Patented Precision 8 August 2014 US Patent 6,775,914

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanical Engineering Design Review BL ARPES Endstation Derek Yegian, Jonathan Denlinger, Keith Franck 4/18/2008.
Advertisements

LLP HMA Pavements Inertial Profiler Prebid Meeting Solano A0104 Oakland, CA September 14, 2012 Peter Vacura Chief, Office of Asphalt Pavement.
KOREA AIRPORTS CORPORATION & ROADTECH Advanced Non-contact Profiler Improving the Quality of Pavement Profile Measurement 1.
History Dynatest was founded in 1976 in Denmark by a group of engineers and technicians who combined  science  technology and  business into the development.
Integrating a Short Range Laser Probe with a 6-DOF Vertical Robot Arm and a Rotary Table Theodor Borangiu Anamaria Dogar
Distance observations
S.H.H.S Building Construction
Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation.
The Company ViaTech is a Norwegian Company with a comprehensive range of tailor-made products and services aimed at road, rail and airport authorities.
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
Data Collection for Determining Pavement Condition
Ninth Synthesis Imaging Summer School Socorro, June 15-22, 2004 Cross Correlators Walter Brisken.
Status of IPBSM Improvement N. Terunuma, KEK 2012/July/13 ATF2 Weekly Meeting.
Crossbow Products Presented by: Stephen Justice. Topics Brief view of gyros Brief view of gyros A look at MEMS A look at MEMS The two types of sensors.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
Peripherals and their Control An overview of industrially available “peripheral devices” that use “pulse-width modulation” for information passing. Review.
Trimble GCS900 Dual Antenna System Why Trimble uses a Dual Antenna Solution and why it is the better solution?
Wes Marshall, P.E. University of Connecticut March 2007
1 Geometry Measurement. 2 Gauge 3 Cluster Camera Sensor.
Portorož, Slovenia ADVANCED ANALYSIS FOR SINGULAR LONGITUDINAL PROFILES Alejandro Amírola SanzAlejandro Amírola Sanz Equipment research and development.
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
1 Development of a New Laser Reference Profiler & Testing at MnRoad 2013 Paul Toom P. Eng. MBA Cherry Systems Research (CSR) International Cybernetics.
Footer Text 3D TEXTURE MEASUREMENT Development and Field Evaluation of a Texture Measurement System Based on Continuous Profiles from a 3D Scanning Instrument.
Emmanuel Fernando, Texas A&M Transportation Institute and and Magdy Mikhail, Texas Department of Transportation Texas Department of Transportation Road.
Dependency of Coefficient of Rolling Resistance on Pavement Surface Characteristics Richard Sohaney, The Transtec Group Bernard Izevbekhai, MnDOT 19 September.
On Low Speed Problem in Road Smoothness Profiling Vadim Peretroukhine Michael Nieminen September 28, 2011.
Comparison of Inertial Profiler Measurements with Leveling and 3D Laser Scanning Abby Chin and Michael J. Olsen Oregon State University Road Profile Users.
ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee.
Automatic Pavement Cracking Distress Measurement System Bugao Xu and Yaxiong Huang University of Texas at Austin (512) December.
DG483 Digital Motion Detector A Touch of Elegance.
4/25/2017 9:25 AM Inertial Profiler Forum Intro to the Inertial Profiler Implementation September 28, 2015 © 2015 California Department of Transportation.
MnDOT Pavement Surface Smoothness Specification 23 rd Annual RPUG Meeting September 29, 2011.
1 COMPARISON OF MPD VALUES FROM HIGH- SPEED LASER MEASUREMENTS WITH MPD FROM TWO STATIONARY DEVICES Rohan Perera, PhD, PE Soil and Materials Engineers,
Working towards a revised MPD standard (ISO ) a sneak-peek on the current mind set Bo Söderling; LMI Technologies Ltd.
GCS400 Lift & Tilt Dozer Control System
2D Guidance for Excavators on the 3D Display. Configuring a 2D Hex Machine If this was a 2D only display you would only see “Depth and Slope”
By Terry Treutel Ride Quality Consultant Former WisDOT Ride Spec Coordinator.
Turning a Mobile Device into a Mouse in the Air
IPBSM Operation 11th ATF2 Project Meeting Jan. 14, 2011 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California Y. Yamaguchi, M.Oroku, Jacqueline Yan.
Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Gyroscope specifications 3. Drift rate compensation 4. Orientation error correction 5. Results 6. Gyroscope and odometers.
January 6, 2005 URSI Nation Radio Science Meeting, Boulder, CO. Pointing and Focusing the GBT K. T. Constantikes NRAO Green Bank.
VMM Update Front End ASIC for the ATLAS Muon Upgrade V. Polychronakos BNL RD51 - V. Polychronakos, BNL10/15/131.
ST7 Interferometer LIGO-G Z1 The ST7 Interferometer Andreas Kuhnert Robert Spero Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Requirements from BI and new instruments after LS1 LHC Optics Measurement and Correction Review; B.Dehning 1 Bernd Dehning CERN BE/BI
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
IncuCyte Training Calibrations and Troubleshooting
Visit for more Learning Resources
Advanced Photon Source Upgrade Project:
Finch Robot Class L4 How do I… ? LED color (Range 0 to 100)
Z. Szillasi On behalf of GEM Alignment group November 15, 2017
StrideMASTER Overview
MultiView 400™ Product Presentation Nanonics MultiView 400™
CMS ECAL Calibration and Test Beam Results
Transitioning to IRI for Pavement Smoothness
Planar Edgeless Silicon Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment
Created by Art Kay, Luis Chioye Presented by Peggy Liska
INSTRUMENTASI INDUSTRI
Digital Motion Detector
Instrument Considerations
Leveling By : Parveen Kumar.
ECE 3336 Introduction to Circuits & Electronics
Application of Inclinometer in Wind Turbine Health Monitoring.
Wavewin Sniffer 24 Configuration & Polling Software
Remote sensing in meteorology
Data Processing Chapter 3
Experience with photoinjector at ATF
Presentation transcript:

Patented Precision 8 August 2014 US Patent 6,775,914 Can Patent 2,405,133 Other Patents Pending surpro.com

The New SurPRO 4000 SurPRO comes from words “Surface” & “Profiler” Used on roads, structures, runways and floors 22 years of R&D and continuous improvement US & Can patents-inertial stabilizer & geometry SurPRO 3000 developed under FHWA contract: “Improving the Quality of Pavement Profile Measurement-Priority Number One: Reference Device” SurPRO 4000 and 4000L (laser) available now Includes all features of SurPRO 3500 Upgrades from 3500 to 4000 model available

FHWA Reference Profiler Introducing SurPRO 4000 Added Laser Adjustable short wavelength to 75mm (3in) or less Short wavelength is phase and amplitude accurate Sunlight shields for laser Optical Target Sensor for precise DMI (+/-1cm error) Automatic start and stop of profiler Automatic start and stop of distance (DMI) cal. Enables very high accuracy short waveband Millimeter sampling High Quality processing

SurPRO 4000L Laser sunlight shields (2) Laser, under center of SurPRO in machined box Optical Target Sensor

SurPRO 4000L Short Wavelength Extension SurPRO 4000 extends to 4.0 cycle/m (250 mm) sufficient for IRI, medium and long wavebands SurPRO 4000L extends to 13.3 cycle/m (75 mm) to add short waveband cross-correlation of 94% Additional Spectral Content SurPRO 4000L (red) SurPRO 4000 (black) 13.3 cycle/m 4.0 cycle/m

SurPRO 4000L 94% Short Waveband Cross-Correlation SurPRO 4000L TT run zoomed in to show 1.6m BW high pass filtered slope detail matching

Optical Targets Optical Target Sensor detects leading edge of each target and records precise distance (location)

FHWA Reference Profiler Data Collection 14-15 May 2013 Record High Temperatures Checked out unit Calibrated distance on 1000’ DMI site Collected 7 runs on 6 test sections in 2 days Repeated DG because of curling on 14 May

Pavement Thermal Shock DG Concrete Slab Curling 14 May 1:10PM 39.3C (102.7F) 15 May 5:44 to 7:07AM 22.6-24.0C (72.7-75.2F) 14 May 11:55AM 33.4C (92.1F) 1.0mm (0.04in) 1.9mm (0.075in) 4.69m (15.4ft) DG, 14 Runs, 14 & 15 May, BW bandpass filtered 1.6 to 8 m (Medium Waveband)

Effect of Temp on DG Cross Correlation DG slab curling during scorcher Data collected 11:45AM-1:10PM at 7 min per run Sequential CC correlates each run with preceding run. First Run CC correlates each run with first run.

Effect of Temp on DG Cross Correlation DG slab generally stable temp at sunrise Data collected 5:45AM-7:07AM at 7 min per run Sequential CC correlates each run with preceding run. First Run CC correlates each run with first run.

SurPRO #90 vs SurPRO #91 TT, 5 runs from each cross-correlated in PCM TT, 1 run from #91 cross-correlated with 5 runs from #90 in PSM, avg. CC of 99.5

RESULTS PROCESSING NOTES Asphalt Concrete (AC) RESULTS PROCESSING NOTES 7 profiles were run on each section; the first was a closed loop. Only the last 6 runs were used to calculate CC Results generally are for #90 profiler Laser alignment on #91 reduced some short waveband CC results Yellow cells indicate Sequential CC method was used due to changing temperatures affecting pavements

Asphalt Concrete (AC) 6 Runs Unfiltered 6 Runs BW Highpass filtered @ 30m 99.9% Repeatability 2 Runs Cross Correlated in ProVAL using IRI filter

Chip Seal

Chip Seal 6 Runs Unfiltered 6 Runs BW Highpass filtered @ 30m 99.6% Repeatability 2 Runs Cross Correlated in ProVAL using IRI filter

Diamond Grinding

Diamond Grinding 6 Runs Unfiltered 5 Runs BW Highpass filtered @ 30m Very small diamond grinder bumps 0.5 mm peak to peak 99.5% Repeatability 2 Runs Cross Correlated in ProVAL using IRI filter

Diamond Grinding Very small diamond grinder bumps

Longitudinal Tining

Longitudinal Tining 6 Runs Unfiltered 5 Runs BW Highpass filtered @ 30m 99.9% Repeatability 2 Runs Cross Correlated in ProVAL using IRI filter

Open Grade

Open Grade 6 Runs Unfiltered 6 Runs BW Highpass filtered @ 30m 99.9% Repeatability 2 Runs Cross Correlated in ProVAL using IRI filter

Transverse Tining

Transverse Tining 6 Runs Unfiltered 6 Runs BW Highpass filtered @ 30m 99.9% Repeatability 2 Runs Cross Correlated in ProVAL using IRI filter

SurPRO Elevation Accuracy DEVICE SENSORS SIGNAL CONVERSION CALCULATIONS X Axis Accelerometer (Roll) θX Mechanical (SurPRO wheels, frame and suspension) Y Axis Accelerometers (Pitch) Electronics & Signal Processing (Analog to Digital-ADC) Math E θY E Real Elevation→θY θX,Y→VθX,YA VθX,YA→VθX,YD VθX,YD→Elevation Error = +/-0.1% (est.) Error = +/-0.2% based on accelerometer calibration sheets. Reduced by dual Y measurement. Error = +/-0.4% based on ADC specified accuracy Error = 0% TOTAL ERROR = +/-0.7%

Repeatability IRI, Medium & Long Wavebands Pass level = 0.98 SurPRO 4000

Repeatability Short Waveband Pass level = 0.94 Short

FHWA Reference Profiler 2013 Benchmark Testing Recap Mean repeatability cross correlation for all six sections (IRI, medium & long filter) was 99.4% Individual cross correlations up to 99.9%. Short waveband cross correlation using 4000L laser of up to 99.4%. SurPRO was insensitive to operator bias such as acceleration and transverse tilting motion Up to 99.5% repeatability using different profilers operated by different operators

SurPRO Models Table 1.

Thanks! surpro.com internationalcybernetics.com For more information including a copy of this presentation please go to: surpro.com internationalcybernetics.com