Stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code Brussels – 19 July 2011 Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C HAPTER Elasticity of Demand and Supply price elasticities of demand and supply, income and cross elasticities of demand, and using elasticity to forecast.
Advertisements

Scoping the Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Geert Van Hauwermeiren Workshop, Ljubljana, 13 Sept 2011.
Introduction The pressure on all types of operators to implement cost- based pricing, especially for interconnect services, is growing I will deal with.
©R. Schwartz Equity Markets: Trading and StructureSlide 1 Topic 6.
The Minimum Price Contract. Purpose of a Minimum Price Contract Minimum price contracts are one of the marketing tools available to producers to help.
THE CONCEPT OF MUSHARAKAH
What are tariffs? DEF1: Tariffs are taxes that are imposed on nations’ import goods and/or export goods DEF2: Tariffs are taxes or duties levied on the.
Chapter 18 Pricing Policies McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Chapter 12 Capturing Surplus.
UK Gas Entry Regime – Review of existing Interruptible Arrangements & Potential Reforms for this Winter.
Update on Transparency Obligations Martin Reisner Junior Adviser, Transparency ENTSOGs Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
15 November th SG meeting Enagás and REN Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms.
Gas Regional Initiative North West Region - Short Term Capacity GRI NW SG Meeting Brussels – 26 November 2010.
Review of NTS entry charge setting arrangements - IA 1 July 2010.
Futures Options Chapter 16.
15 th September 2013 Enagás and TIGF Information to NRAs.
CMP PROPOSAL FOR HARMONISATION 17 th IG meeting Madrid 2 nd November 2011.
Planning for allocation rules and the auction platform NRAs propose to follow a two-steps approach:. 2013: » Based on the wish-list and within the scope.
GRI North West – RCC Meeting on 28 August Day Ahead – status and legal issues Background Day Ahead pilot project was launched within the ERGEG.
Benoît Esnault (CRE) NW Region – governmental meeting 6 May 2010 Pilot framework guideline on capacity allocation mechanisms.
Draft Framework Guidelines on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms for the European Gas Transmission Network Benoît Esnault, CRE Presentation Workshop Ljubljana,
26 th IG meeting 23 th January 2014 Enagás, REN and TIGF Issues to be discussed.
15 November th SG meeting Enagás and TIGF Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms.
Allocation of capacities between Portugal and Spain Madrid 30 th April 2013.
International Accounting Standard 33
Directie Toezicht Energie, Bonn WS 8 february Bonn 1 SG Workshop: Secondary markets for interconnection capacity: way to adress contractual congestion.
Pricing Decisions and Cost Management
Subsidy Types, their impacts on tariff and ways of treating them.
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
2. EU Tariff Code – Emerging Issues. EU Tariff Code – ACER Feedback No.ACER Request/Issue 1Redefine Transmission Services Definition -Harmonised definition.
Pamela Taylor, Ofgem Gas Target Model, 3 rd stakeholder workshop 11 th April 2011, London Connecting markets.
European Developments: Capacity Transmission Workgroup 6th October 2011.
EU Tariff Code Update 23 rd June EU Tariff Code Update – early feedback  Informal ACER feedback:  Draft code not on line with FG and insufficient.
Markus Krug, Co-Chair CEER Workstream 20 th Madrid Forum 26 September 2011 Harmonised transmission tariff structures Framework Guideline.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Transparency – Proposal to amend chapter 3 of the Annex of Regulation 1775/2005 EUROPEAN COMMISSION H. Hick, DG TREN C 2 NW GRI 5th.
Capacity Release Processes and Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
PROPOSAL CAM PROPOSAL FOR HARMONISATION 14 th SG meeting Madrid 11 th July 2011.
Capacity allocation in natural gas transmission networks Framework Guideline (Pilot) Dr. Stefanie Neveling, ACER Workstream Co-Chair Walter Boltz, ACER.
Mod 116B Steve Rose - on behalf of RWE Trading. 2 Background Mod 116 B was raised after discussion with a number of shippers about aspects Mod 116 which.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
Benoît Esnault Commission de Régulation de l’Energie (CRE) - ERGEG 19th Madrid Forum, March 2011 Preparatory work for Framework Guideline Tariffs.
Update on Entry Capacity Substitution Transmission Workstream 6 th March 2008 Summary of consultation responses.
Review of Entry Capacity and the Appropriate Allocation of Financial Risk Review Group th Sept 2008.
Initial Thoughts on the Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 3 rd April 2008.
Benoît Esnault (CRE) 17 th Madrid Forum 14 January 2010 Pilot framework guideline on capacity allocation mechanisms.
1 May 2012CACM Network Code Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15 th May 2012.
CAM PROPOSAL FOR HARMONISATION 19 th IG meeting Madrid 28 th March 2012.
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
Fundamental review of entry charging principles UNC Transmission Workstream - 6 th August 2009.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Gas Regional Initiative North West Region - Draft Framework Guidelines Capacity Allocation Mechanisms BNetzA/CRE Pre-Comitology Meeting Bonn – 26 May 2011.
European Developments Transmission Workgroup 3 rd May 2012.
Alternative Approach to Enduring Exit Flat Capacity & Revenue Recovery Gas TCMF 14 th December 2006.
Gas Transmission Charging Review: Final Capacity Charging Proposal Gas TCMF 14 th December 2006.
Public Consultation : main conclusions (1/2)
Storage users in entry/exit regimes suffer from double charges for transmission
Capacity allocation in natural gas transmission networks Pilot framework guideline - Public consultation results and new content of guidelines - Dr.
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
EU Tariffs Code Update Based on Refined Draft as of 30th October
26th IG meeting 23th January 2014
Background and Process
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms (Reg.984/2013)
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
PARCA Security and Termination Amounts
Information related to auction premium
Ofgem presentation to Gas Transmission Workstream
ERGEG comment to KEMA study on Art. 3 and 7
EUROGAS LNG TASK FORCE Bilbao, 13 March 2009 Presentation by
Presentation transcript:

Stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code Brussels – 19 July 2011 Introduction

Stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code 2 CAM and tariffs are closely related… …reserve prices, bundling, over/under recovery. CAM network code needs to be implemented upon entry into force… ….regulated tariff arrangements on national level will need adjustment to new regime. Essentials need to be codified at an EU level at this stage through the CAM network code, to enable a workable CAM regime.

Stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code 3 Aims of this workshop: Foster common understanding of issues at hand Get support for quality network code rules For the avoidance of doubt: Neither the draft network code nor this workshop including the practical exercises intends to encroach upon NRA and TSO prerogatives in determining specific tariffs. It is however important to point to the policy decisions that have to be taken in tariff calculation Tariff arrangements need to suit the proposed CAM measures to enable the functioning of the regime, therefore essentials have to be set on EU level.

Stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code 4

Tariff provisions in the draft CAM network code Johannes Heidelberger Brussels – 19 July 2011 Stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code

Tariff provisions in the draft CAM network code 7. Tariffs 1) If not further or otherwise specified in the network code on tariffs, the following shall apply for the determination of specific tariffs for the application of this Network Code. 2) The Regulated Tariff shall be used as the Reserve Price in all auctions for all Standard Capacity Products for firm and interruptible capacity. 1.2 Definitions (s) Regulated Tariff means either the tariff as calculated using the methodology set and/or approved by the national regulatory authority, or the tariff set and/or approved by the national regulatory authority, or both. 6

Tariff provisions in the draft CAM network code 7. Tariffs 3) The regulated prices as Reserve Prices for firm Standard Capacity Products shall be set such that bookings of a profiled set of products to meet the actual flow requirements throughout the year yield revenues which are, as far as reasonably possible, equivalent to the revenues from non-profiled longer capacity bookings to meet annual peak flow requirements. In order to achieve such equivalence, Standard Capacity Products shall be offered at regulated prices as Reserve Prices, which are derived per Interconnection Point and per direction by applying multipliers higher than one to a tariff determined from an annual accounting basis. 7

Tariff provisions in the draft CAM network code 7. Tariffs 4) Auction revenues from Bundled Capacity need to be split between the transmission system operators placing capacity elements in a Bundled Capacity. The Reserve Price of the Bundled Capacity shall be the sum of Reserve Prices of the capacity elements in the bundle. All revenues from sales of Bundled Capacity shall be attributed to the contributing transmission system operators in relation to each capacity transaction. 5) Any revenue from an auction of Bundled Capacity shall be split between the transmission system operators placing capacity elements in the bundle according to a pro-rata rule, based on the proportions of the Reserve Prices of the capacity elements placed in the bundle at the time of the auction. By way of derogation, transmission system operators placing capacity in a Bundled Capacity can agree on a different split of the revenue from an auction of bundled products. 8

Tariff provisions in the draft CAM network code 7. Tariffs 6) Auction revenues exceeding the allowed revenue (or under a price cap, auction revenues arising from capacity prices above the regulated tariff) shall be used for different aims, subject to approval by the national regulatory authority. 7) In the event of revenue under-recovery (or under a price cap, capacity prices falling short of later regulated prices after the auction), national regulatory authorities shall allow transmission system operators to collect the revenue shortfall in a timely manner by adjusting tariffs accordingly. 9

Regulated reserve prices throughout Standard Capacity Products Adriaan de Bakker Brussels – 19 July 2011 stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code

Regulated reserve prices throughout Standard Capacity Products To enable the offer of Standard Capacity Products (SCP) as proposed in the draft CAM NC, TSOs need assurance on revenue recovery Reserve price design needs to be based on booking forecast: Profiling of capacity, e.g. seasonal quarters Substitution of products – long vs. short term 11

Regulated reserve prices throughout Standard Capacity Products Revenue of long term booking approximately equal to revenue of profiled booking along actual flows 12 Principle in draft CAM network code : Aim: Equity for all system users and avoidance of cross- subsidisation Not foreseen in draft CAM NC

