Hirohito Haruki, Junichi Nishikawa, Ulrich K. Laemmli  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Advertisements

Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (November 2016)
SMK-1, an Essential Regulator of DAF-16-Mediated Longevity
Nup-PI: The Nucleopore-Promoter Interaction of Genes in Yeast
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
The Rb-Related p130 Protein Controls Telomere Lengthening through an Interaction with a Rad50-Interacting Protein, RINT-1  Ling-Jie Kong, Alison R. Meloni,
Ada Ndoja, Robert E. Cohen, Tingting Yao  Molecular Cell 
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Jin Yang, Hal P. Bogerd, P.Jeremy Wang, David C. Page, Bryan R. Cullen 
DNA Degradation at Unprotected Telomeres in Yeast Is Regulated by the CDK1 (Cdc28/Clb) Cell-Cycle Kinase  Momchil D. Vodenicharov, Raymund J. Wellinger 
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Suzanne Komili, Natalie G. Farny, Frederick P. Roth, Pamela A. Silver 
Deciphering the RNA Polymerase II CTD Code in Fission Yeast
Communication with the Exon-Junction Complex and Activation of Nonsense-Mediated Decay by Human Upf Proteins Occur in the Cytoplasm  Guramrit Singh, Steffen.
Nithya Raman, Elisabeth Weir, Stefan Müller  Molecular Cell 
Shinobu Chiba, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
The Putative RNA Helicase Dbp4p Is Required for Release of the U14 snoRNA from Preribosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Martin Koš, David Tollervey 
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
Shinya Takahata, Yaxin Yu, David J. Stillman  Molecular Cell 
ChIC and ChEC Molecular Cell
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Dmitry Zabezhinsky, Boris Slobodin, Doron Rapaport, Jeffrey E. Gerst 
Colocalization of Sensors Is Sufficient to Activate the DNA Damage Checkpoint in the Absence of Damage  Carla Yaneth Bonilla, Justine Amy Melo, David.
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Exportin 1 (Crm1p) Is an Essential Nuclear Export Factor
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Competition by the Masses
Gislene Pereira, Elmar Schiebel  Molecular Cell 
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (November 2016)
Terunao Takahara, Tatsuya Maeda  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Toyoaki Natsume, Tomomi Kiyomitsu, Yumiko Saga, Masato T. Kanemaki 
Dimethylation of H3K4 by Set1 Recruits the Set3 Histone Deacetylase Complex to 5′ Transcribed Regions  TaeSoo Kim, Stephen Buratowski  Cell  Volume 137,
Junbiao Dai, Weiwu Xie, Troy L. Brady, Jiquan Gao, Daniel F. Voytas 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Chromatin Boundaries in Budding Yeast
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
MAP Kinase-Mediated Stress Relief that Precedes and Regulates the Timing of Transcriptional Induction  Markus Proft, Kevin Struhl  Cell  Volume 118, Issue.
Telomeric Noncoding RNA TERRA Is Induced by Telomere Shortening to Nucleate Telomerase Molecules at Short Telomeres  Emilio Cusanelli, Carmina Angelica Perez.
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Patricia J. Hilleren, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Paul B. Mason, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Adrian Halme, Stacie Bumgarner, Cora Styles, Gerald R Fink  Cell 
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
H2B Ubiquitylation Controls the Formation of Export-Competent mRNP
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Cdc20 is essential for the cyclosome-mediated proteolysis of both Pds1 and Clb2 during M phase in budding yeast  Hong Hwa Lim, Phuay-Yee Goh, Uttam Surana 
Vidhya Ramachandran, Khyati H. Shah, Paul K. Herman  Molecular Cell 
Exit from Mitosis in Budding Yeast
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Condensin and Hmo1 Mediate a Starvation-Induced Transcriptional Position Effect within the Ribosomal DNA Array  Danni Wang, Andres Mansisidor, Gayathri.
