American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Agreement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Division: EIDD WTO TBT Workshop on Good Regulatory Practice March 2008 Focus on Transparency and Consultation.
Advertisements

GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION Levelling the Field for Development BY : EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 5 TH JUNE 2013.
British Columbia and International Trade Agreement Negotiations October 30, 2013 Janel Quiring, Director International Trade Policy Unit Ministry of International.
Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership: The Effects on SMEs Simos Anastasopoulos President American-Hellenic Chamber of Commerce For presentation.
Completing Unfinished Business: Development and Operation of Single European Market Darko Pantelić, M.A. University of Novi Sad, Serbia.
Chapter 4 Global Analysis
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Unit 13 International Marketing
Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) Presented to the County of Riverside by Marin Dimitrov, Consul General of Bulgaria.
Damien LEVIE TTIP Deputy Chief Negotiator European Commission The EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) II Unites States – European.
EU-Canada Trade and Economic Relations – towards a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) 5 May 2014.
Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) - Strengthening the World’s Largest Economic Relationship - 23 January 2014 Transatlantic Trade & Investment.
1 The EU Trade Policy. 2 Contents 1.General background of the EU’s trade policy: how is the EU trading bloc structured?  The institutional setting 
Setting the new, gold standard for trade agreements of the 21 st century CETA will create vast new opportunities across the EU and Canada, opening new.
7. Canada and the United States 7.1. The Canada-US Relationship 7.2. Trade and NAFTA 7.3. Defending North America 7.4. North American Security and Terrorism.
The International Trade Administration: Clean Energy Priorities and Programs Mary Saunders Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Manufacturing and Services.
Business Services in Europe: Raising the Game Norman Rose Vice-Chairman High Level Group on Business Services & Chairman European Business Services Round.
United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council January 30, 2012 Washington D.C
Enterprise and Industry A better functioning food supply chain in the EU? The interplay between the food industry and the primary production. Can the right.
August 2011Beyond the Border1 Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness CSG-ERC Canada-U.S. Relations Committee.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Global Business Today 7e by Charles W.L. Hill.
Free Trade Agreements: Helping U.S. Businesses Export.
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Regulatory Administrative Institutions MPA 517 Lecture-8 1.
Na’el Raja AL-Kabariti Chairman March 19,20th 2014.
British Economy: Lawrence Lui Frank Fritsch. Department of Trade and Industry.
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment – Georgia United Nations Development Programme.
ECIPE PRESENTATION » Natalia Macyra Trade Policy Analyst, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) Implications of the Transatlantic.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION PUBLIC CONSULTATION FIRST OVERVIEW EXPORTIC 27 March 2008 JF SOUPIZET HEAD OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DG INFSO These view are.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Principles of Business, 8e C H A P T E R 3 SLIDE International Business Basics The Global.
Adeline Hinderer, Trade Counselor Delegation of the European Union to the United States WITA Seminar, Washington DC, 9 September The Transatlantic.
How the EU is financed EU spends around €140 billion euro per year across the Member States All Member States contribute to the EU budget In 2011, Ireland’s.
Japan-EU EPA Negotiation: Lessons from EU-South Korea FTA EU Institute in Japan, Kansai Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University Dr. Prof. YOSHII.
TOPIC #7 Canada and International Trade Agreements.
European Commission, Technical Assistance Information Exchange Unit (TAIEX), DG Enlargement in co-operation with The Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and.
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): A U.S. Perspective Prepared by the Trans-Atlantic Business Council.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA INSTITUTE OF MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT July 2007 Where is Lisbon? (and how far is it from Ljubljana)
BUS 460. ECONOMIC INTEGRATION Introduction: Economic integration around the world has been one of the most significant trends since world war two. The.
General Advantages – Joining a community of stability, democracy, security and prosperity – Growing internal market, increasing domestic demand (customs-free.
Employment and Chemical risks Tony Musu, ETUI-REHS Developing trade union activities on sustainable development and employment Torino, 27 October 2006.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AMONG NATIONS. CHAPTER 6: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AMONG NATIONS LEARNING OBJECTIVES To explain the importance of GATT to international.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
HELLENIC REPUBLIC 1 COMPETITIVENESS AND WORLD TRADE.
International Trade. Benefits of trade International trade: exchange of goods and services across international boundaries. Countries trade with each.
Economic Integration Definition: economic cooperation between countries and co-ordination of their economic policies, leading to increased economic links.
1 COMPETITION LAW FORUM Paris 21 June 2006 Competitiveness versus Competition Presentation by Humbert DRABBE Director for Cohesion and Competitiveness,
Developed by Cool Pictures and MultiMedia Presentations Copyright © 2004 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. All rights reserved. Developed.
International Trade. The Global Marketplace The interdependence of nations The benefits of international trade Government involvement in International.
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice Kent Shigetomi Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
Armando MELONE DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission SMEs Access to Finance Milano December 2011.
EU-Indonesia Trade Cooperation Facility Module 2: EU as a negotiating partner Trends of EC trade negotiations 29 September
The Small Business Act for Europe – general overview Wojciech SOPINSKI SME Policy Unit SBA conference -Belgrade 06/03/2012.
“…global multinationals have … viewed developing Asia [countries]…as an offshore-production platform. The offshore- efficiency solution is still an attractive.
Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) Presented to the County of Riverside by Marin Dimitrov, Consul General of Bulgaria.
EU’s response and preparation for the EU-Korea FTA
Business in the Global Economy
The participation of civil society in the modernization of the Association Agreement between the EU and Chile by Dr. Istvan Komoroczki - - a Hungarian.
Honors International Marketing Ms. Osteen
This presentation uses a free template provided by FPPT.com International Business Dr. Aravind Banakar –
This presentation uses a free template provided by FPPT.com International Business
This presentation uses a free template provided by FPPT.com International Business
EU-US Trade Agreement Implications for EU environmental policy
PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January – 30.
Chapter 4 Global Analysis
Will membership in TPP really help Japan?
Global and Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration
NS3040 Fall Term 2018 TPP: Arguments Against
TTIP – What´s in it for the social partners ? Brussels November 2015
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice
International Trade Chapter 4.1 (2006 Edition)
Presentation transcript:

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Agreement

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) What is it: Comprehensive trade agreement between the EU and USA Whats different: Beyond classic Free Trade Agreement of removing tariffs, opening markets on investments, services and public procurement Will also focus on aligning rules (regulations) and technical standards Why Now: Political Support Widow of opportunity (pause in the Doha Round) Financial Crisis – looking for new ways to stimulate economies Emerging Markets Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Strong Economic Ties United States (US) and Europe Union (EU) account for nearly half of the global GDP and 30 percent of world trade. US and EU have invested more than 2.8 billion in each others economies.

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Significant Economic Gains Increase EU GDP by 0.5% and US GDP by 0.4% (source: EU) 86 billion annually for the EU 65 billion annually for the US translates to about an extra 545 in for each EU family and 655 per family in the US Creates jobs – more than 500,000 positions in EU and US Global benefits: global income could increase by 100 billion Eliminating tariffs alone could boost business production by 107 billion in the EU and 71 in the US (source: ECIPE 2012)

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Process ahead Phase I High-Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth issues report and recommends negotiating comprehensive trade agreement [Feb. 2013] EU and US agree to launch negotiations on the TTIP [Obama makes announcement during the State of the Union Address] European Commission obtains negotiating mandate from the Council US Government – notification to Congress (90 day notice period) Numerous Public hearings and Consultation (over 300 submissions submitted) Phase II Negotiating Rounds: I. July 2013 (DC) II. October 2013 (Brussels) III. December 2013 (DC) IV. March 2014 (Brussels) High Level Stock Taking– mid February 2014 Informal EU Trade Ministerial 28 February 2014 EU-US Summit 26 March 2014 End date? …… window of opportunity in 2015 Ratification Process

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Business is advocating for: elimination of tariffs and other border obstacles to trade in goods; Liberalisation of trade in services, including the data flows that underlie them; expanding and protecting investment; Opening of government procurement markets; stimulating innovation and protect intellectual property; enhancing capital markets; facilitating the movement of people; Improve market access on trade in services; and promoting regulatory cooperation and equivalence in standards (goal is to reduce the costs of conflicting regulations and strengthen standards through greater compatibility, transparency, and cooperation, without sacrificing high levels of health, satiety, and environmental protection). Goal: a comprehensive transatlantic trade agreement that opens markets for trade in goods and services (that will make it easier to by and sell goods), investment, procurement, capital and people, while creating a framework that will help us bridge regulatory differences.

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Challenges Maintaining the Political Momentum - support remains strong on both sides of Atlantic and across the political spectrum Addressing the Myths and Misconceptions – Transparency, lowering of consumer protection, ISDS Ensuring an open and transparent negotiating process - Allowing civil society to express its opinion Consumer Protection - Ensuring agreement will benefit consumers and not undermine existing standards (such as on food safety and medicines) Addressing Entrenched Interests - such as geographic indicators or culture and audiovisual industry Agriculture - only 30% enters US and EU duty free; tariff elimination could provide significant benefits (lower prices for consumers; efficiency gains) Health, Safely and Environmental Standards

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) TTIP will not …. … lower present levels of protection … impact countries right to regulate … pose a threat to social rights, consumer rights and the environment … impose each others systems … replace internal standards by domestic US standards … increase administrative burden … lead to unequal outcomes TTIP is not deregulation at work, circumventing democratic principles

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) TTIP could though…... increase economic growth - According to estimates, TTIP could boost the transatlantic economys GDP between 1.5 and 3.5 percent....increase in foreign trade - TTIP would significantly increase foreign trade between the EU and the US.... set global standards in industry and services - Common standards would improve the position of the transatlantic partners in regard to global trade.... strengthening innovation potential - a comprehensive would further strengthen innovation, research and development.... increase labour mobility - significantly influence the mobility of skilled and specialized professionals, addressing the shortage of skilled workers on both sides of the Atlantic.... create new jobs - Increases in exports and new investment opportunities would create new jobs in both economic areas.... create an investment boost - create new opportunities and incentives for companies to invest in the transatlantic marketplace..... provide welfare gains for everyone - comprehensive trade liberalization generates long term economic prosperity for partner states.... increase in competitiveness - the EU and the US could expand their position in international trade as the driving forces of the global economy.... help deepen transatlantic values – the transatlantic relationship that is based on trust, transparency and common principles would be further strengthened.

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Regulatory Convergence and Standards Goal: more integrated transatlantic market place through more compatible regulatory measures Avoid: new and reduce existing unnecessary restrictions to trade and investment Promote: regulatory cooperation, development of international regulations and standards Ensure: transparency and accountability of the process by involving all relevant stakeholders

American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) How to achieve this Ensure conditions for regulatory co-operation are in place Share information on significant regulatory and legislative initiatives Effective and timely dialogue between regulators – alow for comments and feedback Strengthen assessment of impacts on international / transatlantic trade Establish a strong institutional mechanism to monitor existing and enable new cooperation Ensure transparency: Stakeholder consultations, share information on legislative and regulatory initiatives