Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.
Advertisements

1 NPS MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR THE NORTH CANDADIAN RIVER (from Canton dam through Lake Overholser)
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Incorporating the 9-Elements into a WMP Lindsey PhillipsMike Archer Source Water CoordinatorState Lakes Coordinator (402) (402)
Components of every Good Watershed Management Plan NDEQ – Planning Unit August 6 th, 2014 NDEQ – Planning Unit gust 6 th 2014.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
EPA’S WATERSHED PLANNING APPROACH FOR THE SECTION 319 PROGRAM Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch October.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Bill Carter Nonpoint Source Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Trade Fair and Conference, May 2015.
Section 319 Grant Program Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Region 1 & 2 IR Workshop October 28,  The Water Quality Framework is a new way of thinking about how EPA’s data and information systems can be.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Amy Walkenbach Illinois EPA 217/
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
Michigan Watershed Plan Reviews Presentation at the Michigan Watershed-Based Planning Workshop, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
FY 2016 EAP Proposals 1.Groundwater Sampling at Coulee Creek 2.Deep & Coulee Straight to Implementation Project 3.Little Spokane DO/pH TMDL 4.Lake Spokane.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 4, Federal.
April 4, 2011 Princesa VanBuren Hansen Environmental Quality Board.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
Ashley Wendt Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board NPS Project Manager.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Fitting the pieces together
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Leon River Watershed Protection Plan: Addressing EPA Comments
Section 319 Grant Program – writing a proposal that can be funded
Developing a shelter strategy
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Investing in Source Water Protection
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
The Nine Elements that Must Be Included in a 319 Watershed Based Plan
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Nonpoint Source Program
Workshop Technical and Policy Studies to Support the Annex
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed water quality data and watershed characterization utilize a stakeholder process to engage all that are affected by the impairments

What Is EPA Looking For In A Watershed-based Plan? Clearly articulates the water quality problem and how to fix it. Describes what NEEDS to be done to achieve WQ standards Tracks water quality responses in the stream with implementation in the “right” spot.

Basic Review Principles Nine elements Key on Elements A-C development Site specific management strategies Waterbody restoration

Element A – the Cornerstone Establish concentration baseline Recent WQ data Field surveys Land-use characterization Causes/sources of pollution

Element B – Load Reductions Modeling BMPs Likelihood of achieving WQ improvements & attaining standards

Element C Management Measures Contingent on elements A & B Critical to achieving load reductions Sufficient water quality data linkage Appropriate modeling Contingent on elements A & B Element C

Elements A-C Provides the basis for the remaining six elements

Element D – Tech/Financial Assistance and Needs Have funding sources been identified and secured? Has the technical support been identified? anticipated agencies and volunteer groups

Element E – Information/Education Public education/information correct/credible data Stakeholder support Voluntary implementation Generate interest Maintain BMPs Life cycle input mechanism

Element F – Implementation Schedule Schedule includes completion dates to meet goals of WBP Funding commitment to assure timely completion Scale appropriate to achieve goals

Element G – Interim, Measurable Milestones Meeting the implementation schedule will require a series of milestone to assure progress: Interim milestones (measurable/attainable) Address critical areas of watershed Early assessment – midcourse correction Level of detail varies

Element H - Criteria Concentration data from Element A establishes the criteria to measure from Modeled load reduction calculations based on baseline, and end goal Model selection? Model output interpretation? Anticipated load reductions from BMPs and their anticipated placement Decision process to revise as needed?

Element I - Monitoring Monitoring schedule – who,what,when,where and how often Linked to load reduction from edge of field Which Method? Trends analysis Upstream/downstream comparisons Paired watershed designs

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Questions lamb.brad@epa.gov Brad Lamb Watersheds/Nonpoint Source Program Coordinator Watershed Management Section U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 · Dallas, TX 75202 (214) 665-6683