Vietnamese agriculture and global integration David Vanzetti and Pham Lan Huong Australian National University and independent consultant National CGE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 16 Unemployment: Search and Efficiency Wages.
Advertisements

Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Terms. 1. Globalization 2. Financing 3. Inputs.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1.
Chapter 11 An Introduction to Open Economy Macroeconomics.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 International Trade in Goods and Assets.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
The Potential Cost of the Doha Round Failure Antoine Bouet – David Laborde
What causes the commodity price boom? AGRI Green Team Seminar on the Health Check May 15, 2008 AGRI-G1 Agricultural Policy Analysis and Perspectives DG.
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income Update December 2005.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 GROWING EVALUATION CAPACITY THE MID TERM EVALUATION IN OBJECTIVE 1 AND 2 REGIONS 8 OCTOBER 2004.
Prospects for EU-27 agricultural markets and income
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income
Prospects for EU-27 agricultural markets and income
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
1 A Dynamic Multi-Sectoral General Equilibrium Tax Model of the UK Economy Keshab R Bhattarai Economics Group Business School University of Hull HU6 7RX.
1 Discreteness and the Welfare Cost of Labour Supply Tax Distortions Keshab Bhattarai University of Hull and John Whalley Universities of Warwick and Western.
Strategies for Global Value Added: Gains Comparative advantage © Professor Daniel F. Spulber.
Chapter 13 Slide 1 Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc.
Chapter 6 The Theory of Tariffs and Quotas.
KOOTHS | BiTS: International Economics (winter term 2013/2014), Part 4 1 International Economics Part 4 Dr. Stefan Kooths BiTS Berlin (winter term 2013/2014)
British Columbia and International Trade Agreement Negotiations October 30, 2013 Janel Quiring, Director International Trade Policy Unit Ministry of International.
ABC Technology Project
EU market situation for eggs and poultry Management Committee 20 October 2011.
EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.
Money, Interest Rates, and Exchange Rates
1 Undirected Breadth First Search F A BCG DE H 2 F A BCG DE H Queue: A get Undiscovered Fringe Finished Active 0 distance from A visit(A)
BEEF & VEAL MARKET SITUATION "Single CMO" Management Committee 17 October 2013.
BEEF & VEAL MARKET SITUATION "Single CMO" Management Committee 18 April 2013.
BEEF & VEAL MARKET SITUATION Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets 20 March 2014.
BEEF & VEAL MARKET SITUATION "Single CMO" Management Committee 19 July 2012.
VOORBLAD.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
1 Breadth First Search s s Undiscovered Discovered Finished Queue: s Top of queue 2 1 Shortest path from s.
BIOLOGY AUGUST 2013 OPENING ASSIGNMENTS. AUGUST 7, 2013  Question goes here!
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Chapter 20 The ISLM Model. Copyright © 2007 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved Determination of Aggregate Output.
Foundations of Chapter M A R K E T I N G Copyright © 2003 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. Global Marketing 20.
CpSc 3220 Designing a Database
Thom Achterbosch LEI EU - India regional trade agreement – a quantitative assessment.
Presentation transcript:

Vietnamese agriculture and global integration David Vanzetti and Pham Lan Huong Australian National University and independent consultant National CGE Workshop Melbourne, 7 th October 2013

Integration and structural adjustment Vietnam is signing up to bilateral, regional and multilateral trade agreements Structural adjustment –the movement of factors of production (capital, labour and land) between sectors. Declining sectors? Unemployment of factors, particularly labour? 2

Objectives Economic integration (four FTAs) Assess macro and sectoral impacts Identify need for structural adjustment 3

Global general equilibrium model GTAP Version 8, base 2007 Bilateral trade and tariffs (2010) Includes preferential tariffs (needed for FTAs) Whole economy Includes resource (land, labour, capital, natural resources) constraints Limitation - each country: one region, one household 4

Scenarios Four FTAs AFTA China Korea Japan All simultaneously Each FTA without exemptions 5

Methodology Based on negotiated FTA schedules Specify bilateral tariff cuts for 5113 products Aggregate (trade weighted) to 24 sectors by 19 regions using TASTE Specify baseline growth assumptions Specify labour and capital market assumptions Simulate Report 6

Exemptions Scheduled tariff cuts have exemptions for sensitive products Few in number but cover large volume of trade These differ by partner Specify HS 6 level tariff cuts (5113 products) from bilateral applied tariff schedules as negotiated 7

Sectoral coverage PrimaryProcessed RiceSugar Vegetables fruit and nutsBeef Cereal grains necPork and poultry Cane sugarDairy products Other cropsOther processed agriculture OilseedsTextiles CattleMotor vehicles and other trans Other aninmal productsManufactures Raw milkElectronics ForestryTransport & communications FishingBusiness services Petroleum and coal productsServices and activities NES 8

Reported results Welfare (national income) Imports Exports Employment and wage rates Tariff revenue Sectoral effects (production and trade) 9

Baseline 10 Schematic representation. Not to scale.

Baseline in steps 11

Change in FTA tariffs on Vietnams exports 12 Source. GTAP 2010.

Change in tariffs on Vietnams imports 13

Results Macro Welfare Exports Imports Tariff revenue Real wages Agricultural sector Output Exports Imports 14

Vietnam welfare gains in 2017 relative to Income growth important

Vietnam trade impacts in 2017 relative to base 16 Growth in imports exceed imports

Vietnam trade balance in 2017 relative to base 17

Welfare with and without exemptions in 2017 relative to base 18 Japanese rice tariffs

Real wages in 2017 relative to base 19 Fixed employment for skilled labour

Vietnam tariff revenue in 2017 relative to base 20

Agricultural sector impacts Output Exports Imports Use of land, labour and capital Factor prices 21

Change in output in 2017 relative to Textiles Cassava

Change in exports in 2017 relative to Switch to cassava from other crops

Change in imports in 2017 relative to Processed agriculture. Feed.

Use of factors in agriculture Change in 2017 relative to

Factor prices in 2017 relative to

Summary of macro results Income growth important. Changes implemented against background of expanding economy Positive welfare effects (national income) from FTAs Real wage increases Tariff revenue reduced somewhat Trade balance negative 27

Policy implications Income growth depends on capital (macro policy) Non-tariff barriers still exist, and may increase Structural adjustment manageable Need flexible land, labour and capital markets WTO virtually completed. No further tariff cuts Ignored here other FTAs, such as EU, Trans Pacific Partnership, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership 28

The End 29