Affordable Housing Fees Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bae Housing Nexus Study Pinellas County and the Cities of Clearwater, Largo and St. Petersburg Prepared by Bay Area Economics.
Advertisements

“Old Approach to Needs Analysis” The standard practice in Oregon has been to extrapolate forward the past 5 or more years in housing production as the.
SDHC City Linkage Fee Stakeholders Meeting November 19,
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
= How to use this PowerPoint = This presentation template has been especially created for Members of the Local Leaders Council to help frame a problem.
Implementing State Density Bonus Law in Berkeley November 13, 2014 City of Berkeley Planning & Development Department.
Transportation and Housing Connections In Baltimore presented at the MAHRA Conference Panel: Strategies for Connecting Transportation and Affordable Housing.
P. Gurstein & A. Lesnikowski, UBC Vancouver Presented At ACSP 2014 Conference.
“Inclusionary Housing” What does it mean? Inclusionary Housing Policy relies on the production of housing by private industry to bring along with it a.
Housing Element Update March 30, 2009 Community Meeting.
© Cornerstone Partnership 2013 Best Practices in Inclusionary Housing Policy Design.
Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility StudyCity of Berkeley City Council Meeting Downtown Berkeley Development Feasibility Study City of Berkeley City.
West Oakland Specific Plan Equity Strategies. Potential impacts of new development and investment on existing West Oakland community New development &
1 Dane County Workforce Housing Discussion An Affordable Housing Report originally prepared for the Housing – Land Use Partnership January 2004.
City of San Fernando HOUSING ELEMENT. Workshop Overview 1.What is the Housing Element? 2.San Fernando Housing Needs 3.San Fernando Current Housing.
Housing Element Update City of Coachella Planning Commission Hearing September 4, 2013.
Local Housing Policy Initiatives & Engagement Housing WA Conference, October 6, 2015 Kelly Rider, Policy Director Kayla Schott-Bresler, Policy Manager.
OneMECK Affordable Housing Overview January 5, 2016.
Code Related Issues for Affordability Work Group.
City of Burlingame Housing Element Update Community Workshop # 1 | March 18, 2014.
CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE GPAC MEETING January 6, 2010.
Portland Housing Bureau Budget Worksession Presentation Slide 1.
19553 Blue Lake Loop Bend, OR Tel: 541/ City of Redmond Affordable Housing Plan Phase II: Affordable Housing Strategies November 14, 2006.
Placer County Housing Element Update Stakeholder/Community Workshop #2 – Auburn | April 10, Stakeholder/Community Workshop #2 Auburn Placer County.
Presentation By: OLSON LEE MAYOR’S OFFICE OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT April 10, 2014.
Affordable Housing Impact Fees City Council Hearing, Redwood City October 26, 2015.
Affordable Housing Strategy. Developed with stakeholder groups, including residents Provides an Action-Oriented Plan –Measures current and future housing.
Planning & Community Development Interim Development Process to Implement the General Plan Land Use Element City Council July 11, 2016.
Housing Element Update City of National City City Council January 15, 2013.
Residential Impact Fee - Nexus Study Update City of Pasadena Conclusions & Findings Prepared by Brion & Associates In association with Nilsson Consulting.
if the Housing Commissioner determines that the residential project was not feasible because of the number of inclusionary units and could.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Inclusionary Zoning Housing Committee August 1, 2016.
Are existing affordable housing units within The City of Los Angeles appropriately located in proximity to basic services?
Can Rezoning CREATE affordable housing?
Anti-Displacement Policies
State Legislative Update
California Institute for Behavioral Health Solutions:
Residential Displacement in the SF Bay Area – Canaries in the Coal Mine January 28, 2017.
The Scope of the Problem
City Council Community Development Committee
Affordable Housing Joint Park City & Summit County Council Meeting December 6, 2016 Rhoda Stauffer & Anne Laurent Patrick Putt & Peter Barnes.
Housing Production Plan: Meeting Local Needs
Miriam Zuk, Ph.d. UC Berkeley Anna cash • paige dow • Justine marcus
San Benito County home values far exceed U.S.
Karen Chapple, Professor of City & Regional Planning
Commercial Linkage Fee Research
Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning Update
SFDC Affordable Housing/Market Discussion
EVALUATING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Local Real Estate Trends & Market Conditions
Affordable Housing Strategies
Does a Diversity of Funding Sources Improve Feasibility?
Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. January 30, 2018
LAKE TAHOE BENCHMARKS CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION
Affordable Housing in Pittsburgh
the power of tax credits
Rent Burdened Households by Geography
Housing Needs Assessment
City Council October 15, 2018.
City Council Potential Modifications to Tenant Protection Ordinance
Santa Cruz home values exceed U.S. and California
Accessory Dwelling Units: Maximum Unit Size and Residential Impact Fee
Introduction Last comprehensive review was undertaken in 2012/2013
21 Elements San Mateo Countywide Housing Element Update Kit (HEUK)
Affordable Housing in East King County
Gainesville’s Affordable Housing Needs
“There’s More to the Story ”
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
EASTERN placer COUNTY NEXUS-BASED AFFORDABLE/Workforce HOUSING FEE
Presentation transcript:

Affordable Housing Fees Study presented to City of Watsonville presented by Darin Smith and Michael Nimon May 31, 2018 Oakland Denver Los Angeles Sacramento Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 1410, Oakland, CA 94612 510.841.9190

Presentation Overview Introduction Fee Calculations Comparison to Other Jurisdictions Feasibility Findings Fee Level Recommendations Questions? Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

About Economic & Planning Systems (EPS) Consulting on land use plans and policies since 1983 Work for both public and private sector clients Extensive housing-related experience: Nexus and In Lieu Fee Studies Sonoma County, Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park, Walnut Creek, Sunnyvale, Mountain View, San Mateo, Palm Desert, Burbank, Calistoga, Pleasanton, Petaluma, Alameda, Mono County Inclusionary Zoning Ordinances Housing Elements Gentrification and Displacement Issues Market and Feasibility Analysis Density Bonus Implementation Studies Community Benefits Negotiations Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 2

EPS Scope of Services Reviewed existing affordable housing ordinances and fees Calculated maximum fees Ownership Housing In-Lieu Fees Rental Housing In-Lieu Fees Commercial Linkage Fees Surveyed fees in other jurisdictions Tested feasibility of maximum fees to inform fee level recommendations Present: Working with staff and stakeholders to establish appropriate fee level updates and other related policy updates Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3

Watsonville Affordability Definitions Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 4

Financing Gap to Build Affordable Housing Example of Key Inputs for Median Income Households Assumes City would subsidize rental apartments averaging 3BR Costs based on market prices for land, labor, materials, and capital Values determined by household income level Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 5

Financing Gap to Build Affordable Housing by Income Level Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 6

For-Sale Residential Development In-Lieu Fee Calculation In lieu of building units onsite, developers pay City to subsidize affordable units elsewhere in the City. On-site requirement and distribution vary by project size Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

For-Sale Housing In-Lieu Fee (Maximum) Fee is equivalent of 15% Inclusionary Requirement Cost of inclusionary requirement: 5% median-income units 5% moderate-income units 5% above moderate-income units EPS calculation of $19,001 per market-rate unit Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Rental Residential Development In-Lieu Fee Calculation In lieu of building units onsite, developers pay City to subsidize affordable units elsewhere in the City. On-site requirement is 20% inclusionary with the distribution shown below Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Rental Housing In-Lieu Fee (Maximum) Fee is equivalent of 20% Inclusionary Requirement Cost of inclusionary requirement: 5% very low-income units 5% low-income units 5%Median-income units 5% Section 8 units EPS calculation of $36,579 per market-rate unit Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Commercial Linkage – Nexus Calculations New businesses Additional job creation Lower income employees need affordable housing Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 11

Commercial Linkage – Example Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 12

Commercial Linkage – Maximum Fee Levels Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 13

Comparable Jurisdiction Map Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 14

Ownership Housing Fee Comparison Map of Surveyed Jurisdictions (Colored Jurisdictions) Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 15

Rental Housing Fee Comparison Map of Surveyed Jurisdictions (Colored Jurisdictions) Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 16

Commercial Linkage Fee Comparison Map of Surveyed Jurisdictions (Colored Jurisdictions) Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 17

Cost Incidence of a Fee Analysis conservatively assumes cost is borne by the consumer, who must pay higher prices or rents for a developer to receive reasonable return Economic & Planning Systems, Inc.

Feasibility Test Example EPS-Calculated Maximum Fee Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 19

Feasibility Test Findings Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 20

Feasibility Test Findings Watsonville’s existing affordable housing fees are generally consistent with other surveyed jurisdictions Maximum single family in-lieu fees appear to be feasible and within comparable range Maximum multifamily in-lieu fees are well beyond the range and threaten feasibility Maximum fees calculated in commercial linkage nexus studies greatly exceed feasible levels Linkage Fees more consistent with the range among the surveyed jurisdictions appear feasible Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 21

Fee Level Recommendations Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 22

EPS/City Staff Fee Recommendation Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 23

Questions? Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 24