Achieving equity between long and short product users Reserve prices enabling profiling of quarters should therefore be: (annual accounting tariff/4) x (appropriate multiplier) Users who book longer term shall be put on equal footing with those who can book close to time of flow – no undue cross-subsidisation: Reserve prices for short term SCP (monthly and shorter) to reflect further profiling opportunity closer to flow 13

14 … substitutability between long and short term capacity is observed and this may create material distortions and inefficiencies in regime functioning Source: National Grid Sep 2009 Migration from long term booking. Not even zero firm day ahead reserve price! (but discount; and zero within day / interruptible) Low short term prices may lead to non-optimal charging

Regulated reserve prices throughout Standard Capacity Products - Conclusion Finally: KEMA (2009) identified high tariffs for short term capacity as market barrier Regulation 715 calls for tariffs not arbitrarily higher or lower than the standard annual tariff (Art. 14 (2)) 15 With the principle of revenue equivalence of profiled vs. longer term bookings, a reasoned, non-arbitrary approach is introduced.

Exercise 1: revenue equality between users Quarter 1Quarter 2Quarter 3Quarter 4Total Year Annual booking annual accounting based reserve price 1.00 Profiled booking forecast Q capacity sales forecast90%40% 90%65% M capacity sales forecast5% D capacity sales forecast5% Total capacity sales forecast100%50% 100%75% Possible non-seasonal reserve prices Q reserve price 1.30 M reserve price 1.40 D reserve price 1.70 Capacity revenue forecast Possible seasonal reserve prices Q reserve price M reserve price D reserve price Capacity revenue forecast 1.00 To do: fill red box with seasonal reserve pricing, such that total revenue is 1.00 Figures are only to illustrate reserve price principles and do not constitute concrete TSO positions. NB: Regulated reserve prices may be subject to changes over the years – with changes in tariffs for products already auctioned (cf. German model with auction premium above regulated price). Distinction of annual monthly and rolling monthly is conceivable. Within-day needs to fit in revenue equality principle as well.

Issues with over and under recovery Eddie Blackburn Brussels – 19 July 2011 Stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code

Issues with over and under recovery Under recovery; contributing factors are: – Aggregate level of capacity sold being less than forecast – Greater than expected profiling of capacity to meet flow requirements – Target (allowed) revenue increasing following the auction Over recovery; contributing factors are: – Aggregate level of capacity sold being greater than forecast – Less than expected profiling of capacity to meet flow requirements – Target (allowed) revenue reducing following the auction – Capacity sold at prices in excess of the reserve price The method of managing under/over recovery might depend on the contributing factors 18

Issues with over and under recovery Examples of current, quite different ways of dealing with over and under recovery Commodity charge (GB) – Under recovery is charged to all users flowing gas (including flat users) floating regulated price under an auction premium (DE) – System wide smearing of over recovery to all capacity tariffs – Regulated reserve price of products, already auctioned, may change over time, as the TSO cost basis changes. Regulatory account – Under/over recovery is passed through to the next year 19

Issues with over and under recovery General options for dealing with over and under recovery: Retrospective v current year v future year Capacity v commodity Locational v entry/exit side only v system wide 20

Issues with over and under recovery Potential effects of different over and under recovery mechanisms and issues involved (1): Users who bid high at a location get money back: – perverse incentive to excessively outbid competitors Tariff adjustments to or from other users: – may create cross-subsidies Dedicated commodity charge may hamper trade: – acts as a tax on allocated gas quantities 21

Issues with over and under recovery Potential effects of different over and under recovery mechanisms and issues involved (2): Tariff volatility may become substantial, depending on e.g. number of points in system Ex-post over or under recovery mechanisms may involve cash and interest rate issues: – How are network users or TSOs treated in terms of the time value of money? 22

Issues with over and under recovery Conclusion Ex post over and under recovery correction will always have the potential to create cross- subsidisation and distortions, between users – at different locations, or – of different products, or – at different times. 23 It is therefore vital to ex-ante design tariffs such that ex-post correction need is minimised

Entry-Exit zone Allowed revenue: 400 Domestic Exits Revenue: 100 Revenue Entry: 100 Actual auction revenue: 200 Revenue Entry: 50 Revenue Exit: 50 Revenue Entry: 50 Revenue Exit: 50 Auction revenue exceeding allowed revenue: 100 To do: Where, when, and with what charge (capacity/commodity) to be returned to system users? Exercise 2 (1): over recovery

Entry-Exit zone Allowed revenue: 400 Domestic Exits Revenue: 100 Revenue Entry: 100 Actual auction revenue: 40 Revenue Entry: 50 Revenue Exit: 50 Revenue Entry: 50 Revenue Exit: 50 Revenue falling short of allowed revenue: 60 To do: Where, when, and with what charge (capacity/commodity) to be recovered from system users? Exercise 2 (2): under recovery

Wrap up Brussels – 19 July 2011 Stakeholder workshop on tariff aspects of the draft CAM network code

Wrap up 27