DEMONSTRATION OF TRIPLE BUNCH SPLITTING IN THE CERN PS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC Injection in 07 “Summer MD-Planning” Milorad Popovic.
Advertisements

ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Expected performance in the injectors at 25 ns without and with LINAC4 Giovanni Rumolo, Hannes Bartosik and Adrian Oeftiger Acknowledgements: G. Arduini,
Beam Gymnastics and LLRF in the PS S. Hancock The remarkable versatility of the PS machine comes at the price of the complexity of its rf beam controls,
REPHASING TESTS DURING THE TWO BEAM IMPEDANCE MD P. Baudrenghien, J. Noirjean, T. Mastoridis 10/26/2012LSWG meeting 1 Oct 7 th,18:00 – Oct 8 th, 04:00.
Bunch Merging at 24 GeV Goal: 16 Tp per bunch The scheme Set-up problems Result Future work to increase bunch intensity.
Thomas Roser Muon collaboration meeting February 8-10, 2002 AGS beam intensity upgrades What has been achieved Sextupole power supply upgrades Bunch manipulation.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from.
Preliminary results and ideas for the SPS upgrade MDs on LHC beams in 2011 G. Rumolo on behalf of all the MD team (Elena, Thomas, Karel, Christina, Holger,
22/03/1999A.Blas1 Hollow bunches A. Blas, S. Hancock, S. Koscielniak, M. Lindroos, F. Pedersen, H. Schonauer  Why: to improve space charge related problems.
Moriond 2003M. Benedikt, S. Hancock Injection and Accumulation in a High Energy Ion Storage Ring Michael Benedikt, Steven Hancock AB Division, CERN.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
Booster Beam Dynamics Christian Carli On behalf of the team working on and contributing to the study: M. Aiba did all ORBIT simulations (Booster modelling.
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
T. Argyropoulos, LIU /04/2013 Progress in the SPS: RF studies and beam quality T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, J. E. Muller,, H. Timko, E. Shaposhnikova.
HL-LHC/LIU Joint workshop Goal: Progressing towards an agreed set of 450 GeV beam parameters for High Luminosity operation in LHC after LS2 & LS3. Slides.
0 1 Alternative Options in the Injectors – Preliminary Summary H. Damerau LIU-TM#8 18 October 2013 Many thanks for discussions and input to T. Argyropoulos,
PS (electron cloud?!) instability at flat top Mauro Pivi Gianni Iadarola, Giovanni Rumolo, Simone Gilardoni 05/06/2012 LIU-PS meeting, CERN.
RF issues with (beyond) ultimate LHC beams in the PS in the Lin4 era 0.
Production of bunch doublets for scrubbing of the LHC J. Esteban Muller (simulations), E. Shaposhnikova 3 December 2013 LBOC Thanks to H. Bartosik, T.
Some ideas for/from the SPS LIU-SPS team. Scrubbing (only) for ecloud in SPS? aC coating remains baseline..... –but scrubbing has many potential advantages.
Content  The LHC beams produced  LINAC2 & PSB  The PS  The SPS  Super Cycles and N0n-LHC physics  Conclusions IEFC Workshop, 8 March 2012 Rende.
CERN F. Ruggiero Univ. “La Sapienza”, Rome, 20–24 March 2006 Measurements, ideas, curiosities beam diagnostics and fundamental limitations to the performance.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.
Coupled bunch instabilities in the CERN PS
Coupled-bunch oscillation feedback studies 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 20 February 2013 Many thanks to R. Garoby, S. Gilardoni, S. Hancock,
Barrier RF Stacking Weiren Chou and Dave Wildman Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Progress on e-cloud effects (PS and SPS) G. Iadarola, H.Bartosik, G. Rumolo, M. Taborelli, C. Yin Vallgren Many thanks to: G. Arduini, T. Argyropoulos,
High Intensity Beams in Existing Accelerators for CN2PY: SPS studies, PS issues E. Shaposhnikova Laguna-LBNO General Meeting CERN, Acknowledgments:
Outcome of beam dynamics simulations - Scenarios, requirements and expected gains s LIU-SPS Coordination meeting 26/08/2015 A. Lasheen, E. Shaposhnikova,
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Longitudinal Limitations of Beams for the LHC in the CERN PS 0.
Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
LIU-PS Beam Dynamics Working Group Introduction and objectives
Loss of Landau damping for reactive impedance and a double RF system
Impact of the current debuncher limitations (…can we get rid of longitudinal painting?)
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Considerations on RF systems of SPPC collider and its injector chain
BE/RF-IS Contribution to LIU C. Rossi and M. Paoluzzi
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
Tomography at Injection in the PSB
Update on the HiLumi/LIU parameters and performance ramp up after LS2
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
Upcoming longitudinal MDs
New AD Production Beam in the PSB
Multiturn extraction for PS2
The Proton Beam for the neutron Time Of Flight facility
The SPS 800 MHz RF system E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF
Limits on damping times
The LHC25ns cycle in the PS Triple splitting after 2nd injection
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Introduction to LHC beam production in PSB and PS
News on TMCI in the SPS: Injecting high intensity bunches
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Generation of Higher Brightness Beams for LHC
Observation of Transverse Mode Coupling Instability at the PS and SPS
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
Summary of session 9: "LHC Injectors Upgrade"
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Gap Transient Suppression using Increased Bunch Density
MEIC New Baseline: Part 9
Presentation transcript:

