Aryeh Hai Taub, Rita Perets, Eilat Kahana, Rony Paz  Neuron 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bram-Ernst Verhoef, Rufin Vogels, Peter Janssen  Neuron 
Advertisements

Lixia Gao, Kevin Kostlan, Yunyan Wang, Xiaoqin Wang  Neuron 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex
Bram-Ernst Verhoef, Rufin Vogels, Peter Janssen  Neuron 
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Heather L. Dean, Maureen A. Hagan, Bijan Pesaran  Neuron 
Bassam V. Atallah, Massimo Scanziani  Neuron 
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages e7 (May 2017)
Attention-Induced Variance and Noise Correlation Reduction in Macaque V1 Is Mediated by NMDA Receptors  Jose L. Herrero, Marc A. Gieselmann, Mehdi Sanayei,
Oded Klavir, Rotem Genud-Gabai, Rony Paz  Neuron 
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (June 2012)
Developmental Inhibition of Gsk3 Rescues Behavioral and Neurophysiological Deficits in a Mouse Model of Schizophrenia Predisposition  Makoto Tamura, Jun.
Inducing Gamma Oscillations and Precise Spike Synchrony by Operant Conditioning via Brain-Machine Interface  Ben Engelhard, Nofar Ozeri, Zvi Israel, Hagai.
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Roman F. Loonis, Scott L. Brincat, Evan G. Antzoulatos, Earl K. Miller 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages e2 (October 2017)
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Selective Entrainment of Theta Oscillations in the Dorsal Stream Causally Enhances Auditory Working Memory Performance  Philippe Albouy, Aurélien Weiss,
Gamma and the Coordination of Spiking Activity in Early Visual Cortex
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Ju Tian, Naoshige Uchida  Neuron 
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
A. Saez, M. Rigotti, S. Ostojic, S. Fusi, C.D. Salzman  Neuron 
Gating of Fear in Prelimbic Cortex by Hippocampal and Amygdala Inputs
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Slow-γ Rhythms Coordinate Cingulate Cortical Responses to Hippocampal Sharp-Wave Ripples during Wakefulness  Miguel Remondes, Matthew A. Wilson  Cell.
REM Sleep Reorganizes Hippocampal Excitability
Effects of Cue-Triggered Expectation on Cortical Processing of Taste
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Masayuki Matsumoto, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Sharon C. Furtak, Omar J. Ahmed, Rebecca D. Burwell  Neuron 
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages (March 2016)
Effects of Long-Term Visual Experience on Responses of Distinct Classes of Single Units in Inferior Temporal Cortex  Luke Woloszyn, David L. Sheinberg 
Serial, Covert Shifts of Attention during Visual Search Are Reflected by the Frontal Eye Fields and Correlated with Population Oscillations  Timothy J.
Timing, Timing, Timing: Fast Decoding of Object Information from Intracranial Field Potentials in Human Visual Cortex  Hesheng Liu, Yigal Agam, Joseph.
Social Signals in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Volume 76, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Sara E. Morrison, Alexandre Saez, Brian Lau, C. Daniel Salzman  Neuron 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Does Neuronal Synchrony Underlie Visual Feature Grouping?
Sébastien Marti, Jean-Rémi King, Stanislas Dehaene  Neuron 
Jude F. Mitchell, Kristy A. Sundberg, John H. Reynolds  Neuron 
Synchronized Activity between the Ventral Hippocampus and the Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Anxiety  Avishek Adhikari, Mihir A. Topiwala, Joshua A.
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Transient Slow Gamma Synchrony Underlies Hippocampal Memory Replay
Lixia Gao, Kevin Kostlan, Yunyan Wang, Xiaoqin Wang  Neuron 
Population Responses to Contour Integration: Early Encoding of Discrete Elements and Late Perceptual Grouping  Ariel Gilad, Elhanan Meirovithz, Hamutal.
Honghui Zhang, Andrew J. Watrous, Ansh Patel, Joshua Jacobs  Neuron 
Volume 9, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2018)
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Surround Integration Organizes a Spatial Map during Active Sensation
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Jacqueline R. Hembrook-Short, Vanessa L. Mock, Farran Briggs 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Oscillations Synchronize Amygdala-to-Prefrontal Primate Circuits during Aversive Learning  Aryeh Hai Taub, Rita Perets, Eilat Kahana, Rony Paz  Neuron  Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages 291-298.e3 (January 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.042 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Increased Theta Power in Response to Auditory Stimulus (A) Paired conditioning trials (green line): real-time detection of inhale elicited the presentation of a conditioned stimulus (CS, a pure tone) that predicted the release of unconditioned stimulus at the onset of the next inhale (US, an aversive odor, left and right gray rectangles mark the durations of CS and US, respectively). Aversive odors resulted in decreased inhale (UR) and increased inhale to the tone (CR). During habituation and extinction trials (blue line), the CS was not followed by a US. Shown are real data taken from one trial. y axis bar is 0.1 pressure at nose (AU). (B) Following conditioning trials (green line), mean size of the CR increased compared to both habituation (blue) and extinction (maroon), with the latter two not significantly different from each other. (C) Increased CRs, measured as area under the curve during 350 ms post-CS compared with mean inhale volume during pre-CS time (i.e., taken during the ITI), were observed during acquisition trials, with return to baseline levels during extinction trials. The red line is a fit for presentation purposes only. Inset shows individual session learning curves from three different days that are >7 sessions apart and normalized to previous-day extinction. All data are presented using a running window of 6 trials with overlap of 4 trials, separately for habituation, conditioning, and extinction. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) An example of power spectral density analysis indicating an increase in theta power in response to the CS. Data are presented as log/log power with white band (non-shaded) highlighting the theta band. (E) Theta power increases in response to the CS, mean over all sessions and electrodes (horizontal dotted red lines mark theta band range). Right plots show statistics of the increase in power during the CS in comparison to pre-CS activity. Horizontal lines indicate theta band, and vertical line indicates significance level of <0.05. (F) Example of autocorrelation of single units recorded from the amygdala (top) and dACC (bottom) showing an increase in power between 4 and 8 Hz. Insets in log/log; mean power in theta band is presented for all units with white non-shaded background for during CS (solid red) and during inter-trial interval baseline activity (solid blue). Blue dashed line indicates 20 Hz. Neuron 2018 97, 291-298.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.042) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Conditioning Induces Increased Theta Power and Phase Resetting (A) Mean theta power (±SEM) during 1,000 ms following CS onset increased significantly during conditioning. Inset illustrates mean theta power during 1,000 ms before and following CS onset along a daily session of habituation, conditioning, and extinction. (B and D) Phase reset developed during conditioning in both the amygdala (B) and the dACC (D). On the right, the distribution and mean (red line) of theta phases across electrodes and days of recordings are shown. (C and E) Phase reset was characterized by increased MRL score and decreased half-width theta phase distribution in the amygdala (C) and dACC (E), with some change in MRL score, but not half-width phase distribution, during pre-CS period (insets). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (F) Within-trial correlation in theta power between the amygdala and the dACC increases during initial stages of conditioning and then decreases during the last ten trials of conditioning (not different than habituation and extinction, top inset). Bottom inset shows the change in correlation values along conditioning. (G) Phase synchrony as a function of lag between the two structures. Red line indicates the mean MRL score ± SEM and time of maximal MRL. (H) Imaginary coherence reveals specificity of conditioning-dependent increase in LFP power to the theta band and to trials 1–20. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (I) Mean cross-correlation (±SEM) from 1,000 ms post-CS (red line indicates the mean, signed rank test of difference from zero, p < 0.0001). Histograms on right show cross-correlation peaks. The amygdala leads (−7.7 ms, p < 1−10, signed rank test). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Neuron 2018 97, 291-298.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.042) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Phase Locking Depends on the Stage of Conditioning (A) A raster plot (top) and PSTH (bottom) of amygdala spikes overlaid with mean theta (±SEM) activity from dACC (purple). With conditioning, dACC theta became more phase locked to amygdala spikes. (B) The proportion of phase-locked amygdala units increased by 35% while that of the shuffled data and inter-trial interval baseline activity did not change significantly. The solid line depicts the percent of significant amygdala using a sliding window of five trials. In contrast, the proportion of dACC phase-locked units decreased during conditioning by 32% (inset). (C) Synchrony score (MRL) increased during conditioning. MRL score computed in pairs of electrodes that exhibited non-significant synchrony during both habituation and extinction stages (n = 33, p = 0.002) or habituation only (n = 28, p < 0.001). Purple solid line shows the change in MRL score in habituation-only units using a sliding window of five trials. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) An example of spike-triggered averaging (STA; ±SEM) of theta activity averaged on spikes (arrow indicates spike time) taken from the 500 ms post-CS and the averaged Z score separately for the different learning phases (one-way ANOVA for learning stage, F = 7.84, df = 4, p = 3−6, post hoc analysis results are displayed as asterisks). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Neuron 2018 97, 291-298.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.042) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Amygdala-dACC Synchronization Learning (A) Behavioral learning curve (blue dashed line), the percent of significant units (red dashed line), and half-width of spike-phase distributions (green dashed line). Solid lines represent exponent fit (Learning: r2 = 0.86, RMSE = 0.04; Synchrony: r2 = 0.83, RMSE = 0.11; half-width: r2 = 0.84, RMSE = 0.001). (B) Co-variation of synchrony magnitude and behavioral performance. (C) Left: number of trials to peak performance and to peak synchrony per session. Right: number of trials to peak performance and to minimal phase variance per session. Neuron 2018 97, 291-298.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.042) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions