Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction January 14, 2015 School Performance Grades.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Communication Webinar:
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Administrative Conference, September 2013
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
Spring 2016 MCAS Data Overview
2012 Accountability Determinations
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
ABCs/AYP Background Briefing
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
Highlights of Utah’s Plan
OFFICE OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Kansas Elementary and Secondary Education Act Advisory Council (ESEA)
ESSA School Index Reports
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
2012 FCAT Results and Accountability Update
Texas State Accountability
A-F Accountability and Special Education
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Starting Community Conversations
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Every Student Succeeds Act
State Assessment Update
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA):
School Improvement Process
Presentation transcript:

Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services New Charter Schools:  Planning Year Session 4 Every Student  Succeeds Act (ESSA) Paul Davis Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction December 12, 2018

Before We Get Started — Definitions Elementary School (elementary/middle) Means a nonprofit institutional day or residential school, including public elementary charter school, that provides elementary education, as determined under state law Secondary School (middle/high—non-graduating) Means a nonprofit institutional day or residential school, including public charter school, that provides secondary education, as determined under state law, except that the term does not include any education beyond grade 12 High School A school that has one of the following indicators: Biology, Math Course Rigor or ACT/ACT WorkKeys

Before We Get Started — Requirements Meaningful Differentiation Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and state law, all schools must be included in the accountability system and be differentiated in some way School Performance Grades (A–F) is the model of meaningful differentiation Identification of Schools Needing Academic Support Must be identified for both federal and state purposes Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) — ESS Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) — ESSA Low Performing Schools (D/F) — State 95% Assessment Participation Rate Schools are required to ensure that they meet the 95% participation requirements Consequences for not meeting participation may impact School Performance Grades

ESSA Accountability Model Long Term Goals School Performance Grades ELEMENTARY/MIDDLE SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL ELA/Reading EOG Scores E s Reading 3-8 Math 3-8 Reading High School Math EOG Scores s NC Math 1 EOC Scores Growt h Scho l ELA & Math - - - ---- Science- EOG S1,;ores (High o ) English Learners Progress Graduation Math High School Growth (ELA/Reading, English Learners Progress lol_c:;,gy _f;O S_co r4!_S Graduation I Math, & Science) English Learners Progress ACT WorkKeys Math Course Rigor Within 10 Years an Increase in Student Achievement for All Students and Each Subgroup Identify Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI)/ Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) Schools Reduces the Achievement Gap

School Performance Grades Includes a separate grade for ELA/reading and mathematics for elementary and middle schools Includes grades for reported subgroups Major ethnic groups, Students with Disabilities, English Learners, and Economically Disadvantaged 15-point scale for the 2018–19 school year (e.g. A = 85–100)

Long-term Goals All schools should have long-term goals Baseline data for goals will be based on first year of results for the school Minimum N-size is 30 data points in a subgroup 95% participation requirements apply to long-term goals

Measures of Long-term Goals State Level Targets Baseline Performance (All Students) 10-year Goal (All Students) Grades 3–8 Reading 45.8 65.8 Grades 3–8 Mathematics 47.0 74.1 High School Reading 51.0 71.3 High School Mathematics 43.5 73.3 4-year Cohort Graduation Rate 85.9 95.0 English Learner Progress 17.9 50.0

Baseline Performance (Percent Proficient) 10-Year Goal (Percent Prof) State Level Math Grades 3–8 Baseline Performance (Percent Proficient) 2015–16 Percent Increase Per year (Percent Prof) 2017–18 2018–19 2019–20 2020–21 2021–22 2022–23 2023–24 2024–25 2025–26 10-Year Goal (Percent Prof) 2026–27 10-Year Percent Improvement Yearly Measures of Interim Progress All Students 47.0 2.709 49.7 52.4 55.1 57.8 60.5 63.3 66.0 68.7 71.4 74.1 27.1 Subgroups American Indian 31.6 3.216 34.8 38.0 41.2 44.5 47.7 50.9 54.1 57.3 63.8 32.2 Asian 76.1 1.763 77.9 79.6 81.4 83.2 84.9 86.7 88.4 90.2 92.0 93.7 17.6 Black 3.363 30.5 33.8 37.2 40.6 43.9 47.3 50.6 54.0 57.4 60.7 33.6 Hispanic 38.1 3.004 41.1 44.1 47.1 50.1 53.1 56.1 59.1 62.1 65.1 68.1 30.0 Two or More Races 45.1 2.775 47.9 53.4 56.2 59.0 61.7 64.5 67.3 70.1 72.9 27.8 White 58.9 2.325 61.2 63.6 65.9 68.2 70.5 75.2 77.5 79.8 82.2 23.3 Economically Disadvantaged Students 32.1 3.200 35.3 38.5 41.7 44.9 48.1 51.3 54.5 57.7 60.9 64.1 32.0 English Learners 21.4 3.549 24.9 28.5 35.6 39.1 42.7 46.2 49.8 53.3 56.9 35.5 Students with Disabilities 14.1 3.788 17.9 21.7 25.5 29.3 33.0 36.8 44.4 48.2 52.0 37.9

Questions Thank you