T-Mobile | stick together

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The regulation of France Telecom Reference Interconnection Offer 27 january 2003.
Advertisements

1 Medicines for Chronic Diseases: too costly, too scarce, too important to ignore Margaret Ewen Health Action International.
Orbitz Worldwide at a Glance
Policy and Regulatory Challenges – Technology Providers View February 14 Challenges for Successful Implementation of ICT Projects Challenges for Successful.
Introduction to PPP in the EU RCC PPP Conference, Sarajevo, 25 September 2009 Michael Burnett, Director, European PPP Forum, European Institute of Public.
Credit Insurance: A Business Solution
Updated: April 21, 2010 Comparison of Internet Access Options How to Compare, Shop for, Choose The best Internet Access option for your needs.
The Impact of New Technology on the Public Switched Telephone Network Bob Calaff Director, Technology Policy T-Mobile USA.
GO USA CARD EXPLORER PASS. 1 Smart Destinations Company Confidential Smart Destinations Overview Identified gap in existing travel offerings which failed.
Section 26.2 Setting Prices
Foundations of Chapter M A R K E T I N G Copyright © 2003 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. Managing the Pricing Function 14.
2.7 – Percent of Change. Percent Change: Change = x _ Original 100.
Case Study: Conversion of End-User Office Products Business through T.O.P.S. (Demandbridge) Case Study: Conversion of End-User Office Products Business.
How to Become a Benefits Providing Dealer How to Become a Benefits Providing Dealer.
FCC to keep in mind... In determining what UNEs to make available, must consider whether –Access to proprietary elements is necessary –Failure to provide.
Universal Service Funding An Overview of the Connect America Fund Marsha Spellman, JD Oregon Connections Conference October 25,
MiCTA Program Southwest Michigan Library Cooperative Presented by : Jay Van Duzen Director of Member Services (586)
The Consumer Council is an independent consumer organisation, working to bring about change to benefit Northern Ireland (NI) consumers. Our aim is to make.
Fundamentals of Cost Analysis for Decision Making
The State of Missouri Public Service Commission (MPSC) An Overview.
What Constitutes an Audit? Presenters: Diane Robichaud-Cormier, NB Terry Hing, ON Michele Snow, ON.
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
E-RATE: FUNDING YEAR 2015 DO WE APPLY? Zeller and Associates, LLC Presentation available at
Earl Comstock President and CEO COMPTEL. The World Has Changed FCC adopts Cable Modem Order and Supreme Court upholds FCC in Brand X FCC adopts Wireline.
Customer Billing Education Package Mileage Calculations DS0, DS1, LightGate® Service, SMARTRing® Service, Switched.
1 NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AGENCY MULTIMEDIA IN THE FIXED SWITCHED TELEPHONE SERVICE the of information Edmundo Antonio Matarazzo Superintendent.
SBT Spring 2003 March 11, 2003 Page 1.
SPECIAL ACCESS DATA COLLECTION 1 High-Level OverviewHigh-Level OverviewWebinar October 30, 2014 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.
Broadband ? Bob Loube NASUCA 2011 Thanksgiving Loube NASUCA
Thank you.
Intercarrier Compensation. Nextel calls to BellSouth BellSouth pays to terminate Nextel calls In aggregate, it may cause BellSouth to increase capacity.
ECO 436 Industry Seminar Dr. David G. Loomis Illinois State University
Chp. 3 – Industry Overview Traditional Telephone Companies & Cable TV Providers Mobile Providers Smaller Competitors Internet Based Competitors Why Governments.
Telecommunications The Transition to Competition.
1 Special Access “Dispelling the Myths” Wendy M. Moser Vice President Public Policy, Qwest July 14, 2007.
Carriers of Last Resort – An Evolving Concept Presented to NARUC Telecommunications Committee, February 20, 2008 Peter Bluhm, National Regulatory Research.
Support For Rural America William Maher Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau July 2, 2003 Universal Service and The FCC.
 Personal Communication System  PCS (personal communications service) is a wireless phone service similar to cellular telephone.  It's sometimes referred.
Carriers Carriers carry traffic for a fee Must have rights of way to lay wire Given some monopoly protection Regulated but being deregulated.
THE FEDERAL LIFELINE PROGRAM. Overview Low-income consumers apply for discounts for local telephone service through the telephone company. Low Income.
Alternative Forms of Regulation A Rural ILEC’s Views and Experiences October 9, 2007 NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance Conference Timothy.
Telecommunications Act of 1996 Signed into law, February 8, 1996 “ An Act to promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices.
Access Charges The major questions –What services did IXC’s require in order to provide their interLATA toll and private line services? –What to do about.
Proposed Tactical Framework Telecomm Regulation Onno W. Purbo
The Truth About Special Access Donna Epps Vice President – Federal Regulatory Verizon.
COMT Network Services. COMT Definition of “Switched Services” In a switched service at least some portion of the call path is set up for the.
Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.
Professional Project Management Service “Bringing It All Together”  The Project Manager is responsible for the overall planning and installation of Qwest.
Covad Confidential Broadband Technology and Policy – A Service Provider Perspective Anjali Joshi EVP, Engineering July 2002.
Competitive Implications of Forbearance Petitions (Cost Assignment and ARMIS) and the Special Access Debate Presentation to NARUC Staff Subcommittee on.
Forecasting Market Structure in U.S. Telecoms George S. Ford, PhD Chief Economist Phoenix Center.
Summary and State Implications FCC Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CenturyLink February 28, 2012.
ECON 100 Mar 10, 2008 Mergers, Natural Monopolies and Deregulation.
Slide 1 Helsinki University of Technology Networking Laboratory Bundling of Handset and Subscription Mathias Tallberg October 13,
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
9-1-1 Network Survivability and Disaster Recovery Feb 17, 2005 Roger Hixson NENA Technical Issues Director FCC Telecommunications Service Priority Summit.
Federal Communications Commission TC 310 May 14, 2008.
Constructing An Effective Statutory & Regulatory Framework for Broadband Networks Phoenix Center Symposium December 1, 2005 Disclaimer: Views presented.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
Defining Market Power and Competition* ANRT & ITU Rabat Workshop on Competition Jake E. Jennings, FCC December 19-21, 2005 * The views expressed are solely.
Introduction to Information Networks COMT 625 Hans Kruse.
The competition enforcement in regulated sectors
Level 3 Voice Services Network Architecture June 15, 2004
Chapter 9 Copyright 2001 Prentice-Hall
Lecture 5: TELEPHONE NETWORK
Lecture 5: TELEPHONE NETWORK.
Lecture 3: TELEPHONE NETWORK.
Chapter 6 – Circuit-switching systems and networks
Presentation transcript:

T-Mobile | stick together Saturday, April 01, 2017 Special Access Dave Conn Nat. Director, State Regulatory T-Mobile USA Bellevue, WA Presentation to NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Telecommunications July 14, 2007

Special Access Regulatory Framework T-Mobile | stick together Saturday, April 01, 2017 Special Access Regulatory Framework Two alternate regulatory processes used for Price Cap carriers: Phase I pricing flexibility allows contract tariffs, and term and volume discounts, but must maintain availability of price-cap tariffed offerings Phase II allows services to be offered free of constraints imposed by Part 69 (rate structure) and Part 61 (price caps) Determinations of whether "triggers" for alternate treatment have been met are made at the MSA level Triggers are intended to be a measurement of competition within the MSA If triggers are met, competition is assumed to be sufficient to constrain market power within the MSA Different triggers for: Channel terminations (dedicated circuit between LEC end office and customer premises) Dedicated transport services

Special Access Regulatory Framework T-Mobile | stick together Saturday, April 01, 2017 Special Access Regulatory Framework Triggers for Channel Terminations: Phase I pricing flexibility allowed if unaffiliated competitors: are collocated at 50+% LEC's wire centers within the MSA; or are collocated at wire centers accounting for at least 65% of the revenue within the MSA of the allows contract tariffs, and term and volume discounts, but must maintain availability of price-cap tariffed offerings Phase II pricing flexibility allowed if unaffiliated competitors: are collocated at 65+% LEC's wire centers within the MSA; or are collocated at wire centers accounting for at least 85% of the revenue within the MSA of the allows contract tariffs, and term and volume discounts, but must maintain availability of price-cap tariffed offerings Triggers for Dedicated Transport: are collocated at 15+% LEC's wire centers within the MSA; or are collocated at wire centers accounting for at least 30% of the revenue within the MSA of the allows contract tariffs, and term and volume discounts, but must maintain availability of price-cap tariffed offerings

Special Access: Why T-Mobile Cares Illustrative Network Design Cell Site Cell Site Cell Site DS1s 96% of links to cell sites purchased from ILECs CO 68% of Interoffice Transport links (Tandem to MSC) are purchased from ILECs DS1s (and sometimes DS3s) 94% of Interoffice Transport links (CO to Tandem) purchased from ILECs DS3 Tandem MSC

Special Access: Why T-Mobile Cares T-Mobile | stick together Saturday, April 01, 2017 Special Access: Why T-Mobile Cares Key T-Mobile Facts: 96% of "cell site to end office" links (DS1s) are purchased from incumbent wireline carriers 94% of "end office to tandem" links (special access DS1s and DS3s) are purchased from incumbent wireline carriers 68% of "tandem to mobile switch" links (DS3s) are purchased from incumbent wireline carriers

Special Access: Why T-Mobile Cares T-Mobile | stick together Saturday, April 01, 2017 Special Access: Why T-Mobile Cares Key Policy Facts: In areas where pricing flexibility has been granted to ILECs, special access prices have gone up, not down Qwest + 62% between 2002 and 2005 SWB +27% between 2002 and 2005 Pac Bell +15% between 2002 and 2005 Price-flex markets have DS1 rates that are 20% higher than price-capped markets today Special Access prices are usually 25%-200% higher than prices for equivalent cost-based UNEs ROI on special access of 37% in 2002, 43% in 2003 , and continues to climb Validate against results of AT&T/BS Merger Conditions

Special Access: Why It Matters T-Mobile | stick together Saturday, April 01, 2017 Special Access: Why It Matters Problems posed by the control of bottleneck telecommunications facilities Backhaul, primarily using bottleneck special access facilities, constitutes 30% of total wireless operating expenses, which in turn affects: The price paid by consumers The ability to expand and improve wireless coverage The quality of wireless service State Commissions are in a good position to evaluate the actual competition for special access services

Special Access: Next Steps T-Mobile | stick together Saturday, April 01, 2017 Special Access: Next Steps Understand that special access issues affect customers in your states, both in terms of price and in terms of quality of service NARUC Study underway Determine how special access competition should be measured Investigate whether special access markets are sufficiently competitive to warrant price deregulation Discover whether there are special access provisioning issues that affect competitors Examine data at a granular level Tell the FCC

T-Mobile | stick together Saturday, April 01, 2017 Thank you! Contact Information: Dave Conn National Director, State Regulatory 425 383 6151 Dave.Conn@T-Mobile.com