Genomic Run-On Evaluates Transcription Rates for All Yeast Genes and Identifies Gene Regulatory Mechanisms  José Garcı́a-Martı́nez, Agustı́n Aranda, José.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Microarray technology and analysis of gene expression data Hillevi Lindroos.
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Mahadeb Pal, Alfred S. Ponticelli, Donal S. Luse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Influence of RNA Labeling on Expression Profiling of MicroRNAs
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages e5 (October 2017)
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Targeted mRNA Degradation by Deadenylation-Independent Decapping
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 165, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Constitutive Expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) Gene Disrupts Circadian Rhythms and Suppresses Its Own Expression  Zhi-Yong Wang, Elaine.
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Transcriptional Termination Enhances Protein Expression in Human Cells
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Revealing Global Regulatory Perturbations across Human Cancers
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Mechanism of Transcription Termination by RNA Polymerase III Utilizes a Non-template Strand Sequence-Specific Signal Element  Aneeshkumar G. Arimbasseri,
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Antonin Morillon, Nickoletta Karabetsou, Anitha Nair, Jane Mellor 
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Reliability and Reproducibility of Gene Expression Measurements Using Amplified RNA from Laser-Microdissected Primary Breast Tissue with Oligonucleotide.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Mahadeb Pal, Alfred S. Ponticelli, Donal S. Luse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Antitumor activity- and gene expression-based profiling of ecteinascidin Et 743 and phthalascidin Pt 650  Eduardo J Martinez, E.J Corey, Takashi Owa 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Nuclear Retention Prevents Premature Cytoplasmic Appearance of mRNA
Integral Nuclear Pore Proteins Bind to Pol III-Transcribed Genes and Are Required for Pol III Transcript Processing in C. elegans  Kohta Ikegami, Jason D.
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Stress-Induced Phosphorylation of S
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Global Position and Recruitment of HATs and HDACs in the Yeast Genome
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Analyzing Fission Yeast Multidrug Resistance Mechanisms to Develop a Genetically Tractable Model System for Chemical Biology  Shigehiro A. Kawashima,
Paul B. Mason, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
Post-Transcriptional Regulation of UV Induced TNF-α Expression
RNase III-Mediated Silencing of a Glucose-Dependent Repressor in Yeast
Michael J Dye, Nick J Proudfoot  Molecular Cell 
Steven West, Nicholas J. Proudfoot, Michael J. Dye  Molecular Cell 
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Integral Nuclear Pore Proteins Bind to Pol III-Transcribed Genes and Are Required for Pol III Transcript Processing in C. elegans  Kohta Ikegami, Jason D.
Presentation transcript:

Genomic Run-On Evaluates Transcription Rates for All Yeast Genes and Identifies Gene Regulatory Mechanisms  José Garcı́a-Martı́nez, Agustı́n Aranda, José E Pérez-Ortı́n  Molecular Cell  Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 303-313 (July 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.004

Figure 1 Experimental Design Cells growing under the desired conditions are collected into two aliquots. The first aliquot is used for run-on analysis. We optimized the conditions of the labeling reaction for this purpose. Radioactivity was linearly incorporated up to 200 μCi of 33P-UTP per sample, and 5 min was the optimum time for run-on (data not shown). Determination of the amount of radioactivity incorporated quantitatively reflects the amount of transcribing RNA polymerases in the precise moment of cell collection (Hirayoshi and Lis, 1999). By correcting the signal intensities by the number of uridines of every probe, the values obtained are proportional to the RNA pol II density on the probe region for every gene. The second aliquot is used for RNA isolation and then labeled by RT to cDNA. This sample is used for rehybridization of the same DNA macroarray used for GRO. Normalization between different hybridizations was done differently for mRNA and TR samples. When cells are subjected to external perturbations, it is not possible to assume that the amount of mRNA per cell is constant. We evaluated the total amount of poly(A) mRNA per cell and used this datum to normalize the different hybridizations of cDNA. For GRO hybridizations it is not possible to use a similar protocol because the variations in RNA pol II total transcription are not known. In this case we used the total RNA obtained after each run-on experiment to calculate the number of cells and to use this datum for normalization. The use of the same DNA chip for successive hybridization of cDNA and GRO samples improves the comparison between these two values for each gene (see Supplemental Data). Molecular Cell 2004 15, 303-313DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.004)

Figure 2 Time Course of the Glu→Gal Experiment At time zero, exponentially growing cells (OD600 = 0.5) were collected and transferred to galactose medium as described in Experimental Procedures. A first pair of aliquots was taken and subjected to the protocol described in Figure 1 (t0 sample). Duplicated aliquots were taken at the indicated times (t1–t5). For each aliquot the total amount of mRNA/cell and RNA pol II TR/cell was calculated as described in Experimental Procedures. The mRNA stability was obtained as the ratio between mRNA/cell and TR/cell. Thus, it indicates the average stability for the bulk of cell mRNA. These three parameters were normalized to an arbitrary value of 100 at t0. Diamonds, log2OD600; squares, TR/cell; triangles, mRNA/cell; circles, mRNA stability. Molecular Cell 2004 15, 303-313DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.004)

Figure 3 Clustering of mRNA Data The tree obtained after clustering is shown on the left. For each cluster, the number of genes contained, its profile, and name are indicated. Only the most significant GO categories (<8 × 10−6) are shown. Molecular Cell 2004 15, 303-313DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.004)

Figure 4 Clustering of TR Data Description as in Figure 3. Molecular Cell 2004 15, 303-313DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.004)

Figure 5 Clustering of mRNA Stability Data Description as in Figure 3. Molecular Cell 2004 15, 303-313DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.004)

Figure 6 Dependence of the mRNA Amount on the TR and the mRNA Stability Histograms of the Pearson coefficient (r) for correlations of individual values of TR versus mRNA data (black columns) and mRNA stability versus mRNA (gray columns). Molecular Cell 2004 15, 303-313DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.004)