Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Targeted Disruption of V600E-Mutant BRAF Gene by CRISPR-Cpf1
Advertisements

CRISPR/Cas9 screening using unique molecular identifiers
A 3′ Poly(A) Tract Is Required for LINE-1 Retrotransposition
by Megan D. Hoban, Gregory J. Cost, Matthew C
Single Cell-Based Vector Tracing in Patients with ADA-SCID Treated with Stem Cell Gene Therapy  Yuka Igarashi, Toru Uchiyama, Tomoko Minegishi, Sirirat.
MethySYBR, a Novel Quantitative PCR Assay for the Dual Analysis of DNA Methylation and CpG Methylation Density  Pang-Kuo Lo, Hanano Watanabe, Pi-Chun.
Comparison of BIOMED-2 Versus Laboratory-Developed Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Detecting T-Cell Receptor-γ Gene Rearrangements  Keyur P. Patel,
Β-Glucuronidase Is an Optimal Normalization Control Gene for Molecular Monitoring of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia  Joong Won Lee, Qiaofang Chen, Daniel.
Cotranscriptionally Formed DNA:RNA Hybrids Mediate Transcription Elongation Impairment and Transcription-Associated Recombination  Pablo Huertas, Andrés.
Application of Single-Molecule Amplification and Resequencing Technology for Broad Surveillance of Plasma Mutations in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma 
Application of Single-Molecule Amplification and Resequencing Technology for Broad Surveillance of Plasma Mutations in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma 
Global Mapping of Human RNA-RNA Interactions
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (May 2018)
Clinical Relevance of Sensitive and Quantitative STAT3 Mutation Analysis Using Next- Generation Sequencing in T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia 
Super-Enhancers at the Nanog Locus Differentially Regulate Neighboring Pluripotency- Associated Genes  Steven Blinka, Michael H. Reimer, Kirthi Pulakanti,
A Comprehensive Strategy for Accurate Mutation Detection of the Highly Homologous PMS2  Jianli Li, Hongzheng Dai, Yanming Feng, Jia Tang, Stella Chen,
DNA Diagnostics by Surface-Bound Melt-Curve Reactions
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (May 2018)
Sequencing of t(2;7) Translocations Reveals a Consistent Breakpoint Linking CDK6 to the IGK Locus in Indolent B-Cell Neoplasia  Edward P.K. Parker, Reiner.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Transient Gene Expression by Nonintegrating Lentiviral Vectors
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Donald B. Kohn, MD, Caroline Y. Kuo, MD 
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Target-Specific Precision of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing
USH2A Gene Editing Using the CRISPR System
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Novel Fluorescent Ligase Detection Reaction and Flow Cytometric Analysis of SYT-SSX Fusions in Synovial Sarcoma  Robyn Gaffney, Artemis Chakerian, John.
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Custom Zinc-Finger Nucleases for Use in Human Cells
Marija Debeljak, Donald N. Freed, Jane A
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Targeted Myostatin Gene Editing in Multiple Mammalian Species Directed by a Single Pair of TALE Nucleases  Li Xu, Piming Zhao, Andrew Mariano, Renzhi.
GFP to BFP Conversion: A Versatile Assay for the Quantification of CRISPR/Cas9- mediated Genome Editing  Astrid Glaser, Bradley McColl, Jim Vadolas  Molecular.
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Olivier Humbert, Nancy Maizels  Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Regulation of the Expression of Peptidylarginine Deiminase Type II Gene (PADI2) in Human Keratinocytes Involves Sp1 and Sp3 Transcription Factors  Sijun.
Inclusion of jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus proviral elements markedly increases lentivirus vector pseudotyping efficiency  Patrick L. Sinn, Erin R. Burnight,
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Commitment to X Inactivation Precedes the Twinning Event in Monochorionic MZ Twins  Joanita Monteiro, Catherine Derom, Robert Vlietinck, Nina Kohn, Martin.
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Deletion of CTG Expansions Recovers Normal Phenotype in Myogenic Cells Derived from Myotonic Dystrophy 1 Patients  Claudia Provenzano,
Targeted Deletion of an Entire Chromosome Using CRISPR/Cas9
Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick, Gang Bao  Molecular Therapy 
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Triplex-forming Peptide Nucleic Acids Induce Heritable Elevations in Gamma-globin Expression in Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells  Joanna Y Chin, Faisal.
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Jia Liu, Thomas Gaj, Mark C Wallen, Carlos F Barbas 
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Zinc-Finger Nucleases Induced by HIV-1 Tat Excise HIV-1 from the Host Genome in Infected and Latently Infected Cells  Haiyan Ji, Panpan Lu, Baochi Liu,
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Pre-clinical Development of a Lentiviral Vector Expressing the Anti-sickling βAS3 Globin for Gene Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease  Valentina Poletti,
Nuclease Target Site Selection for Maximizing On-target Activity and Minimizing Off- target Effects in Genome Editing  Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick,
Nonsense-Associated Altered Splicing
Exon Skipping in IVD RNA Processing in Isovaleric Acidemia Caused by Point Mutations in the Coding Region of the IVD Gene  Jerry Vockley, Peter K. Rogan,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 468-479 (February 2018) Characterization of Gene Alterations following Editing of the β-Globin Gene Locus in Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells  Joseph Long, Megan D. Hoban, Aaron R. Cooper, Michael L. Kaufman, Caroline Y. Kuo, Beatriz Campo-Fernandez, Dianne Lumaquin, Roger P. Hollis, Xiaoyan Wang, Donald B. Kohn, Zulema Romero  Molecular Therapy  Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 468-479 (February 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.001 Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Potential Rearrangement Events Occurring as a Result of On-Target Cleavage in HBB and Off-Target Cleavage in HBD The human δ-globin gene (HBD) is represented in yellow and the β-globin gene (HBB) in blue. The dashed lines indicate off-target cleavage of this ZFN pair in HBD and on-target cleavage in HBB. (A) Result of a deletion and primer combinations used to detect deletion events: HBD-Forward and HBB-Reverse. (B) Result of an inversion and primer combinations used to detect inversion events: HBD-Forward and HBB-Forward. (C) Result of a specific translocation and primer combinations used to detect the β-δ translocation events: HBB-Forward and HBD-Reverse. Molecular Therapy 2018 26, 468-479DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.001) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Detection of Rearrangement Events by PCR in CB CD34+ Cells Treated with 1 μg of ZFN mRNA (A) Representative gel showing intact HBB and HBD by PCR using the primers shown in Figure 1 (HBB-F and HBB-R for HBB and HBD-F and HBD-R for HBD). (B) Representative gel showing the deletion, inversion, and translocation events using the primer pairs shown in Figures 1A–1C, respectively, present in cells treated with the ZFNs but not in mock-treated cells. Mock: untreated CD34+ samples; ZFN, 1 μg of ZFN 88/01 mRNA-treated CD34+ cells; Pos. Ctrl, positive control, CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid-treated K562 3.21 previously detected as positive for the corresponding event; Neg. Ctrl, negative control, as no-template control. Molecular Therapy 2018 26, 468-479DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.001) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Detection of Rearrangement Events by PCR in CFUs from CD34+ Cells Treated with 1 μg of ZFN mRNA (A) Representative gel showing the deletion event in CFUs from SCD BM CD34 cells. (B) As in (A) for the inversion events. (C) As in (A) and (B) for the translocation events. Mock, untreated CD34+ samples; ZFN, 1 μg of ZFN 88/01 mRNA-treated CD34+ cells, Pos. Ctrl, K562 3.21 cells treated with a different endonuclease and previously detected as positive for the corresponding event. (A total of 76 CFUs were analyzed for each event.) Molecular Therapy 2018 26, 468-479DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.001) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Detection of Rearrangement Events by ddPCR in CD34+ Cells from CB Using ZFNs Not Having (55/58) or Having (88/01) Off-Target Cleavage at HBD (A) Schematic showing the binding site for primers and probes for the different rearrangement event detections. (B) Percentage of alleles containing the deletion event in cells treated with 1.5 μg or 3 μg of mRNA from ZFNs 55/58 or ZFNs 88/01. (C) Percentage of alleles containing the inversion event in cells treated with 1.5 μg or 3 μg of mRNA from ZFNs 55/58 or ZFNs 88/01. (D) Percentage of alleles containing the translocation event in cells treated with 1.5 μg or 3 μg of mRNA from ZFNs 55/58 or ZFNs 88/01. Mock, untreated CD34+ samples (n = 2 for each treatment). Error bars represent mean ± SD. Molecular Therapy 2018 26, 468-479DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.001) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Detection of Rearrangement Events by ddPCR in Bulk Cells and CFUs Derived from SCD BM CD34+ Cells (A) Percentage of alleles containing each rearrangement event in SCD BM CD34+ cells from two independent SCD BM donors, treated with 1 μg of ZFN 88/01 as mRNA only (4 biological replicates) or with the addition of the oligonucleotide (OHS) or integrase-defective lentiviral vector (IHS) donor templates (6 biological replicates per treatment). (B) Percentage of deletion-positive CFUs with mono-allelic or bi-allelic deletion events (ZFN only, n = 25; ZOHS, n = 57; ZIHS, n = 54). (C) Percentage of inversion-positive CFUs with mono-allelic or bi-allelic deletion events (ZFN only, n = 13; ZOHS, n = 17; ZIHS, n = 18). Bi-allelic modification refers to detection of both a deletion and an inversion event within the same sample. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test (A) and unpaired t tests (B and C) were used to determine statistical significance between ZFN only-ZOHS, ZFN only-ZIHS, and ZOHS-ZIHS conditions and to determine statistical differences between mono- versus bi-allelic modifications within the same treatment (ZFN only, ZOHS, and ZIHS). For all comparisons, p ≥ 0.05. Error bars represent mean ± SD. The legend shown in (C) also applies to (B). Molecular Therapy 2018 26, 468-479DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.001) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 High-Throughput Sequencing of HBB Rearrangements in ZFN-Treated PBSCs (A) Schematic displaying the orientation of HBB upstream of the cut site and an unknown connected sequence downstream of the cut site. This represents the potential rearrangement product after ZFN treatment, shearing, and Illumina adaptor ligation (gray bars adjacent to the molecule). The directionality of sequencing is shown, starting upstream of the ZFN cut site (indicated by the dashed lines) in HBB and sequences toward the rearrangement junction (designated as HBB upstream). The expected rearrangement events and whether they were observed are specified below the schematic. (B) Schematic displaying the orientation of HBB downstream of the cut site and an unknown connected sequence upstream of the cut site. This represents the potential rearrangement product after ZFN treatment, shearing, and Illumina adaptor ligation (gray bars adjacent to the molecule). The expected rearrangement events and whether they were observed is specified below the schematic. (C) A summary table showing the samples sequenced in both the upstream and downstream libraries. The number of normal templates (for HBB); templates for the deletion, inversion and translocation; and the percentage of deletion, inversion, and translocation events are shown. The percentages of deletion, inversion, and translocation events were calculated as the number of templates positive for each event over the total number of templates for that sample. Mock_up and ZFN_up refer to samples from the HBB_Upstream library versus the Mock_down and ZFN_down samples, which were from the HBB_Downstream library. Molecular Therapy 2018 26, 468-479DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.001) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Detection of Rearrangement Events by High-Throughput Sequencing in CD34+ Cells Treated with 1 μg of ZFN mRNA Percentage of total templates of each sample possessing either the deletion (only detected by the HBB_Downstream library), inversion events (detected by both the HBB_Upstream and HBB_Downstream libraries), or translocation events (detected by the HBB_Upstream library) in PBSCs treated with 1 μg of ZFN mRNA. Inversion (HBB_Upstream) identifies one junction of this event, whereas inversion (HBB_Downstream) identifies the other junction. Mock, untreated BM CD34+ sample. Unpaired t test was used to determine statistical significance in ZFN-only treatment between deletion and inversion (HBB_Upstream) (p < 0.001), deletion and inversion (HBB_Downstream) (p < 0.001), inversion (HBB_Upstream) and inversion (HBB_Downstream) (p = 0.12), deletion and translocation (p < 0.001), inversion (HBB_Downstream) and translocation (p < 0.001), and inversion (HBB_Upstream) and translocation (p = 0.004). Error bars represent mean ± SD. Molecular Therapy 2018 26, 468-479DOI: (10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.001) Copyright © 2017 The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions