Image Production and Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Advertisements

Technical Aspects: the machine the image
Advanced Biomedical Imaging Lecture 3
Ch. 14 Four Radiographic Qualities Ch
X-Ray & γ-Ray Interactions with Matter
Formation Characteristics
Advanced Biomedical Imaging Lecture 4 Dr. Azza Helal A. Prof. of Medical Physics Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University.
Chapter 18 Radiographic Exposure
Components of Radiographic Image Quality
Digital Radiography.
Resident Physics Lectures
The Grid Kyle Thornton DMI 50B.
MAMMO QC – covered in week 8
Analyzing the Image Density. Density Overall blackening of the image.
Part II Image Quality 1  Image Quality  Photographic Quality  Geometric Quality 2.
Technical Factors or Prime Factors
Dr. Mustafa Zuhair Mahmoud Mr.Ali B Alhailiy بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم 1.
FILM ARTIFACTS.
Chapter 15 Radiographic Intensifying Screens And Cassettes
Unsharpness Calculations and Resolution By Professor Stelmark.
INSTRUMENTATION. ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS AND EFFICIENCY  Effective voltage  High frequency inverter technology (over 10,000Hz)  Constant potential.
Control of Scatter Radiation
Quality Control.
IMAGE QUALITY REVIEW RT
Dr Mohamed El Safwany, MD.
Resident Physics Lectures
Components of Image Quality & Radiographic Artifacts Radiologic Technology A Spring 2010 Final Final.
Image Quality Radiographic Resolution.
Mammography Questions and Answers
Geometric Factors Focal Spot Object Film Object b a h c Film B A H C
Fluoroscopy Q&A Robert L. Metzger, Ph.D..
Exposure Factors or Prime Factors
IMAGE QUALITY AND ARTIFACTS 1 2 WHY YOU SEE WHAT YOU SEE… The films or images have different levels of density – different shades of gray X-rays show.
RAD 254 Chapter 16 Image Quality Film factors Geometric factors Subject factors.
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNIQUE AND EXPOSURE
Radiographic Quality Visibility and Sharpness
Image Quality Q&A. RAPHEX Diagnostic Question 2001 D9: The imaging system which is best for visualizing small high contrast objects is: A. Computed tomography.
Film Optical Density Spectral Matching & sensitometry.
Image Production and Evaluation NOTE: QA AND QC ARE USED INTERCHANGABLY IN APPLETON AND LANGE.
IMAGE RECEPTORS. Follow the Sequence- Film System Tube Tube Patient Patient (bucky) or non-bucky (bucky) or non-bucky Cassette Cassette INTENSIFYING SCREEN.
CR Image Acquisition By Professor Stelmark.
RAD 354 Chapt. 16 Image QUALITY
DIGITAL IMAGING.
Image Receptor Unsharpness By Professor Stelmark.
Sergeo Guilbaud School of Radiologic Sciences
RADIOGRAPHIC QUALITY S. Guilbaud, Education Director School of Radiologic Sciences.
Chapter 9 Concepts you already know!!! INTENSITY = ROENTGENS AKA EXPOSURE l mAs and mR proportional? l kVp and mRproportional? l Distance and mRproportional?
Exposure Factors or Prime Factors
Image Evaluation Guidelines for Image Analysis Chapter 1.
EVERYTHING YOU WANTED TO KNOW BUT WERE AFRAID TO ASK!!!!
Chapters 21 & 22.
Radiographic Contrast
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Discovery of X-rays X-rays were discovered on November 8, 1895, by Dr. Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen. Accidental discovery First radiograph of Mrs. Roentgen's.
Principles of Image Production
Stacy Kopso, M.Ed., R.T.(R)(M)
Principles of Image Production
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Concepts you already know!!!
Challenges with Digital Imaging
Resident Physics Lectures
Principles of Radiographic Exposure
Principles of Radiographic Exposure
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
What makes a Quality Image
RECORDED DETAIL.
Artifacts and Errors.
RECORDED DETAIL.
Dept of Radiodiagnosis, BJMC, Pune
GRIDS PRESENTER-Dr.Vishwanath patil PG resident
Presentation transcript:

Image Production and Evaluation NOTE: QA AND QC ARE USED INTERCHANGABLY IN APPLETON AND LANGE

Intensifying screen Base Reflective layer Active Layer Protective layer

Intensifying.Screen: Detail and speed Thicker the active layer: less detail and more speed Larger the phospher:less detail and more speed Formula: old screen new screen

Digital Imaging PSP CRT ADC IP CR DR FOV field of view or how much of the patient is included in the matrix Matrix-rows and columns of pixels (512 x512) Pixel size As matrix increase, pixel size decreases As FOV increases, pixel size increases As pixel size increases, resolutions decreases

TARGET ANGLE LINE FOCUS PRINCIPLE PG. 56 in, Mosby Actual Effective Large angle small angle anode heel

MAMMOGRAPHY Use very low KVP 23-28 molybdenum targets High MAS

PROCESSING

DEFINE EXIT (REMNANT RADIATION) LATENT IMAGE MANIFEST IMAGE

Magnification: FOR EVERY 1” OF OID INCREASE, SID MUST INCREASE BY 7” WALLACE PG 27-33 Mag. Factor - SID SOD SOD ---- SID - OID IMAGE SIZE -image = SID object SOD % OF MAG- OID SOD X 100 #s 45 57,93

DENSITY OD or Logarithm of opacity Ratio of amount of light incident on film to the amount of light transmitted thru film (Mosby, pg. 53) Controlling factors mAs kVP Distance Film/screen Grids Collimation Anatomy/pathology Anode Heel Filtration

Detail Focal spot size Screen speed SID OID Motion artifact

CONTRAST KVP GRID FIELD SIZE Filtration Anatomy and pathology HIGH, SHORT LOW, LONG

CHARACTERISTIC/H&D CURVE PG 58 MOSBY Exposure error latitude Contrast latitude speed of film base/fog processing

DIFFERENTIAL ABSORPTION & ATTENUATION Difference between x-rays absorbed through photoelectric effect and those not absorbed at all.

Quantum Mottle Mottled appearance (looking through a mist) low mas-increase QM high speed film- increase QM

GRIDS GRID RATIO: HEIGHT DIVIDED BY DISTANCE AFFECT ON CONTRAST MULTIPLYING FACTOR GRID CUTOFF

FOCAL SPOT/ BLUR Umbra/penumbra or focal spot blur Small FS = less Large FS = more Increased SID = less decreased SID = more increased OID = more decreased OID = less

FILM CONSTRUCTION (Pg. 166-167 Bushong)/Cassette BASE EMULSION

INTERACTIONS CHARACTERISTIC COMPTON INFRARED CLASSICAL, THOMSON, COHERENT PHOTOELECTRIC BREMSTRAULING PAIR PRODUCTION PHOTO-DISINTEGRATION

Technique and Exposure