A Scalable Population Code for Time in the Striatum
Sharon C. Furtak, Omar J. Ahmed, Rebecca D. Burwell  Neuron 
Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations  Timothy J.
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Computational Models of Grid Cells
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Caudate Microstimulation Increases Value of Specific Choices
Tracking Route Progression in the Posterior Parietal Cortex
Synchronized Activity between the Ventral Hippocampus and the Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Anxiety  Avishek Adhikari, Mihir A. Topiwala, Joshua A.
Masayuki Matsumoto, Masahiko Takada  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Traces of Experience in the Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Transient Slow Gamma Synchrony Underlies Hippocampal Memory Replay
The Hippocampus, Memory, and Place Cells
Looking for cognition in the structure within the noise
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2019)
Spatial Representation along the Proximodistal Axis of CA1
Rapid Neocortical Dynamics: Cellular and Network Mechanisms
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Richard A. Andersen, He Cui  Neuron 
Matthew R. Roesch, Adam R. Taylor, Geoffrey Schoenbaum  Neuron 
Presentation transcript:

Decoding Cognitive Processes from Neural Ensembles Joni D. Wallis  Trends in Cognitive Sciences  Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 1091-1102 (December 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.002 Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Replay Events Decoded from Hippocampal Place Cells. (A) As a rat walks along a linear track, different hippocampal neurons, with different place fields (colored ellipses) fire at different locations along the track. (B) Top: raw LFP trace recorded from hippocampus. Middle: ripple-filtered LFP trace. Bottom: spike rasters from 263 simultaneously recorded hippocampal neurons, indicating the increased firing during ripple events. (C) When the rat pauses at the end of the track, the cells rapidly fire in the same order in which the place fields were encountered. (D) A Bayesian decoder allowed the spatial trajectory of the replay event to be constructed from the pattern of firing in the 263 neurons. Adapted, with permission, from [74]. Abbreviation: LFP, local field potential. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018 22, 1091-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.002) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Decoding Spatial Trajectories in the Open Field. (A) Rats explored an open field, searching for a reward hidden in one of 36 wells. The reward was hidden at D1 and D2 on the first and second day, respectively. (B) Eight examples showing replay events decoded on the first day. The trajectories often traveled from the current location of the rat (cyan triangle) to the reward location (cyan circle). (C) Frequency with which the end points of constructed replay trajectories occurred at different well locations. There was a bias for trajectories to end at the well in which the reward was hidden. Adapted, with permission, from [8]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018 22, 1091-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.002) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Decoding Hippocampal Activity on a Single T-Maze Trial. (A) A rat runs along a maze that requires them run down leftward or rightward arms on alternating trials. The choice point is outlined by the blue box. (B) The results of Bayesian decoding of spatial position from a hippocampal neural ensemble. The color scale indicates the location decoded with the highest probability and the white circle indicates the position of the rat. The hippocampal ensemble first represents locations in the leftward arm (from about 160ms until 360ms), followed by locations in the rightward arm (200ms until 400ms). Adapted, with permission, from [9]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018 22, 1091-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.002) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Decoding Value from Orbitofrontal Cortex Neurons during Decision Making. (A) The plots show six trials, selected at random, in which the animal was choosing between pairs of the reward-predictive cues. The value of the two cues is indicated above the plots (Ch, chosen picture value; UnCh, unchosen picture value). The individual lines of the plots indicate the decoder output, which is the probability that the neural activity is consistent with the representation of one of the two cues. The lines are color coded according to whether the value related to the picture that the animal ultimately chose, the picture it did not choose, or the unavailable pictures that were not presented on that trial. (B) There were significantly more flip-flops on error trials relative to correct trials (t test, P<0.005). (C) Strength of correlation between decoder output (posterior probability) and choice response time, for the chosen (red) and unchosen (blue) options. Stronger representation of the chosen option produced faster response times (negative correlation), while the opposite was true for the unchosen option. (D) The number of states per trial, averaged for each session. States were defined as a probability >0.5 for >80ms. Chosen states were more prevalent than unchosen states. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018 22, 1091-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.002) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure I Representation of Different Attractor Basins. The color of the balls indicates whether they end up at trough 1 (blue) or trough 2 (red). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2018 22, 1091-1102DOI: (10.1016/j.tics.2018.09.002) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions