Andrey S. Shaw, Michael L. Dustin  Immunity 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of T Cell Receptor CHO Variable region “V” Constant region “C” Hinge “H ” Alpha chain Beta chain Disulfide bridge Transmembrane region Cytoplasmic.
Advertisements

Antigen presentation in a nutshell
ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC T – CELL ACTIVATION MHC – peptide complex (ligand)
Immune Receptors and Signal Transduction
Thymocyte development summary
Chapter 11 T-cell Activation and Differentiation Dr. Capers
IgSF.
Figure 1 CTLA-4 and PD-1–PD-L1 immune checkpoints
Transplant: immunology and treatment of rejection
The State Diagram for Cell Adhesion Mediated by Two Receptors
بيولوژي لنفوسيتهايT لنفوسيتهاي T نقش اساسي و محوري در پاسخ به آنتي ژنهاي پروتئيني دارند و به دليل وجود پروتئين در اكثر ارگانيسم هاي عفونت زا سلولهاي.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Chapter 11 T-cell Activation and Differentiation
3. Lymphocytes Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Superantigen Recognition by γδ T Cells
Pathogenesis of primary biliary cirrhosis
Antonio del Sol, Chung-Jung Tsai, Buyong Ma, Ruth Nussinov  Structure 
Trimeric C-type lectin domains in host defence
Spatial Control of Actin Filament Assembly
Cyclic Mechanical Reinforcement of Integrin–Ligand Interactions
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 1997)
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Figure 1 The role of CTLA4 and PD1 in T cell activation
Decoy Strategies: The Structure of TL1A:DcR3 Complex
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
T-cell activation through the antigen receptor
Jo-Ellen Murphy, Caroline Robert, Thomas S. Kupper 
Darren Thompson, Mark B Pepys, Steve P Wood  Structure 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Dendritic cells: regulators of hepatic immunity or tolerance?
Miriana Moran, M.Carrie Miceli  Immunity 
Cytoskeletal Regulation Couples LFA-1 Conformational Changes to Receptor Lateral Mobility and Clustering  Christopher W. Cairo, Rossen Mirchev, David E.
Richard M. Siegel, MD, PhD, Thomas A. Fleisher, MD 
Russell G. Jones, Edward J. Pearce  Immunity 
Phagocytosis Immunity Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Quantitative Imaging Approaches to Study the CAR Immunological Synapse
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Coinhibitory Pathways in the B7-CD28 Ligand-Receptor Family
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Naomi E. Harwood, Facundo D. Batista  Immunity 
Immunology: How Do T Cells Recognize Antigen?
The Multiple Mechanisms of T Cell Receptor Cross-reactivity
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Pathogenesis of primary biliary cirrhosis
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Signaling from the Living Plasma Membrane
Signaling Takes Shape in the Immune System
Stop and Go Traffic to Tune T Cell Responses
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (February 1996)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Sites and Stages of Autoreactive B Cell Activation and Regulation
Force as a Facilitator of Integrin Conformational Changes during Leukocyte Arrest on Blood Vessels and Antigen-Presenting Cells  Ronen Alon, Michael L.
A schematic presentation of secreted, endocytic, and signaling pattern-recognition receptors. A schematic presentation of secreted, endocytic, and signaling.
Conformational Ensembles in GPCR Activation
The Enhanceosome and Transcriptional Synergy
F-Actin-Driven CD28-CD80 Localization in the Immune Synapse
Follicular Helper T Cells: Lineage and Location
Altered Peptide Ligands Induce Delayed CD8-T Cell Receptor Interaction—a Role for CD8 in Distinguishing Antigen Quality  Pia P. Yachi, Jeanette Ampudia,
Presentation transcript:

Making the T Cell Receptor Go the Distance: A Topological View of T Cell Activation  Andrey S. Shaw, Michael L. Dustin  Immunity  Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 361-369 (April 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80279-4

Figure 1 Schematic Depiction of Different Sizes of T Cell Membrane Proteins and Their Arrangement before and after Engagement with Antigen In the resting T cells, large and small proteins, kinases, and phosphatases are randomly distributed. In this figure, the smaller, low molecular isoform of CD45 is depicted. Antigen engagement (lower panel) results in the segregation of large and small proteins, as well as kinases (ovals) and phosphatases (circles). Small balls represent immunoglobulin folds. Tree-like stick figures represent carbohydrate modifications. Immunity 1997 6, 361-369DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80279-4)

Figure 2 What Is “Two-Dimensional” Affinity? Thinking about the concept of 2D affinity illuminates key issues for T cell activation. Membrane protein concentrations can be quantitated as 2D densities. In reality, however, adhesion molecules are three-dimensional (3D) structures and can have a variable height from the cell surface. Furthermore, the contact area between the two cells is not ideal. Membrane flexibility, cytoskeletal dynamics, and molecular motion add a third dimensional component to interactions between molecules attached to cell surfaces. What this means is that the 2D affinity is not absolute, but depends on the distance between the two membranes and their rigidity. The 2D affinity is, therefore, related to the 3D affinity by the equation 3D Kd (molecules/μm3) = 2D Kd (molecules/μm2) ÷ σ, where σ represents the constrained third dimensional distance (Bell et al. 1984). Thus, as σ gets smaller, the 2D affinity increases. The figure illustrates how size similarity between adhesion molecules (black lines) and TCRs (green lines) is critical for achieving a high 2D affinity. The boxes are drawn to suggest the 3D volume in the cell–cell interface. An optimal 2D affinity will be favored by small, topologically similar or identical adhesion molecules that hold membranes rigidly at a uniform distance (small σ in [A]). Inclusion of large adhesion molecules in the contact area produces a large variance in the distance between membranes (large σ) elevating the 2D Kd (B). Finally, aggregation of large, rigid adhesion molecules into the contact is predicted to inhibit TCR engagement (C). Because the sizes of CD2–CD58 and CD28–CD80 are very similar to the size of the TCR–MHC complex, these adhesion molecules play a unique and important role in T cell activation. They enhance the sensitivity of T cells to antigen because they can hold the two membranes at the perfect distance to maximize the 2D affinity of the TCR. Lateral interactions may also promote efficient packing of TCRs and accessory molecules to achieve high local protein density and increased membrane rigidity. Immunity 1997 6, 361-369DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80279-4)

Figure 3 Lymphocytes Plated on ICAM-1 or CD58 Exhibit Distinct Behaviors A round lymphoblast displays dramatically different behavior when it lands on a substrate coated with ICAM-1 (CD54) or CD58. ICAM-1 is the ligand for LFA-1 and mediates cells spreading with a highly irregular cell–substrate separation. In contrast, CD58 is the ligand for CD2 and maintains a rounded cell morphology with a regular cell–substrate spacing. These profiles were traced from electron micrographs of human T lymphoblasts on planar bilayers containing the respective ligands (Dustin and Springer 1988). Original electron micrographs are courtesy of Dr. J. Caulfield. Immunity 1997 6, 361-369DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80279-4)

Figure 4 Topological Model for T Cell Activation (Top) Cell to cell adhesion is initiated by integrins that are not inhibited by charge resulsion. This creates opportunities for smaller adhesion molecules or antigen receptors to engage ligands (circled event in top panel; checkpoint 1). (Middle) TCR engagement and initiation of phosphatase exclusion (checkpoint 2). (Bottom) If sufficient TCR ligand is present, the regions of phosphatase exclusion can coalesce to form a contact cap (checkpoint 3). If the contact cap is sustained for several hours, a naive T cell can be activated to produce cytokines and proliferate. Key: adhesion molecules, black; TCR, red bars; MHC peptide, green bars; tyrosine kinases, red balls; tyrosine phosphatase CD45, blue ovals. Immunity 1997 6, 361-369DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80279-4)