DEMONSTRATION OF TRIPLE BUNCH SPLITTING IN THE CERN PS OUTLINE 1. PS role in the LHC injection chain 1.1 Nominal scheme 1.2 Multiple splittings scheme 2. Principle of Bunch Splitting 2.1 Double splitting 2.2 Triple splitting 3. Experimental results 3.1 Triple splitting at 1.4 GeV 3.2 Other gymnastics 3.3 Lessons 4. Future plans 5. Conclusions R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

1. PS role in the LHC injection chain 1.1 Nominal scheme 0.35 eVs (bunch) 1.1 ´ 1011 ppb 25 eVs (total) 96 ´ 1011 p 85 % Blow-up (optimistic) 1 eVs (bunch) 6 ´ 1011 ppb 45 % Blow-up (voluntary) 1.4 eVs (bunch) 12 ´ 1011 ppb R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

1. PS role in the LHC injection chain 1.1 Nominal scheme Major steps in the process: Double splitting (h=8 -> h=16) at 3.57 GeV/c Debunching (h=16 - 7.6 MHz) / rebunching (h=84 - 40 MHz) at 26 GeV/c Beam characteristics at ejection: Factors limiting present performance: Drawbacks of debunching / rebunching (emittance blow-up, microwave instability, lack of reproducibility) R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

1. PS role in the LHC injection chain 1.2 Multiple splittings scheme 0.35 eVs (bunch) 1.1 ´ 1011 ppb 40 % Blow-up (pessimistic) 1 eVs (bunch) 4.5 ´ 1011 ppb 115 % Blow-up (voluntary) 1.4 eVs (bunch) 13.5 ´ 1011 ppb R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

2. Principle of splitting: 2.1 Double splitting Time evolution of the RF voltage Time evolution of the bunch(es) R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

2. Principle of splitting: 2.2 Triple splitting Time evolution of the RF voltage Time evolution of the bunch(es) R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

2. Principle of splitting: 2.2 Triple splitting R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

2. Principle of splitting: 2.3 Advantages (with respect to debunching / rebunching & based on experience with double splitting): good control (potential preservation) of longitudinal emittance: no need for very low RF voltages to minimise blow-up, capability to preserve a gap without particles over a fraction of the circumference, good reproducibility: beam is always confined by RFs, and feedback loops can be used for stabilisation, lower risk of microwave instability thanks to the larger (Dp/p)2/I in the beam. R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

3. Experimental results: 3.1 Triple splitting at 1.4 GeV Mountain-range display (1 PSB bunch) T=1.4 GeV 1.5 ´ 1012 ppb Mountain-range display (4 PSB bunches) T=1.4 GeV 6 ´ 1012 ppp R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