Van Q. Nguyen, Carl Co, Kaoru Irie, Joachim J. Li  Current Biology 
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Presentation transcript:

The Anchor-Away Technique: Rapid, Conditional Establishment of Yeast Mutant Phenotypes  Hirohito Haruki, Junichi Nishikawa, Ulrich K. Laemmli  Molecular Cell  Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 925-932 (September 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.020 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Scheme of the AA Technique: Anchor Selection (A) The anchor and target C-terminally fused to the FKBP12 and FRB domains, respectively, and the ternary complex formed upon addition of rapamycin. (B) Two main schemes were successfully applied to deplete the nucleus of target proteins. The static scheme 1 (left half of the depicted cell) uses the abundant, essential plasma membrane H+-ATPase Pma1p as an anchor. The PMA1 anchor fused to FKBP12 was found to rapidly inactivate, in a ligand-dependent manner, proteins that shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm, such as proteins involved in nuclear transport. This anchor, though, does not work with typical nonshuttling nuclear proteins. The mobile scheme 2 (right half of the depicted cell) uses a ribosomal protein anchor, RPL13A-FKBP12, taking advantage of the large flux of ribosomal proteins transiting the nucleus during their assembly process to the 40S and 60S particles, to deplete the nucleus of the target proteins. Scheme 2 worked for all genes tested that code for nuclear proteins. (C) Exploratory spot-test series in which the NLS-cargo import function of KAP95-FRB (importin-β), which is inhibited with the nucleopore (NIC96-FKBP12), core histone (HTB2-FKBP12), and H+-ATPases (PMA1-FKBP12) anchors. Control (−RAP) and rapamycin (+RAP) containing plates are shown. The strains tested were TD422, expressing KAP95-FRB lacking an anchor, and derivative thereof, expressing the NIC96 (HHY50), the HTB2 (HHY51), or the PMA1 anchor (HHY118). Molecular Cell 2008 31, 925-932DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Rescue by Complementation and Imaging of the Anchor-Target Complex (A) Shows spot-test on control (−URA or −LEU) and rapamycin (−URA or −LEU +RAP) containing plates. Note that anchoring in the PMA1 anchor strain by addition of rapamycin results in lethality for the three transport genes, KAP95 (importin-β), SRP1 (importin-α) and MEX67. But lethality is complemented/rescued by coexpression of the endogenously FRB-tagged and of the untagged gene product from a CEN plasmid. Strains used are the parental PMA1 anchor strains HHY110, HHY118 (KAP95-FRB), HHY122 (SRP1-FRB), and HHY133 (MEX67-FRB). (B) Exponential culture of PMA1 anchor strain HHY225 expressing KAP95-FRB-GFP was treated with rapamycin and fixed at indicated time points. Fluorescence micrograph shows the rapid displacement by exposure to rapamycin for 15 min of KAP95-FRB-GFP from its normal location at the nuclear periphery (top left, −RAP) to the plasma membrane anchor PMA1-FKBP12 (top right, +RAP). The bottom row shows the nuclear DAPI signals. Molecular Cell 2008 31, 925-932DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Anchoring Results in Specific Import/Export Phenotypes (A) PMA1 anchor strains HHY118 and HHY133 expressing KAP95-FRB (top row) and MEX67-FRB (bottom row), respectively, were transformed with a multicopy (2 μm) plasmid that express NLS-GFP. Left micrographs show live images of the NSL-GFP cargo dominantly localized in the nucleus due to normal import (−RAP, 0 min.). However, exposure of the cells for 3 min to rapamycin blocks import. This is manifested by a general redistribution of NLS-GFP throughout the cell (top, +RAP, 3 min.). The bottom row shows a specificity control, demonstrating that anchoring MEX67-FRB does not inhibit the normal nuclear signal of NLS-GFP as expected. (B) Poly(A)+ was visualized by in situ hybridization with an oligo(dT)50 probe in HHY133 expressing MEX67-FRB. The top row shows, as a control, the predominantly cytoplasmic poly(A)+ signal resulting from normal RNA export (−RAP, 0 min.). However, exposure of the cells for 30 min to rapamycin blocks RNA export (+RAP, 30 min.). This is manifested by the retention of the poly(A)+ signal in the nucleus. The bottom row shows the DAPI signal of the nucleus. (C) Identical to (A), but carried out with the ribosome anchor strain HHY208. (D) Immunoblot of KAP95-FRB and TBP-FRB in the PMA1 (lanes 1 and 2, HHY118) and ribosome anchor (lanes 3 and 4, HHY154) strains. The blot shows that exposure to rapamycin (+RAP) for 1 hr (1H) does not result in degradation of the targets and anchors. Top filter was blotted with the anti-FRB (α-FRB) and the bottom one with anti-FKBP12 (α-FKBP12). Molecular Cell 2008 31, 925-932DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Specific Transcription Phenotype by Anchoring TBP (A) Bar graph shows the rapid inhibition of GAL1 transcription by anchoring TBP-FRB. Ribosome anchor strain HHY154 expressing TBP-FRB was exponentially cultured in YPAR. Rapamycin was added concomitantly (0) or prior to galactose at −15, −30, −60 min, as indicated. The mRNA level of GAL1 and ACT1 was measured after 60 min of galactose induction using reverse transcriptase-mediated real-time PCR. The fold inhibition by exposure to rapamycin is indicated. (B) Spot-test series of various FRB constructs in the ribosome anchor strain on control and rapamycin plates. Note that coexpression of untagged gene products results in full complementation of the lethal phenotype (normal growth on RAP plates). The plate contains glucose for strains HHY168 (parental ribosome anchor strain), HHY208 (KAP95-FRB), HHY195 (SRP1-FRB), HHY182 (MEX67-FRB), and HHY154 (TBP-FRB), while galactose is used for HHY183 (GAL4-FRB). (C) Exponential culture of ribosome anchor strain HHY209 expressing TBP-FRB-GFP was treated with rapamycin and fixed at indicated time points thereafter. GFP micrographs in the top row show the time course of the depletion of TBP-FRB-GFP from the nucleus to the cytoplasm by anchoring. Bottom row shows the DAPI signal of the nuclei. Molecular Cell 2008 31, 925-932DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The AA Technique Works for All Genes Tested (A) Spot-test and complementation results for many different genes involved in diverse functions, as indicated. Complementation was observed for all constructs by mating (Mated +RAP). The fold inhibition of GAL1 transcription following preexposure to rapamycin for 60 min is listed. Note that anchoring GAL4-FRB did not lead to lethality on rapamycin plates, since media used for the spot test contained glucose, but see Figure 4B. However, anchoring this protein resulted in the galactose media in transcription inhibition of GAl1 down to background level (see [B]). (B) Bar graph shows the inhibition of GAL1 transcription by anchoring several gene products involved in transcription. These are GAL4-FRB (HHY183), SPT20-FRB (HHY189), SRB5-FRB (HHY178), SNF2-FRB (HHY190), TBP-FRB (HHY154), and RPO21-FRB (HHY170). Rapamycin was added together with galactose, or 15, 30, and 60 min prior to galactose (0 min, indicated by a wedge). The mRNA level of GAL1 was measured after 60 min galactose induction, and the maximum value was normalized to 100%. Molecular Cell 2008 31, 925-932DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Examples of Specific Phenotypes (A) Spot test of cells containing a URA3 reporter inserted at silent mating-type locus HML on plates containing rapamycin alone (+RAP) or this ligand and 5′-fluoroorotic acid (+FOA, +RAP). FOA kills cells expressing this reporter. Note that the untagged strain (Sir3p, JNY356) grows normally on either plate. In contrast, the tagged strain (SIR3-FRB, JNY365) is killed on the double-selection plate (+RAP +FOA) due to the desilencing of URA3. The expression state of URA3 is indicated (silenced/desilenced). (B) Anchoring of the cohesin subunit SCC1-FRB results in sister chromatid separation (doublets) in about 28% of the cells. Exposure to rapamycin was 120 min. All strains contained a LacO array inserted near GAL1 highlighted with the help of GFP-LacI. Only about 2%–3% doublets were observed in the controls, including anchoring of SMC2-FRB or TOP2-FRB. Inset shows a field of cells enriched for doublets. Molecular Cell 2008 31, 925-932DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.07.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions