Radar-lidar synergy for the retrieval of water cloud parameters

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lidar observations of mixed-phase clouds Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Ewan OConnor & Mukunda Dev Behera University of Reading UK Overview Enhanced.
Advertisements

Ewan OConnor, Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan and the Cloudnet team Cloudnet.
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds.
1 Drizzle rates inferred from CloudSat & CALIPSO compared to their representation in the operational Met Office and ECMWF forecast models. Lee Hawkness-Smith.
R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
Anthony Illingworth, + Robin Hogan, Ewan OConnor, U of Reading, UK and the CloudNET team (F, D, NL, S, Su). Reading: 19 Feb 08 – Meeting with Met office.
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Robin Hogan & Julien Delanoe
Robin Hogan Anthony Illingworth Ewan OConnor Nicolas Gaussiat Malcolm Brooks University of Reading Cloudnet products available from Chilbolton.
Robin Hogan Department of Meteorology University of Reading Cloud and Climate Studies using the Chilbolton Observatory.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Use of ground-based radar and lidar to evaluate model clouds
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Anthony Illingworth Nicolas Gaussiat Malcolm Brooks Cloudnet Evaluating the clouds in European forecast models.
Modelling radar and lidar multiple scattering Modelling radar and lidar multiple scattering Robin Hogan The CloudSat radar and the Calipso lidar were launched.
Integrated Profiling at the AMF
Application of Cloudnet data in the validation of SCIAMACHY cloud height products Ping Wang Piet Stammes KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands CESAR Science day,
Exploiting multiple scattering in CALIPSO measurements to retrieve liquid cloud properties Nicola Pounder, Robin Hogan, Lee Hawkness-Smith, Andrew Barrett.
The NARVAL-North campaign: Postfrontal convective cloud research using the HALO aircraft Felix Ament, Nicole Albern, Stephan Bakan, Felix Erdmann, Lutz.
Stratus Cloud parameters retrieval from Doppler radar Virendra P. Ghate.
EGU-Boers (2006) Accuracy assessment of an integrated profiling technique for temperature, humidity and liquid water content profiles U. Lohnert (1), E.
Microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds Evaluation of the representation of clouds in models J. Delanoë and A. Protat IPSL / CETP Assessment.
Wesley Berg, Tristan L’Ecuyer, and Sue van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Evaluating the impact of aerosols on.
Robin Hogan Anthony Illingworth Marion Mittermaier Ice water content from radar reflectivity factor and temperature.
1. The problem of mixed-phase clouds All models except DWD underestimate mid-level cloud –Some have separate “radiatively inactive” snow (ECMWF, DWD) –Met.
Aerosol and Cloud Microphysics Working Group Dietrich Althausen, Andrea Riede, Herman Russchenberg, Aldo Amodeo, Susanne Crewell, Paolo Di Girolamo, Stephen.
Remote sensing of Stratocumulus using radar/lidar synergy Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth & Robin Hogan University of Reading.
Lee Smith Anthony Illingworth
1 Cloud Droplet Size Retrievals from AERONET Cloud Mode Observations Christine Chiu Stefani Huang, Alexander Marshak, Tamas Várnai, Brent Holben, Warren.
Bredbeck Workshop, 7 – 10 July 2003 Jörg Schulz Meteorological Institute, University of Bonn Harald Czekala RPG Radiometer.
Ewan O’Connor Anthony Illingworth Comparison of observed cloud properties at the AMF COPS site with NWP models.
1 H.W.J Russchenberg 1, C.L. Brandau 1, U. Loehnert 2 and K. Ebell 2 (1) International Research Centre for Telecommunication and Radar (IRCTR), Delft Technical.
Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley Kerstin Ebell, Susanne Crewell, Ulrich Löhnert Institute for Geophysics and.
2013 DOE/EU Retrieval Workshop, Köln “Common Algorithm Evaluation Approaches ” Session Shaocheng Xie, Kerstin Ebell, Dave Turner, and Ulrich Lohnert EU/DOE.
Remote-sensing of the environment (RSE) ATMOS Analysis of the Composition of Clouds with Extended Polarization Techniques L. Pfitzenmaier, H. Russchenbergs.
Delft University of Technology 1 Do eddy dissipation rate retrievals work for precipitation profiling Doppler radar?, CESAR Science Day, June 18th, 2014.
Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff & Dave Donovan Comparing ice-cloud microphysical properties using Cloudnet & ARM data.
Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers with the Adiabatic Assumption Paquita Zuidema*, Janet Intrieri, Sergey Matrosov, Matthew.
CloudNet: TARA status and database H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands.
Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research - CESAR - Henk Klein Baltink Atmospheric Research Section.
Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan, Ewan O’Connor, U of Reading, UK Nicolas Gaussiat Damian Wilson, Malcolm Brooks Met Office, UK Dominique Bouniol, Alain.
1 Optimal Channel Selection. 2 Redundancy “Information Content” vs. “On the diagnosis of the strength of the measurements in an observing system through.
Dual-Polarization and Dual-Wavelength Radar Measurements Vivek National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado I.Polarization and dual- wavelength.
BBC Workshop DeBilt, 18.–19. October 2004 Reconstruction of three dimensional cloud fields from two dimensional input datasets Klemens Barfus & Franz H.
Water cloud retrievals O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research Centre for Telecommunications-transmission and Radar, Faculty of.
Lidar+Radar ice cloud remote sensing within CLOUDNET. D.Donovan, G-J Zadelhof (KNMI) and the CLOUDNET team With outside contributions from… Z. Wang (NASA/GSFC)
The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.
Robin Hogan Ewan O’Connor The Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product.
Radiometer Physics GmbH
Towards a Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Matthew D. Shupe a, Pavlos Kollias b, Ed Luke b a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.
Retrieval of Cloud Phase and Ice Crystal Habit From Satellite Data Sally McFarlane, Roger Marchand*, and Thomas Ackerman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
THE PUZZLING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF STRATOCUMULUS AND AIRBORNE IN SITU DATA H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov, S. Crewell, U. Loehnert, M.
Drakkar Calibration The Drakkar microwave radiometer Calibrating Drakkar The Calibrated Data Future Work Delft, October 2004 Anne Armstrong (CETP/LMD)
Charles L Wrench RCRU Determining Cloud Liquid Water Path from Radiometer measurements at Chilbolton.
An Evaluation of Cloud Microphysics and Radiation Calculations at the NSA Matthew D. Shupe a, David D. Turner b, Eli Mlawer c, Timothy Shippert d a CIRES.
Rob Roebeling CloudNET meeting 18 – 19 October 2004, Delft METEOSAT-8 OBSERVATIONS AND DERIVED CLOUD MICROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES.
Cloudnet meeting Oct Martial Haeffelin SIRTA Cloud and Radiation Observatory M. Haeffelin, A. Armstrong, L. Barthès, O. Bock, C. Boitel, D.
Robin Hogan Anthony Illingworth Marion Mittermaier Ice water content from radar reflectivity factor and temperature.
Rob Roebeling, Hartwig Deneke and Arnout Feijt GEWEX Cloud Assessment Meeting Madison, United States of America 6 -7 July 2006 "METEOSAT-8 (SEVIRI) CLOUD.
Developing Winter Precipitation Algorithm over Land from Satellite Microwave and C3VP Field Campaign Observations Fifth Workshop of the International Precipitation.
Xie, X., U. Löhnert, S. Kneifel, and S. Crewell
"CRIME Investigations" Henk Klein Baltink (RDWD, KNMI)
Liquid Water Path Variabilities Damian Wilson
Understanding warm rain formation using CloudSat and the A-Train
Radiometer Physics GmbH
Radar-lidar retrievals of water cloud parameters
Radiometer retrievals of LWP
Presentation transcript:

Radar-lidar synergy for the retrieval of water cloud parameters Herman Russchenberg, Oleg Krasnov February 25, 2019 International Research Centre for Telecommunication and Radar

Ground based observations radar lidar radiometry February 25, 2019

Dropsize distribution Very sensitive to tail of dsd Are power laws useful? Dropsize distribution Very sensitive to tail of dsd February 25, 2019

Common opinion: No, there is too much scatter due to drizzle unless we can identify the drizzle droplets somehow... February 25, 2019

drizzle “transition” drizzle non-drizzling A million droplets of 10 micron give the same radar reflection as one droplet of 100 micron! A million droplets of 10 micron contain a thousand times as much water as one one droplet of 100 micron... And so: one drizzle droplet changes the reflectivity significantly without changing the liquid water content non-drizzling February 25, 2019

Radar reflection Drizzling Non-drizzling Coarse classification February 25, 2019

Radar and lidar observables in relation to microphysics of water clouds Radar-lidar ratio vs effective radius Radar reflectivity vs liquid water content February 25, 2019

Example: June 19, 2003, Chilbolton February 25, 2019

February 25, 2019

February 25, 2019

Statistics of cloud types, Cabauw 7.9 % 27.1 % 65.0 % February 25, 2019

Statistics of cloud types, Chilbolton 9.3 % 29.3 % 61.4 % February 25, 2019

Statistics of cloud types, Palaiseau 8.7 % 27.8 % 63.5 % February 25, 2019

Statistics of cloud types, all sites 8.7 % 27.8 % 63.5 % -35 dBZ -20 dBZ February 25, 2019

Climatology or calibration? Site-specific thresholds Averaged CloudNet thresholds February 25, 2019

February 25, 2019

After filtration out values of both LWP > 400 g/m^2 The difference between the radar/lidar LWP retrievals and microwave radiometer After filtration out values of both LWP > 400 g/m^2 February 25, 2019

The comparative statistic for the Cloudnet LWP datasets February 25, 2019

observations February 25, 2019

The difference between the Radar/lidar retrievals and ECMWF NWPM LWP After filtration out values of both LWP > 400 g/m^2 February 25, 2019

February 25, 2019

Outlook Refine statistics Refine thresholds Application to ARM data Apply to CloudSat – Calipso Combine with IPT February 25, 2019