3. Experimental results: 3.1 Triple splitting at 1.4 GeV Tomographic reconstruction of phase plane density T=1.4 GeV 1.5 ´ 1012 ppb R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

3. Experimental results: 3.2 Other gymnastics Acceleration to 25 GeV Capture, splitting and acceleration to 25 GeV (4 PSB bunches) 6 ´ 1012 ppp Bunch (h=21) at 25 GeV 0.5 ´ 1012 ppb eL = 0.66 eVs R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

3. Experimental results: 3.2 Other gymnastics Quadruple splitting at 25 GeV First double splitting (h=21 -> 42) Instability of the initial beam degrades the process Second double splitting (h=42 -> 84) Suffers from imperfect result of first double splitting R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

3. Experimental results: 3.3 Lessons Triple bunch splitting is feasible (!) Key ingredients: beam phase loop locked during the full process fine adjustment of the phases between harmonics stability of the initial beam Reproducibility looks good (over a few days) and is independent of the number of PSB bunches to be split Bunches of small longitudinal emittance (~ 0.7 eVs) are stable during acceleration up to 25 GeV Preliminary steps before splittings at 25 GeV trigger bunch oscillations: hardware improvements are required R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

4. Future plans: “Exotic” splitting schemes Bunch train with 120 ns gaps without beam 0.35 eVs (bunch) 1.7 ´ 1011 ppb 40 % Blow-up (pessimistic) 1 eVs (bunch) 6.8 ´ 1011 ppb 45 % Blow-up (voluntary) 1.4 eVs (bunch) 13.6 ´ 1011 ppb R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

4. Future plans: “Exotic” splitting schemes Bunch train with 50 ns between bunches 0.40 eVs (bunch) 2.2 ´ 1011 ppb 20 % Blow-up (pessimistic) 0.66 eVs (bunch) 4.5 ´ 1011 ppb 42 % Blow-up (voluntary) 1.4 eVs (bunch) 13.6 ´ 1011 ppb R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

5. Conclusions Triple bunch splitting has been successfully demonstrated with the nominal beam for LHC in the PS: è new possibility in the accelerator designer’s toolbox Emittance is indeed preserved: è exotic bunch trains are feasible which should help study and fight electron clouds induced instabilities in SPS and LHC Hardware improvements are necessary for the proper performance of the full multiple splitting scheme: è beam experiments resume in Summer 2000 R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

ANNEX 1: Problems with debunching - rebunching Principle of debunching - rebunching: Iso-adiabatic debunching by slow voltage reduction down to a level where acceptance << emittance and then fast reduction to zero volt. beam drift without RF voltage Iso-adiabatic capture by the reverse process at the new RF frequency R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

ANNEX 1: Problems with debunching - rebunching Drawbacks: need for control of low RF voltages to minimise blow-up. (emittance is multiplied by p/2 when acceptance = emittance at the time of cancellation) no control on the beam while drifting, the full circumference is filled with particles risk of microwave instability because of the small (Dp/p)2/I of the debunched beam R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

ANNEX 1: Problems with debunching - rebunching Typical PS results for LHC Debunching Instability Rebunching + Bump R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

ANNEX 2: Simulations of splitting Splitting bunches in three at 3.57 GeV/c R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

ANNEX 2: Simulations of splitting Splitting bunches in four at 26 GeV/c R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

ANNEX 3: Experience with double splitting Merging in the AGS (Brookhaven) [Mountain range of longitudinal PU signal during a full acceleration cycle of Au77+ in the AGS - (courtesy of J.M. Brennan / BNL)] h=4 é h=8 h=8 é h=16 Time à R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

ANNEX 3: Experience with double splitting Splitting in the CERN-PS [Tomographic reconstruction from data measured with 3 1012 ppb @ 3.57 GeV/c (from S. Hancock ’s files)] R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

ANNEX 3: Experience with double splitting Splitting and controlled blow-up in the CERN-PSB R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS

ANNEX 4: PS filling scheme for LHC R. Garoby Triple Bunch Splitting in the CERN PS