Academy of Pacesetting States

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACADEMY OF PACESETTING STATES Orientation to Cohort # Seeing Change Through to the Classroom.
Advertisements

Parents as Partners in Education
Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners May 2012 Developing High Quality IEPs Ensuring each student has access to their least.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Rubrics-Based Evaluation of a Statewide System of Support A Tool to Enhance Statewide Systems of Support.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Two Generations of Success Family Engagement in Full Service Community Schools Coalition for Community Schools April, 2010.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 7.
Linking Systems: State, District, School, Classroom: The Virginia Project Chairs: Nancy Protheroe, Center on Innovation & Improvement Kathleen Smith, Virginia.
Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 2.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.
The Academy of Pacesetting Districts Introducing...
Indistar® Information about the Indistar® Online Tool.
Participating States and Regional Centers Alaska, Alaska Comprehensive Center Arkansas, Mid-Continent Comprehensive Center Idaho, Northwest Comprehensive.
Overview – Indistar® SSOS Online Web Tool in comparison to the publication “ Evaluating the Statewide System of Support” Assessment Process Planning Process.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Academy of Pacesetting States Indicators of Effective Instruction Larry Kugler July 20, 2009.
Presentation to North Carolina State Board of Education Global Education Task Force March 14, 2012  Adam Hartzell, Executive Director  Matt Friedrick,
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
The Value of School Librarians, School Libraries, and School Library Systems Barbara Stripling
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning PLANNING FOR SUCCESS.
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) End-of-Year Conference.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Home Base Partnership Team
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
English Learner Strategic Plan
Youth Engagement Project
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Nonprofit Capacity Building
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application
What We Know About Effective Professional Development for Teachers
Assessing the Indicators
Structures for Implementation
Bring the GWP to Your School
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Statewide InD Coordinators/ December 2017
Public engagement strategy
Framework for an Effective Statewide System of Support
Michigan School Improvement Grant
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Implementing Race to the Top
Professional Learning Communities Kick-off Day
Nested State System of School Support
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Schoolwide Programs.
An Overview April 2012.
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Introduction Introduction
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Human capital development
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Academy of Pacesetting States Seeing Change Through to the Classroom Academy of Pacesetting States Orientation to Cohort #2 - 2011

Participating States and Regional Centers Nevada, Southwest Comprehensive Center New Hampshire, New England Comprehensive Center North Dakota, North Central Comprehensive Center Vermont, New England Comprehensive Center West Virginia, Appalachia Regional Comprehensive Center Wisconisn, Great Lakes West Comprehensive Center Bureau of Indian Education, CII

Objectives of the Academy of Pacesetting States  The objectives of CII for the Academy of Pacesetting States are to provide:   A learning community for teams from states and the Bureau intent upon leading the way to rapid improvement of districts and schools. Training, consultation, and support to enable partners to reach their goals for high quality Statewide Systems of Support that build local capacity to initiate and sustain rapid improvement that brings all classrooms to an optimal level of performance. Training, consultation, and support for state teams to develop skilled experts

Objectives of the Academy of Pacesetting States The objectives of the members of the Academy of Pacesetting States are to:   Take full advantage of the opportunities to share talents and experiences with other states, the Academy faculty and partners. Develop and achieve bold plans of action to: Elevate the effectiveness of the Statewide System of Support; Build local capacity to initiate and sustain rapid improvement that brings all classrooms to an optimal level of performance;

Measures of Success Improvement of Statewide System of Support as indicated by rubrics-based evaluation; Achievement of Plan of Action; Evidence of impact on classroom instruction, local capacity to initiate and sustain rapid improvement.

Central Themes

Spheres of Influence on the Instructional Core

Building Local Capacity Culture of Candor Leadership Effective Teams Collegial Coaching/Learning Open scrutiny of data from both sides of equation What students learn What adults do that affects what students learn Indicators of Effective Practice Guideposts for effective practice Plain language, behavioral indicators Aligned with research base Drivers of planning and improvement Necessary in a Culture of Candor

Catalytic Teams A Catalytic Team in a well-coordinated system of support to rapidly improve districts and schools in ways that show substantial effects in classroom instruction and student learning.

The ultimate goal in school improvement is for the people attached to the school to drive its continuous improvement for the sake of their own children and students.

We have important work to do.