PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proton Driver Magnet Power Supply System Cezary Jach BD/EE Support April 19, 2000.
Advertisements

Muon Coalescing 101 Chuck Ankenbrandt Chandra Bhat Milorad Popovic Fermilab NFMCC IIT March 14, 2006.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
2nd EuroNu Plenary Meeting Review of CERN Proton Driver bunch compression studies 02/06/2010M.M. - EUROnu1.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from.
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
Experimental Study of the Inductance of a Toroidal Ferrite Core at High frequencies Michelle Walker North Carolina A&T State University Supervisor: Dave.
Status of the PSB 2 GeV Upgrade and the RCS Study SGUI Meeting B. Mikulec, 07 July 2011.
22/03/1999A.Blas1 Hollow bunches A. Blas, S. Hancock, S. Koscielniak, M. Lindroos, F. Pedersen, H. Schonauer  Why: to improve space charge related problems.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.
RAL Muon Beam Line Properties. ISIS 70 MeV H- injection Ring accelerates up to 800 MeV in about 10 ms 50 Hz cycle - Dual Harmonic System ~ 2 x 1.5 MHz;
Production of bunch doublets for scrubbing of the LHC J. Esteban Muller (simulations), E. Shaposhnikova 3 December 2013 LBOC Thanks to H. Bartosik, T.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
E.M, PS-OP shut-down lectures, 20/02/ u Requirements of the LHC on its injectors u What are the nominal & already achieved beams at PS exit? u How.
FFAG Acceleration David Neuffer Fermilab FFAG Workshop ‘03.
Benchmark and Study of PSR Longitudinal Beam Dynamics Sarah M. Cousineau, Jeffrey A. Holmes, Slava Danilov MAP Workshop March 18, 2004.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Barrier RF Stacking Weiren Chou and Dave Wildman Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany,
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Longitudinal Painting S. Hancock p.p. G. Feldbauer.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
RCS design Valeri Lebedev AAC Meeting November 16-17, 2009.
Outcome of beam dynamics simulations - Scenarios, requirements and expected gains s LIU-SPS Coordination meeting 26/08/2015 A. Lasheen, E. Shaposhnikova,
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
Elias Métral, LIS meeting, 29/01/2008 1/26 GAMMA TRANSITION JUMP FOR PS2 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral and D. Möhl u Introduction with the case of.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
Coupled bunch Instabilities at ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University Refer to.
HEADTAIL simulation during the accelerating ramp in the PS S. Aumon - EPFL & CERN Acknowledgement to B. Salvant, G. Rumolo.
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Beam Manufacture in PS2 M. Benedikt, S. Hancock. LHC Beams in the PS by 2015 Typeh injε l inj [evs] h ejN bunch ej RF ej [MHz] ε l ej [evs] τ ej [ns]
Loss of Landau damping for reactive impedance and a double RF system
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Status of the PS TFB Hardware Overview Machine results To be done
Calculation of Beam Equilibrium and Luminosities for
Impact of the current debuncher limitations (…can we get rid of longitudinal painting?)
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Wideband, solid-state driven RF systems for PSB and PS longitudinal damper.
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
New AD Production Beam in the PSB
LHC Radio Frequency Swing
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
The LHC25ns cycle in the PS Triple splitting after 2nd injection
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV
Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB
Generation of Higher Brightness Beams for LHC
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson
PSB rf Foreseen limitations with 2 E13 p at 2 GeV
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
PSB rf Power limitations with Linac4
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Fast kicker beam dynamics simulations
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
eSPS Impedance Considerations Aaron Farricker Acknowledgements: T
Presentation transcript:

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring PS TFB PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Specifications 2.5E13 p from 160 MeV to 2 GeV Current in bending magnets < 2267 ARMS +10% = 2493 ARMS with 1.2 second cycle (no modification of the cooling circuit). MPS model: L= 0.18H, R=0.5Ω, Umax=3600V, B/I=2.15G/A Cavity voltage limited to 8 kV. Longitudinal space charge effects taken into account A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 25/05/2010

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring PS TFB PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simplifications Pure h=1 acceleration Inductive and resistive wall effect neglected (impedance value to be asked for, but practically assumed to be low !?). The inductive effect counteracts the space charge effect. All these (pessimistic) simplifications lead to conservative figures A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 25/05/2010

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring PS TFB PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Longitudinal space charge effect Total coupling impedance: Z0 = 377 Ω Parasitic voltage superimposed (each turn) to the accelerating voltage (space charge only): Inductive and resistive wall neglected Circular beam pipe approximation (real value to be checked for) A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 25/05/2010

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring PS TFB PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Longitudinal space charge effect Parasitic voltage superimposed (each turn) to the accelerating voltage (space charge only): A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 25/05/2010

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring PS TFB PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simulation 1: injection at 1.2 T/s, 8kV (- SC) bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.5E13p (0.77 eV.s instead of 1.02 as planned) The acceleration lasts 470 ms with a 5 ms flat-top (490 ms presently) A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 25/05/2010

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring PS TFB PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simulation 1: injection at 1.2 T/s, 8kV (- SC) bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.5E13p (0.77 eV.s instead of 1.02 as planned) The acceleration lasts 470 ms with a 5 ms flat-top (490 ms presently) A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 25/05/2010

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring PS TFB PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Simulation 1: injection at 1.2 T/s, 8kV (- SC) bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.5E13p (0.77 eV.s instead of 1.02 as planned) The acceleration lasts 470 ms with a 5 ms flat-top (490 ms presently) A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 25/05/2010

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring PS TFB PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring Conclusion: These simulations concerns h1 uniquely, for a single harmonic acceleration made as fast as possible with a 8 kV h1 cavity and a beam emittance of 0.77 eV.s (80% of the 8 kV-SC bucket at injection) instead of the 1.02 eV.s beam planned at first. The rf h1 cavity needs to supply 6 A of “accelerating current” (3 A presently available). The MPS with a voltage limited to 3600 V is not fast enough to be compatible with a 1.2 s cycle. Even if the MPS voltage is increased, with the h1 cavities limited at 8 kV, its RMS current will go above the limit of 2493 A A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 25/05/2010

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring PS TFB PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring To be done: Make simulations with new “realistic” values for the MPS max voltage (>3600V) and the max RMS current (> 2490 A). A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 25/05/2010