Intestinal Stem Cell Pool Regulation in Drosophila

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Advertisements

Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Centrosome Amplification Can Initiate Tumorigenesis in Flies
Ilp6 and egr regulate epithelial homeostasis.
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Spyros Goulas, Ryan Conder, Juergen A. Knoblich  Cell Stem Cell 
Monica Boyle, Chihunt Wong, Michael Rocha, D. Leanne Jones 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Stem Cells and the Niche: A Dynamic Duo
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages e10 (February 2019)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Samuel A. LoCascio, Sylvain W. Lapan, Peter W. Reddien 
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Jiawen Huang, Hongyan Wang  Stem Cell Reports 
The Drosophila Hindgut Lacks Constitutively Active Adult Stem Cells but Proliferates in Response to Tissue Damage  Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling 
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
Jia You, Yan Zhang, Zhouhua Li, Zhefeng Lou, Longjin Jin, Xinhua Lin 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 2017)
In Vivo Analysis of Centromeric Proteins Reveals a Stem Cell-Specific Asymmetry and an Essential Role in Differentiated, Non-proliferating Cells  Ana.
Atypical PKC and Notch Inhibition Differentially Modulate Cortical Interneuron Subclass Fate from Embryonic Stem Cells  David J. Tischfield, Junho Kim,
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Piwi Is Required to Limit Exhaustion of Aging Somatic Stem Cells
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
GRM7 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis via CREB and YAP
Christine E. Hochmuth, Benoit Biteau, Dirk Bohmann, Heinrich Jasper 
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Benoît Biteau, Heinrich Jasper  Cell Reports 
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Nur Hayati Jaafar Marican, Sara B. Cruz-Migoni, Anne-Gaëlle Borycki 
Elena M. Lucchetta, Benjamin Ohlstein  Cell Stem Cell 
Swapna Kollu, Rana Abou-Khalil, Carl Shen, Andrew S. Brack 
David P. Doupé, Allon M. Klein, Benjamin D. Simons, Philip H. Jones 
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
The POU/Oct Transcription Factor Nubbin Controls the Balance of Intestinal Stem Cell Maintenance and Differentiation by Isoform-Specific Regulation  Xiongzhuo.
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis  Phylis Hétié, Margaret de Cuevas, Erika.
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Intestinal Stem Cells in Mammals and Drosophila
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2019)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Intestinal Stem Cells Exhibit Conditional Circadian Clock Function
Adult Neurogenesis in Drosophila
Benoit Biteau, Christine E. Hochmuth, Heinrich Jasper  Cell Stem Cell 
Fig. 1 ee cells are specified by ISCs asymmetric divisions.
Presentation transcript:

Intestinal Stem Cell Pool Regulation in Drosophila Yinhua Jin, Parthive H. Patel, Alexander Kohlmaier, Bojana Pavlovic, Chenge Zhang, Bruce A. Edgar  Stem Cell Reports  Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 1479-1487 (June 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.002 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 ISCs Failed to Repopulate after the Depletion Induced by p53 Overexpression (A–D) ISC and EB maintenance after partial depletion. Transgene expression was induced using the esgts system at 29°C for 4 days and turned off at 18°C as indicated. GFP expression was induced at 29°C for 12 hr before dissection. (A) Control adult midgut. (B) p53-overexpressing midgut after 8-day recovery. (C) p53-overexpressing midgut after 16-day recovery. (D) p53-overexpressing midgut after 32-day recovery. ISCs and progenitor cells did not repopulate to recover the stem cell pools. Scale bars represent 50 μm. (E–G) Quantification of GFP+ progenitors (E), ISCs (F), and mitotic index (G) in posterior midgut during the recovery process both after depletion. n = 10–26 guts; ns (not significant), p > 0.05. Error bars in each graph represent SD. See also Table S1 and Figures S1–S3. Stem Cell Reports 2017 8, 1479-1487DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ISCs Still Have the Mitotic Capability after p53 Overexpression (A–D) Effect of P. entomophila (P.e.) infection on ISC proliferation after p53 overexpression. Transgene expression was induced using the esgts system at 29°C for 4 days and turned off at 18°C for 32 days. Flies were shifted back to 29°C for P. entomophila infection for 24 hr. Samples were stained with anti-GFP (green), anti-PH3 (red, arrow), and DAPI (blue) to mark DNA. Scale bars, 50 μm. (A) Control adult midgut. (B) Control midgut after 24 hr P. entomophila infection. (C) p53-overexpressing midgut. (D) p53-overexpressing midgut after 24 hr P. entomophila infection. (E) Quantification of mitotic index of posterior midgut ISCs + EBs following P. entomophila infection. Error bars represent SD; n = 10 guts; ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S3. Stem Cell Reports 2017 8, 1479-1487DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ISCs Divide Asymmetrically Even under Stress Condition (A) Quantification of GFP+ cells in p53-induced midguts (n = 19–26) under different conditions after p53 was expressed for 4 days and turned off for 8 days. (B) Quantification of PH3+ cells in P. entomophila (P.e.)-infected midgut after kanamycin treatment. Induced ISC division upon P. entomophila infection was restored after kanamycin treatment. n = 19–25 guts; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (C) Two sets of twin-spot MARCM clones are shown. In asymmetric twin spot, the first-born EB differentiated into EC and was labeled with GFP. In symmetric twin spots, both daughter cells generate multicellular clones. Therefore, one was labeled with GFP while the other was labeled with RFP. (D) Quantification of the division modes in control (n = 208 clones) and P. entomophila-infected (n = 236 clones) midguts (n = 21). Twin spots were induced at the indicated times, and asymmetric and symmetric signatures were scored 16 hr later. See also Figure S3. Stem Cell Reports 2017 8, 1479-1487DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ISC Proliferation Rate Regulates Midgut Epithelial Cell Turnover (A–C) Midgut epithelial cell turnover (GFP; green) was decreased in midguts overexpressing cell-cycle inhibitors (+Dap+Wee1) for 21 days with esgtsF/O compared with midguts expressing GFP alone for 21 days. Prospero+ enteroendocrine cells are in red. (D and E) The surface area and the total R4a + b cell number of midguts overexpressing Dap and Wee1 for 21 days (n = 16) with esgtsF/O was similar to midguts expressing GFP alone for 21 days (n = 10; n = 6 for 1 day). (F) Percent midgut epithelial turnover (%GFP+ cells per total R4a + b cell number) was reduced in midguts overexpressing Dap and Wee1 for 21 days with esgtsF/O compared with control midguts expressing GFP alone for 21 days. The data in (A) to (F) suggest that decelerating ISC proliferation increases midgut cell lifespan and decreases their turnover. (G and H) Midgut epithelial turnover (GFP; green) was increased in midguts expressing secreted Spi (sSpi) for 7 days with esgtsF/O compared with control midguts expressing GFP alone for 7 days. (I and J) While the surface area mildly increases in midguts expressing sSpi for 7 days (n = 7) with esgtsF/O compared with midguts expressing GFP alone for 7 days (n = 8), the total number of R4a + b cells was similar between midguts expressing either sSpi or GFP alone for 7 days. (K) Percent midgut epithelial turnover (% GFP+ cells per total R4a + b cell number) was, however, increased in midguts expressing sSpi for 7 days with esgtsF/O compared with control midguts expressing GFP alone for 7 days. (L) Turnover of GFP− cells was increased in midguts expressing sSpi for 7 days with esgtsF/O compared with control expressing GFP alone. The data in (G) to (L) suggest that accelerating ISC proliferation increases midgut cell turnover. Surface areas and cell numbers in region R4a + b were measured on one side of the midgut epithelium. Total R4a + b cell number, % GFP+ cells/total R4a + b cell number, and GFP− R4a + b cell number were determined from n = 5 R4a + b regions. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired t test (∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗∗p ≤ 0.0001; ns [not significant] p > 0.05). In all plots the median is shown, box includes 25th–75th percentiles, and whiskers show minimum to maximum. DNA in (A–C), (G), and (H) (blue). Scale bars in (A–C), (G), and (H) represent 40 μm. See also Figure S4. Stem Cell Reports 2017 8, 1479-1487DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions