Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oral contraceptive use changes brain activity and mood in women with previous negative affect on the pill—A double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized.
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)
Emotional Memory: Selective Enhancement by Sleep
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Human sleep and cortical reactivity are influenced by lunar phase
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2009)
Perceptual Echoes at 10 Hz in the Human Brain
Chimpanzees Trust Their Friends
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
Avi J.H. Chanales, Ashima Oza, Serra E. Favila, Brice A. Kuhl 
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Kinesthetic information disambiguates visual motion signals
Sing-Hang Cheung, Fang Fang, Sheng He, Gordon E. Legge  Current Biology 
Perirhinal-Hippocampal Connectivity during Reactivation Is a Marker for Object-Based Memory Consolidation  Kaia L. Vilberg, Lila Davachi  Neuron  Volume.
Modification of Existing Human Motor Memories Is Enabled by Primary Cortical Processing during Memory Reactivation  Nitzan Censor, Michael A. Dimyan,
Human Hippocampal Dynamics during Response Conflict
The Privileged Brain Representation of First Olfactory Associations
Marine Battesti, Celine Moreno, Dominique Joly, Frederic Mery 
Volume 20, Issue 23, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages e2 (October 2017)
Deciphering Cortical Number Coding from Human Brain Activity Patterns
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Human Orbitofrontal Cortex Represents a Cognitive Map of State Space
Single-Unit Responses Selective for Whole Faces in the Human Amygdala
Mathilde Bonnefond, Ole Jensen  Current Biology 
Avi J.H. Chanales, Ashima Oza, Serra E. Favila, Brice A. Kuhl 
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
BOLD fMRI Correlation Reflects Frequency-Specific Neuronal Correlation
Decoding the Yellow of a Gray Banana
Ryota Kanai, Tom Feilden, Colin Firth, Geraint Rees  Current Biology 
Source Memory in the Rat
Event-Based Prospective Memory in the Rat
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages (October 2006)
Honeybee buzz attenuates plant damage by caterpillars
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Caudate Microstimulation Increases Value of Specific Choices
Jingping P. Xu, Zijiang J. He, Teng Leng Ooi  Current Biology 
Evidence of episodic-like memory in cuttlefish
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
The Evolutionary Origins of Human Patience: Temporal Preferences in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Adults  Alexandra G. Rosati, Jeffrey R. Stevens, Brian.
Volume 17, Issue 20, Pages R877-R878 (October 2007)
Crows Spontaneously Exhibit Analogical Reasoning
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (October 2018)
Attention Reorients Periodically
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages (July 2016)
Motor Skills Are Strengthened through Reconsolidation
Accelerated long-term forgetting in asymptomatic APOE ε4 carriers
A Causal Link between Visual Spatial Attention and Reading Acquisition
Volume 16, Issue 20, Pages (October 2006)
Function and Structure of Human Left Fusiform Cortex Are Closely Associated with Perceptual Learning of Faces  Taiyong Bi, Juan Chen, Tiangang Zhou, Yong.
Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)
Claudia Lunghi, Uzay E. Emir, Maria Concetta Morrone, Holly Bridge 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 76, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Social Facilitation of Long-Lasting Memory Retrieval in Drosophila
Cross-Modal Associative Mnemonic Signals in Crow Endbrain Neurons
Christa Müller-Axt, Alfred Anwander, Katharina von Kriegstein 
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Similarity Breeds Proximity: Pattern Similarity within and across Contexts Is Related to Later Mnemonic Judgments of Temporal Proximity  Youssef Ezzyat,
Compensatory Neural Reorganization in Tourette Syndrome
Selective Imitation in Domestic Dogs
Memory Reactivation Enables Long-Term Prevention of Interference
Sleep Spindle Refractoriness Segregates Periods of Memory Reactivation
Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder  Current Biology 
The Sound of Actions in Apraxia
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Presentation transcript:

Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages 2690-2695 (October 2016) Disrupting Reconsolidation Attenuates Long-Term Fear Memory in the Human Amygdala and Facilitates Approach Behavior  Johannes Björkstrand, Thomas Agren, Fredrik Åhs, Andreas Frick, Elna-Marie Larsson, Olof Hjorth, Tomas Furmark, Mats Fredrikson  Current Biology  Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages 2690-2695 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.022 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Exposure during Reconsolidation Attenuates Amygdala-Related Return of Fear Experimental conditions: after fear activation followed by seven exposure trials on day 1, the memory was tested on day 2 (A). Exposure to spiders on day 1 was performed either within the reconsolidation window after 10 min (10 min group) or outside the window after 6 hr (6 hr group) after fear activation. Another spider cue was activated but not presented during exposure (B). An additional cue was presented eight times during exposure day 1 but was not preceded by activation (C). On day 2, a new fourth spider slide was introduced (D). Within each group, subjects were exposed to all experimental conditions, and pictures were counter-balanced across subjects. Results: fMRI demonstrated increased amygdala activation from day 1 to day 2 in the 6 hr group (n = 23) as compared to the 10 min group (n = 22) for the activated and repeatedly exposed stimulus (xyz = −27, −7, −14; Z = 3.45; p < 0.0001; pcorrected = 0.006; 1,053 mm3; xyz = 27, −1, −14; Z = 2.34; p = 0.010; pcorrected = 0.107; 432 mm3) (A). For the activated but not exposed spider cue, amygdala reactivity tended to be higher in the 6 hr group than the 10 min group (xyz = −24, −7, −14; Z = 2.42; p = 0.008; pcorrected = 0.091; 243 mm3) (B). The exposed but not activated slide also elicited enhanced amygdala responsivity in the 6 hr group as compared to the 10 min group (xyz = −24, −7, −14; Z = 3.17; p = 0.001; pcorrected = 0.014; 1,053 mm3; xyz = 24, −10, −11, Z = 2.79; p = 0.003; pcorrected = 0.039; 378 mm3) (C). The new slide introduced on day 2 elicited higher amygdala activation in the 6 hr group as compared to the 10 min group (xyz = −24, −7, −14; Z = 2.82; p = 0.002; pcorrected = 0.035; 567 mm3) (D). The measure of amygdala activity is blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activity. Brighter colors represent larger effects with higher significance. Brain coordinates are according to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI). See also Figures S1–S3 and Table S1. Current Biology 2016 26, 2690-2695DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.022) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Disrupted Reconsolidation Facilitates Approach and Amygdala Activity Predicts Behavior Subjects chose between avoiding or viewing a spider slide while being paid nothing or 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, or 5 SEK (Swedish Krona; 1 SEK ≈ 0.11 USD). (A) Approach behavior was facilitated by disrupted reconsolidation because the 10 min group (n = 21), as compared to the 6 hr group (n = 23), approached more spiders during high-gain conditions (F(5, 210) = 3.23; p = 0.008), being significant for the 2 and 5 SEK conditions (t(42) > 2.86; p < 0.005), and non-significant for the other conditions (t(42) < 1.70; n.s). Error bars indicate the SEM. (B) In the 6 hr group (top), which received undisrupted reconsolidation, amygdala activity during re-exposure was inversely related to approach behavior (xyz = −24, −1, −23; Z = 3.05; p = 0.001; pcorrected = 0.018; 540 mm3), whereas in the 10 min group, which received disrupted reconsolidation, no such relationship was observed. (C) The amygdala areas coupled to disrupted reconsolidation (Figure 1A) overlapped with areas predicting approach behavior in a 378 mm3 volume in the 6 hr group. See also Figure S4. Current Biology 2016 26, 2690-2695DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.022) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions