Commission strategy to

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Risk management: A EU perspective Lincoln Tsang May 2008.
Advertisements

Registration in Europe Current situation and future outlook Thomas K ü rner, M.D. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
Disclaimer The presentation is intended for educational purposes only and does not replace independent professional judgement. Statements of fact and opinions.
The Paediatric Regulation
ONS Population Statistics Roadshows Population Statistics Strategy Paul Vickers April 2013.
1 The European Commission's Proposal to Re-design Existing European Drug Safety Rules An Industry View on Practical Implications Margaret Walters – Merck,
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
Slide 1 November 2008 Name Sarah Morgan © Crown copyright 2005 Pharmacovigilance Working Party - Role and future perspective Sarah Morgan Medicines and.
I&EHL: EU Pharmaceutical Law André den Exter
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
An introduction to the EU and its legislation. Member States currently 15 –Austria- Ireland –Belgium- Luxembourg –Denmark- Netherlands –Finland- Portugal.
IPhVWP Polish Presidency, Warsaw October 6 th 2011 Almath Spooner Irish Medicines Board Monitoring the outcome of risk minimisation activities.
1 Europe André Meijer Universiteit Maastricht Programme director European Public Health.
Benefits of a strong collaboration with patient groups at national and EU level Susanna Palkonen, Director European Federation.
The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) High level the IMI Concept, Strategic Research Agenda and Call topics Eva Lindgren.
IPhVWP Polish Presidency, Warsaw October 6 th 2011 Almath Spooner Irish Medicines Board Monitoring the outcome of risk minimisation activities.
European Commission, Technical Assistance Information Exchange Unit (TAIEX), DG Enlargement in co-operation with The Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and.
The 3rd package for the internal energy market Key proposals EUROPEAN COMMISSION Heinz Hilbrecht Directorate C - Security of supply and energy markets.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. European.
Regulators’ response to consultation on EU legislative proposals for pharmacovigilance : common themes 2 nd International Pharmaceutical Regulatory and.
An agency of the European Union Presented by: Noël Wathion Head of Unit, Patient Health Protection HMA – Human Agenda item 3: Implementation of the New.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
CONFERENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE -MiFID- Split, June 2007 OPENING SPEECH Ante Samodol President of the Board.
TAIEX Workshop on the Implementation of EU Pharmacovigilance Legislation - BELGRADE CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser.
Health Technology Assessment Methodology, an EUnetHTA View Basics for the Assessment in EU Countries PharmDr. Martin Visnansky, MBA, PhD., MSc. (HTA) HTA.
1 PHARMACOVIGILANCE & THE NATIONAL ADVERSE DRUG REACTION (ADR) REPORTING SYSTEM Sarah Spiteri Post-Licensing Directorate Medicines Authority.
Free Energy Market Association (ASEP) Who we are? Non – governmental, non-profit organization registered in 2014 Founded by electricity traders and open.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
The IFPMA Code and how to set up a national self-regulation system Presentation to China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry Forum 17 May 2017, Shanghai, China.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Principles of Risk Management
Efficacy and Safety of Medicines
The Citizen in the centre in EU, Bratislava November,2005
REMOVING BURDENS – a European rail system fit for the future
Information on Medicinal Products
Areas Separate Approaches Parallel Approaches Joint Approaches
The 3rd package for the internal energy market
EudraVigilance.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority Introduction
REPARIS Workshop Vienna
The role of mutual learning in Migration Integration policies
REGULATORY PROBLEMS IN CARING OUT PRE- AND POST- AUTHORISATION CLINICAL TRIALS Dr Penka Decheva GCP Inspector, BDA.
Strategic Management by INTOSAI Regions – A guidance
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
TAIEX, Istanbul, April 19th, 2011
Workforce Planning Framework
Helen Lee, European Commission
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
CAROSAI’S Strategic Planning Experience
The EPSO Peer Evaluation of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority
Current Developments at EU level
The EU Raw Materials Initiative: a short overview
The importance of dialogue between regulators
THE PROGRAMME OF THE GREEK PRESIDENCY
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Regulation of Medical Products & Patient Safety- A Narrative Review
ESS Vision 2020.
The International Consortium for Personalised Medicine
GPC WG and GPC meeting 5th of June “Future of Joint Programming”
NEW MDR Regulatory Context. NEW MDR Regulatory Context.
Kaisa Immonen EPF Director of Policy
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
A strategic approach to data development and data sharing in the social sciences Peter Elias NCRM/SRA Workshop: "Data Linkage: Exploring the Potential"
Posting of workers – new proposals
European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
ESS Vision 2020.
Building the Single Market for Green Products (SMGP)
Item 2. Latest developments as regards the population and housing census round 2021 in the ESS  Luis del Barrio Enlargement, neighbourhood.
Presentation transcript:

Commission strategy to European Commission Peter Arlett: June 2007 Commission strategy to Strengthen and Rationalise the EU Pharmacovigilance System

Strengthening and Rationalising EU Pharmacovigilance In this talk: Drivers for the project Commission strategy

Strengthening and Rationalising EU Pharmacovigilance Why conduct a strategic assessment of EU PhV? ADRs – significant morbidity and mortality Major product withdrawals: harm to patients and innovation Robust PhV supports earlier product authorisation “2001 Review” - modest changes to the law EU enlargement – 15 becomes 25 becomes 27 becomes……… Society changing complex system (30+ agencies, 2 MA routes, responsibilities differ) resource (money, people, technology) Duty to ensure our system is fit for the future

Strengthening and Rationalising EU Pharmacovigilance The assessment 2004 to 2007 – key steps 2004 – Commission launches call for proposals for independent study 2005 – independent study conducted for Commission 2006 – based on independent study, Commission launches public consultation 2007 – Commission announces its strategy

Strengthening and Rationalising EU Pharmacovigilance 2006 Commission consultation - method March to May (July) 2006: Web based public consultation Commission / Industry workshop – April 06 Commission / Patient / HCP / academia workshop – April 06 Commission / regulators dialogue

Strengthening and Rationalising EU Pharmacovigilance Consultation results – 48 responses – all stakeholder groups Patients, consumers – 7 HCP – 10 Industry – 16 Regulators – 10 Other 5 See:http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/pharmacovigilance_acs/index.htm

Assessment of the Community System of Pharmacovigilance Response announced by Commission Vice-President Verheugen on 26 February 2007 Commission response includes both: better implementation of the current system and proposals to change the legal framework for pharmacovigilance in the EU.

Assessment of the Community System of Pharmacovigilance Response Improving implementation of the current framework will include but not be limited to: ·  Working with the Commission’s Directorate General for Research on funding of studies into the safety of medicines as well as studies into the methodologies used to conduct pharmacovigilance. · Working with the Member States to resolve implementation issues, including administrative practices that complicate reporting rules for industry. · Working with the EMEA to strengthen its coordinating role including supporting full compliance and maximum utilisation of the EU pharmacovigilance database ‘Eudravigilance’.

Assessment of the Community System of Pharmacovigilance Response Proposals for change to the legal framework will focus on but not be limited to: · Strengthen the rules on transparency relating to pharmacovigilance data, assessment and decision-making and involve stakeholders (e.g. patient and healthcare professional groups) in the processes including reporting (including patient reporting).

Assessment of the Community System of Pharmacovigilance Response proposals for change to the legal framework will focus on but not be limited to: Establish clear standards (‘Good Vigilance Practices - GVP’) for the conduct of pharmacovigilance by both the industry and regulators.

Assessment of the Community System of Pharmacovigilance Response proposals for change to the legal framework will focus on but not be limited to: Free up resource by rationalising and simplifying the reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs), both expedited and periodic reporting, making best use of current information technology (including Eudravigilance) and matching the reporting requirements with the level of knowledge about the safety of a specific product.

Assessment of the Community System of Pharmacovigilance Response proposals for change to the legal framework will focus on but not be limited to: Make clear the respective roles and responsibilities and minimise duplication of effort, while maintaining the current split of competences between the Member States and the EMEA.

Assessment of the Community System of Pharmacovigilance Response proposals for change to the legal framework will focus on but not be limited to: Establishing a clear legal requirement to conduct post-authorisation safety studies including those in risk management systems.

Assessment of the Community System of Pharmacovigilance Response proposals for change to the legal framework will focus on but not be limited to: Rationalise EU decision-making on drug safety issues to deliver fast, robust decisions that are equally and fully implemented for all relevant products and across all markets.

Assessment of the Community System of Pharmacovigilance The Commission services will be working on an impact assessment during the course of 2007 with a view to a legal proposal in 2008.